Rfaqat Ali1. 1. Photonics Research Center, Applied Physics Department, Gleb Wataghin Physics Institute, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, SP 13083-970, Brazil.
Abstract
Usually, low refractive index passive spheres exhibit strong forward scattering and a positive asymmetry parameter due to weak interference between the electric and magnetic scattering channels. In this work, we investigate, analytically and numerically, the forward scattering of light by a gain-functionalized low refractive index dielectric sphere. It is shown that by tuning the optical gain one can optimize the interference, which provides a novel paradigm to achieve the zero forward scattering and negative asymmetry parameter even for a low refractive index sphere. As a result, a low-density collection of such identical back scatterers provides an anomalous regime, where the scattering mean free path and extinction mean free path are greater than the transport mean free path. Furthermore, we also provide the numerical guideline to achieve the larger extinction mean free path without achieving preferential back-scattering.
Usually, low refractive index passive spheres exhibit strong forward scattering and a positive asymmetry parameter due to weak interference between the electric and magnetic scattering channels. In this work, we investigate, analytically and numerically, the forward scattering of light by a gain-functionalized low refractive index dielectric sphere. It is shown that by tuning the optical gain one can optimize the interference, which provides a novel paradigm to achieve the zero forward scattering and negative asymmetry parameter even for a low refractive index sphere. As a result, a low-density collection of such identical back scatterers provides an anomalous regime, where the scattering mean free path and extinction mean free path are greater than the transport mean free path. Furthermore, we also provide the numerical guideline to achieve the larger extinction mean free path without achieving preferential back-scattering.
The
scattering of light by an individual subwavelength spherical
particle has remained a subject of great interest with fundamental
importance for the understanding of light–matter interaction
with countless applications.[1−4] One of the most desired scientific goals in the optical
scattering problem is to dictate the scattered field distribution
around the particle.[5,6] The optimal control on the direction
of scattered momentum is a matter of interest in light-emitting and
light-guiding devices[7,8] and optical manipulation.[9−12] The direction of scattered light by a spherical particle can accurately
be determined in terms of material properties and the length scale
involved in the course of interaction[13,14] using the
Mie scattering theory.[15]With this
perspective, the direction of the scattered light by
a spherical particle can be explained using the asymmetry parameter
(g), which is the average cosine of all scattering
angles and is given as g ≡ ⟨cos θ⟩,[13,14] where θ is the angle between the incident wavevector to the
scattered wavevector. For instance, a scatterer with g = 1 exhibits zero back-scattering, and g = −1
leads to zero forward scattering, which are the so-called first and
second Kerker’s conditions,[16] respectively.
According to Kerker’s criterion, the extremum values of the
asymmetry parameter, g = ±1, can be achieved
for magnetic spheres. In contrast, the electromagnetic scattering
by a usual nonmagnetic dielectric sphere is elongated in the forward
direction, and hence the asymmetry parameter is expected to be 1 > g > 0. However, as a spacial case, g =
0 can be achieved for a dipole-like scattering. However, by considering
a large refractive index sphere and composite sphere, one can achieve
zero backward scattering with g ≈ 1, which
occurs due to induced magnetic dipoles owing to the rotation of displacement
currents inside the sphere.[17−20] On the contrary, the second Kerker’s condition
hardly occurs in ordinary nonmagnetic scatterers due to the fundamental
restriction imposed by the optical theorem. To be more specific, the
observation of the second Kerker’s condition not only is challenging
but also is considered to be impossible to observe for the passive
sphere, as required by causality.[21]In the past two decades, some works have been reported demonstrating
the negative asymmetry parameter by a magnetic sphere,[22] a sphere with large refractive index,[19,20,23,24] a plasmonic passive sphere,[25] and an
active nanoparticle with a large refractive index.[26−28] In addition,
the negative asymmetry parameter is also achieved by applying an external
magnetic field[29] and in a cluster made
of short-range correlated identical scatterers.[30] Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, no study has
been proposed presenting a negative or turntable asymmetry parameter
in a low refractive index sphere, especially in the visible frequency
range.[31]The negative asymmetry parameter
plays a key role in many applications,
where the switching of the scattered light direction is not only required
but also should be achieved with optimal control. For instance, the
structural information on a random medium consisting of a dilute dispersion
of identical spheres can be extracted by means of unusual characteristic
parameters, such as extinction mean free path (EMFP), scattering mean
free path (SMFP), and transport mean free path (TMFP), denoted by , , and , respectively.
The EMFP describes the attenuation
of the averaged field inside the medium, which is equal to the SMFP
for a lossless medium. Moreover, the EMFP and SMFP can be defined
in terms of the TMFP and the average single particle scattering properties
such as extinction efficiency, Qext, scattering
efficiency, Qs, and the asymmetry parameter.[32]With this perspective, the negative asymmetry
parameter plays a
crucial role, and it may lead to an unusual multiple light-scattering
regime, where the becomes larger than the . This achievement
has important applications
in many characterization and imaging methods such as the fabrication-tolerant
broad-band operation of random spectrometers, where and are needed to be larger than .[33−35] A usual low refractive
index
sphere exhibits large forward scattering and positive g, which imposes severe limitations to achieve large values of and .In this
work, we present an alternative strategy to achieve negative g, along with tunable EMFP and SMFP, by employing the optical
gain in the visible frequency domain. We show that the gain-functionalized
multipolar particle exhibits a preferential back-scattering which
can be tailored experimentally, for instance, by tuning the power
of the pump laser that governs the optical gain level. Furthermore,
using a realistic gain model, we numerically (by Comsol multiphysics
simulation) demonstrate that by varying the gain level inside the
sphere, one can achieve zero forward scattering, even for a sphere
of remarkably low refractive index compared to the ones reported so
far.[31] As a result, for a low-density collection
of such back-scattering identical scatterers, an anomalous regime
occurs, where the EMFP becomes larger than the TMFP, that is, . In addition, we also propose
an alternative
strategy for tunable EMFP and show that by varying the optical gain
level one can achieve the larger EMFP without relaying the negative g.
Theoretical Model
Let us consider
an electromagnetic plane wave with vacuum wavelength
λ0 impinging on an isotropic nonmagnetic sphere of
radius a, immersed in a non-absorbing medium of refractive
index n. The Mie scattering theory provides the exact
scattering solution to quantify the energy received from the incident
field, energy scattered, and energy absorbed by the sphere in terms
of extinction cross section Cext, scattering
cross section Cs, and absorption cross
section Ca, respectively. As per convention,
we normalize these cross sections by a geometric cross section of
the sphere πa2, which leads us to
define normalized extinction and scattering and absorption efficiencies
as[14]andrespectively, where the index denotes the order spherical harmonic, and x = ka is the size parameter in the surrounding medium
with k = 2π/λ, where λ = λ0/n. In addition, and are the Mie scattering coefficients
that
can be calculated by applying the subsidiary boundary conditions at
the sphere surface and given as[14,36]where and are Riccati-Bessel functions and m and μs are the relative refractive index
and relative permeability of the sphere, respectively. In the far-field
domain, the scattered radiant intensity can be defined aswhere I1 and I2 are the transverse
electric (ϕ = 90°)
and transverse magnetic (ϕ = 0°) components of the scattered
intensity, respectively. In addition, θ and ϕ are the
polar and the azimuthal angles, respectively. Furthermoreandare the
components of the scattering matrix,[14] where
π(cos θ) and τ(cos θ)
describe the angular scattering patterns of the spherical harmonics.[14] Finally, the scattering efficiency in the forward
direction (θ = 0) is given asIt can be
seen in eq that the
second Kerker’s condition can be achieved by solving , which presents
multiple solutions for
the Mie sphere. However, in the long wavelength region (λ ≫ a) where only dipolar terms (a1, b1) are excited, Qf ≃ 0 can be achieved by providing a1 ≃ −b1. This
occurs when the condition is satisfied,
where ϵs is the relative permittivity of the sphere.[16,21,23,36] Otherwise
for a nonmagnetic sphere the second Kerker’s condition is difficult
to achieve, as required by the optical theorem to preserve the causality.[21] It can be explained analytically by solving eq , where Qf = 0 occurs only if and vanish simultaneously. However, for a passive
sphere, real parts of and are obliged to be positive to
preserve
the passivity condition. Thus, sum of nonzero (positive) real scattering
amplitudes can never be zero. These limitations can be circumvented
by employing the optical gain in the sphere that would allow one to
achieve negative or . Thus, introduction of the optical gain
is a necessary requirement to realize zero forward scattering.
Modeling of the
Gain Media
The optical gain media can
be designed by embedding the gain elements (e.g., fluorescent dyes
molecules or quantum dots) inside a host medium of permittivity ϵs. When the gain elements are excited by means of pump frequency,
they emit photons due to their de-excitations, as shown in Figure a. As a result, close
to the resonance frequency of the gain elements, the composite material
shows a negative imaginary refractive index that characterizes the
active nature of the composite particle under exp– monochromatic time-harmonic
convention. For our purpose, we consider solvatochromic dye LDS 798
molecules[37,38] as a four-level atomic system, and each
level has an occupation number density N, where i = 0, 1, 2, 3, as sketched
in Figure a. The total
number of dye molecules per unit volume of the host medium are represent
by Ndye that can be given as ∑3N = Ndye. As the incident pump laser excites
the dye molecules from N0 to N3 during the de-excitation, they make a transition from
the ith level to the jth level (ith> jth) with lifetime τ, where τ21 ≫ {τ32, τ10}. Thus, frequency emitted due to the
transition between the level 2 to level 1 would play a key role in
the design of the gain media that we call probing frequency, as shown
in Figure a. Finally,
the effective permittivity of such a heterogeneous composite medium
can be expressed by the following dispersion relation:[39−43]where ω
= 2πc/λ, c is the speed
of light, Δ = 2/τ,
τ is the relaxation time constant associated with energy relaxation
processes of the dye molecules,[37,41] μd is the dipole moment transition amplitude of the dye molecules,
ωa is the emission frequency, ℏ is the reduced
Plank constant, and ϵ0 represents the permittivity
of free space. In addition, Ñ is the population
inversion which is counted in terms of the number of dye molecules
in the excited state. The population inversion Ñ can be controlled through the action of the external pump laser:
for no pump, all dye molecules are in the ground state N0 and hence Ñ = 0; on the other
hand, Ñ = 1 can be achieved for a larger pump
power that sets the all dye molecules in the excited state. By varying
the pumping power, one can tune the gain level which allows the inferences
between the electric and magnetic scattering amplitudes to be tailored.
It is worth noting that the probing frequency ω is substantially
different than the pump frequency (as sketched in Figure a); therefore, scattering contribution
from the pump frequency can be blocked, thereby, we are not considering
it in the Mie scattering calculations. Thus, the radiation pattern
around the scatterer can be defined using the Mie scattering theory
in terms of the asymmetry parameter:[14]The multiple
scattering theory of random media
made of dilute concentrations of identical scatterers provides a connection
between the to the and in terms
of single particle scattering
cross sections and asymmetry parameter. In this assumption, the average
separation between the particles is considered to be significantly
larger than the particle size without positional correlation. The
relation between and of light in a such dilute medium is defined
as[31,32] and can be defined in terms of transport cross
section Ct and scattering cross sections Cs as[31,32]where ρ is the density of scatterers
in the medium. As we are considering an active sphere and the absorption
cross section of the sphere would be nonzero, therefore, it is worthwhile
to discuss the absorption mean free path which can be defined as .[44,45] In this case, the EMFP
should be different than the SMFP that can be expressed as .[32,44,45] For the active
media, it is more convenient to investigate the TMFP
in terms of the EMFP and single particle scattering properties using
the following relation:[25,31]It is clear that
for a losses medium Ca = 0 and .
Figure 1
(a) Schematic illustration of problem:
a dielectric sphere is doped
with dye molecules. An incident beam and laser pump are illuminating
the sphere, where ki, ks, and ke are representing
the wave vectors of the incident, scattered, and emitted light, respectively.
In the inset, a four-level energy scheme is presented, where the laser
pump with pump frequency higher than the probing frequency inverts
the population of dye molecules. In this way, the excited dye molecules
emit photons of frequency ω. (b) Forward scattering efficiency Qf as a function of incident wavelength by a
passive sphere Ñ = 0 (dashed) and an active
sphere Ñ = 0.61 (solid). (c) Scattered field
distribution around the particle for fixed Ñ = 0.61 and λ = 785 nm. (d) Qf as
a function of population inversion for fixed wavelength at λ
= 785 nm. In all calculations, the radius of the dielectric sphere
and permittivity is fixed at a = 155 nm and ϵs = 6.7, respectively.
(a) Schematic illustration of problem:
a dielectric sphere is doped
with dye molecules. An incident beam and laser pump are illuminating
the sphere, where ki, ks, and ke are representing
the wave vectors of the incident, scattered, and emitted light, respectively.
In the inset, a four-level energy scheme is presented, where the laser
pump with pump frequency higher than the probing frequency inverts
the population of dye molecules. In this way, the excited dye molecules
emit photons of frequency ω. (b) Forward scattering efficiency Qf as a function of incident wavelength by a
passive sphere Ñ = 0 (dashed) and an active
sphere Ñ = 0.61 (solid). (c) Scattered field
distribution around the particle for fixed Ñ = 0.61 and λ = 785 nm. (d) Qf as
a function of population inversion for fixed wavelength at λ
= 785 nm. In all calculations, the radius of the dielectric sphere
and permittivity is fixed at a = 155 nm and ϵs = 6.7, respectively.
Results and Discussion
In the following discussion, we consider
gain-functionalized composite
sphere composed of silicon carbide (SiC) as a host sphere of radius a = 155 nm, relative permittivity ϵs =
6.7 and doped with solvatochromic dye LDS 798 molecules[37] with a dye concentration Ndye as depicted in Figure a. The characteristic parameters of the dye molecules
(appearing in eq ) are
given as ωa = 2.42 × 1015 Hz, μd = 1.33 × 10–29 Cm, τ = 1 ×
10–14 s, and Ndye =
1 × 1018 cm–3.[37,38,40,41] The effective
refractive index m of the composite sphere is defined
using eq as . Since m is a complex
number which governs the optical properties of sphere, it behaves
like a passive sphere if Im(m) ≥ 0 and active
sphere otherwise. In the case of active sphere, the optical gain level
can be tuned by varying the population inversion by means of an external
pump laser, as depicted in Figure a, that governs the population inversion by exciting
and de-exciting the dye molecules.In Figure b, we
demonstrate the forward scattering efficiency as a function of wavelength
by a SiC sphere (dashed line) and an active sphere (black line) for
fixed population inversion at Ñ = 0.61. It
shows that the passive sphere presents large forward scattering for
all wavelengths, and it is the ultimate fact that a sphere with a
relatively lower refractive index (m < 3)[17,31] can never realize zero forward scattering due to limitations imposed
by the optical theorem.[21,36]Here, this limitation
is circumvented by shining the pump laser
to activate the dye molecules inside the SiC sphere and puts them
into an excited state. In this scenario, we have additional photons
(emitted photons) to meet the condition for causality during the suppression
of forward scattering. As shown by the black line, the forward scattering
is completely suppressed at a wavelength of λ = 785 nm.In Figure c, we
numerically, using Comsol, illustrate the angular distribution of
the scattered field intensity at a fixed incident wavelength of 785
nm and Ñ = 0.61. It is clearly shown that
the scattered field is elongated in the backward direction with zero
footprint in the forward direction. In Figure d, we calculate Qf as a function of population inversion, which shows that the required
population inversion is not very sharp, and hence, one can experimentally
control it by tuning the pump laser power.It is important to
emphasis that, here, Qf = 0 is achieved
in the presence of optical gain which optimizes
the interference between the scattering coefficients. Particularly,
the photons emitted by dye molecules amplify the field around the
sphere, which is counted as negative absorption. Therefore, in this
scenario, the real parts of the scattering amplitudes are expected
to be negative, as given in Table , where the first six, three electric a1, a2, a3 and three magnetic b1, b2, b3, coefficients
are given for a passive sphere and an active sphere. The forward scattering
efficiency Qf, in this case can be simplified asFor the
passive sphere, all coefficients have
positive real parts, and hence, a large Qf is observed, whereas in the presence of photon emission, some of
them appear to be negative; therefore, eq gives Qf = 0.
Table 1
Mie Scattering Coefficients of a Dye
Functionalized Sphere with Radius a = 155 nm, Permittivity
ϵs = 6.7 for Two Population Inversions (Ñ = 0 and Ñ = 0.61; Incident Wavelength Is
Fixed at 785 nm)
Ñ = 0
a1
0.66140–0.47320i
b1
0.77886 + 0.41501i
a2
0.00503–0.07081i
b2
0.00070–0.02649i
a3
≃0–0.00250i
b3
≃0–0.00046i
Figure a demonstrates
the asymmetry parameter as a function of wavelength for a passive
sphere (dashed line) and for an active sphere (black line). It shows
that the asymmetry parameter is positive g ≃
0.2 for the passive sphere due to preferential forward scattering,
as shown in Figure b,d, and for active sphere g ≃ −1/2,
which occurs due to the preferential back-scattering, as shown in Figure b–d. In Figure b,c, we numerically
calculate the angular distribution of the scattered field for fixed
population inversion Ñ = 0 and Ñ = 0.61, respectively. These three-dimensional scattering sketches
illustrate that scattering is preferentially in the forward direction
for the passive sphere and in the backward direction for the active
sphere.
Figure 2
(a) Asymmetry parameter as a function of wavelength for a passive
sphere, Ñ = 0 (dashed line), and active sphere, Ñ = 0.61 (solid line). (b) Corresponding scattered
field intensity around the sphere for fixed population inversion at
(b) Ñ = 0 and (c) Ñ = 0.61, where wavelength is 785 nm.
(a) Asymmetry parameter as a function of wavelength for a passive
sphere, Ñ = 0 (dashed line), and active sphere, Ñ = 0.61 (solid line). (b) Corresponding scattered
field intensity around the sphere for fixed population inversion at
(b) Ñ = 0 and (c) Ñ = 0.61, where wavelength is 785 nm.Until now, we have achieved the negative asymmetry parameter with
zero forward scattering for a refractive index sphere relatively lower
than that reported in ref (31). Consequently, it is easy to perceive that for all wavelengths
corresponding to negative g, this should also lead
to larger SMFP, that is, . However, the
EMFP also depends on Qext that might have
negative values at a large
gain level. Thus, only g cannot provide an exact
description of as a comparison to .To this end, in Figure a, we plot the asymmetry parameter as a function of wavelength
and population inversion, where the area enclosed by the dotted line
corresponds to negative g, and the sphere exhibits
zero forward scattering close to g = −1/2,
as we have demonstrated in Figures and 2. Figure b,c illustrates and , respectively, as a function of wavelength
and population inversion. It has been shown that the sphere with g > 0 and g < 0 leads to and , respectively, as one can inspect from eq . Thus, the area enclosed
by the dotted line leads to a parametric space where SMFP is larger
than TMFP. On the contrary, is not necessarily less than 1
for all
regions where the asymmetry parameter is negative. For instance, close
to the transition length, λa = 777 nm, the low population
inversion Ñ < 0.21 provides weak photon
emission, and we measure . As the population inversion is increased, g becomes
negative and is observed. However, we note that for
certain wavelength and population inversion, where the emitted photons
overcome the incident photons, in this scenario, the major scattering
contribution is coming from the emission ones, and hence, according
to eq , extinction efficiency
becomes negative. For a better understanding of this fact, let us
consider point A(800,0.61) in Figure c, where g < 0, Qext < 0, and |Qext – Qsg| < |Qext|, which manifests as (further details are presented in Figure ). Thus, the introduction
of optical gain provides an additional degree of freedom to tune the
EMFP without strictly depending on g and a large
index sphere.
Figure 3
(a) Asymmetry parameter, (b) , and (c) are plotted as a function of incident
wavelength
and population inversion, where the dotted line indicates (a) g = 0 and (b) . Here, radius and permittivity of the host
sphere is a = 155 nm and ϵs = 6.7.
Figure 5
(a) Asymmetry parameter
and (b) as a
function of incident wavelength and
population inversion. (c) Extinction efficiency (black line), denominator
of eq D = (Qext – gQs) (dotted line) and absorption efficiency (dashed line)
(d) as a function of permittivity
for fixed
population inversion Ñ = 0.5 as marked by
black lines in (b). Here, the radius of the sphere is taken at a = 155 nm and ϵs = 2.
(a) Asymmetry parameter, (b) , and (c) are plotted as a function of incident
wavelength
and population inversion, where the dotted line indicates (a) g = 0 and (b) . Here, radius and permittivity of the host
sphere is a = 155 nm and ϵs = 6.7.To gain further insight into the phenomenon, in Figure a, we present an
asymmetry
parameter as a function of wavelength and permittivity of the host
dielectric sphere at fixed Ñ = 0.7. It is
clearly shown that the gain-functionalized sphere not only exhibits
negative asymmetry parameter for lower permittivity sphere ϵs ≃ 2 but also preferentially scatters light in backward
directions at ϵs ≃ 5, where g = −1/2. Here, the area enclosed by the dotted line indicates
negative g, and in this region, should occur.
In Figure b, we calculate as a function of wavelength and
permittivity
of the host sphere. It is clearly shown that for an active sphere, g and do not
follow the fundamental rule as they
do for a passive sphere.[25] To demonstrate
the role of g on , we consider two lines in the
parameter
space of Figure a,b,
and the corresponding g and are plotted in Figure c,d, respectively, versus permittivity
of
the host sphere. It is demonstrated that the sphere with ϵs = 2 exhibits g > 0 and EMFP larger than
TMFP (i.e., ) as marked by a vertical dotted line. On
the other hand, at ϵs = 3.5, where g < 0 but EMFP is smaller than TMFP, , and at ϵs =
7, g < 0 and , as indicated by the vertical
dotted lines
in Figure c,d. It
is worth concluding that one can achieve tunable EMFP by employing
the optical gain without strictly relying on negative g and a larger refractive index sphere. In this scenario, gain level
and Qext play a crucial role in the tuning
of mean free paths.
Figure 4
(a) Asymmetry parameter (the dotted line indicates g = 0) and (b) as a function of incident wavelength
and
permittivity of the sphere. We draw a purple line-cut in (a), black
line-cut in (b) at wavelength λ = 790 nm along the permittivity
axis. The corresponding asymmetry parameter and are plotted in (c) and (d), respectively,
as a function of permittivity of the sphere for fixed wavelength λ
= 790 nm. In this calculation, the radius of the sphere is taken at a = 155 nm and Ñ = 0.7.
(a) Asymmetry parameter (the dotted line indicates g = 0) and (b) as a function of incident wavelength
and
permittivity of the sphere. We draw a purple line-cut in (a), black
line-cut in (b) at wavelength λ = 790 nm along the permittivity
axis. The corresponding asymmetry parameter and are plotted in (c) and (d), respectively,
as a function of permittivity of the sphere for fixed wavelength λ
= 790 nm. In this calculation, the radius of the sphere is taken at a = 155 nm and Ñ = 0.7.For deeper insights into this concept, now we are considering
a
sphere made of a low refractive index of 1.41 to unveil the role of
gain on EMFP under the condition where g is positive.
In Figure a, we calculate the asymmetry parameter as a function
of wavelength and population inversion. The sphere has a low refractive
index, and it presents a g > 0. In this case,
it
is immediately determined that the TMFP is large than the SMFP or . On the other hand, strongly depends on Ñ and wavelength, as shown in Figure b, where three distinct regions, A, , B, , and, C, , are found as indicated in Figure b. To explore physical phenomena
behind the scene, we draw a line at Ñ = 0.5,
which crosses through all of the regions, and we calculate the corresponding
quantities such as Qext (black), denominator
of eq , D = (Qext – Qsg) (dotted), and Qa (dashed) are plotted in Figure c. In the first region A, where the sphere has a smaller
gain level, the extinction efficiency and D are positive
quantities, as shown in Figure c. Thus, it is found that , as shown in Figure d. In the second region B,
gain level increases
and the particle undergoes Qext > 0,
and
the electromagnetic field amplification governs the denominator of eq , such that it becomes
negative. As a result, is measured and shown in Figure d. Finally, in region C, the
sphere has achieved higher gain level such that the emitted photons
overcome the incident photons and the extinction efficiency and D become negative, as shown in Figure c. As a result, in region C, is measured and shown in Figure b,d. In a nutshell, it has
been demonstrated that by applying the appropriate gain level, one
can achieve the anomalous region where EMFP is larger than the TMFP
without achieving the negative asymmetry parameter.(a) Asymmetry parameter
and (b) as a
function of incident wavelength and
population inversion. (c) Extinction efficiency (black line), denominator
of eq D = (Qext – gQs) (dotted line) and absorption efficiency (dashed line)
(d) as a function of permittivity
for fixed
population inversion Ñ = 0.5 as marked by
black lines in (b). Here, the radius of the sphere is taken at a = 155 nm and ϵs = 2.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have studied the electromagnetic scattering by
a gain-functionalized low refractive index sphere. By providing a
realistic optical gain model, we have, analytically and numerically
(Comsol), shown that the implication of optical gain can optimize
the destructive interference between the electric and magnetic scattering
amplitudes. It has been demonstrated that optimal control on the optical
gain level can not only achieve the negative asymmetry parameter but
also completely offset the optical scattering in the forward direction
by a strikingly low refractive index sphere than that reported to
date. As a result, an anomalous regime occurs where the EMFP and SMFP
are larger than the TMFP. Another novel finding of the presented work
is the optimal control on EMFP, where we have shown that by tuning
the experimentally controllable parameter (i.e., population inversion),
one can achieve the large EMFP without necessarily achieving the negative
asymmetry parameter. Altogether, we hope that our findings could provide
a route to analyze the structural information on complex media and
in the design of materials with specific transport properties.
Authors: Andrey B Evlyukhin; Sergey M Novikov; Urs Zywietz; René Lynge Eriksen; Carsten Reinhardt; Sergey I Bozhevolnyi; Boris N Chichkov Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Isabelle Staude; Andrey E Miroshnichenko; Manuel Decker; Nche T Fofang; Sheng Liu; Edward Gonzales; Jason Dominguez; Ting Shan Luk; Dragomir N Neshev; Igal Brener; Yuri Kivshar Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2013-08-21 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: A García-Etxarri; R Gómez-Medina; L S Froufe-Pérez; C López; L Chantada; F Scheffold; J Aizpurua; M Nieto-Vesperinas; J J Sáenz Journal: Opt Express Date: 2011-03-14 Impact factor: 3.894