Setsuko Tsuboi1, Takashi Jin1. 1. RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, RIKEN, Furuedai 6-2-3, Suita, Osaka 565-0874, Japan.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are conjugates of a monoclonal antibody and a cytotoxic drug that induce tumor apoptosis. The evaluation of ADC-induced tumor apoptosis is crucial for the development of ADCs for cancer therapy. To evaluate the efficacy of ADCs, we present in vitro and in vivo fluorescence imaging techniques for ADC-induced tumor apoptosis using annexin V-EGFP (EGFP: enhanced green fluorescent protein) conjugated quantum dots (annexin V-EGFP-QDs). This probe emits visible (VIS) and near-infrared (NIR) dual fluorescence at 515 nm (EGFP emission) and 850 nm (QD emission), which can be used for the detection of tumor apoptosis at the cellular and whole-body levels. By using annexin V-EGFP-QDs, we achieved VIS and NIR fluorescence imaging of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast tumor apoptosis induced by an ADC, Kadcyla (trastuzumab emtansine). The results show that the in vitro and in vivo fluorescence imaging of ADC-induced tumor apoptosis using annexin V-EGFP-QDs is a useful tool to evaluate the efficacy of ADCs for cancer therapy.
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are conjugates of a monoclonal antibody and a cytotoxic drug that induce tumor apoptosis. The evaluation of ADC-induced tumor apoptosis is crucial for the development of ADCs for cancer therapy. To evaluate the efficacy of ADCs, we present in vitro and in vivo fluorescence imaging techniques for ADC-induced tumor apoptosis using annexin V-EGFP (EGFP: enhanced green fluorescent protein) conjugated quantum dots (annexin V-EGFP-QDs). This probe emits visible (VIS) and near-infrared (NIR) dual fluorescence at 515 nm (EGFP emission) and 850 nm (QD emission), which can be used for the detection of tumor apoptosis at the cellular and whole-body levels. By using annexin V-EGFP-QDs, we achieved VIS and NIR fluorescence imaging of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast tumor apoptosis induced by an ADC, Kadcyla (trastuzumab emtansine). The results show that the in vitro and in vivo fluorescence imaging of ADC-induced tumor apoptosis using annexin V-EGFP-QDs is a useful tool to evaluate the efficacy of ADCs for cancer therapy.
Antibody–drug
conjugates (ADCs) are conjugates composed
of a monoclonal antibody and a cytotoxic drug via a chemical linker.[1−3] ADCs are used as the antitumor drugs for cancer therapy. To date,
ADCs have received market approval and over 70 are being investigated
in various stages of clinical development. For the development of
ADCs for cancer treatment, the examination of the efficacy of ADCs
that induce tumor apoptosis is crucial.[4,5] For the apoptosis
detection, we can employ several imaging modalities such as single
photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography,
magnetic resonance imaging, and optical imaging.[6−11] Among these imaging modalities, fluorescence imaging has a high
sensitivity and a spatial resolution (∼μm) sufficient
to perform molecular imaging at the cellular and whole-body levels.[11] Herein, we present visible (VIS) and near-infrared
(NIR) fluorescence imaging techniques for the visualization of ADC-induced
tumor apoptosis in vitro and in vivo.In the early stages of
apoptosis, the morphological change in the
cancer cell membrane occurs due to the externalization of phosphatidylserine
(PS).[12,13] To detect PS molecules on the surface of
apoptotic cells, annexin V,[14] an endogenous
protein with a binding ability to PS, is widely used as an apoptosis
detection probe.[14−17] Although various types of apoptosis detection optical probes[18−36] [e.g., fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-annexin V,[31−34] Cy5-annexin V,[35,36] and 800CW-annexin V[29] have been developed, there are no robust fluorescent
probes that enable the long-term optical imaging of apoptosis in vivo.
The disadvantage of fluorescent-dye-labeled annexin V probes is the
instability of photobleaching caused by the irradiation of excitation
lights. To overcome this disadvantage, we synthesized a quantum dot
(QD)-based robust probe (annexin V–EGFP–QD) that consists
of a fusion protein, annexin V and enhanced green fluorescent protein
(annexin V–EGFP),[37] and an NIR-emitting
CdSeTe/CdS QD.[38,39] This probe emits VIS and NIR
dual fluorescence at 515 nm (EGFP emission) and 850 nm (QD emission),
which can be used for the detection of tumor apoptosis at both the
cellular and whole-body levels.In this paper, we present in
vitro and in vivo fluorescence imaging
of tumor apoptosis induced by an ADC, Kadcyla (ado-trastuzumab emtansine
or T-DM1),[40,41] using annexin V–EGFP–QD.
Kadcyla is a conjugate of a humanized monoclonal anti-HER2 (human
epidermal growth factor receptor 2)[42] antibody
and emtansine, a highly potent microtubule polymerization inhibitor.[40,41] Kadcyla is used as an anticancer drug against HER2-positive solid
tumors.[43−45] For HER2-positive breast tumor cells (KPL-4[46,47]), we detected Kadcyla-induced apoptosis by the VIS fluorescence
of EGFP. We also detected the Kadcyla-induced apoptosis of the HER2-positive
breast tumor in mice by the NIR fluorescence of QDs. The NIR fluorescence
imaging enabled a long-term (24 days) observation of the tumor shrinking
induced by Kadcyla-induced apoptosis. We demonstrate the utility of
VIS and NIR fluorescence imaging using annexin V–EGFP–QDs
for the detection of ADC-induced tumor apoptosis in vitro and in vivo.
Results and Discussion
Design of the VIS and NIR
Emitting Apoptosis
Detection Probe
To detect apoptotic cells in vitro, VIS fluorescence
imaging is usually used because of the high sensitivity of the VIS
light (400–700 nm) in conventional fluorescence microscopies.[31−34] However, VIS fluorescence imaging is not suitable for the in vivo
detection of apoptosis because of the strong absorption and scattering
of VIS light. In contrast, NIR light (700–900 nm) shows high
permeability and low scattering in living tissues. Thus, we employ
EGFP and NIR-emitting QDs for apoptosis detection at the cellular
and whole-body levels, respectively.[29,35,36]For in vitro and in vivo apoptosis detection,
we designed a QD-based VIS and NIR dual emitting probe, annexin V–EGFP–QD
(Figure a). Although
several types of QD-based apoptosis detection probes have been developed,[25,28,48−52] there are no dual-emitting QD probes for the fluorescence
imaging of apoptosis at the cellular and whole-body levels. Annexin
V–EGFP is a histidine-tagged fused protein and directly binds
to the surface of the Cd–S layer of glutathione-coated CdSeTe/CdS
QDs (GSH–QDs) via the histidine tags of the protein.[53−55] This is due to the high affinity of histidine molecules to Cd2+ ions at the surface of a GSH–QD.[53−55] Annexin V molecules
presented at the QD surface can bind the PS molecules of the apoptotic
cell membrane in the presence of Ca2+ ions (Figure b). Since annexin V–EGFP–QD
emits VIS (EGFP) and NIR (QD) dual fluorescence, in vitro and vivo
fluorescence imaging of apoptotic cells can be performed using a single
fluorescent probe, annexin V–EGFP–QD.
Figure 1
(a) Synthetic method
for the preparation of an annexin V–EGFP–QD
by conjugation of a GSH-coated CdSeTe/CdS QD (GSH–QD) with
a recombinant protein, annexin V–EGFP. (b) Schematic representation
for the binding of an annexin V–EGFP–QD to PS molecules
at the surface of the apoptotic cell membrane in the presence of Ca2+ ions.
(a) Synthetic method
for the preparation of an annexin V–EGFP–QD
by conjugation of a GSH-coated CdSeTe/CdS QD (GSH–QD) with
a recombinant protein, annexin V–EGFP. (b) Schematic representation
for the binding of an annexin V–EGFP–QD to PS molecules
at the surface of the apoptotic cell membrane in the presence of Ca2+ ions.
Characterization
of Annexin V–EGFP–QDs
The binding of annexin
V–EGFP protein to GSH–QDs
can be confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis (Figures and S1). The mobility of an NIR-emitting QD band decreased with the increasing
amount of annexin V–EGFP, indicating the formation of an annexin
V–EGFP–QD conjugate. The image of agarose gel electrophoresis
for the mixture of annexin V–EGFP and GSH–QDs indicates
that ca. five molecules of annexin V–EGFP bind to one QD particle
(Figure ). Annexin
V–EGFP–QDs can be purified by dialysis (membrane, MWCO:
300,000) to remove unconjugated annexin V–EGFP (66.7 kDa).
Figure 2
Agarose
gel electrophoresis of GSH–QDs and mixtures of the
QDs and annexin V–EGFP. The molar ratio of annexin V–EGFP–QD
was changed from 0 to 7.5. The fluorescence bands of QDs were detected
at the wavelength of 830 nm.
Agarose
gel electrophoresis of GSH–QDs and mixtures of the
QDs and annexin V–EGFP. The molar ratio of annexin V–EGFP–QD
was changed from 0 to 7.5. The fluorescence bands of QDs were detected
at the wavelength of 830 nm.The fluorescence spectrum of annexin V–EGFP–QDs showed
VIS and NIR dual emission resulting from EGFP and QDs, respectively
(Figure a). The fluorescence
quantum yields of annexin V–EGFP and CdSeTe/CdS QDs were 75
and 59%, respectively. The intensity of EGFP emission in annexin V–EGFP–QDs
decreased by 6 times compared to that in annexin V–EGFP (Figures a and S2). This decrease in the fluorescence intensity
of the EGFP emission can be explained by the intramolecular fluorescence
resonance energy transfer (FRET) from EGFP to the QD in an annexin
V–EGFP–QD conjugate. The fluorescence decay measurements
confirmed the FRET from EGFP to the QD in the conjugate. The average
fluorescence lifetime[56] (τ) of EGFP
in annexin V–EGFP was significantly decreased from 2.7 to 0.53
ns by complexation with GSH–QDs (Figure b). The FRET efficiency from EGFP to the
QD was determined to be 76 and 80% from the fluorescence intensities
and lifetimes of EGFP, respectively.[57]
Figure 3
(a) Fluorescence
spectra of annexin V–EGFP (green line)
and annexin V–EGFP–QDs (red line) in PBS. A black dotted
line shows the absorption spectrum of GSH–QDs. The inset shows
the TEM image of annexin V–EGFP–QDs. Scale bar: 20 nm.
(b) Fluorescence decay curves of EGFP emissions in annexin V–EGFP
and annexin V–EGFP–QDs in PBS. An excitation pulse (at
475 nm) is shown as a black line.
(a) Fluorescence
spectra of annexin V–EGFP (green line)
and annexin V–EGFP–QDs (red line) in PBS. A black dotted
line shows the absorption spectrum of GSH–QDs. The inset shows
the TEM image of annexin V–EGFP–QDs. Scale bar: 20 nm.
(b) Fluorescence decay curves of EGFP emissions in annexin V–EGFP
and annexin V–EGFP–QDs in PBS. An excitation pulse (at
475 nm) is shown as a black line.Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed that annexin V–EGFP–QDs
are monodispersed nanoparticles with a diameter of 4.4 ± 0.68
nm (inset in Figures a and S3). The hydrodynamic diameter of
annexin V–EGFP–QDs was evaluated by using fluorescence
correlation spectroscopy (FCS).[56] Since
the diffusion times (DTs) of GSH–QDs and annexin V–EGFP–QDs
were calculated to be 0.35 ± 0.031 and 0.51 ± 0.045 ms,
respectively (Figure a), the hydrodynamic diameters of GSH–QDs and annexin V–EGFP–QDs
were estimated to be 5.4 ± 1.5 and 7.9 ± 2.2 nm, respectively.[58−60] This result shows that the diameter of annexin V–EGFP–QDs
increased 1.5 times compared to that of GSH–QDs after the binding
of annexin V–EGFP to the surface of the QD.
Figure 4
(a) Fluorescence autocorrelation
curves for GSH–QDs, annexin
V–EGFP–QDs, and fluorescent beads (14 nm in diameter)
in 10 mM Na2CO3. The inset graph shows the average
DT of the particles: (1) GSH–QDs, (2) annexin V–EGFP–QDs,
and (3) fluorescent beads. (b) Size-exclusion column chromatography
for GSH–QDs (red line) and annexin V–EGFP–QDs
(green line). An inset plot shows the relationship between the molecular
weights of standard proteins and their retention times. Molecular
weights: 670 kDa for thyroglobulin, 450 kDa for ferritin, 145 kDa
for Herceptin, 79.5 kDa for transferrin, and 66 kDa for bovine serum
albumin.
(a) Fluorescence autocorrelation
curves for GSH–QDs, annexin
V–EGFP–QDs, and fluorescent beads (14 nm in diameter)
in 10 mM Na2CO3. The inset graph shows the average
DT of the particles: (1) GSH–QDs, (2) annexin V–EGFP–QDs,
and (3) fluorescent beads. (b) Size-exclusion column chromatography
for GSH–QDs (red line) and annexin V–EGFP–QDs
(green line). An inset plot shows the relationship between the molecular
weights of standard proteins and their retention times. Molecular
weights: 670 kDa for thyroglobulin, 450 kDa for ferritin, 145 kDa
for Herceptin, 79.5 kDa for transferrin, and 66 kDa for bovine serum
albumin.The size of GSH–QDs and
annexin V–EGFP–QDs
was also evaluated by using size-exclusion column chromatography (Figure b). Using the relationship
between the molecular weights of standard proteins and their retention
times (inset in Figure b), apparent molecular weights of GSH–QDs and annexin V–EGFP–QDs
were determined to be 200 and 563 kDa, respectively. As the molecular
weight of annexin V–EGFP is 66.7 kDa, the number of annexin
V–EGFP protein bound to one QD particle was calculated to be
5.4. This finding is consistent with the result obtained from the
agarose gel electrophoresis experiment (Figure ).
Binding Activity of the
Annexin V–EGFP–QD
to PS
The binding activity of the annexin V–EGFP–QD
to PS was examined using FCS. FCS is a very sensitive method to detect
changes in the hydrodynamic diameter of fluorescent particles.[57−60] We measured the DTs of annexin V–EGFP–QDs before and
after the addition of liposomes containing 10% PS [liposome (PS+)],
whose size was 43 nm in diameter (Figure S4). When the liposome (PS+) was added to the solution of annexin V–EGFP–QDs,
the DT of annexin V–EGFP–QDs increased from 0.65 to
2.9 ms (Figures S5 and 5a). This change indicates that the hydrodynamic size of annexin
V–EGFP–QDs increased 4.5-fold upon the binding of the
PS liposomes. In contrast, the addition of liposomes containing no
PS [liposome (PS−)] to the solution of annexin V–EGFP–QDs
did not change the DT of annexin V–EGFP–QDs (Figures S5 and 5a).
Figure 5
Fluorescence
autocorrelation curves for (a) annexin V–EGFP–QDs
and (b) GSH–QDs in the absence and presence of soybean lecithin
liposomes containing 0% PS (liposome PS−) and 10% PS (liposome
PS+). To 10 μL of 10 nM annexin V–EGFP–QD or 10
nM GSH–QD solutions, 5 μL of a liposome solution (0.1
mg/mL, 0.1 mM Ca2+) was added.
Fluorescence
autocorrelation curves for (a) annexin V–EGFP–QDs
and (b) GSH–QDs in the absence and presence of soybean lecithin
liposomes containing 0% PS (liposome PS−) and 10% PS (liposome
PS+). To 10 μL of 10 nM annexin V–EGFP–QD or 10
nM GSH–QD solutions, 5 μL of a liposome solution (0.1
mg/mL, 0.1 mM Ca2+) was added.A control experiment using GSH–QDs showed that the DT of
GSH–QDs did not change upon the addition of liposomes (PS+)
and (PS−) to the solutions of GSH–QDs (Figures S5 and 5b). This finding shows
that there is no specific binding between GSH–QDs and liposomes
(PS+) and (PS−). Thus, the change in the DT of annexin V–EGFP–QDs
in the presence of liposome (PS+) indicates the specific binding of
annexin V–EGFP–QDs to the PS molecules of liposomes
via the annexin V moiety of the QDs.
In Vitro
Imaging of Tumor Apoptosis
For fluorescence imaging of tumor
cell apoptosis, we used a human
breast tumor cell line, KPL-4, that overexpresses HER2[45,46] on the cell surface. The apoptosis of KPL-4 cells was induced by
the treatment with an ADC, Kadcyla (a conjugate of Herceptin and emtansine).[40,41] Kadcyla acts as an anticancer drug against HER2-positive cancer.[42−44] Since Herceptin is ineffective to the treatment of KPL-4 cells,[62] we used Herceptin as a control drug to confirm
the cytotoxic effect of Kadcyla.To detect the tumor apoptosis
induced by Kadcyla, we first used a traditional apoptosis-detection
probe, FITC-annexin V. FITC-annexin V is a widely used a VIS-emitting
fluorescent probe for the detection of apoptosis.[31−34] We observed that the KPL-4 cells
treated with Kadcyla for 72 h emit intense VIS fluorescence from FITC-annexin
V (lower image in Figure a). The image of the control cells treated with no drugs shows
only weak emissions from a few cells (upper image in Figure a). The KPL-4 cells treated
with an anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (Herceptin)[61] also show weak emissions from a few cells (middle image
in Figure a). These
findings indicate that Kadcyla can induce the apoptosis of KPL-4 cells,
while Herceptin cannot induce the apoptosis of the KPL-4 cells.[62,63]
Figure 6
Fluorescence
imaging of breast tumor cells (KPL-4) treated with
and without Herceptin and Kadcyla. Herceptin and Kadcyla (10 nM) were
added to cell culture dishes and maintained at 37 °C for 72 h.
The cell suspensions were dispensed and incubated with (a) FITC-annexin
V (48 nM) or (b) annexin V–EGFP–QDs (33 nM) for 15 min
at room temperature. Fluorescence emissions of FITC and EGFP were
observed at 525 nm. Scale bar: 50 and 25 μm for magnified images.
Fluorescence
imaging of breast tumor cells (KPL-4) treated with
and without Herceptin and Kadcyla. Herceptin and Kadcyla (10 nM) were
added to cell culture dishes and maintained at 37 °C for 72 h.
The cell suspensions were dispensed and incubated with (a) FITC-annexin
V (48 nM) or (b) annexin V–EGFP–QDs (33 nM) for 15 min
at room temperature. Fluorescence emissions of FITC and EGFP were
observed at 525 nm. Scale bar: 50 and 25 μm for magnified images.As annexin V–EGFP–QDs emit VIS fluorescence
from
EGFP, we tested whether annexin V–EGFP–QDs can be used
as an apoptosis detection probe similar to FITC-annexin V. For the
KPL-4 cells treated with Kadcyla, we observed the VIS emission of
EGFP (lower image in Figure b). For the control KPL-4 cells (upper and middle images in Figure b), we could not
observe significant EGFP fluorescence emissions resulting from the
apoptosis of the cells. These imaging patterns were similar to those
obtained by using FITC-annexin V (Figure a). This finding indicates that annexin V–EGFP–QDs
can be used as an apoptosis detection probe similar to FITC-annexin
V for the detection of apoptotic cells.
In Vivo
Imaging of Tumor Apoptosis
We conducted in vivo NIR fluorescence
imaging of tumor apoptosis
using breast tumor-bearing mice. The tumor-bearing mice were prepared
by the transplantation of KPL-4 cells to a ventral region of nude
mice. Annexin V–EGFP–QDs were intravenously injected
to the tumor mice, and then, the NIR fluorescence of the mice was
detected. The VIS fluorescence of EGFP could not be detected owing
to the strong tissue absorption and autofluorescence (Figure S6).For the control mouse treated
with no antitumor drugs, NIR fluorescence resulting from the tumor
accumulation of annexin V–EGFP–QDs was not observed
(Figure a). For the
mouse treated with Herceptin, NIR fluorescence from the breast tumor
was also not observed (Figure b). In contrast, the mouse treated with Kadcyla showed intense
NIR fluorescence emission from the breast tumor (Figure c),[63] indicating the accumulation of annexin V–EGFP–QDs
to the tumor. These results were consistent with the results obtained
by the cellular imaging using annexin V–EGFP–QDs (Figure b). The cellular
and whole-body fluorescence imaging (Figures and 7) shows that
Kadcyla (10 nM for the cell and 100 μL of 1 mg/mL for the mouse)
induces the apoptosis of KPL-4 cells, and the resulting apoptotic
cells can be detected by VIS and NIR fluorescence using annexin V–EGFP–QDs.
Figure 7
In vivo
NIR fluorescence imaging (a–c) of breast-tumor-bearing
mice. Ex vivo images are shown at the right side of each image. Three
days after the injection of Herceptin and Kadcyla, annexin V–EGFP–QDs
(100 μL of 1 μM solution) were intravenously injected
into the mice via the tail vein. The dotted white circles show the
positions of tumors. (a) Control mouse: no antitumor drug was injected.
(b) Herceptin-injected mouse: 100 μL of Herceptin (1 mg/mL)
was injected. (c) Kadcyla-injected mouse: 100 μL of Kadcyla
(1 mg/mL) was injected. The fluorescence emissions at 830 nm were
detected 3, 4, and 7 days after the injection of Herceptin and Kadcyla.
Seven days after the injection of tumors and organs were isolated
from the mice. 1: heart, 2: spleen, 3: kidney, and 4: liver. Scale
bar: 10 mm.
In vivo
NIR fluorescence imaging (a–c) of breast-tumor-bearing
mice. Ex vivo images are shown at the right side of each image. Three
days after the injection of Herceptin and Kadcyla, annexin V–EGFP–QDs
(100 μL of 1 μM solution) were intravenously injected
into the mice via the tail vein. The dotted white circles show the
positions of tumors. (a) Control mouse: no antitumor drug was injected.
(b) Herceptin-injected mouse: 100 μL of Herceptin (1 mg/mL)
was injected. (c) Kadcyla-injected mouse: 100 μL of Kadcyla
(1 mg/mL) was injected. The fluorescence emissions at 830 nm were
detected 3, 4, and 7 days after the injection of Herceptin and Kadcyla.
Seven days after the injection of tumors and organs were isolated
from the mice. 1: heart, 2: spleen, 3: kidney, and 4: liver. Scale
bar: 10 mm.
Long-Term
In Vivo Imaging of Tumor Apoptosis
Long-term imaging for
a Kadcyla-treated breast tumor-bearing mouse
(100 μL of 1 mg/mL Kadcyla injection) was performed to observe
the shrinking of a breast tumor. Annexin V–EGFP–QDs
were intravenously injected to the Kadcyla-treated mouse 3 days after
the injection of Kadcyla (Figure a). NIR fluorescence images of the mouse were taken
at 4, 6, 13, and 24 days after the injection of Kadcyla. The accumulation
of annexin V–EGFP–QDs to the breast tumor was observed
for the tumor-bearing mouse one day after the injection of annexin
V–EGFP–QDs (Figure b). The change in the tumor size was evaluated from
the NIR fluorescence image of the tumor. The size of the breast tumor
was decreased by 4 times during the imaging experiment, showing the
effect of Kadcyla on the shrinking of the tumor (Figures c and S7). Twenty-four days after the injection of Kadcyla, the
significant shrinking of the tumor (from 10 to 3 mm in diameter) was
observed (Figure b).
The average NIR fluorescence intensity of the breast tumor was almost
constant 6–24 days after the injection of annexin V–EGFP–QDs
(Figure d), although
the size of the tumor gradually decreased with time. The stable NIR
emission from the tumor can be attributed to the robustness of QDs,
which have high resistance to photobleaching.
Figure 8
(a) Time course of the
experimental procedure for the administration
of Kadcyla and annexin V–EGFP–QDs to a breast-tumor-bearing
mouse. One hundred microliters of Kadcyla (1 mg/mL) and 200 μL
of annexin V–EGFP–QDs (1 μM) were injected into
the mouse. NIR fluorescence imaging was performed 4, 6, 13, and 24
days after the injection of Kadcyla. (b) NIR fluorescence images (at
830 nm) of a tumor-bearing mouse. The white dotted circles show the
positions of tumors. (c) Time course of the change in the tumor size
in a breast-tumor-bearing mouse treated with Kadcyla. The size was
determined from the NIR fluorescence images of the breast tumors.
(d) Time course of the average NIR fluorescence intensity of a breast
tumor after the injection of annexin V–EGFP–QDs.
(a) Time course of the
experimental procedure for the administration
of Kadcyla and annexin V–EGFP–QDs to a breast-tumor-bearing
mouse. One hundred microliters of Kadcyla (1 mg/mL) and 200 μL
of annexin V–EGFP–QDs (1 μM) were injected into
the mouse. NIR fluorescence imaging was performed 4, 6, 13, and 24
days after the injection of Kadcyla. (b) NIR fluorescence images (at
830 nm) of a tumor-bearing mouse. The white dotted circles show the
positions of tumors. (c) Time course of the change in the tumor size
in a breast-tumor-bearing mouse treated with Kadcyla. The size was
determined from the NIR fluorescence images of the breast tumors.
(d) Time course of the average NIR fluorescence intensity of a breast
tumor after the injection of annexin V–EGFP–QDs.Finally, we checked the effect of the cytotoxicity
of annexin V–EGFP–QDs
on the viability of KPL-4 cells. The result showed that the annexin
V–EGFP–QDs under the concentration of less than 1 nM
did not affect the viability of KPL-4 cells (Figure S8). From the NIR fluorescence image of the mouse injected
with annexin V–EGFP–QDs, we observed that the average
concentration of annexin V–EGFP–QDs in the mouse was
not higher than 1 nM (Figure S9). This
finding indicates that the cytotoxicity of annexin V–EGFP–QDs
did not affect the apoptosis of KPL-4 cells during the in vivo imaging
in this study.
Conclusions
In this
paper, we present in vitro and in vivo dual-fluorescence
imaging of tumor apoptosis by using a conjugate of a recombinant protein,
annexin V–EGFP, and a CdSeTe/CdS QD. We demonstrate that the
conjugate, annexin V–EGFP–QDs, can be used for VIS and
NIR dual-fluorescence imaging of tumor cell apoptosis. Since the NIR
fluorescence emission of annexin V–EGFP–QDs is very
bright and stable, long-term imaging of ADC-induced tumor cell apoptosis
can be achieved. Although many types of fluorescence-labeled annexin
V have been reported, there are a very few probes that can be used
for the fluorescence imaging of tumor apoptosis in vitro and vivo.
We demonstrate a long-term NIR fluorescence imaging technique of Kadcyla-induced
tumor apoptosis using annexin V–EGFP–QDs. The presented
imaging technique using annexin V–EGFP–QDs will greatly
contribute to the study of the action of ADCs at the cellular level
as well as the whole-body level.
Experimental
Section
Materials
Glutathione-coated CdSeTe/CdS
QDs (GSH–QDs) and annexinV–EGFP were prepared according
to the previously reported methods (Supporting Information).[64,65] The anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody
(Herceptin) and Kadcyla (trastuzumab emtansine) were purchased from
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Japan). The FITC-annexin V apoptosis
detection kit and MTT cell counting kit were purchased from Nacalai
Tesque (Japan). Fluorescent beads (size: 14 nm in diameter, latex,
FluoSpheres, carboxylate-modified and red fluorescent) were purchased
from Molecular Probes, Inc. Soybean lecithin was purchased from Nacalai
Tesque. l-α-Phosphatidyl-l-serine (soybean)
was purchased from Sigma. All other regents were of analytical grade
and were used as received without further purification. Breast tumor
cells (KPL-4) were kindly provided by Dr. J. Kurebayashi (Kawasaki
Medical School). Nude mice (5 week old female BALB/c nu/nu) were purchased
from Nihon SLC Inc. (Japan).
Preparation of Annexin
V–EGFP–QDs
One hundred microliters of annexin
V–EGFP [1 mg/mL, phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS)] was added to 200 μL of an aqueous solution of
GSH–QDs (1 μM, 10 mM Na2CO3 solution).
Then, the solution buffer was dialyzed (MWCO: 300,000) for 1 h using
10 mM Na2CO3 to remove unconjugated EGFP–annexin
V. The purified annexin V–EGFP–QDs were preserved at
4 °C.
Preparation of the Liposome
Liposome
PS (−): 10 mg of soybean lecithin in 10 mL of PBS was sonicated
with a tip-type sonicator (Branson Sonifier-150) for 5 min. Then,
the liposome suspension was passed through a 0.45 μm membrane
filter. The average diameter of the resulting liposomes was 32 nm.
Liposome PS (+): 9 mg of soybean lecithin, 1 mg of l-α-phosphatidyl-l-serine (soybean), and 10 mL of PBS were added to a glass tube,
and the mixture was sonicated with a tip-type sonicator for 5 min.
Then, the liposome suspension was passed through a 0.45 μm membrane
filter. The average diameter of the resulting liposomes was 43 nm.
Agarose Gel Electrophoresis
Ten microliters
of aqueous solutions of GSH–QDs and annexin V–EGFP was
processed with 1% agarose gel in Tris-acetate buffer (pH 8.0) at 100
V for 20 min. Fluorescence emissions of QDs and EGFP were monitored
at 830 and 525 nm, respectively.
Optical
Measurements
The absorption
spectra were recorded with a spectrophotometer (V-670, Jasco). The
fluorescence spectra were recorded using a photonic multi-channel
analyzer (C10027, Hamamatsu Photonics). The fluorescence decay curves
of EGFP emissions were measured by excitation at 485 nm using a time-correlated
single-photon counting kit (Horiba Fluoro Cube). The fluorescence
autocorrelation curves were measured on a compact FCS system (C9413-01MOD,
Hamamatsu Photonics, Japan) at an excitation of 473 nm using a laser-diode-pumped
solid-state laser. The size of the pinhole was 25 μm, and the
spectral range of the detection wavelengths was 500–900 nm.
For the determination of the concentration of GSH–QDs, the
number of QD particles in a 10 μL solution was measured by using
FCS, and the QD concentration was estimated by using a 20 nM solution
of rhodamine 6G as a reference. Fluorescence quantum yields were measured
using an absolute quantum yield measurement system (C9920, Hamamatsu
Photonics). Excitation wavelengths were set to be 475 nm for annexin
V–EGFP and 488 nm for GSH–QDs.
Transmission
Electron Microscopy
The morphologies of GSH–QDs and
annexin V–EGFP–QDs
were observed by TEM using a Hitachi H-800 microscope operating at
an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The TEM sample (ca. 1 μM
QDs in PBS) was prepared by dropping the sample solution onto a copper
grid.
Size-Exclusion Column Chromatography
Size-exclusion column chromatography using a high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) system (Elite LaChrom, Hitachi) was performed
using a TSK-gel G4000SW column (7.8 mm × 30 cm, Tosoh). The mobile
phase was 10 mM PBS (pH 7.2–7.4), and the flow rate was adjusted
to 1 mL/min. Standard proteins of thyroglobulin (670 kDa), ferritin
(450 kDa), Herceptin (145 kDa), transferrin (79.5 kDa), and bovine
serum albumin (66 kDa) were used to draw a calibration curve. The
HPLC chromatographs of GSH–QDs and annexin V–EGFP–QDs
were obtained by monitoring the absorption at 600 nm.
Cellular Imaging of Tumor Apoptosis
KPL-4 cells were
seeded to 35 mm cell culture dishes (3 × 105 cells
per dish) and incubated in Dulbecco’s modified
Eagle’s medium with 10% fetal bovine serum overnight at 37
°C. Then, the cells were exposed to Herceptin and Kadcyla (10
nM or none) for 72 h at 37 °C. For each dish, the cells floating
in the medium and the cells detached during PBS washing were collected,
and the cells attached to the dish were carefully detached by trypsin
treatment to combine all the cell suspensions into one. The cells
were washed once with PBS and then resuspended in 1 mL of the annexin
V binding buffer (Nacalai Tesque). The cell suspensions were dispensed
in 100 μL volumes and incubated with FITC-annexin V (5 μL;
FITC-annexin V apoptosis detection kit, Nacalai Tesque) or annexin
V–EGFP–QDs (final concentration, 33 nM) for 15 min at
room temperature. The stained cell suspensions were then diluted with
400 μL of binding buffer, from which 100 μL was transferred
to a plastic dish for the observation of cells. Fluorescence images
were acquired with a fluorescence microscope (BZ-X700, Keyence Corp.,
Japan) with emission filters. The emission filter for FITC and EGFP
was 525 ± 25 nm. The emission filter for QDs was 832 ± 18
nm.
Preparation of Tumor-Bearing Mice
A suspension of KPL-4 cells (107 cells per mouse) was
transplanted to the ventral side of 5 week old female BALB/c nu/nu
mice. After several weeks, we selected a mouse bearing a tumor less
than 10 mm in diameter for imaging. Mice maintenance and animal experiments
were performed in accordance with the Guidelines for Care and Use
of Laboratory Animals of RIKEN and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee
of RIKEN (QA2015-01-8).
In Vivo Imaging of Tumor
Cell Apoptosis
NIR fluorescence images were obtained using
an in vivo fluorescence
imaging system (Bruker, MS FX PRO). An aqueous solution (100 μL)
of Kadcyla (1 mg/mL) was intravenously injected via a tail vein of
a tumor-bearing mouse. After 3 days, 100 μL of annexin V–EGFP–QDs
was injected into the mouse. In vivo NIR fluorescence images of the
tumor were obtained after the injection of annexin V–EGFP–QDs.
Four
days after the injection of the probe, ex vivo images of the breast
tumor and organs were taken. In long-term in vivo imaging, images
were obtained up to 24 days after the injection for Kadcyla. The NIR
fluorescence of annexin V–EGFP–QDs was observed at 830
nm by the excitation at 760 nm. The exposure time was 30–60
s, and the excitation light (400 W xenon lamp) power was 30 μW/cm2 at the ventral side of the mouse.
Authors: J Hickson; S Ackler; D Klaubert; J Bouska; P Ellis; K Foster; A Oleksijew; L Rodriguez; S Schlessinger; B Wang; D Frost Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2010-01-08 Impact factor: 15.828
Authors: Christel Vangestel; Marc Peeters; Gilles Mees; Ruth Oltenfreiter; Hendrikus H Boersma; Philip H Elsinga; Chris Reutelingsperger; Nancy Van Damme; Bart De Spiegeleer; Christophe Van de Wiele Journal: Mol Imaging Date: 2011-04-26 Impact factor: 4.488
Authors: Shanta M Messerli; Shilpa Prabhakar; Yi Tang; Khalid Shah; Maria L Cortes; Vidya Murthy; Ralph Weissleder; Xandra O Breakefield; Ching-Hsuan Tung Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.715