| Literature DB >> 35071779 |
Tora Sund Morken1,2, Christina Knutsen3, Margrete Sætre Hanssen1,2, Dordi Austeng1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Standard treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is intravitreal injections (IVI) of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) according to treat-and-extend (TnE). Observe-and-plan (OnP), a new regimen based on each individual's relapse interval lead to fewer clinical visits and has so far shown to be safe in treatment-naïve patients. In this study, we explore patient satisfaction and safety in nAMD when switching from TnE to OnP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 38 participants treated acording to TnE for ≥12 months were included and switched from TnE to OnP with their last stable interval. Main outcome was patient satisfaction (Leeds Satisfaction Questionnaire). Secondary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) before and 12 months after switch and number of monitoring visits and injections of anti-VEGF 12 months prior to and following switch.Entities:
Keywords: degeneration; drugs; macula; retina; treatment medical
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35071779 PMCID: PMC8744110 DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000930
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol ISSN: 2397-3269
Figure 1Switch of treatment protocol from treat and extend to observe and plan. Prior to switch participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration had been receiveing anti-VEGF treatment for a minimal amount of 12±1 months. VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Primary outcome
| LSQ | Time point 1 | Time point 2 | P value |
| A. General satisfaction | 3.8±0.8 | 4.0±0.6 | 0.14 |
| B. Provision of information | 3.1±0.8 | 3.3±0.8 | 0.13 |
| C. Empathy towards the patient | 3.2±0.8 | 3.4±0.6 | 0.07 |
| D. Technical quality and competence | 4.3±0.6 | 4.3±0.6 | 0.96 |
| E. Attitude towards the patient | 3.4±0.6 | 3.5±0.6 | 0.14 |
| F. Access and continuity | 3.6±0.6 | 3.8±0.8 | 0.15 |
| Overall score |
|
LSQ; attachment 1 at time point 1 and time point 2. LSQ measures mean overall patient satisfaction score (from 1 to 5, 1=lowest score) averaged from six subgroups (A–F); (A) general satisfaction, (B) provision of information, (C) empathy towards the patient, (D) technical quality and competence, (E) attitude towards the patient and (F) access and continuity. Scores >3 represent satisfaction, while <3 represent dissatisfaction. Each subgroup was unchanged while the overall sum of subgroups was increased when measured at 12 months following a switch from treat-and-extend to observe and plan protocol. Results are presented as mean±SD.
LSQ, Leeds Satisfaction Questionnaire.
Secondary outcomes
| Time point 1 | Time point 2 | P value | |
| BCVA | 62.3±15.1 | 61.6±16.3 | 0.7 |
| CRT | 227.5±47.7 | 233.1±55.5 | 0.4 |
|
|
|
| |
| Clinical visits | 5.5±1.7 | 3.5±1.2 | 6.1E-07 |
| IVI | 9.1±2.8 | 7.8±3.2 | 0.007 |
Best-corrected ETDRS visual acuity (BCVA) and CRT did not change from time point 1 to time point 2. During the 12 months prior to switch from TNE to OnP number of clinical visits and IVI was higher than during 12 months after switch of protocols. Results are presented as mean±SD.
BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; CRT, central retinal thickness; ETDRS, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; IVIS, intravitreal injections; OnP, observe-and-plan; TnE, treat-and-extend.