| Literature DB >> 35071446 |
Xin Zhou1,2, Xuying Wang3, Xianhong Li3, Yao Zhang3, Ying Liu1, Jingtao Wang4, Sun Chen1, Yurong Wu1, Bowen Du1, Xiaowen Wang5, Xin Sun2, Kun Sun1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heart sound auscultation, due to it being a non-invasive, convenient, and relatively low-cost technique, remains the dominant method for detection of cardiovascular disease.Entities:
Keywords: Heart sounds classification; convolutional neural network (CNN); multi-scale attention mechanism
Year: 2021 PMID: 35071446 PMCID: PMC8756246 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-4962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
Figure 1The overlapping sliding of heart sounds.
Figure 2The network architecture of Dense-FSNet. Dense-FSNet, Dense Feature Selection Convolution Network framework.
The performance of each algorithm on an independent test set
| Method | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-D-covnlution ( | 0.814 | 0.740 | 0.890 |
| ECNN ( | 0.811 | 0.810 | 0.810 |
| Cristhian Potes ( | 0.827 | 0.970 | 0.690 |
| Dense-FSNet (our model) | 0.867 | 0.940 | 0.790 |
ECNN, Ensemble Convolutional Neural Network.
Figure 3Comparison of the performance of Dense-FSNet, ECNN, and 1-DConv on an independent test set. Dense-FSNet, Dense Feature Selection Convolution Network framework; ECNN, Ensemble Convolutional Neural Network.
Figure 4ROC curve analysis. ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
Performance of Dense-FSNet under different hyperparameters
| Window size | Step size | Multi-scale attention | Data balance | Acc. | Sen. | Spe. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 600 | 200 | Y | Y | 0.8432 | 0.93 | 0.75 |
| 1,000 | 200 | Y | Y | 0.8638 | 0.95 | 0.78 |
| 1,200 | 200 | Y | Y | 0.8505 | 0.93 | 0.77 |
| 800 | 200 | Y | Y | 0.8671 | 0.94 | 0.79 |
| 800 | 200 | Y | N | 0.8272 | 0.80 | 0.85 |
| 800 | 200 | N | Y | 0.8472 | 0.92 | 0.77 |
Dense-FSNet, Dense Feature Selection Convolution Network framework.
The results of the 10-fold cross-validation between models taken from previous literature and our model
| Method | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-D-convolution ( | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.95 |
| ECNN ( | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.87 |
| Dense-FSNet (our model) | 0.95 | 0.89 | 0.97 |
Dense-FSNet, Dense Feature Selection Convolution Network framework; ECNN, Ensemble Convolutional Neural Network.
Figure 5Regions activated when using the Grad-CAM visualization model for heart sound classification.