Literature DB >> 3507144

Comparison of the strength and holding power of 4 pin designs for use with half pin (type I) external skeletal fixation.

R A Bennett1, E L Egger, M Histand, A B Ellis.   

Abstract

The strength and holding power of four pin designs for use with half pin (type I) external skeletal fixation were evaluated. Pins that were tested were fully threaded, nonthreaded, two cortices partially threaded, and one cortex partially threaded. The study involved three parts: (1) resistance of the pins to axial extraction immediately after insertion; (2) resistance of the pins to axial extraction 8 weeks after being inserted into the tibiae of live dogs; and (3) resistance of the pins to bending load. Pins with threads engaging two cortices were more resistant to axial extraction than nonthreaded pins in both the acute (p less than 0.0001) and chronic (p less than 0.0001) studies. Nonthreaded pins were more resistant to bending than fully threaded and two cortices partially threaded pins (p less than 0.0005). One cortex partially threaded pins possessed similar bending strength to nonthreaded pins (p = 0.21) and had 5.3 times more resistance to axial extraction in the acute study (p less than 0.0001) and 6.9 times more in the chronic study (p less than 0.0001). Though one cortex partially threaded pins were not as resistant to axial extraction as pins with threads engaging two cortices (p less than 0.0001), they were more resistant to bending loads (p less than 0.0005). Loss of holding power and pin failure are two of the most serious problems associated with fracture stabilization using external skeletal fixation. The results of this study suggest that one cortex partially threaded pins are better at maintaining holding power and resisting bending and breaking than nonthreaded pins.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3507144     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1987.tb00940.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Surg        ISSN: 0161-3499            Impact factor:   1.495


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of a reverse-transverse cross pin technique with a same side cross pin type II external skeletal fixator in 89 dogs.

Authors:  Kun-Yang Tsai; Matthew Pead
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

2.  Repair of fractures of the radius and ulna in a ewe using positive profile transfixation pins and casting.

Authors:  D E Anderson; G St-Jean
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  External fixator clamp reuse degrades clamp mechanical performance.

Authors:  Robert S Gilley; David P Beason; David M Snyder; Raymond C Boston; Alex Radin; Amy S Kapatkin; Gail K Smith; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.495

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.