| Literature DB >> 35071349 |
Karsten Königstein1,2,3, Julia Charlotte Büschges1,3, Giselle Sarganas1,3, Susanne Krug1,3, Hannelore Neuhauser1,3, Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss2.
Abstract
Background: Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and stiffness (cS) are predictive markers of early vascular aging and atherosclerotic risk. This study assessed, whether exercise has protective effects on carotid structure and function or on vascular risk in the young.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; arterial stiffness; atherosclerosis; carotid stiffness; exercise; intima-media thickness
Year: 2022 PMID: 35071349 PMCID: PMC8766972 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.767025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Flow-chart of data collection and cleaning (n unweighted).
Characteristics of the study sample.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2,893 | 698 | 620 | 573 | 1,002 |
| Age [years] | 17.18 ± 3.75 | 17.74 ± 3.58 | 17.29 ± 3.66 | 17.13 ± 0.55 | 16.69 |
| Females (%) | 49.64 | 57.91 | 60.41 | 55.14 | 34.89 |
|
| 2,893 | 698 | 620 | 573 | 1,002 |
| Age [years] | 22.02 ± 3.75 | 22.54 ± 3.56 | 22.13 ± 3.69 | 21.95 ± 3.84 | 21.55 |
| cIMT [mm] | 0.55 ± 0.05 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 0.55 ± 0.05 |
| Wall-to-lumen-ratio | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 |
| β-SI [–] | 4.08 ± 0.86 | 4.07 ± 0.79 | 4.03 ± 0.88 | 4.06 ± 0.89 | 4.14 ± 0.89 |
| DC [10−3 kPa] | 45.03 ± 11.35 | 45.02 ± 10.48 | 45.78 ± 10.87 | 45.57 ± 12.17 | 44.22 ± 11.81 |
| EP [kPa] | 50.65 ± 12.03 | 50.55 ± 11.29 | 49.60 ± 11.55 | 50.25 ± 12.97 | 51.64 ± 12.29 |
| YEM [kPA] | 0.28 ± 0.08 | 0.28 ± 0.08 | 0.28 ± 0.08 | 0.28 ± 0.08 | 0.29 ± 0.09 |
| CV-R [–] | 0.40 ± 3.25 | 0.85 ± 3.93 | 0.36 ± 2.67 | 0.17 ± 3.10 | 0.19 ± 2.90 |
| Body mass index [kg/m2] | 24.02 ± 4.59 | 24.33 ± 4.89 | 23.97 ± 4.44 | 24.04 ± 5.01 | 23.78 ± 4.07 |
| MAP [mmHg] | 92.07 ± 8.63 | 92.17 ± 8.83 | 91.66 ± 8.67 | 91.57 ± 8.87 | 92.55 ± 8.19 |
| HbA1c [mmol/mol] | 32.66 ± 4.89 | 32.97 ± 6.85 | 32.50 ± 2.75 | 32.30 ± 3.17 | 32.72 ± 4.52 |
| Triglycerides [mg/dL] | 1.30 ± 0.95 | 1.40 ± 1.19 | 1.32 ± 0.74 | 1.30 ± 0.87 | 1.21 |
| Total-/HDL-chol. ratio [–] | 3.35 ± 0.88 | 3.49 ± 0.98 | 3.38 ± 0.84 | 3.29 | 3.25 |
| LDL-cholesterol | 2.60 ± 0.77 | 2.72 ± 0.80 | 2.66 ± 0.74 | 2.56 | 2.49 |
| Resting heart rate [bpm] | 75.10 ± 11.65 | 78.32 ± 10.75 | 76.81 ± 11.20 | 73.98 | 72.01 |
| hsCrP [mg/dL] | 2.35 ± 4.20 | 2.44 ± 4.22 | 2.64 ± 4.39 | 2.63 ± 5.22 | 1.93 ± 3.22 |
| Overweight or Obesity | 14.36 | 17.82 | 13.12 | 14.90 | 12.03 |
| Current smoking (%) | 30.94 | 40.40 | 24.58 | 28.05 | 28.98 |
| Hazardous drinking | 28.01 | 21.94 | 26.87 | 29.20 | 33.08 |
Data presented as weighted mean ± standard deviation (SD), unless specified otherwise. Significance codes:
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.
Based on KiGGS (.
Hazardous drinking (.
cIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; β-SI, ß stiffness index; DC, distensibility coefficient; EP, Peterson's elastic modulus; YEM, Young's elastic modulus; CV-R, Index of cardiovascular risk (sum of z-scores of mean arterial pressure, triglycerides, total/HDL-cholesterol-ratio, body mass index and HbA1c). MAP, mean arterial pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; hsCrP, high-sensitive C-reactive protein; bpm, beats per minute.
Figure 2Margin plots demonstrating associations of the cardiovascular risk index (CV-R) with cross-sectional (A) and longitudinal (B) volumes of exercise. CV-R is significantly lower with higher cross-sectional and longitudinal volumes of exercise. “None” set as reference. Weighted estimations from linear regression; n = 2,893. Vertical bars = 95%–confidence intervals. Models adjusted for sex and age.
Figure 3Forest plot demonstrating relative risk for intima-media thickness (cIMT ≥ 90th percentile), parameters of carotid stiffness (cS ≥ 90th percentile) and elevated cardiovascular risk (CV-R ≥ 1 standard deviation) stratified by cross-sectional exercise at KiGGS-Wave-2. Relative risk for elevated CV-R is significantly lower with higher volumes of cross-sectional exercise. No between-group differences were observed for relative risk of elevated cS parameters and cIMT. Results from log binomial regression models. If the 95% confidence interval does not include the null value (RR = 1), the finding is statistically significant. Reference level of exposure: no regular exercise; weighted analyses. DC, distensibility coefficient; β-SI, ß stiffness index; YEM, Young's elastic modulus; EP, Peterson's elastic modulus; CV-R, Index of cardiovascular risk (sum of z-scores of mean arterial pressure, triglycerides, total/HDL-cholesterol-ratio, body mass index, and HbA1c); RR [95%-CI], Relative risk [95%–confidence interval].
Figure 4Forest plot demonstrating relative risk for intima-media thickness (cIMT ≥ 90th percentile), parameters of carotid stiffness (cS ≥ 90th percentile) and elevated cardiovascular risk (CV-R ≥ 1 standard deviation) stratified by longitudinal changes of exercise between KiGGS-Wave-1 and KiGGS-Wave-2. Relative risk for elevated CV-R is significantly lower with regularly higher volumes of exercise, as is the relative risk for elevated cS parameters in tendency. No between-group differences were observed for relative risk of elevated cIMT. Results from log binomial regression models. If the 95% confidence interval does not include the null value (RR = 1), the finding is statistically significant. Changes of exercise from KiGGS-Wave-1 to KiGGS-Wave-2: “low-low” (always <2 h), “low-high” (<2 h at KiGGS-Wave-1 and ≥2 h at KiGGS-Wave-2), “high-low” (≥2 h at KiGGS-Wave-1 and <2 h at KiGGS-Wave-2), “high-high” (always ≥2 h); Reference level of exposure: “low-low”; weighted analyses; DC, distensibility coefficient; β-SI, ß stiffness index; YEM, Young's elastic modulus; EP, Peterson's elastic modulus; CV-R, Index of cardiovascular risk (sum of z-scores of mean arterial pressure, triglycerides, total/HDL-cholesterol-ratio, body mass index and HbA1c); RR [95%-CI], Relative risk [95%–confidence interval].