| Literature DB >> 35071029 |
Hongmei Chen1, Ye Zhang2, Jie Zheng1, Lei Shi1, Yingli He1, Yinghua Niu1, Jine Lei1, Yingren Zhao1, Han Xia2, Tianyan Chen1.
Abstract
Background: Despite the obvious advantages of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in etiological diagnosis of various infectious diseases, there are few reports on etiological diagnosis of suspected thoracic and abdominal infections in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD).Entities:
Keywords: culture; diagnosis criterion; end-stage liver disease (ESLD); metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS); neutrophil count; thoracic and abdominal infections
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35071029 PMCID: PMC8766839 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.741220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1The enrolled patients and their detected results by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and culture. Seventy-three out of 84 patients were finally enrolled in this study. Sixteen patients were positive by culture. A total of 56 patients were detected with pathogens by mNGS, of whom 31 were considered as positive. Pathogens were found in 13 patients by both mNGS and culture, and 9 were considered as positive by both methods. Of the 9 patients with positive results, 7 were detected with bacteria consistent at the genus level and 5 were with bacteria consistent at the species level.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the 73 patients.
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
|
| 49 (67.1%) |
|
| |
| Age (Mean-years) | 54.6 |
| Distribution-no. (%) | |
| 30–39 years | 13 (17.8%) |
| 40–49 years | 11 (15.1%) |
| 50–59 years | 24 (32.9%) |
| 60–69 years | 15 (20.5%) |
| 70–79 years | 8 (11.0%) |
| 80–89 years | 2 (2.7%) |
|
| |
| HBV | 30 (41.1%) |
| HCV | 6 (8.2%) |
| HEV | 1 (1.3%) |
| Alcoholic | 11 (15.1%) |
| Autoimmune | 4 (5.5%) |
| Unknown | 21 (28.8%) |
|
| |
| ≥250/mm3 | 14 (19.2%) |
| <250/mm3 | 59 (80.8%) |
|
| |
| Ascites | 57 (78.1%) |
| Pleural fluid | 16 (21.9%) |
HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HEV, hepatitis E virus.
Figure 2The metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) results of suspected thoracic and abdominal infection patients with different causes of end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Patients with ESLD of different causes were shown in the inner circle. Patients with detected pathogens by mNGS were shown in the middle circle. Patients with positive results by mNGS were shown in the outer circle.
Figure 3The positive and suspected pathogens detected by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). A total of 96 pathogens were detected, including 47 bacteria, 32 viruses, 14 fungi, 2 M. tuberculosis, and 1 parasite, of which 46 were considered as positive.
Figure 4The distribution of Gram-positive bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria detected by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Of the 47 detected bacteria, 29 (62%) were Gram-positive bacteria and 18 (38%) were Gram-negative bacteria.
Figure 5The content of positive results detected by mNGS and culture (A), and the positive fungi results between alcoholic liver disease patients and other causes ESLD patients (B). Chi-square test was used to analyze the difference of the comparisons. P< 0.01 was marked as **.
The positive results of mNGS and culture between patients with different PMN count levels.
| PMN ≥250/mm3 | PMN <250/mm3 | |
|---|---|---|
| mNGS positive alone | 3 | 5 |
| Culture positive alone | 3 | 6 |
| Both positive | 3 | 3 |
| Overall positive rate | 64.3% (9/14) | 23.7% (14/59) |
mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing.