| Literature DB >> 35070860 |
Mbarga Manga Joseph Arsene1, Podoprigora Irina Viktorovna1, Anyutoulou Kitio Linda Davares1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of medicinal plants' toxicity is a prerequisite prior to their usage. The vertebrate models used for this purpose are often the object of ethical consideration. Though invertebrate models including Galleria mellonella (GM) have demonstrated the ability to be used to assess the toxicity of various products. To the authors' knowledge, GM has never been exploited to determine the toxicity of medicinal plants. AIM: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the potential of GM larvae as a simple, inexpensive, and rapid model for the evaluation of the toxicity of herbal medicines.Entities:
Keywords: Galleria mellonella; Greater wax moth; Insect model; Medicinal plants; Toxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35070860 PMCID: PMC8770176 DOI: 10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i4.15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Vet J ISSN: 2218-6050
Fig. 1.(A): Group of 20 larvae. (B): Injection of GM larvae with plant extracts through the last left proleg.
Extract yields (%) obtained from the seven plants with distilled water and ethanolic solution (EtOH 80%).
| Medicinal plants | Parts used | Local name | Volume yield | Mass yied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EtOH extract | Aqueous extract | EtOH extract | Aqueous extract | |||
|
| Bark | Ikouk | 95.0 | 8.9 | 9.7 | |
|
| Leaves | Ndole | 78.0 | 75.0 | 8.3 | 9.5 |
|
| Seed | Essok | 93.0 | 90.0 | 9.8 | 14.0 |
| Bark | 93.0 | 86.0 | 8.4 | 7.9 | ||
|
| Bark | Nfol | 92.0 | 85.0 | 12.4 | 9.3 |
|
| Leaves | Neem | 87.0 | 83.0 | 5.8 | 15.1 |
| Seed | 91.0 | 88.0 | 9.3 | 7.4 | ||
|
| Leaves | Moringa | 82.0 | 77.0 | 7.3 | 21.2 |
|
| Leaves | Citronelle | 87.0 | 86.0 | 8.3 | 17.3 |
LD50, LD90 and LD100 values for the medicinal plants tested on GM model.
| Medicinal plants | Parts used | Extract | LD50 | LD90 | ≥LD100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg/ml | g/kg of bw | mg/ml | g/kg of bw | mg/ml | g/kg of bw | |||
| Bark | EtOH | 4.87 | 3.90 | 42.30 | 38.45 | 45.00 | 40.91 | |
| H20 | 9.53 | 8.66 | 50.00 | 38.46 | 98.03 | 75.41 | ||
| Leaves | EtOH | 119.60 | 92.00 | >200 | >148.15 | >200 | >148.15 | |
| H20 | >200 | >148.15 | >200 | >173.91 | >200 | >173.91 | ||
|
| Seed | EtOH | 14.93 | 12.98 | 66.64 | 51.26 | 100.00 | 76.92 |
| H20 | 30.73 | 23.64 | 72.09 | 65.54 | 167.45 | 128.81 | ||
| Bark | EtOH | 34.30 | 31.18 | 133.37 | 102.59 | 200.00 | 148.15 | |
| H20 | 64.22 | 49.40 | 184.21 | 141.70 | >200 | >173.91 | ||
|
| Bark | EtOH | 50.00 | 37.04 | 85.49 | 71.24 | 100.00 | 74.07 |
| H20 | 100.00 | 86.96 | 200.00 | 160.00 | >200 | >173.91 | ||
|
| Leaves | EtOH | 120.65 | 92.81 | >200 | >181.82 | >200 | >153.85 |
| H20 | >200 | >166.67 | >200 | >153.85 | >200 | >160.00 | ||
| Seed | EtOH | 6.01 | 4.81 | 25.00 | 18.52 | 50.00 | 45.45 | |
| H20 | 19.23 | 17.48 | 65.88 | 59.89 | 100.00 | 76.92 | ||
|
| Leaves | EtOH | 55.79 | 42.92 | 87.30 | 67.15 | 100.00 | 74.07 |
| H20 | 165.40 | 122.52 | >200 | >148.15 | >200 | >173.91 | ||
|
| Leaves | EtOH | 41.14 | 35.77 | 81.03 | 70.46 | 100.00 | 76.92 |
| H20 | 149.08 | 114.68 | >200 | >153.85 | >200 | >181.82 | ||
Fig. 2.Survival curves for GM larvae against (a): Enantia chlorantha ethanolic bark extract (HAE), (b): Cymbopogon citratus leaves HAE, (c): Azadirachta indica seed HAE (d): Garcinia lucida bark HAE. Each data point represents the mean percentage survival of 3 groups of 20 larvae, following injection with 20 μl of specific concentrations of the selected plant extract and incubation for 24 hours at 37°C.
Cubic spline model used to determine the LD50, LD90 and LD100 of E. chlorantha bark ethanolic extract (HAE), C. citratus leaves HAE, A. indica seed HAE and G. lucida bark HAE.
| Plant material | Spline intervals |
| Constant |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (0; 5) | −0.005 | 0.000 | 0.119 | 100.000 | 0.92 | |
| (5; 12.5) | 0.002 | −0.072 | −0.239 | 100.000 | ||
| (12.5; 25) | 0.001 | −0.028 | −0.986 | 95.000 | ||
| (25; 50) | 0.000 | 0.005 | −1.278 | 80.000 | ||
| (50; 100) | 0.000 | 0.000 | −1.163 | 50.000 | ||
| (100; 200) | 0.000 | 0.010 | −0.668 | 0.000 | ||
| (0; 5) | 0.003 | 0.000 | −0.067 | 100.000 | 0.88 | |
| (5; 12.5) | −0.008 | 0.040 | 0.133 | 100.000 | ||
| (12.5; 25) | 0.004 | −0.133 | −0.567 | 100.000 | ||
| (25; 50) | 0.000 | 0.019 | −2.000 | 80.000 | ||
| (50; 100) | 0.000 | 0.011 | −1.264 | 40.000 | ||
| (100; 200) | 0.000 | 0.006 | −0.413 | 0.000 | ||
| (0; 5) | 0.038 | 0.000 | −9.951 | 100.000 | 0.69 | |
| (5; 12.5) | −0.021 | 0.570 | −7.099 | 55.000 | ||
| (12.5; 25) | −0.002 | 0.099 | −2.080 | 25.000 | ||
| (25; 50) | 0.000 | 0.013 | −0.676 | 10.000 | ||
| (50; 100) | 0.000 | 0.006 | −0.186 | 0.000 | ||
| (100; 200) | 0.000 | −0.001 | 0.068 | 0.000 | ||
| (0; 5) | −0.017 | 0.000 | −0.584 | 100.000 | 0.85 | |
| (5; 12.5) | 0.018 | −0.249 | −1.831 | 95.000 | ||
| (12.5; 25) | −0.005 | 0.165 | −2.468 | 75.000 | ||
| (25; 50) | 0.001 | −0.025 | −0.721 | 60.000 | ||
| (50; 100) | 0.000 | 0.016 | −0.937 | 35.000 | ||
| (100; 200) | 0.000 | 0.000 | −0.137 | 15.000 |
Fig. 3.(A): Healthy GM larva. (B): Larva showing slight and uniform melanisation. (C): Larvae showing localised melanization following injection with a LD100 of C. officinalis ethanolic bark extract.