| Literature DB >> 35070848 |
Verônica M Govoni1, Claudio Pigoli2,3, Felipe Augusto R Sueiro4, Fernanda Zuliani1, Thayná O da Silva5, Juliany G Quitzan1, Renee Laufer-Amorim5, Valeria Grieco3, Carlos Eduardo Fonseca-Alves1,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Urothelial carcinoma (UC), also known as transitional cell carcinoma, is the most common malignant tumor of the canine urinary bladder and represents a model for studying human bladder cancer. However, the existing literature has limited data on the clinicopathological characteristics of these tumors and their prognostic value. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate such factors, correlating them with follow-up, in a group of 32 dogs with bladder UC.Entities:
Keywords: Bladder cancer; Dog; Prognosis; Transitional cell carcinoma
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35070848 PMCID: PMC8770177 DOI: 10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i4.3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Vet J ISSN: 2218-6050
Clinical information from the 32 UC affected dogs.
| Case | Breed | Age (years) | Sex | Treatment | Survival (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Labrador | 11 | Male | Surgery + carboplatin | 90 |
| 2 | Poodle | 15 | Female | NI | NI |
| 3 | Poodle | 14 | Female | Surgery + vimblastin | 101 |
| 4 | Dachshund | 5 | Female | NI | NI |
| 5 | Beagle | 10 | Female | Surgery + carboplatin | 130 |
| 6 | Pitbull | 7 | Female | NI | NI |
| 7 | Lhasa apso | 8 | Male | Surgery + carboplatin | 85 |
| 8 | Lhasa apso | 15 | Female | NI | NI |
| 9 | Dachshund | 8 | Female | NI | NI |
| 10 | Mixed breed | 14 | Female | NI | NI |
| 11 | NI | 7 | Female | NI | NI |
| 12 | Lhasa apso | 13 | Female | NI | NI |
| 13 | Beagle | 12 | Male | Surgery + vimblastin | 145 |
| 14 | Poodle | 15 | Female | NI | NI |
| 15 | Poodle | 10 | Female | NI | NI |
| 16 | English bulldog | 11 | Male | Surgery + carboplatin | 60 |
| 17 | Doberman pinscher | 12 | Female | NI | NI |
| 18 | Poodle | 13 | Female | NI | NI |
| 19 | Mixed breed | 10 | Male | Surgery + vimblastin | 180 |
| 20 | Maltese | 10 | Female | NI | NI |
| 21 | Yorkshire terrier | 8 | Female | NI | NI |
| 22 | Shih tzu | 12 | Female | NI | NI |
| 23 | Poodle | 13 | Female | Surgery + vimblastin | 201 |
| 24 | Maltes | 15 | Male | NI | NI |
| 25 | Labrador | 7 | Female | NI | NI |
| 26 | Chow chow | 9 | Male | Surgery | NI |
| 27 | Doberman pinscher | 9 | Female | NI | NI |
| 28 | Scottish terrier | 10 | Male | Surgery | 1 |
| 29 | Pitbull | 13 | Female | Surgery | 4 |
| 30 | Poodle | 12 | Male | Surgery + carboplatin + toceranib | 485 |
| 31 | Poodle | 12 | Female | Surgery | 425 |
| 32 | Mixed breed | 12 | Female | Surgery + vimblastin | 412 |
NI: No information.
Fig. 1.Histological type photomicrograph of canine UC. (A) UC papillary (case 4) (H&E, 5× magnification). (B) The tumor “A,” focusing on tumor infiltration (H&E, 10× magnification). (C) UC non-papillary and infiltrating (case 21) (H&E, 5× magnification). (D) The tumor “C,” focusing on tumor infiltration (H&E, 10× magnification).
Fig. 2.Histological grading photomicrograph of canine bladder UC. (A) UC with histological grade II (case 11) (H&E, 40× magnification). (B) UC with histological grade III (case 5) (H&E, 40× magnification). Enlarged nucleus, anisokaryosis, and multiple evident nucleoli in grade III are more evident when compared with grade II.
Fig. 3.Histological photomicrograph of invasive canine bladder UC. (A) UC with muscular infiltration (case 21) (H&E, 10× magnification). (B) UC with lymphatic infiltration (case 12) (H&E, 40× magnification).
Pathological data of the 32 canine bladder UC cases.
| Case | Histologic classification ( | Histologic grade ( | Sample with all layers | Muscular invasion | Lymphatic invasion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | Yes | Present and extensive |
| 2 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | No | NI | Absent |
| 3 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | No | NI | Absent |
| 4 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | No | Present |
| 5 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | III | Yes | Yes | Present and extensive |
| 6 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | No | NI | Absent |
| 7 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | III | Yes | Yes | Present and extensive |
| 8 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | III | No | NI | Present |
| 9 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | No | Absent |
| 10 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | Yes | Absent |
| 11 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | No | Present |
| 12 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | Yes | Present and extensive |
| 13 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | No | Absent |
| 14 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | No | NI | Absent |
| 15 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | No | NI | Present |
| 16 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | Yes | Present |
| 17 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | No | Present and extensive |
| 18 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | No | NI | Present |
| 19 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | III | Yes | Yes | Present and extensive |
| 20 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | III | No | NI | Present |
| 21 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | III | Yes | Yes | Present and extensive |
| 22 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | III | Yes | No | Present |
| 23 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | No | Absent |
| 24 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | III | Yes | No | Present |
| 25 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | No | Absent |
| 26 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | Yes | Absent |
| 27 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | No | Absent |
| 28 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | No | Present |
| 29 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | III | Yes | Yes | Present |
| 30 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | No | Absent |
| 31 | UC Papillary and infiltrating | II | Yes | Yes | Absent |
| 32 | UC Non-papillary and infiltrating | II | No | NI | Absent |
NI: No information.
Fig. 4.Survival curves (Kaplan–Meier) in relation to different parameters. (A) Survival curve for types of treatment. (B) Survival curve for histological types. (C) Survival curve for muscle invasion. (D) Survival curve for lymphatic invasion.