Literature DB >> 35070816

Kidney stone disease and cardiovascular events: a study on bidirectional causality based on mendelian randomization.

Yuanyuan Zhao1,2,3,4, Yang Fan5, Mengru Wang6, Chenguang Yu6, Mengchen Zhou6, Dan Jiang6, Dunfeng Du1,2,3,4, Shanshan Chen7, Xin Tu6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Kidney stone disease (KSD) has been reported to be associated with several cardiovascular diseases. However, the causality between the conditions remains unknown. In the study, we performed a study on bidirectional causality by two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causality between KSD and cardiovascular diseases including coronary atherosclerosis, hypertension, and cardiomyopathy.
METHODS: In the recent study, we performed a bidirectional two-sample MR study using available genome-wide association summary data from the online database MRBASE. We identified genetic variants associated with KSD in one European population from UK Biobank (version 2, n=462,933). Two phenotypes of samples were chosen from the population to define our genetic instrumental variables: (I) samples with the phenotype of kidney stone/ureter stone/bladder stone (ukb-b-8297), and (II) samples with the phenotype of kidney stone surgery/lithotripsy (ukb-b-13537). For cardiovascular diseases, we picked up another independent European population from FinnGen Biobank (n=93,421). We selected the exposure and outcome SNPs and then performed the two-sample MR using R package.
RESULTS: After bidirectional causality by two-sample MR, we verified that genetic predisposition to KSD could increase the risk of coronary atherosclerosis (OR: 4.45×1037; SE=±7.80×1014, P for MR-Egger =0.024) and cardiomyopathy (OR: 5.35×1013; SE=±7.18×106, P for IVW=0.045 for finn-a-I9_CARDMYO, and OR: 3.60×1025; SE=±3.26×1012, P for IVW=0.041 for finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTH) when we used ukb-b-13537 as exposure group. Furthermore, hypertension could increase the risk of KSD (OR: 1.001; SE=±1.00, P for IVW=0.003) when we used ukb-b-8297 as exposure group, without detected pleiotropy bias (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed KSD may trigger causal pathological processes including coronary atherosclerosis and cardiomyopathy. Furthermore, hypertension may causally affect KSD. 2021 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney stone disease (KSD); bidirectional Mendelian randomization; cardiomyopathy; coronary atherosclerosis; hypertension

Year:  2021        PMID: 35070816      PMCID: PMC8749067          DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Androl Urol        ISSN: 2223-4683


Introduction

Kidney stone disease (KSD) and cardiovascular diseases are two common conditions, and more and more studies reveal that KSD and cardiovascular diseases commonly coexist (1,2). In addition, KSD is also associated with some metabolic disturbance such as obesity (3) and diabetes mellitus (4). However, there is little evidence about the causality between KSD and these systemic diseases. On the one hand, several studies suggested that occurrence of KSD could increase the risk of cardiovascular events such as hypertension (5,6), coronary atherosclerosis (7), and myocardial disorders (8). On the other hand, some study results showed that kidney stone formation was associated with subclinical coronary atherosclerosis (9) and so on. Therefore, the causality between KSD and cardiovascular events need to be determined, which has important implications for understanding the etiology of disease processes. Mendelian randomization (MR) is a recently developed technique for causal inference based on large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAs) (10,11). Briefly, MR is a technique that can detect causal effects of phenotypes as unbiased and possibly estimate their magnitude (11). This technique utilizes the random allocation of exposure-related genetic variants. This random assortment minimizes the possibility of environmental confusion and enables the investigation to reveal the causal relationship between exposures and outcomes. Numerous studies have used MR to demonstrate the causality of coexisting phenotypes or diseases (12-14). Based on these, Hemani et al. developed a platform called MR-Base (http://app.mrbase.org/) that integrates a database of thousands of GWAS summary datasets with a web interface and R packages for automated causal inference through MR (15). Therefore, in the recent study, we performed two-sample MR by the database MRBASE to explore the bidirectional causality of KSD and cardiovascular events including three diseases: coronary atherosclerosis, hypertension, and cardiomyopathy.

Methods

Ethical statement

This research involving human participants were conformed to the guidelines set forth by the Declaration of Helsinki (2013).

Implementation and operation

In the recent study, we used two-sample MR designed (16) by the online database MRBASE (15) (http://app.mrbase.org/) which is a database and analytical platform for Mendelian randomization developed by the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol. All the data used were from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and publicly available. These SNPs were selected based on the GWAS findings. We selected the exposure and outcome SNPs and then performed the two-sample MR using R package.

Study exposures and outcomes

We selected the genetic variants of KSD in one European population from UK Biobank (version 2, n=462,933). Two phenotypes of samples were chosen to define our genetic instrumental variables: (I) samples with the phenotype of kidney stone/ureter stone/bladder stone (ukb-b-8297), and (II) samples with the phenotype of kidney stone surgery/lithotripsy (ukb-b-13537). For cardiovascular diseases, we detected three phenotypes including coronary atherosclerosis, hypertension, and cardiomyopathy. We chosen an independent European population from FinnGen Biobank to examine the causality between KSD and these cardiovascular diseases. The detailed sub-group ID were listed in . Both the databases were European population.
Table 1

Basic information of population in the study

PhenotypeGroup IDDatabaseDescription
Kidney stone disease (KSD)ukb-b-8297UK Biobank Non-cancer illness code, self-reported: kidney stone/ureter stone/bladder stone
ukb-b-13537Operation code: percutaneous/open kidney stone surgery/lithotripsy
Coronary atherosclerosisfinn-a-I9_CORATHERFinnGen BiobankCoronary atherosclerosis
Hypertensionfinn-a-I9_HYPTENSFinnGen BiobankHypertension
Cardiomyopathyfinn-a-I9_CARDMYOFinnGen BiobankCardiomyopathy
finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTHCardiomyopathy, other and unspecified
All the SNPs used us instrumental variants were from GWAS studies above. For SNPs selection, first of all, genetic variants associated with exposure factors at genome-wide significance (P<5×10-5) and not in linkage disequilibrium (R2<0.01) were selected as instrumental SNPs. Furthermore, SNP≥0.05 was defined as minor allele frequency. SNPs with MAF threshold was 0.01. Second, through sensitivity analysis, the nonspecific SNPs were removed. Third, through checking the allele and frequency information of SNPs in both the exposure and outcome groups, we removed the SNPs with inconsistent information. We used “TwoSampleMR” R package to pick up appropriate variants.

Statistical analysis (Mendelian randomization analysis)

The primary analysis estimated the effect of exposure on the risk of outcome using “TwoSampleMR” R package. In the recent study, two complementary MR approaches were adopted in our analyses to assess the causal effect of the exposure on the outcome and its robustness, including MR Egger and Inverse variance weighted (IVW). Heterogeneity tests were performed using IVW and MR-Egger, and sensitivity analysis was performed using the weighted median method and Leave-one-out analysis which were described in the previous study (13). Scatter plots, forest plots, and funnel plots were used to present the results.

Results

KSD increases the risk of coronary atherosclerosis

We selected two subtype groups from UK Biobank with a genotype of KSD (ukb-b-8297 and ukb-b-13537) and one group with a genotype of coronary atherosclerosis from FinnGen Biobank (finn-a-I9_CORATHER) (). We first performed KSD→coronary atherosclerosis MR analysis. For exposure, 30 and 24 SNPs were included as genetic IVs for ukb-b-8297 and ukb-b-13537, respectively. For outcome, 28 SNPs were included. After analysis, the results showed that KSD increased the risk of coronary atherosclerosis using MR-Egger method (, OR: 4.45×1037; SE=±7.80×1014, P=0.024) when ukb-b-8297 was treated as the exposure group, without detected pleiotropy bias (P>0.05). However, when we used ukb-b-13537 as exposure group, KSD didn’t increased the risk of coronary atherosclerosis (, P>0.05).
Figure 1

Mendelian randomization study of the bidirectional effect between KSD and coronary atherosclerosis. (A,B) Forest plots were presented for the MR effect size for KSD-ukb-b-8297 (A), and KSD-ukb-b-13537 (B) on coronary atherosclerosis. The results showed that KSD increased the risk of coronary atherosclerosis by using MR-Egger method (OR: 4.45x1037; SE=±7.80x1014, P=0.024) when we used ukb-b-8297 but not ukb-b-13537 as exposure group. (C,D) Forest plots were presented for the MR effect size for coronary atherosclerosis on KSD-ukb-b-8297 (C) and KSD-ukb-b-13537 (D). The results showed that coronary atherosclerosis didn’t affect the outcome of KSD (P>0.05). For the forest plots, red points showing the combined causal estimate using all SNPs together in a single instrument, using each of two different methods [inverse-variance weighted (IVW) and MR-Egger]. Horizontal lines denote 95% confidence intervals.

Mendelian randomization study of the bidirectional effect between KSD and coronary atherosclerosis. (A,B) Forest plots were presented for the MR effect size for KSD-ukb-b-8297 (A), and KSD-ukb-b-13537 (B) on coronary atherosclerosis. The results showed that KSD increased the risk of coronary atherosclerosis by using MR-Egger method (OR: 4.45x1037; SE=±7.80x1014, P=0.024) when we used ukb-b-8297 but not ukb-b-13537 as exposure group. (C,D) Forest plots were presented for the MR effect size for coronary atherosclerosis on KSD-ukb-b-8297 (C) and KSD-ukb-b-13537 (D). The results showed that coronary atherosclerosis didn’t affect the outcome of KSD (P>0.05). For the forest plots, red points showing the combined causal estimate using all SNPs together in a single instrument, using each of two different methods [inverse-variance weighted (IVW) and MR-Egger]. Horizontal lines denote 95% confidence intervals. Then, we performed coronary atherosclerosis→KSD MR analysis. For exposure, 19 SNPs were included as genetic IVs for finn-a-I9_CORATHER. For outcome, 12 and 10 SNPs were included ukb-b-8297 and ukb-b-13537, respectively. After analysis, the results showed that coronary atherosclerosis didn’t affect the outcome of KSD (, P>0.05). The P value in all the heterogeneity test results in the bidirectional MR analysis between KSD and coronary atherosclerosis was >0.05. In conclusion, KSD increases the risk of coronary atherosclerosis, but coronary atherosclerosis didn’t affect the outcome of KSD.

KSD increases the risk of cardiomyopathy

Two subtype groups from UK Biobank with the genotype of KSD (ukb-b-8297 and ukb-b-13537) and two groups with the genotype of cardiomyopathy from FinnGen Biobank (finn-a-I9_CARDMYO and finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTH) were selected (). We first performed KSD→cardiomyopathy MR analysis. For exposure, 30 and 24 SNPs were included as genetic IVs for ukb-b-8297 and ukb-b-13537, respectively. For outcomes, 28 and 28 SNPs were included for finn-a-I9_CARDMYO and finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTH, respectively. After analysis, the results showed that KSD increased the risk of cardiomyopathy by using IVW method [OR: 5.35×1013; SE=±7.18×106, P=0.045 for finn-a-I9_CARDMYO (), and OR: 3.60×1025; SE=±3.26×1012, P=0.041 for finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTH ()] when we used ukb-b-13537 as exposure group, without detected pleiotropy bias (P>0.05). However, when we used ukb-b-8297 as exposure group, KSD didn’t increased the risk of cardiomyopathy ( for finn-a-I9_CARDMYO, and for finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTH, P>0.05).
Figure 2

Mendelian randomization study of the effect of KSD on cardiomyopathy. (A,B) Forest plots were presented for the MR effect size for KSD-ukb-b-13537 on cardiomyopathy-finn-a-I9_CARDMYO (A) and cardiomyopathy-finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTH (B). The results showed that KSD-ukb-13537 increased the risk of cardiomyopathy by using IVW method [OR: 5.35×1013; SE=±7.18×106, P=0.045 for finn-a-I9_CARDMYO (A), and OR: 3.60x1025; SE=±3.26×1012, P=0.041 for finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTH (B)] when we used ukb-b-13537 as exposure group. (C,D) Forest plots were presented for the MR effect size for KSD-ukb-b-8297 on cardiomyopathy-finn-a-I9_CARDMYO (C) and cardiomyopathy-finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTH (D). The results showed that KSD-ukb-b-8297 didn’t affect the outcome of cardiomyopathy-finn-a-I9_CARDMYO (C) nor cardiomyopathy-finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTH (D) (P>0.05). For the forest plots, red points showing the combined causal estimate using all SNPs together in a single instrument, using each of two different methods (inverse-variance weighted [IVW] and MR-Egger). Horizontal lines denote 95% confidence intervals.

Mendelian randomization study of the effect of KSD on cardiomyopathy. (A,B) Forest plots were presented for the MR effect size for KSD-ukb-b-13537 on cardiomyopathy-finn-a-I9_CARDMYO (A) and cardiomyopathy-finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTH (B). The results showed that KSD-ukb-13537 increased the risk of cardiomyopathy by using IVW method [OR: 5.35×1013; SE=±7.18×106, P=0.045 for finn-a-I9_CARDMYO (A), and OR: 3.60x1025; SE=±3.26×1012, P=0.041 for finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTH (B)] when we used ukb-b-13537 as exposure group. (C,D) Forest plots were presented for the MR effect size for KSD-ukb-b-8297 on cardiomyopathy-finn-a-I9_CARDMYO (C) and cardiomyopathy-finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTH (D). The results showed that KSD-ukb-b-8297 didn’t affect the outcome of cardiomyopathy-finn-a-I9_CARDMYO (C) nor cardiomyopathy-finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTH (D) (P>0.05). For the forest plots, red points showing the combined causal estimate using all SNPs together in a single instrument, using each of two different methods (inverse-variance weighted [IVW] and MR-Egger). Horizontal lines denote 95% confidence intervals. Then, we performed cardiomyopathy→KSD MR analysis. After analysis, the results showed that cardiomyopathy didn’t affect the outcome of KSD (Figure S1, P>0.05). All the heterogeneity test results in the bidirectional MR analysis between KSD and coronary atherosclerosis were with P>0.05. In conclusion, KSD increases the risk of cardiomyopathy, but cardiomyopathy didn’t affect the outcome of KSD.

Hypertension increases the risk of KSD

Two subtype groups from UK Biobank with genotype of KSD (ukb-b-8297 and ukb-b-13537) and three groups with genotype of hypertension from FinnGen Biobank (finn-a-I9_HYPTENS) (). We first performed KSD→hypertension MR analysis. For exposure, 30 and 24 SNPs were included as genetic IVs for ukb-b-8297 and ukb-b-13537, respectively. For outcome, 28 SNPs were included. After analysis, the results showed that KSD didn’t affect the outcome of hypertension (, P>0.05). Then, we performed hypertension→KSD MR analysis. For exposure, 77 SNPs were included as genetic IVs for finn-a-I9_HYPTENS. For outcome, 47 and 41 SNPs were included ukb-b-8297 and ukb-b-13537, respectively. After analysis, the results showed that hypertension could increase the risk of KSD by using IVW method (, OR: 1.001; SE=±1.00, P=0.003) when we used ukb-b-8297 as exposure group, without detected pleiotropy bias (P>0.05). However, when we used ukb-b-13537 as exposure group, hypertension didn’t increase the risk of KSD (, P>0.05). All the heterogeneity test results in the bidirectional MR analysis between KSD and hypertension were with P>0.05.
Figure 3

Mendelian randomization study of the bidirectional effect between KSD and hypertension. (A,B) Forest plots were presented for the MR effect size for KSD-ukb-b-8297 (A), and KSD-ukb-b-13537 (B) on hypertension. The results showed that KSD didn’t affect the outcome of hypertension (P>0.05). (C,D) Forest plots were presented for the MR effect size for hypertension on KSD-ukb-b-8297 (C) and KSD-ukb-b-13537 (D). The results showed that hypertension could increase the risk of KSD by using IVW method (C, OR: 1.001; SE=±1.00, P=0.003) when we used ukb-b-8297 as exposure group. However, when we used ukb-b-13537 as exposure group, hypertension didn’t increased the risk of KSD (D, P>0.05). For the forest plots, red points showing the combined causal estimate using all SNPs together in a single instrument, using each of two different methods [inverse-variance weighted (IVW) and MR-Egger]. Horizontal lines denote 95% confidence intervals.

Mendelian randomization study of the bidirectional effect between KSD and hypertension. (A,B) Forest plots were presented for the MR effect size for KSD-ukb-b-8297 (A), and KSD-ukb-b-13537 (B) on hypertension. The results showed that KSD didn’t affect the outcome of hypertension (P>0.05). (C,D) Forest plots were presented for the MR effect size for hypertension on KSD-ukb-b-8297 (C) and KSD-ukb-b-13537 (D). The results showed that hypertension could increase the risk of KSD by using IVW method (C, OR: 1.001; SE=±1.00, P=0.003) when we used ukb-b-8297 as exposure group. However, when we used ukb-b-13537 as exposure group, hypertension didn’t increased the risk of KSD (D, P>0.05). For the forest plots, red points showing the combined causal estimate using all SNPs together in a single instrument, using each of two different methods [inverse-variance weighted (IVW) and MR-Egger]. Horizontal lines denote 95% confidence intervals. In conclusion, hypertension increases the risk of KSD, but KSD didn’t affect the outcome of hypertension.

Discussion

In this MR-based bidirectional causality study, we detected the causality between KSD and cardiovascular events, including coronary atherosclerosis, hypertension, and cardiomyopathy. We found that KSD was associated with higher coronary atherosclerosis and cardiomyopathy risks, and hypertension was associated with a higher KSD risk. In the bidirectional MR analysis between KSD and cardiovascular events, all the heterogeneity test results were with P>0.05, and no detected pleiotropy bias was detected (P>0.05). Based on a wide variety of sensitivity analyses to test the MR assumptions, our results showed an association between KSD and cardiovascular events are likely to be causal. Moreover, our findings are consistent with previous observational studies (7-9,17,18). Lots of observational studies proved that KSD and cardiovascular diseases commonly coexisted. But the causality between these phenotypes couldn’t be known from these studies. The main benefit of MR studies is to avoid the common biases in the conventional observational literature (19). Based on these, we thought our findings were useful for patient care. We recommend that if patients with KSD, regular image logical examinations were suggested to monitor the probable risk of coronary atherosclerosis and cardiomyopathy. Meanwhile, for patients with hypertension, KSD was also need to be noticed in patient care. In the year of 1976, Elmfeldt et al. first reported an association between KSD and cardiovascular events (20). However, this cross-sectional study had only included 299 males and adjusted for age. Subsequently, more and more studies observed the association. In our study, we focused on three common cardiovascular events: coronary atherosclerosis, hypertension, and coronary atherosclerosis. Our study first confirmed the causality between these three clinical phenotypes and KSD. For hypertension and KSD, although several studies presented an increased risk of hypertension with KSD (21-23), our MR study showed that patients with KSD didn’t get a higher risk of hypertension (P>0.05). This maybe because certain types of stones are associated with different comorbidities. Nevertheless, hypertension might be one independent cause of kidney stone formation (OR: 1.001; SE=±1.00, P=0.003). Cupisti and colleagues believed that the relationship between hypertension and KSD had similar pathophysiological mechanisms to insulin resistance in diabetes (24). KSD is generally recognized as a systemic disease indicating an adverse metabolic environment (4). Therefore, hypertension which was a systematic disease could contribute to kidney stone formation. In addition, hypercalciuria, which is usually described in hypertension, can increase the urinary calcium excretion and may cause the formation of calcium kidney stones (24-26). However, it was worth mentioning that in our recent study, we only observed that hypertension could increase the risk of KSD when we used ukb-b-8297 as an exposure group based on an OR of 1.001. When we used ukb-b-13537 as an exposure group, hypertension didn’t increase the risk of KSD (P>0.05). Based on these results, we thought that the observed statistical and clinical significance was not remarkable. More independent analysis need to be performed to validate the findings in future studies. In addition, through the bidirectional MR study, we confirmed that KSD was associated with a higher coronary atherosclerosis (P for MR-Egger =0.024) and cardiomyopathy (P for IVW=0.045 for finn-a-I9_CARDMYO group, and P for IVW=0.041 for finn-a-I9_CARDMYOOTH group) risk. Of course, we need to pay attention to the that we only observed the significance between KSD and cardiomyopathy when we used ukb-b-13537 as an exposure group. We thought the source of samples in the two groups (ukb-b-13537 and ukb-b-8297) were different which cause to the different results. Some studies thought that patients with kidney stones have an increased pulse-wave velocity, arterial stiffness and vascular calcifications (27,28). These factors were associated with cardiovascular events such as coronary atherosclerosis. Furthermore, most kidney stones are composed of calcium oxalate, which can accumulate in all tissues, including the heart, and even lead to heart tissues damage in some reported cases (29,30). In these above cases, patients with Primary hyperoxaluria, a rare disease with a genetic disorder characterized by increased urinary excretion of calcium oxalate, accompanied by cardiomyopathy. Our study presented that other types of kidney stones could also increase the risk of cardiomyopathy. There is a limitation with the present study. First, we didn’t find appropriate data to verify our results in other populations such as Asians. Second, the effect on hypertension for KSD, and on KSD for coronary atherosclerosis were validated in only one group. Third, for KSD, we checked the population information carefully, and unfortunately, we found that these KSD patients were only with a diagnosis of kidney stone/ureter stone/bladder stone without the specific type of stone. Therefore, we could not confirm the specific type of KSD which could increase the risk of coronary atherosclerosis and cardiomyopathy. Based on these, we will collect another independent population to validate the findings in the future studies. In conclusions, we confirmed KSD may trigger causal pathological processes including coronary atherosclerosis and cardiomyopathy. Furthermore, hypertension may causally affect KSD. Through a bidirectional MR study based on GWAS data, we attempted to discuss and reveal the causality between KSD and common cardiovascular events. Furthermore, these results proved that KSD play a crucial role to affect the pathology process of cardiovascular events. The article’s supplementary files as
  29 in total

1.  'Mendelian randomization': can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease?

Authors:  George Davey Smith; Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Kidney stone disease and risk factors for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Satoshi Hamano; Hiroomi Nakatsu; Noriyuki Suzuki; Susumu Tomioka; Masashi Tanaka; Shino Murakami
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.369

3.  Essential arterial hypertension and stone disease.

Authors:  L Borghi; T Meschi; A Guerra; A Briganti; T Schianchi; F Allegri; A Novarini
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Kidney stones associate with increased risk for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Andrew D Rule; Veronique L Roger; L Joseph Melton; Eric J Bergstralh; Xujian Li; Patricia A Peyser; Amy E Krambeck; John C Lieske
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Kidney stones and cardiovascular events: a cohort study.

Authors:  R Todd Alexander; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Natasha Wiebe; Aminu Bello; Susan Samuel; Scott W Klarenbach; Gary C Curhan; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones.

Authors:  Eric N Taylor; Meir J Stampfer; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Diabetes mellitus and the risk of nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Eric N Taylor; Meir J Stampfer; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 8.  Nephrolithiasis and hypertension: possible links and clinical implications.

Authors:  Adamasco Cupisti; Claudia D'Alessandro; Sara Samoni; Mario Meola; Maria Francesca Egidi
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 9.  Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  George Davey Smith; Gibran Hemani
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Circulating vitamin D concentration and risk of seven cancers: Mendelian randomisation study.

Authors:  Vasiliki I Dimitrakopoulou; Konstantinos K Tsilidis; Philip C Haycock; Niki L Dimou; Kawthar Al-Dabhani; Richard M Martin; Sarah J Lewis; Marc J Gunter; Alison Mondul; Irene M Shui; Evropi Theodoratou; Katharina Nimptsch; Sara Lindström; Demetrius Albanes; Tilman Kühn; Timothy J Key; Ruth C Travis; Karani Santhanakrishnan Vimaleswaran; Peter Kraft; Brandon L Pierce; Joellen M Schildkraut
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-10-31
View more
  1 in total

1.  Sex disparities and the risk of urolithiasis: a large cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jin-Zhou Xu; Cong Li; Qi-Dong Xia; Jun-Lin Lu; Zheng-Ce Wan; Liu Hu; Yong-Man Lv; Xiao-Mei Lei; Wei Guan; Yang Xun; Shao-Gang Wang
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.