Sebastian Freilinger1, Dario Andric1,2, Caroline Andonian1,3, Jürgen Beckmann3,4,5, Christa Bongarth6, Hans Peter Einwang6, Peter Ewert1, Michael Hofbeck7, Ann-Sophie Kaemmerer1, Nicole Nagdyman1, Renate Oberhoffer8, Yskert von Kodolitsch2, Harald Kaemmerer1, Rhoia Neidenbach1. 1. Department of Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology, German Heart Centre Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. 2. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 3. Chair of Sportpsychology, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 4. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Australia. 5. Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Ireland. 6. Klinik Höhenried, Höhenried, Germany. 7. Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany. 8. Department of Preventive Paediatrics, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The number of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is steadily increasing. Over their life-time, many of the affected patients require medical rehabilitation after interventional or surgical treatment of residua, sequels or complications of their congenital heart defect (CHD). However, up to now only scarce data exist about indication, performance and outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation in ACHD. METHODS: The course and outcome of rehabilitation after previous interventional or surgical treatment in ACHD was analyzed in a retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: Two hundred and five ACHD {54% female; mean age 34±12 [16-68] years} with mild (23.9%), moderate (35.1%) or severe CHD (41.0%), of whom 32% had complex CHD, 21% right-ventricular outflow tract obstructions, 20% pre-tricuspid shunts, 18% left heart or aortic anomalies, 9% post-tricuspid shunts and 2% other congenital cardiac anomalies were included into analysis. The main indications for rehabilitation were a preceding surgical (92%) or interventional (3%) treatment of the underlying CHD immediately before rehabilitation. During rehabilitation, no severe complications occurred. The number of patients in function class I/II increased from 189 to 200 and decreased in class III/IV from 16 to 5. Cardiac medication could be reduced or stopped after rehabilitation in 194 patients, with the exception of ACE-inhibitors. There was an improvement in cardiovascular risk factors. While before medical treatment 77% (n=157) patients were capable of working, the number increased to 82% [168] at the end of rehabilitation. Throughout a follow-up 9.3% (n=19) of patients needed further cardiac interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provided for the first time comprehensive data on the course of rehabilitation in a large cohort of ACHD after surgical or interventional treatment. The overall outcome of ACHD after rehabilitation was uneventful and favorable. Further research is required to assess the clinical long-term outcome, the impact of rehabilitation on the quality of life, disease coping and employment. The results of this study can serve as a benchmark for the development of specific rehabilitation programs in ACHD. 2021 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The number of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is steadily increasing. Over their life-time, many of the affected patients require medical rehabilitation after interventional or surgical treatment of residua, sequels or complications of their congenital heart defect (CHD). However, up to now only scarce data exist about indication, performance and outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation in ACHD. METHODS: The course and outcome of rehabilitation after previous interventional or surgical treatment in ACHD was analyzed in a retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: Two hundred and five ACHD {54% female; mean age 34±12 [16-68] years} with mild (23.9%), moderate (35.1%) or severe CHD (41.0%), of whom 32% had complex CHD, 21% right-ventricular outflow tract obstructions, 20% pre-tricuspid shunts, 18% left heart or aortic anomalies, 9% post-tricuspid shunts and 2% other congenital cardiac anomalies were included into analysis. The main indications for rehabilitation were a preceding surgical (92%) or interventional (3%) treatment of the underlying CHD immediately before rehabilitation. During rehabilitation, no severe complications occurred. The number of patients in function class I/II increased from 189 to 200 and decreased in class III/IV from 16 to 5. Cardiac medication could be reduced or stopped after rehabilitation in 194 patients, with the exception of ACE-inhibitors. There was an improvement in cardiovascular risk factors. While before medical treatment 77% (n=157) patients were capable of working, the number increased to 82% [168] at the end of rehabilitation. Throughout a follow-up 9.3% (n=19) of patients needed further cardiac interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provided for the first time comprehensive data on the course of rehabilitation in a large cohort of ACHD after surgical or interventional treatment. The overall outcome of ACHD after rehabilitation was uneventful and favorable. Further research is required to assess the clinical long-term outcome, the impact of rehabilitation on the quality of life, disease coping and employment. The results of this study can serve as a benchmark for the development of specific rehabilitation programs in ACHD. 2021 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD); medical health supply; prevention; primary health care; supply characteristics in congenital heart defects
Authors: Dieter Horstkotte; Ferenc Follath; Erno Gutschik; Maria Lengyel; Ali Oto; Alain Pavie; Jordi Soler-Soler; Gaetano Thiene; Alexander von Graevenitz; Silvia G Priori; Maria Angeles Alonso Garcia; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Andrzej Budaj; Martin Cowie; Veronica Dean; Jaap Deckers; Enrique Fernández Burgos; John Lekakis; Bertil Lindahl; Gianfranco Mazzotta; João Morais; Ali Oto; Otto A Smiseth; John Lekakis; Alec Vahanian; François Delahaye; Alexander Parkhomenko; Gerasimos Filipatos; Jan Aldershvile; Panos Vardas Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Rhoia Neidenbach; Harald Kaemmerer; Lars Pieper; Peter Ewert; Jörg Schelling Journal: Dtsch Med Wochenschr Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 0.628
Authors: JoAnn Lindenfeld; Karin Keller; David N Campbell; Robert R Wolfe; Robert A Quaife Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Piotr Ponikowski; Adriaan A Voors; Stefan D Anker; Héctor Bueno; John G F Cleland; Andrew J S Coats; Volkmar Falk; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Ewa A Jankowska; Mariell Jessup; Cecilia Linde; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John T Parissis; Burkert Pieske; Jillian P Riley; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Luis M Ruilope; Frank Ruschitzka; Frans H Rutten; Peter van der Meer Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 29.983