Senescence marker protein 30 inhibits tumor growth by reducing HDAC4 expression in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Senescence marker protein 30 (SMP30), which plays a pivotal role as a suppressor protein in cell proliferation, among other regulatory actions, is a marker of aging that shows decreased expression during senescence. Decreased SMP30 has been identified in several human cancers, but its expression and role in human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain unclear.
METHODS: Using tumor tissue and matched adjacent normal tissue from 341 patients with resected NSCLC, we assessed SMP30 expression using immunohistochemical methods. The relationship between SMP30 expression and clinicopathologic characteristics was investigated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate analysis. Cell viability assay, colony formation assay, EdU incorporation assay and in vivo tumor xenograft models were also performed to investigate NSCLC cell proliferation using A549 and H1299 cell lines. Recombinant lentivirus-meditated in vivo gene overexpression and Western blot were performed to clarify the underlying molecular mechanism of SMP30 inhibiting NSCLC proliferation.
RESULTS: SMP30 expression was frequently downregulated in NSCLC tissue, as compared with adjacent non-tumor tissue. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses revealed NSCLC patients with low SMP30 expression had a significantly worse overall survival (OS), with median OS of 18 vs. 67 months in high SMP30 expression group. SMP30 overexpression significantly inhibited A549 and H1299 cell proliferation both in vitro and in tumor xenografts and downregulated the expression of c-Myc and CyclinD1 protein. Moreover, Western blot analyses confirmed that SMP30 overexpression significantly inhibited the histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) level in NSCLC cells, and HDAC4 overexpression reversed SMP30-mediated NSCLC repression both in vitro and in vivo.
CONCLUSIONS: SMP30 inhibited NSCLC proliferation by reducing HDAC4 expression, and SMP30 and HDAC4 may serve as new prognostic biomarkers and future therapeutic targets for NSCLC. 2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Introduction

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), mainly consisting of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), is the predominant type, accounting for approximately 85% (1). Despite great progress in therapeutic regimens, including surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, and targeted biological agents, the prognosis of NSCLC patients remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 26% (2,3). Clearly, there is a desperate need of novel diagnostic and therapeutic targets that can promote better evaluation of prognosis and optimization of treatments for individual NSCLC patients. Recent studies reported that senescence marker protein 30 (SMP30), a calcium-binding protein, may function as a tumor suppressor against tumor development and progression (4,5).

SMP30, also known as regucalcin, shows decreased expression during senescence and is a marker of aging (6). SMP30 was reported to be associated with aging and partial loss of hepatology function (7) and is involved in the regulation of intracellular Ca2+ levels, modulation of several cellular signaling pathways, and has antioxidant properties (8). Decreased levels of SMP30 leads to increased generation of reactive oxygen species, regarded as the most influential factor causing senescence (9). SMP30 has a protective action against oxidative damage through modulation of the activity of enzymes involved in generation of oxidative stress, as well as in antioxidant defense (9).

SMP30 plays a pivotal role as a suppressor protein in cell proliferation (4,5). It has been demonstrated that SMP30 overexpression (OE) suppressed cell proliferation via decreasing DNA synthesis (10-12). Additionally, OE of SMP30 upregulated p53 and p21, while downregulating the mRNA expression of c-Myc and H-ras, suggesting that SMP30 inhibits cell proliferation by modulating the expression of pro-oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (13,14). The expression of c-Jun and chk2 cell-cycle regulators was decreased in SMP30-transfected NRK52e cells (11). Interestingly, accumulating evidence demonstrates that suppression of SMP30 expression is involved in carcinogenesis (4,15,16). Decreased SMP30 expression has been found in several human cancers, such as pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, and liver cancer (5,17,18). Moreover, low SMP30 level was also associated with poor prognosis in these cancers (5,16). However, SMP30 expression and its role in NSCLC are still unknown.

HDAC4 is a member of the class IIa HDAC family and is associated with a wide range of cellular and epigenetic processes as a transcriptional corepressor, similar to other members of the family (HDAC5, HDAC7, HDAC9) (19). It was reported that the OE of HDAC4 promotes proliferation, metastasis and invasion of gastric cancer (20), esophageal carcinoma (21) and glioma (22). Moreover, elevated HDAC4 expression also correlated with poor prognosis (21,23,24). HDAC4 was also reported to promote progression of lung cancer by regulating epithelial mesenchymal transition, autophagy and apoptosis (25,26). Additionally, HDAC inhibitors were reported to exert growth arrest and apoptosis effect on tumor cells (27) and several HDAC inhibitors were used in NSCLC (28,29). However, the oncostatic actions of HDAC4 and its detailed underlying molecular mechanisms in NSCLC remain largely unclear.

In the current study, we built the SMP30 OE NSCLC cell lines to investigate the actions of SMP30 on NSCLC proliferation both in vitro and in vivo. Western blot results revealed that SMP30 OE dramatically affected HDAC4 expression. Then we evaluated the role of HDAC4 in SMP30-mediated tumor proliferation. Furthermore, the expression of SMP30 in 341 paired human NSCLC tissues and its correlation with related clinicopathologic features and survival were analyzed. We also analyzed whether the expressions of SMP30 could serve as predictive marker for prognosis of NSCLC patients. We present the following article in accordance with the ARRIVE reporting checklist (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-21-982).

Methods

Database-mining

To evaluate the expression of SMP30 in NSCLC tissue and paired normal tissue, data from Oncomine database (https://www.oncomine.org/, Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array, Reporter ID: 210751_s_at) were analyzed. Correlation analysis of SMP30 expression and clinicopathologic parameters was also performed. Moreover, we also analyzed the associations between SMP30 expression and NSCLC patient prognosis using data from Kaplan-Meier plotter database (https://kmplot.com/, use earlier release of the database: all 2015 version, n=2,437) and The Human Protein Atlas database (the RNA-seq data based on The Cancer Genome Atlas, http://www.proteinatlas.org/).

NSCLC tissue samples and tissue microarray immunohistochemistry (IHC)

We included 341 patients who underwent NSCLC surgery at Tangdu Hospital between May 2009 and December 2013 in this retrospective study. Among them, 152 patients were of early clinical stage (stage I/II) and 189 patients were of late clinical stage (stage III/IV). None of the patients had received radiotherapy or chemotherapy before surgery, and the final follow-up was updated until death or December 2018, whichever came first. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fourth Military Medical University (No. TDLL-202110-03) and informed consents were not required for this retrospective study. Using paraffin-embedded tissue microarray containing 341 pairs NSCLC and matched adjacent normal lung tissues, IHC staining was conducted using the primary antibodies of anti-SMP30 (1:50, 17947-1-AP, Proteintech), and standard protocols were followed as previously described (30).

The IHC staining score was based on two criteria: (I) percentage of positive cells (0, ≤5%; 1, 6–25%; 2, 26–50%; 3, 51–75%; and 4, >75%); (II) staining intensity (0, negative; 1, yellow; 2, brown; and 3, tan). The two scores were multiplied to produce the total score and the median score was used to divide the NSCLC samples into those with low and high SMP30 expression.

Cell culture and lentivirus (LV) infection

Human NSCLC A549 (ATCC Cat# CRM-CCL-185, RRID: CVCL_0023) and H1299 (ATCC Cat# CRL-5803, RRID: CVCL_0060) cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, VA, USA) in January 2018, and the A549 and H1299 cells were authenticated by the ATCC upon purchase (5 months prior to experimental research) using morphology, karyotyping, and PCR based approaches to profile the cytochrome C oxidase I gene (COI analysis) and short tandem repeat to confirm the identity of human cell lines and to rule out both intra- and interspecies contamination (see ATCC website https://www.atcc.org/CellAuthenticationMatters.aspx). Cells were cultured in DMEM with high glucose (Gibco, NY, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), penicillin-streptomycin solution (100 units/mL; Solarbio, Beijing, China). SMP30, HDAC4 and paired empty vector LVs were purchased from Genechem (Shanghai, China). LV infection of A549 and H1299 cells was performed according to the Genechem protocols. Next, SMP30 and HDAC4 OE cells or negative controls (NCs) were selected with puromycin.

Cell viability assay

The A549 and H1299 cell viability assay used the CCK-8 kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (7Sea, Shanghai, China). Optical density values were measured at 450 nm through a microplate reader (SpectraMax 190, Molecular Device, USA).

Colony formation assay

A total of 500 A549 and H1299 cells were seeded and cultured in 6-well plates for 12–14 days, after which the plates were photographed and colonies containing >50 cells were counted after staining with 0.1% crystal violet.

5-Ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation assay

Cell proliferation was assessed by EdU incorporation assay. A BeyoClick EdU Cell proliferation kit with Alexa Fluor 594 (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were imaged by Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). EdU-positive cells were manually counted and expressed as the percentage of cells calculated from nuclear labeling with Hoechst 33342.

In vivo tumor xenograft models

Animal experiments were performed under a project license (No. IACUC-20210609) granted by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Fourth Military Medical University, in compliance with the institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals. A protocol was prepared before the study without registration. For each part, 5 athymic nude mice (male, 4–6 weeks, 18–20 g) were obtained from the university’s Laboratory Animal Center. They were housed singly under the conditions of 12 h light/12 h dark cycle, 65–75 °F (18–23 °C) and 40–60% humidity with adequate food and water. The left and right flanks of 5 nude mice (male, 4–6 weeks, 18–20 g) were subcutaneously inoculated with LV-control and LV-SMP30 cells separately while another 5 mice received LV-SMP30 + LV-HDAC4 and LV-SMP30 + LV-control cells, respectively. Different groups of 5×106 H1299 cells were separately inoculated subcutaneously into the right or left flank of 6-week-old male nude mice for in vivo tumor xenograft assay. The tumor size and body weight were assessed every 3 days (the longer diameter of the tumor should not be >20 mm). Twenty-one to Twenty-eight days after injection, the animals were anesthetized and the tumors were excised for additional analysis before the humane death of the animal. After photographing and weighing the tumor, part of each sample was fixed in formalin, and another part was prepared for further analysis.

Western blot

Western blot was performed as previously described (31). Antibodies against SMP30 (1:1,000, 17947-1-AP, Proteintech), against HDAC4 (1:1,000, Proteintech Cat# 17449-1-AP, RRID: AB_2118864), anti-CyclinD1 (1:1,000, 60186-1-Ap, Proteintech), anti-c-Myc (1:1,000, #5605, CST) anti-β-actin (1:5,000, ab6276, Abcam), and anti-tubulin (1:1,000, #2148, CST) were used. The 1:5,000 dilution of horseradish-peroxidase-linked anti-mouse or rabbit IgG was used as the secondary antibody (Zhongshan Company, Beijing, China).

Cell treatment

The pan-HDAC inhibitor vorinostat (SAHA), and the specific class IIa inhibitor TMP269, were obtained from MedChemExpress and prior to the experiment were prepared in DMSO and diluted in culture media immediately. One day after seeding onto culture dish, normal cells and HDAC4 overexpressing cells were divided into four groups: (I) control group; (II) 0.625 µM SAHA/20 µM TMP269 group; (III) 1.25 µM SAHA/40 µM TMP269 group; (IV) 2.5 µM SAHA/60 µM TMP269 group. After the above treatments for 48 h, cells were analyzed.

Statistical analysis

Data analyses were carried out with SPSS 23.0 (SPSS Inc., IL, USA) software. The relationships between SMP30 expression and the clinicopathologic parameters of the NSCLC patients were evaluated by χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Survival analyses were examined by Kaplan-Meier method, then compared with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were conducted using Cox hazards regression models. Results were compared between groups by Student’s t-test. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Expression of SMP30 in NSCLC patients

To investigate the expression of SMP30 in NSCLC, we initially conducted database-mining to compare the gene expression profiles of SMP30 between normal lung and cancer tissues. Oncomine database (https://www.oncomine.org/) analysis revealed that the SMP30 mRNA level was significantly lower in various cancer types compared with normal tissues, but especially in lung cancer (Figure S1A). Results showed that SMP30 mRNA levels in NSCLC, including large-cell lung carcinoma, LUAD and LUSC, were significantly decreased compared with normal lung tissue samples (Figure S1B). To further validate the SMP30 expression in NSCLC tissues, we performed IHC analysis to detect the SMP30 level in a tissue microarray containing 341 paired tumor-normal lung tissues () and it was clearly lower in NSCLC than in adjacent noncancerous lung samples ().

Figure 1

Correlation of low SMP30 level with worse overall survival in NSCLC patients. (A) Representative immunohistochemical (IHC) images for SMP30 expression in NSCLC (lung squamous cell carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma) and adjacent noncancerous tissues. Scale bar, 200 and 20 µm (inset) respectively. (B) Statistical analysis of SMP30 expression in tumor tissue and adjacent noncancerous tissue of 341 NSCLC patients through IHC staining. (C-F) Kaplan-Meier survival analyses of high/low SMP30 expression based on tissue microarray IHC results for 341 NSCLC patients (C), 1,926 NSCLC patients in the Kaplan-Meier plotter database (D), 1,014 NSCLC patients from The Human Protein Atlas (original RNA-seq data from TCGA) (E), 152 NSCLC patients in the early clinical stages, and 189 NSCLC patients in the late clinical stages (F). (G) Statistical analysis of SMP30 expression in different clinical stages and T classifications of 341 NSCLC patients through IHC staining. SMP30, senescence marker protein 30; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.

In order to characterize the roles of SMP30 in NSCLC, we analyzed whether its expression was associated with clinicopathologic variables (). Of the 341 samples, 133 had a score of 0 while two samples had a score of 12. The median score for the entire cohort was 2. On univariate analysis, SMP30 expression was significantly associated with tumor size, tumor invasion, lymphatic metastasis, distant metastasis, cancer differentiation and clinical stage respectively (). These results indicated that abnormal SMP30 expression was involved in NSCLC progression.

Table 1

Association of SMP30 expression with clinicopathologic parameters of patients with NSCLC

Parameter	N	SMP30 expression
		Low	High	P value
Age, years				0.911
<60	153	88	65
≥60	188	107	81
Sex				0.503
Male	272	158	114
Female	69	37	32
Tumor location				0.803
Left lung	142	89	53
Right lung	199	106	93
Tumor size, cm				0.003
<5	124	58	66
≥5	217	137	80
T classification				0.001
T1	6	3	3
T2	130	62	68
T3	127	71	56
T4	78	59	19
Lymph node metastases				<0.001
N0	156	72	84
N1–N3	185	123	62
Metastasis				0.022
No	330	185	145
Yes	11	10	1
Differentiation				<0.001
Well and moderate	235	108	127
Poorly and not	106	87	19
Clinical stage				<0.001
I	48	12	36
II	104	46	58
III	178	127	51
IV	11	10	1

SMP30, senescence marker protein 30; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.

Correlation of SMP30 expression and NSCLC prognosis and survival

We analyzed the association between SMP30 expression and NSCLC patient prognosis using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test for significance estimates. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that NSCLC patients with low SMP30 expression were associated with worse overall survival (OS) (log-rank P<0.001, ). Consistently, the Kaplan-Meier plotter database (https://kmplot.com/) survival analysis based on 1,926 NSCLC cases suggested that a low SMP30 level was significantly correlated with poor prognosis [hazard ratio (HR) =0.58, log-rank P<0.001, ]. Furthermore, we analyzed the survival of 1,014 NSCLC cases through The Human Protein Atlas database (the RNA-seq data based on The Cancer Genome Atlas, https://www.proteinatlas.org/), and verified that low SMP30 level was related to poor prognosis (). Interestingly, we found that NSCLC patients with low SMP30 expression had worse OS when the patients were analyzed based on stage at diagnosis. This was evident in both early stage (stage I/II) and more advanced stage (stage III/IV) (P<0.001, ). Our results also indicated that NSCLC patients with larger tumors (T3/T4) and high clinical stage (stage III/IV) had lower expression of SMP30 than those with smaller tumor invasion (T1/T2) and low clinical stage (stage I/II) (P<0.001, ).

To further assess whether SMP30 expression represents a prognostic factor for patients with NSCLC, we performed Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of the patients’ OS. Univariate analysis showed that low SMP30 expression negatively correlated with NSCLC survival (). In the multivariate survival analysis, when other risk factors such as tumor invasion, lymphatic invasion, distant metastasis, cancer differentiation, and clinical stage were taken in consideration, the SMP30 expression was still associated with a lower risk of death 0.383 (95% CI: 0.282–0.518, P<0.001).

Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the correlation between clinicopathological variables for survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Variable	Category	Univariate analysis				Multivariate analysis
		HR	95% CI	P value		HR	95% CI	P value
Age	<60/≥60 years	1.171	0.919–1.491	0.201		–	–	–
Sex	Male/female	1.067	0.789–1.442	0.675		–	–	–
Tumor location	Left lung/right lung	0.879	0.689–1.121	0.299		–	–	–
T classification	I–II/III–IV	2.002	1.552–2.584	<0.001		1.393	1.005–1.930	0.046
Lymphatic invasion	Yes/no	1.740	1.359–2.229	<0.001		0.991	0.714–1.377	0.959
Distant metastasis	Yes/no	2.425	1.323–4.445	0.004		1.171	0.537–2.553	0.692
Differentiation	Well and moderate/poorly and not	5.150	3.913–6.777	<0.001		3.272	2.452–4.365	<0.001
Clinical stage	I/II/III/IV	1.549	1.332–1.800	<0.001		1.378	1.018–1.867	0.038
SMP30 expression	Low/high	0.263	0.201–0346	<0.001		0.383	0.282–0.518	<0.001

Low SMP30 level and poor prognosis in both LUAD and LUSC patients

We further studied the prognostic role of SMP30 expression in LUAD and LUSC patients. The Kaplan-Meier plotter database survival analysis including 719 LUAD cases indicated that low SMP30 expression in LUAD patients was significantly associated with poor prognosis (HR =0.44, log-rank P<0.001, ). Analysis of SMP30 expression in 131 LUAD patients in our cohort, verified that low SMP30 level significantly correlated with worse OS, with median OS in low SMP30 expression group and high SMP30 expression group was 22 and 47 months respectively (log-rank P<0.001, ). Moreover, we found the prognosis of LUAD patients with low SMP30 expression was worse in both early clinical stage (stage I/II) (median OS of 31 vs. 103 months) and late clinical stage (stage III/IV) (median OS of 13 vs. 39 months) subgroups (log-rank P<0.05, ).

Figure 2

Correlation of low SMP30 level with worse overall survival in both LUAD and LUSC patients. (A,E) Kaplan-Meier survival analyses of high/low SMP30 expression in 719 LUAD patients and 524 LUSC patients, respectively, based on the Kaplan-Meier plotter database. (B-D,F-H) Kaplan-Meier survival analyses of high/low SMP30 expression in 131 LUAD patients and 210 LUSC patients based on the tissue microarray immunohistochemical results. SMP30, senescence marker protein 30; HR, hazard ratio; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Interestingly, the Kaplan-Meier plotter database showed no significance between SMP30 expression and LUSC patients’ OS (HR =0.95, log-rank P=0.67) (), but our Kaplan-Meier survival analysis based on 210 LUSC patients showed that low SMP30 level was associated with poor prognosis (median OS of 13 vs. 103 months) (log-rank P<0.001, ). Furthermore, we found LUSC patients with low SMP30 expression had significantly worse OS in both the early and late clinical stage subgroups (log-rank P<0.001, ).

Effect of SMP30 OE on proliferation of NSCLC A549 and H1299 cells

To verify the potential antitumor actions of SMP30 in NSCLC, we first examined its expression in multiple NSCLC cell lines () and established stable SMP30 overexpressing A549 and H1299 cell lines through use of the SMP30 LV. SMP30 expression was confirmed by Western blot (). Subsequently, we performed cell viability and colony formation assays to evaluate the role of SMP30 in A549 and H1299 cell proliferation. Compared with the NC group, we found SMP30 OE significantly decreased the A549 and H1299 cell viability determined by CCK-8 analysis (P<0.05, ). This anti-proliferative effect was further validated by the colony formation assay, in which SMP30 OE significantly decreased the colony formation ability in A549 and H1299 cells (P<0.05, ). We also used the EdU incorporation assay to analyze the role of SMP30 on proliferation, and we found SMP30 OE remarkably decreased the EdU-positive cells compared with the NC group (P<0.05, ). To further validate the effect of SMP30 OE on inhibiting NSCLC cell proliferation, we established H1299 cell xenograft in athymic nude mice and measured their tumor volumes. We found that all nude mice developed subcutaneous tumors, but the tumor volume in SMP30 OE group was clearly reduced compared with NC group (). Aberrant activation or expression of c-Myc contributes to tumor progression. Western blot analyses showed that SMP30 OE inhibited the expression of c-Myc both in vitro and in vivo (). We further examined cell-cycle proteins with Western blot analysis and found that the level of CyclinD1 was dramatically decreased in the SMP30 overexpressing groups both in vivo and in vitro (). However, other cell cycle-related proteins did not significantly change in these cell lines (Figure S2A). Taken together, the results revealed that SMP30 had an antiproliferative action on NSCLC cells.

Figure 3

Effect of SMP30 overexpression on proliferative ability of A549 and H1299 cells, and tumor growth in H1299 cell tumor xenografts. (A) Relative protein levels of SMP30 in cell lines as determined by Western blot. β-actin was used as a loading control. (B) Representative Western blot results of Flag, SMP30, c-Myc and CyclinD1 in LV-SMP30 A549 and LV-SMP30 H1299 cells. (C) Growth curves of the A549 and H1299 cells. Cell viability was detected by CCK-8 assay and expressed as optical density values. (D) Representative images and results of the colony formation assay. Colonies were visualized by crystal violet staining. (E) Representative images (×20) and statistical analysis of EdU incorporation assay. The results are presented as the ratio between the number of EdU-positive cells (red fluorescence) and the total number of Hoechst 33342-stained cells (blue fluorescence). (F) Representative results of tumor weight changes after subcutaneous injection of H1299 cells. Photographs show tumor xenograft morphologies in the LV-control and LV-SMP30 H1299 groups. (G) Representative Western blot results of Flag, SMP30, c-Myc and CyclinD1 in H1299 xenograft tumor tissues. β-actin was used as a Western blot loading control. The values below the Western blot band represent the relative gray values. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD. Student’s t-test, *, P<0.05 vs. LV-control group. LV, lentivirus; SMP30, senescence marker protein 30.

Role of HDAC4 in SMP30-mediated NSCLC inhibition

To further explore the underlying mechanism of SMP30 OE on inhibiting NSCLC proliferation, we measured the level of HDAC family members in A549 and H1299 cells among the NC and SMP30 overexpressing groups. Our results showed that HDAC4 was downregulated after SMP30 OE both in vivo and in vitro () while other members showed no significant changes (, Figure S2B). To further explore the role of HDAC4 in NSCLC, we measured its levels in several NSCLC cell lines () and then established stable HDAC4 overexpressing A549 and H1299 cell lines using the HDAC4 LV, and HDAC4 expression was confirmed by Western blot (). Colony formation assay was performed to show that HDAC4 OE significantly increased colony formation ability of both cell lines (). These results were also confirmed by the EdU incorporation assay () and furthermore, Western blot results showed that the levels of c-Myc and CyclinD1 were elevated after HDAC4 OE in both the A549 and H1299 cell lines ().

Figure 4

Effect of HDAC4 level of SMP30 overexpression both in vivo and in vitro, and effect of HDAC4 overexpression on NSCLC cell proliferation. (A) Representative Western blot results of HDAC4, HDAC5, HDAC7 and HDAC9 in LV-SMP30 A549 and LV-SMP30 H1299 cells. (B) Representative Western blot results of HDAC4, HDAC5, HDAC7 and HDAC9 in H1299 xenograft tumor tissues. (C) Relative protein levels of HDAC4 in cell lines as determined by Western blot. (D) Representative Western blot results of Flag, HDAC4, c-Myc and CyclinD1 in LV-HDAC4 A549 and LV-HDAC4 H1299 cells. (E) Representative images and results of colony formation assay. Colonies were visualized by crystal violet staining. (F) Representative images (×20) and statistical analysis of EdU incorporation assay. The results are presented as the ratio between the number of EdU-positive cells (red fluorescence) and the total number of Hoechst 33342-stained cells (blue fluorescence). β-actin was used as a Western blot loading control. The values below the Western blot band represent the relative gray values. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD. Student’s t-test, *, P<0.05 vs. LV-control group. HDAC histone deacetylase; LV, lentivirus; SMP30, senescence marker protein 30; SD, standard deviation; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.

Involvement of HDAC4 in SMP30-mediated NSCLC suppression

To further confirm the involvement of HDAC4 in SMP30-mediated NSCLC repression, we upregulated HDAC4 by transfecting HDAC4 LV into SMP30 overexpressing H1299 cells. The OE of HDAC4 was verified by Western blot and had no effect on the levels of SMP30 protein (). HDAC4 OE markedly reversed SMP30 OE-induced c-Myc and CyclinD1 inhibition in NSCLC cells (). Moreover, we found HDAC4 OE partially reversed the repressed proliferative ability of H1299 cells overexpressing SMP30 (). These results were confirmed by the EdU incorporation assay (). Furthermore, the in vivo study showed that HDAC4 OE significantly increased the mean volume of tumors in the H1299 SMP30 overexpressed xenograft group (). Western blot analyses of subcutaneous tumors indicated that the OE of HDAC4 reversed the c-Myc and CyclinD1 inhibition both in vivo and in vitro (). Taken together, these results suggested that SMP30-mediated NSCLC inhibition can be reversed by HDAC4 upregulation.

Figure 5

Essential requirement for HDAC4 in SMP30-mediated NSCLC cell proliferation. (A) Representative Western blot results of Flag, SMP30, HDAC4 and c-Myc and CyclinD1. (B) Representative images and results of colony formation assay. Colonies were visualized by crystal violet staining. (C) Representative images (×20) and statistical analysis of EdU incorporation assay. The results are presented as the ratio between the number of EdU-positive cells (red fluorescence) and the total number of Hoechst 33342-stained cells (blue fluorescence). (D) Representative results for tumor weight changes after subcutaneous injection of H1299 cells. Photographs show tumor xenograft morphologies in the LV-SMP30 + LV-HDAC4 and LV-SMP30 + LV-control H1299 groups. (E) Representative Western blot results of SMP30, HDAC4, c-Myc and CyclinD1 in H1299 xenograft tumor tissues. β-actin was used as a Western blot loading control. The values below the Western blot band represent the relative gray values. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD. Student’s t-test, *, P<0.05 vs. the LV-SMP30 control group; #, P<0.05 vs. the LV-SMP30 group; &, P<0.05 vs. the LV-SMP30 control + LV-HDAC4 group. HDAC, histone deacetylase; LV, lentivirus; SMP30, senescence marker protein 30; SD, standard deviation; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.

Effect of pharmacological inhibition of HDAC4 on proliferative abilities of H1299 cells

To further confirm the role of HDAC4 in NSCLC, normal cells and HDAC4 overexpressing cells were incubated with the pan-inhibitor vorinostat (SAHA) and the specific class IIA inhibitor TMP269 respectively. Western blot results showed that, with increasing concentrations of SAHA and TMP269, the level of HDAC4 decreased (). Consistently, the levels of c-Myc and CyclinD1 were also decreased and the average expressions of HDAC4, c-Myc and CyclinD1 in the HDAC4 overexpressing groups were significantly higher than in the normal cell groups (). Moreover, the colony formation assay showed that as the level of HDAC4 decreased, the cells’ proliferative ability was inhibited (). These results were confirmed by the EdU incorporation assay ().

Figure 6

Effect of pharmacologic inhibition of HDAC4 on proliferative abilities of H1299 cells. LV-control and LV-HDAC4 H1299 cells were pretreated with SAHA or TMP269 for 48 h. (A,B) Representative Western blot results of HDAC4, c-Myc, and CyclinD1. (C,D) Representative images and results of colony formation assay. Colonies were visualized by crystal violet staining. (E,F) Representative images (×20) and statistical analysis of EdU incorporation assay. The results are presented as the ratio between the number of EdU-positive cells (red fluorescence) and the total number of Hoechst 33342-stained cells (blue fluorescence). *, P<0.05 vs. the LV-control +SAHA/TMP269 0 µM group; #, P<0.05 vs. the LV-control + SAHA1.25 µM/TMP269 40 µM group; &, P<0.05 vs. the LV-HDAC4 + SAHA/TMP269 0 µM group. HDAC, histone deacetylase; LV, lentivirus; SMP30, senescence marker protein 30.

Discussion

SMP30, a multifunctional protein, plays a pivotal role in cell homeostasis (4), through maintaining calcium homeostasis, inhibiting various signaling pathways involving various protein kinases and protein phosphatases, suppressing nuclear DNA and RNA synthesis, and preventing cell proliferation and apoptosis (16,32). Furthermore, downregulation of SMP30 during aging might contribute to the deterioration of cellular functions and interactivity. It is well known that cancer is more common with aging (33). Previous studies suggest that SMP30 is downregulated and exerts anticancer actions in human tumor tissues (15), but its oncostatic effects and detailed molecular mechanisms in NSCLC remain unclear. Consistent with previous research, our databases-mining results indicated that SMP30 mRNA levels were lower in NSCLC compared with normal lung tissues. Furthermore, that outcome was confirmed by our IHC analysis results based on tissue microarray containing 341 paired NSCLC tumor and normal samples. SMP30 expression negatively correlated with tumor size, tumor invasion, lymphatic metastasis, distant metastasis, cancer differentiation and clinical stage.

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to show a connection between SMP30 negativity and poor prognosis, and to indicate that SMP30 may be an independent prognostic factor for NSCLC patients. NSCLC patients, both LUAD and LUSC with low SMP30 expression had a significantly shorter OS time than those with high expression. Furthermore, we also found that NSCLC patients with low SMP30 expression had poor prognosis regardless of stage at diagnosis. Interestingly, the Kaplan-Meier plotter database showed that low SMP30 expression was a predictor of poor prognosis in LUAD but not in LUSC patients, but our analysis demonstrated that low SMP30 level was associated with the poor prognosis of both LUAD and LUSC patients. We supposed that the differences may be due to that the Kaplan-Meier plotter database was based on mRNA and the expression of SMP30 in our study was based on IHC, which may be more reliable.

Several studies report that SMP30 OE inhibited cell proliferation in pancreatic cancer (34), colorectal carcinoma (17), liver cancer (18), and breast cancer (5) in vitro. Those findings support the idea that SMP30 may play an important inhibitory role in human cancer cells and that downregulation of SMP30 expression may lead to carcinogenesis. We found SMP30 OE significantly inhibited the proliferative ability (cell viability and colony formation assays) of A549 and H1299 cells. Additionally, the suppression of tumor growth by SMP30 was further confirmed in a subcutaneous xenograft tumor nude mice model. Western blot analysis suggested that SMP30 OE downregulated the expression of HDAC4 both in vitro and in vivo.

HDAC4 is a member of the class IIa HDAC family and controls a complex cellular signaling cascade (19). It has diverse roles in cellular regulation, mainly including promoting chondrocyte differentiation (35), preventing neuronal death (36), promoting myocyte differentiation (37) and promoting the proliferation of satellite cells (38). Recently, numerous studies reported that OE of HDAC4 promoted cancer proliferation, invasion and metastasis via various signaling pathways, such as inhibition of p21 and/or p27 (20,22,24,39) or elevation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) (40). These results indicate that HDAC4 may act as a putative tumor promoter. In our study, the Western blot results showed that HDAC4 levels were significantly suppressed in SMP30 overexpressing A549 and H1299 cell lines. Previous studies showed that pharmacological inhibition of HDAC suppressed the levels of c-Myc and CyclinD1 (41,42). Similarly, in our study, HDAC4 OE in the A549 and H1299 cell lines increased the levels of c-Myc and CyclinD1, and pharmacologic inhibition of HDAC4 decreased both. Intriguingly, HDAC4 OE dramatically reversed the inhibition of SMP30 OE on cell proliferation both in vivo and in vitro but had no effect on the level of SMP30 expression.

Transcription factor c-Myc, product of gene MYC, correlates with tumor aggression and poor clinical outcome in a variety of tumors (43). CyclinD1, encoded by CCND1 gene in humans, is an important regulator of the cell-cycle G1/S transition (44). c-Myc and CyclinD1, which were often dysregulated and constitutively activated in human NSCLC, play important roles in many cancer types, suggesting that they may be key targets for treatment (45,46). Previous studies report that c-Myc increases the levels of CyclinD1, and further, activates CDK4 and CDK6, promoting G1-phase cell-cycle progression (47). In this study, SMP30 OE significantly inhibited the levels of c-Myc and CyclinD1 both in vivo and in vitro, and this was dramatically reversed by HDAC4 OE. These results indicated that SMP30 suppresses NSCLC proliferation via the HDAC4/c-Myc, CyclinD1 pathways.

In conclusion, we demonstrated for the first time that SMP30 functions as a novel tumor suppressor factor in NSCLC. The level of SMP30 expression was significantly decreased in NSCLC tumors and a low level strongly correlated with worse OS of patients. Our findings indicated that SMP30 inhibited the development and progression of NSCLC through inhibiting cell proliferation via inhibition of HDAC4 expression. Therefore, targeting SMP30 may be a novel therapeutic strategy for NSCLC.

There are some limitations to this study that should be noted. Firstly, SMP30 was reported to be decreased during senescence (6) while SMP30 expression showed no significant changes with aging in our cohort, which may be due to our small size of data and deserve more efforts. Secondly, in the two parts: involvement of HDAC4 in SMP30-mediated NSCLC suppression and effect of pharmacological inhibition of HDAC4, we used the H1299 cell line nor the combination of A549 and H1299 cell lines, which may affect the reliability of our study and will be our subsequent work.

The article’s supplementary files as