Lian Lian1, Xue-Fei Xu2, Xiao-Ming Shen1, Tie-Ao Huang2, Xian-Min Li1, Shu-Guang Han2, Chong Zhou3, You-You Xia4. 1. Department of Oncology, Suzhou Xiangcheng People's Hospital, Suzhou, China. 2. Department of General Surgery, Suzhou Xiangcheng People's Hospital, Suzhou, China. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang), Lianyungang, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the metastatic patterns and explored the prognostic value of distant metastasis pattern in patients with metastatic colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2015, newly diagnosed colorectal MC patients were selected using the SEER database. Patient prognosis was compared based on the clinicopathological parameters, treatment method, and the site and number of metastatic organs. Cox analyses were used to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS). A nomogram was built to predict the patient's survival. Harrell's concordance index (c-index) and calibration curves were used to analyze the discriminative ability of the prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of 3,088 patients diagnosed with colorectal MC, the liver was the only metastatic organ in 78.4% (997/1,271) of all liver metastasis cases, the lung was the only metastatic organ in 41.0% (164/400) of all lung metastasis cases, bone was the only metastatic organ in 26.6% (29/109) of all bone metastasis cases, and the brain was the only metastatic organ in 23.5% (4/17) of all brain metastasis cases. Compared with the untreated cases, those treated with chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy had better OS (P<0.001). There were marked OS differences (P<0.001) between patients with and without liver and bone metastases. Patients with bone metastasis had the best survival, while those with brain metastasis had the worst survival (P<0.001). Patients with one metastatic site had better prognosis compared to those with two or three (P<0.001). Patients with liver metastasis had the best survival, while those with bone and brain metastasis had the worst survival (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age <65 years, non-black race, grade I, N0 stage, chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, liver metastasis, and bone metastasis were independent prognostic factors. A nomogram was constructed to predict survival probability. The c-index value was up to 0.745. The calibration plot showed that the nomogram was clinically useful. CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic MC (mMC) patients had a characteristic distant metastasis pattern. This study constructed a new and sufficiently accurate prognostic model of mMC based on population-based data. These findings can be utilized to predict prognosis and guide mMC patient management. 2021 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the metastatic patterns and explored the prognostic value of distant metastasis pattern in patients with metastatic colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2015, newly diagnosed colorectal MC patients were selected using the SEER database. Patient prognosis was compared based on the clinicopathological parameters, treatment method, and the site and number of metastatic organs. Cox analyses were used to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS). A nomogram was built to predict the patient's survival. Harrell's concordance index (c-index) and calibration curves were used to analyze the discriminative ability of the prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of 3,088 patients diagnosed with colorectal MC, the liver was the only metastatic organ in 78.4% (997/1,271) of all liver metastasis cases, the lung was the only metastatic organ in 41.0% (164/400) of all lung metastasis cases, bone was the only metastatic organ in 26.6% (29/109) of all bone metastasis cases, and the brain was the only metastatic organ in 23.5% (4/17) of all brain metastasis cases. Compared with the untreated cases, those treated with chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy had better OS (P<0.001). There were marked OS differences (P<0.001) between patients with and without liver and bone metastases. Patients with bone metastasis had the best survival, while those with brain metastasis had the worst survival (P<0.001). Patients with one metastatic site had better prognosis compared to those with two or three (P<0.001). Patients with liver metastasis had the best survival, while those with bone and brain metastasis had the worst survival (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age <65 years, non-black race, grade I, N0 stage, chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, liver metastasis, and bone metastasis were independent prognostic factors. A nomogram was constructed to predict survival probability. The c-index value was up to 0.745. The calibration plot showed that the nomogram was clinically useful. CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic MC (mMC) patients had a characteristic distant metastasis pattern. This study constructed a new and sufficiently accurate prognostic model of mMC based on population-based data. These findings can be utilized to predict prognosis and guide mMC patient management. 2021 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Colorectal cancer (CRC); Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER); distant metastases; mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC); nomogram
Authors: Andrew J Page; Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Tiffany Zavadsky; Michael C Grant; Daniel J Galante; Elizabeth C Wick; Matthew Weiss; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wu; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Niamh McCawley; Cillian Clancy; Brian D P O'Neill; Joseph Deasy; Deborah A McNamara; John P Burke Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: N Hugen; R H A Verhoeven; S A Radema; I H J T de Hingh; J F M Pruijt; I D Nagtegaal; V E P P Lemmens; J H W de Wilt Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Claudia Ott; Michael Gerken; Daniela Hirsch; Petra Fest; Stefan Fichtner-Feigl; Stefan Munker; Elisabeth Schnoy; Christian Stroszczynski; Martin Vogelhuber; Wolfgang Herr; Matthias Evert; Michael Reng; Hans Jürgen Schlitt; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Andreas Teufel Journal: Digestion Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 3.216
Authors: E Van Cutsem; A Cervantes; R Adam; A Sobrero; J H Van Krieken; D Aderka; E Aranda Aguilar; A Bardelli; A Benson; G Bodoky; F Ciardiello; A D'Hoore; E Diaz-Rubio; J-Y Douillard; M Ducreux; A Falcone; A Grothey; T Gruenberger; K Haustermans; V Heinemann; P Hoff; C-H Köhne; R Labianca; P Laurent-Puig; B Ma; T Maughan; K Muro; N Normanno; P Österlund; W J G Oyen; D Papamichael; G Pentheroudakis; P Pfeiffer; T J Price; C Punt; J Ricke; A Roth; R Salazar; W Scheithauer; H J Schmoll; J Tabernero; J Taïeb; S Tejpar; H Wasan; T Yoshino; A Zaanan; D Arnold Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 32.976