| Literature DB >> 35070355 |
Wael Abdallah1,2, Malek Nassar1,2.
Abstract
AIM: To assess the accuracy of antenatal diagnosis of clubfoot (CF), risk factors and outcomes in postnatal. PATIENTS &Entities:
Keywords: clubfoot; diagnostic accuracy; fetal outcomes; prenatal diagnosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 35070355 PMCID: PMC8765115 DOI: 10.2144/fsoa-2021-0106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Future Sci OA ISSN: 2056-5623
Figure 1.Sonographic image of clubfoot.
The accuracy of the prenatal diagnosis of clubfoot in function of several maternal and fetal characteristics with p-value (A) and odds ratio (B).
| A | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Confirmed CF (56) | No CF (4) | p-value |
| Maternal age (year) | 31.68 ± 5.03 | 34 ± 2.16 | 0.12 |
| GA at US evaluation (week) | 22.35 ± 3.4 | 23.5 ± 2.6 | 0.45 |
| Unilateral | 17 (30.4%) | 3 (75%) | 0.06 |
| Bilateral | 39 (69.6%) | 1 (25%) | 0.06 |
| Isolated | 31 (55.4%) | 4 (100%) | 0.08 |
| Complex | 25 (44.6%) | 0 (0 %) | 0.08 |
| Female | 23 (41.1%) | 2 (50%) | 0.72 |
| Male | 33 (58.9%) | 2 (50%) | 0.72 |
| Breech | 16 (28.6%) | 1 (25%) | 0.75 |
| Cephalic | 34 (60.7%) | 3 (75%) | 0.75 |
| Transverse | 6 (10.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0.75 |
| Single pregnancy | 47 (83.9%) | 3 (75%) | 0.64 |
| Multiple pregnancy | 9 (16.1%) | 1 (25%) | 0.64 |
CF: Clubfoot; GA: Gestational age; OR: Odds ratio; US: Ultrasound.
The association between the outcomes of the pregnancy and different variables.
| Variable | Normal evolution (37) | Medical interruption (14) | Stillbirth (9) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consanguinity | 37 (100%) | 11 (78.6%) | 6 (66.7%) |
|
| No consanguinity | 0 (0%) | 3 (21.4%) | 3 (33.3%) | |
| Isolated | 33 (89.2%) | 1 (7.1%) | 1 (11.1%) |
|
| Complex | 4 (10.8%) | 13 (92.9 %) | 8 (88.9%) | |
| Unilateral | 18 (48.6%) | 1 (7.1%) | 1 (11.1%) |
|
| Bilateral | 19 (51.4%) | 13 (92.9%) | 8 (88.9%) |
p-values < 0.05 are considered to be statistically significant and are in boldface.