| Literature DB >> 35069951 |
Ping Li1, Peter E Highfield2, Zi-Qiang Lang1, Darren Kell2.
Abstract
Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) has been used as an adjunct to colposcopy for cervical cancer diagnosis for many years, Currently, the template match method is employed for EIS measurements analysis, where the measured EIS spectra are compared with the templates generated from three-dimensional finite element (FE) models of cancerous and non-cancerous cervical tissue, and the matches between the measured EIS spectra and the templates are then used to derive a score that indicates the association strength of the measured EIS to the High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HG CIN). These FE models can be viewed as the computational versions of the associated physical tissue models. In this paper, the problem is revisited with an objective to develop a new method for EIS data analysis that might reveal the relationship between the change in the tissue structure due to disease and the change in the measured spectrum. This could provide us with important information to understand the histopathological mechanism that underpins the EIS-based HG CIN diagnostic decision making and the prognostic value of EIS for cervical cancer diagnosis. A further objective is to develop an alternative EIS data processing method for HG CIN detection that does not rely on physical models of tissues so as to facilitate extending the EIS technique to new medical diagnostic applications where the template spectra are not available. An EIS data-driven method was developed in this paper to achieve the above objectives, where the EIS data analysis for cervical cancer diagnosis and prognosis were formulated as the classification problems and a Cole model-based spectrum curve fitting approach was proposed to extract features from EIS readings for classification. Machine learning techniques were then used to build classification models with the selected features for cervical cancer diagnosis and evaluation of the prognostic value of the measured EIS. The interpretable classification models were developed with real EIS data sets, which enable us to associate the changes in the observed EIS and the risk of being HG CIN or developing HG CIN with the changes in tissue structure due to disease. The developed classification models were used for HG CIN detection and evaluation of the prognostic value of EIS and the results demonstrated the effectiveness of the developed method. The method developed is of long-term benefit for EIS-based cervical cancer diagnosis and, in conjunction with standard colposcopy, there is the potential for the developed method to provide a more effective and efficient patient management strategy for clinic practice.Entities:
Keywords: Cole model; Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS); cervical cancer; classification; diagnosis; logistic regression; prognosis; spectrum curve fitting
Year: 2021 PMID: 35069951 PMCID: PMC8713385 DOI: 10.2478/joeb-2021-0018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Electr Bioimpedance ISSN: 1891-5469
Fig.1The ZedScan handset for making the EIS measurements used in this paper. The handset is shown placed on the base.
Fig.2Comparison between measured and model fitted EIS
p-values from MANOVA using EIS data taken from 1704 women for HG CIN detection
| Feature combinations | Feature combinations | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.1003 × 10−31 |
| 5.0124 × 10−31 |
|
| 1.5861 × 10−31 |
| 5.3276 × 10−31 |
|
| 2.6287 × 10−31 |
| 6.5955 × 10−31 |
|
| 3.1665 × 10−31 |
| 7.2683 × 10−31 |
|
| 3.4687 × 10−31 |
| 7.4318 × 10−31 |
p-values from MANOVA using EIS data taken at initial colposcopy of 569 women for evaluation of prognostic value of EIS
| Feature combinations | Feature combinations | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.0168 |
| 0.0286 |
|
| 0.0231 |
| 0.0295 |
|
| 0.0256 |
| 0.0296 |
|
| 0.0274 |
| 0.0314 |
|
| 0.0275 |
| 0.0335 |
AUC values for testing sets from 10 repeated two-fold cross validation runs with three logistic regression models
| Repetitions |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.9127 | 0.9160 | 0.9165 |
| 2 | 0.9177 | 0.9178 | 0.9190 |
| 3 | 0.9013 | 0.9034 | 0.9045 |
| 4 | 0.9165 | 0.9210 | 0.9238 |
| 5 | 0.8830 | 0.8840 | 0.8858 |
| 6 | 0.9206 | 0.9222 | 0.9230 |
| 7 | 0.9164 | 0.9165 | 0.9172 |
| 8 | 0.9053 | 0.9061 | 0.9075 |
| 9 | 0.9122 | 0.9146 | 0.9155 |
| 10 | 0.9181 | 0.9215 | 0.9222 |
| Mean AUC | 0.9104 | 0.9123 | 0.9135 |
Regression coefficient estimates and the associated p-values for the final logistic regression model
|
| estimates | |
|---|---|---|
| -2.9619 | 3.9518 × 10−32 | |
| −7.4684 × 10−11 | 0.0047 | |
| 3.3987 | 0.0090 | |
| 3.0025 × 10−11 | 0.0044 | |
| 2.3621 | 3.9281 × 10−47 | |
| 2.2241 | 5.8068 × 10−35 |
Fig.3ROC comparison between new method, template match method and colposcopy only.
Mean AUC values from 100 5-fold cross validation runs with linear logistic regression models
| Feature combinations | Mean AUC | Feature combinations | Mean AUC |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.5870 |
| 0.5723 |
|
| 0.5777 |
| 0.5716 |
|
| 0.5745 |
| 0.5715 |
|
| 0.5744 |
| 0.5686 |
|
| 0.5736 |
| 0.5678 |
Mean AUC values from 100 5-fold cross validation runs with nonlinear logistic regression models
| Feature combinations | Mean AUC | Feature combinations | Mean AUC |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.6103 |
| 0.5911 |
|
| 0.5992 |
| 0.5899 |
|
| 0.5989 |
| 0.5895 |
|
| 0.5946 |
| 0.5891 |
|
| 0.5939 |
| 0.5885 |
Fig.42-D histogram of α̅-Δα data points from two groups
Fig.5An ROC curve of final model for separating two groups with OOP and the associated performance indices
Classification performance comparison between the new classifier developed and the previous classifiers
| Classifier | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logistic regression | 0.628 | 45.714% | 82.022% |
| Impedance at 152Hz | 0.621 | 38.7% | 83.4% |
| Slope (between 1.22 | 0.596 | 45.2% | 70.1% |
| and 2.44kHz) as α |