| Literature DB >> 35069748 |
Masoume Nodehi1, Abolghasem Ajami2, Maryam Izad3,4, Hossein Asgarian Omran2, Fatemeh Esfahanian5, Saeed Yekaninejad6, Mahbobeh Hemmatabadi5, Atieh Amouzegar7, Reza Chahardoli7, Fatemeh Mansouri8, Ali Akbar Saboor-Yaraghi8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) is the most prevalent autoimmune disease, and there is no definitive treatment available for this disease. To find the appropriate therapeutic approach, it is necessary to determine the mechanism of this disease. To achieve this purpose, the frequency of CD4+ T cells was evaluated in patients with HT and compared with healthy individuals.Entities:
Keywords: CD4+ T Cells; Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis; LT CD4+IL-4+IL-17+; Th1; Tr1
Year: 2021 PMID: 35069748 PMCID: PMC8762522 DOI: 10.5812/ijem.110013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 1726-913X
Characteristics of Patients with Hashimoto's Thyroiditis and Healthy Women
| Variables | Anti-TPO > 100 and Anti-TG > 100 (n = 17) | Anti-TPO > 100 (n = 16) | Healthy Women (n = 13) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5.1 (7.8) | 3.1 (2.4) | 2.5 (0.9) |
|
| 354.9 (128) | 254.1 (84.8) | 16 (7.3) |
|
| 1004.5 (1247.6) | 48.5 (23.3) | 39.3 (14) |
|
| 1 (0.0) | 1.07 (0.0) | 0 |
Figure 1.Evaluation of CD4+ T cells frequency in women with Hashimoto's thyroiditis. For intracellular staining, CD4+ T cells were stimulated with PMA and ionomycin for 6 h and then the cells were washed, fixed, permeabilized, and incubated with monoclonal antibodies. Finally, the frequencies of Th1, Th2, Th17, LTCD4+IL-17+IL-4+, and Tr1 and MFI of their related cytokines were analyzed by flow cytometry. Th1, Th2, Tr1 and Th17 cells were identified as IFN-γ secreting CD4+ T cells, IL-4 secreting CD4+ T cells, CD4+ IL-10+IL-4- T cells and IL-17 secreting CD4+ T cells, respectively. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 within groups.
Differences of Immunological Outcomes in Patients with Hashimoto's Thyroiditis and Healthy Women [a]
| Variables | Anti-TPO > 100 and Anti-TG > 100 (n = 17) | Anti-TPO > 100 (n = 16) | Healthy Women (n = 13) | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18.9 (10.8 - 21.0) | 17.3 (15.2 - 21.5) | 14.3 (8.8 - 17.2) | 0.135 |
|
| 1.8 (0.73 - 4.0) | 1.5 (0.76 - 3.3) | 0.49 (0.31 - 1.5) | 0.023 [ |
|
| 1.4 (0.87 - 2.2) | 1.6 (1.2 - 2.1) | 1.7 (0.81 - 3.2) | 0.761 |
|
| 1.7 (1.1 - 2.3) | 1.5 (1.1 - 2.2) | 1.4 (1.0 - 1.8) | 0.460 |
|
| 0.06 (0.01 - 0.4) | 0.12 (0.04 - 0.35) | 0.02 (0.007 - 0.05) | 0.026 [ |
|
| 0.94 (0.45 - 1.4) | 0.81 (0.52 - 1.4) | 0.66 (0.4 - 0.8) | 0.474 |
|
| 0.21 (0.14 - 0.48) | 0.35 (0.24 - 0.45) | 0.33 (0.18 - 0.47) | 0.493 |
|
| 0.13 (0.08 - 0.25) | 0.22 (0.12 - 0.28) | 0.18 (0.13 - 0.28) | 0.293 |
|
| 333.00 (183.00 - 442.00) | 318.00 (245.00 - 455.00) | 142.00 (73.00 - 185.00) | 0.000 [ |
|
| 84.00 (40.00 - 109.00) | 78.00 (52.00 - 112.00) | 48.00 (40.00 - 73.00) | 0.090 |
|
| 18.00 (14.00 - 22.00) | 17.00 (15.00 - 24.00) | 19.00 (18.00 - 25.00) | 0.098 |
|
| 148.00 (95.00 - 242.00) | 134.00 (69.00 - 175.00) | 132.00 (85.00 - 218.00) | 0.331 |
Abbreviations: MFI, mean fluorescent intensity; SEM, standard error of mean.
a Values are expressed as median (Q1 – Q3).
b Mean value was significantly different compared to the control group (Healthy women).