| Literature DB >> 35069650 |
Ryan Tangney1,2,3, David J Merritt2,4, Ben P Miller2,4.
Abstract
Changes in fire regimes due to climate change and fire management practices are affecting the timing, length, and distribution of vegetation fires throughout the year. Plant species responses and tolerances to fire differ from season to season and are influenced by species-specific phenological processes. The ability of seeds to tolerate extreme temperatures associated with fire is one of these processes, with survival linked to seed moisture content at the time of exposure. As fire is more often occurring outside historic dry fire seasons, the probability of fire occurring when seeds are hydrated may also be increasing. In this study, we set out to understand the seasonal dynamics of seed hydration for seeds of Banksia woodland species, and how certain seed traits interact with environmental conditions to influence survival of high temperatures associated with fire. We measured the moisture content of seeds buried to 2 cm in the soil seed bank for four common native species and one invasive species on a weekly basis throughout 2017, along with soil moisture content and environmental correlates. We determined water sorption isotherms at 20°C for seeds of each species and used these functions to model weekly variation in seed water activity and predict when seeds are most sensitive to soil heating. Using Generalised additive models (GAMs), we were able to describe approximately 67% of the weekly variance in seed water activity and explored differences in seed hydration dynamics between species. Seed water activity was sufficiently high (i.e., ≥ 0.85 a w) so as to have created an increased risk of mortality if a fire had occurred during an almost continuous period between May and November in the study period (i.e., 2017). There were brief windows when seeds may have been in a dry state during early winter and late spring, and also when they may have been in a wet state during summer and late autumn. These data, and the associated analyses, provide an opportunity to develop approaches to minimize seed mortality during fire and maximize the seed bank response.Entities:
Keywords: fire season; seed banks; seed hydration; seed survival; seed water activity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35069650 PMCID: PMC8767118 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.795003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Species used for this analysis and their key attributes.
| Species | Family (aceae) | Seed storage syndrome | Dormancy Class | Native | Seed weight (mg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Haemodor | Soil | MPD | Yes | 1.0 | 83.5 | 123.8 |
|
| Asparag | Soil | PD | No | 6.5 | 72.2 | 75.5 |
|
| Prote | Weakly serotinous | ND | Yes | 23.5 | 94.2 | 131.6 |
|
| Prote | Weakly serotinous | ND | Yes | 6.2 | 98.5 | 144.0 |
|
| Haemodor | Soil | PD | Yes | 0.3 | 114.6 | 130.5 |
Native data sourced from FloraBase (Western Australian Herbarium, 1998. Florabase), Seed Weight, and T50 values sourced from (Tangney et al., 2019). T.
Figure 1Fitted isotherms of the five study species using cubic polynomial models describing the relationship between seed moisture content and relative humidity of seeds, at 20°C.
Figure 2Seed and weather data visualized. Seeds were collected weekly for 51 weeks for the year of 2017. (A) Plotted mean seed moisture content, averaged from three replicates for each collection date, and mean soil moisture content averaged from three replicate samples each collection date. (B) Mean daily pan evaporation and mean daily rainfall for the 7 days preceeding the seed collection date, and number of days since last rain (>1 mm of rain) over the course of 2017. All weather data extracted from Bureau of Meteorology taken from Perth metro weather station and derived products (Bureau of Meteorology, 2020).
Top generalised additive models (GAMS; ΔAICc < 2) from full subsets analysis describing the patterns in seed water activity.
| Model | AICc | edf | ΔAICc | ωAICc |
| Deviance explained |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean daily evaporation * Days since last rain | −1389.34 | 7.84 | 0 | 0.52 | 0.67 | 80.2 |
| Mean daily evaporation * Days since last rain + Species | −1389.17 | 11.85 | 0.16 | 0.48 | 0.69 | 81.3% |
Akaike’s Information Criterion corrected for small sample size (AICc), estimated degrees of freedom (edf), and difference from lowest reported AICc (ΔAICc), AICc model weights (ωAICc), variance explained (R.
Figure 3(A) Modelled interactive relationships between seed water activity for seeds within in the soil seed bank, mean daily evaporation, and days since last rain >1 mm. Dashed contour line indicates the threshold water activity of 0.85 aw. (B) Patterns of water activity for each individual species for the year of 2017 stratified by season. Dashed line indicates the hydration threshold where seeds are >0.85 aw.