| Literature DB >> 35069532 |
Jules Petit1, Irene de Bruijn2, Mark R G Goldman1, Erik van den Brink1, Wilbert F Pellikaan3, Maria Forlenza1, Geert F Wiegertjes1.
Abstract
Dietary supplementation of fish with β-glucans has been commonly associated with immunomodulation and generally accepted as beneficial for fish health. However, to date the exact mechanisms of immunomodulation by β-glucan supplementation in fish have remained elusive. In mammals, a clear relation between high-fibre diets, such as those including β-glucans, and diet-induced immunomodulation via intestinal microbiota and associated metabolites has been observed. In this study, first we describe by 16S rRNA sequencing the active naive microbiota of common carp intestine. Based on the abundance of the genus Bacteroides, well known for their capacity to degrade and ferment carbohydrates, we hypothesize that common carp intestinal microbiota could ferment dietary β-glucans. Indeed, two different β-glucan preparations (curdlan and MacroGard®) were both fermented in vitro, albeit with distinct fermentation dynamics and distinct production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA). Second, we describe the potential immunomodulatory effects of the three dominant SCFAs (acetate, butyrate, and propionate) on head kidney leukocytes, showing effects on both nitric oxide production and expression of several cytokines (il-1b, il-6, tnfα, and il-10) in vitro. Interestingly, we also observed a regulation of expression of several gpr40L genes, which were recently described as putative SCFA receptors. Third, we describe how a single in vivo oral gavage of carp with MacroGard® modulated simultaneously, the expression of several pro-inflammatory genes (il-1b, il-6, tnfα), type I IFN-associated genes (tlr3.1, mx3), and three specific gpr40L genes. The in vivo observations provide indirect support to our in vitro data and the possible role of SCFAs in β-glucan-induced immunomodulation. We discuss how β-glucan-induced immunomodulatory effects can be explained, at least in part, by fermentation of MacroGard® by specific bacteria, part of the naive microbiota of common carp intestine, and how a subsequent production of SFCAs could possibly explain immunomodulation by β-glucan via SCFA receptors present on leukocytes.Entities:
Keywords: SCFA; fish; immunomodulation; microbiota; β-glucan
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35069532 PMCID: PMC8770818 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.761820
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Overview of RT-qPCR primers used for in the current study.
| Primer | Gene name | Forward (5′–3′) | Reverse (5′–3′) | GenBank accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| CCGTGGGTGACATCGTTACA | TCAGGACATTGAACCTCACTGTCT | AB012087 |
|
|
| GGGTGTAGATCCACGCTGTC | CTTTACAGTGTGGGCTTGGAG | AJ550164 |
|
|
| GCTGCCTGCTTGTTGTAGAG | ATCTGTTTTGGAGGAACCA | AB082985 |
|
|
| AAGGAGGCCAGTGGCTCTGT | CCTGAAGAAGAGGAGGAGGCTGTCA | AJ245635 |
|
|
| CAGATAGCGGACGGAGGGGC | GCGGGTCTCTTCGTGTCTT | KC858890 |
|
|
| GGCGTATGAAGGAGCGAAGA | ATCTGACCGATAGAGGAGCG | KC858889 |
|
|
| CGCCAGCATAAAGAACTCA | TGCCAAATACTGCTCAATGT | cypCar_00007086,LHQP01030085 |
|
|
| CGCCAGCATAAAGAACTCGT | TGCCAAATACTGCTCGATGT | cypCar_00012555,LHQP01021640 |
|
|
| GAGCGCATCAACCTGACCAT | AGGATCGTGGATATGTGACCTCTAC | AJ621425 |
|
|
| TCTTGCACCGCAAGAAACTATG | TGCAGTTGATGAGACTAGAGTTTCG | AJ628699 |
|
|
| TGGTTGATAAGGTTCACCCTTCTC | TATCTGTTCTACAGGTCAGGGTAACG | AJ628700 |
|
|
| GAGCTTCACGAGGACTAATAGACAGT | CTGCGGTAAGGGCAGCAATC | AJ311800 |
|
|
| CGGCACGAGGAGAAACCGAGC | CATCGTTGTGTCTGTTAGTAAGTTC | AJ311801 |
|
|
| GAAGACGATGAAGATGATACCAT | AAGTGGTTTTCTCATCCTCAA | cypCar_00029601, LHQP01065580 |
|
|
| CTTGGACGAAGCCGATGAAGAC | ATCTTGTGACTGGCAAACA | cypCar_00023012, LHQP01037150 |
|
|
| GTTATCCCTGGCGCATAATA | TCTTCAATAATTGGTAAGGATGATG | KF387571 |
|
|
| GTTTATCCCTGGAGCATAACT | CTTCAATAACTGGTAAAGACGAAC | KF387572 |
|
|
| ACAATTTGCGGTCTTTGAGA | CCCTGCCATTTCTCTTCG | cypCar_00015892, LHQP01004675 |
|
|
| GCTTACGGTCTCTGGGG | TGGTTTCATCTTTAGTTCTTATCATC | cypCar_00029512, LHQP01026950 |
|
|
| ACAAAGGACAATAACTGGCG | GAGGTCAGGAACATCACTG | cypCar_00017679, LHQP01012215 |
|
|
| CTAGAGTTGCCACTGCC | TCCAGTTGAATCCACTTCG | cypCar_00025664, LHQP01010684 |
|
|
| ACTGAAGTGTGTGTTTTTGG | CAGACCTGGTAGATAAAGGAG | cypCar_00012158, LHQP01006771 |
|
|
| GCCTTCTACACGCTCAG | CGCTCCACGCTCAC | MZ447840 |
|
|
| GAAGGCTGAGGGCG | AATAATCGGGTCCAAACAAG | MZ447841 |
|
|
| GTTTCCAATCCGATATGCT | TTATCACTTGAGGGTATGTATG | MZ447848 |
|
|
| TGTCATTTTCTCAGTGGTG | AAACGGCACGAGGAT | MZ447842 |
|
|
| GTTATGACGACTTCACTGAC | GATGGCTCTAAACCGCT | MZ447844 |
|
|
| TGCTCTTCCTCATACCG | GCTACATATCCAACCACG | MZ447843 |
|
|
| GCGGTGCTCTTCGTAAC | CCAGTCGGGGCTGTA | MZ447845 |
|
|
| CAACCCTTCCCAAAACA | ATTAAGAGCGGCAGCA | MZ447846 |
|
|
| GCCACCCTTCCCAAAAAT | GCAGCATGTATAGAACCAC | MZ447847 |
|
|
| TTCTGCTATATAAGCTGTATCTG | GAGACAAGTTGTGGGGT | MZ447849 |
Note: cypCar numbers identify ORFs in the common carp genome (BioProject: PRJNA73579) that were also confirmed by RNA sequencing. LHQP numbers refer to the accession number of the associated scaffold.
Figure 1Relative abundance of active bacteria in the intestinal microbiota of common carp. Characterization with 16S rRNA sequencing of the intestinal microbiota of naive, unhandled common carp [(bars indicate relative abundance (mean, n = 5)]. (A) Relative abundance of phyla. (B) Relative abundance of family. Xanthomonadales refers to family Xanthomonadales Incertae sedis.
Figure 2Carp naive microbiota is capable of in vitro fermentation of different β-glucans. (A) Cumulative gas production over 168 h as a result of in vitro fermentation of PBS, glucose, MacroGard® and curdlan by carp intestinal microbiota. Data shown as mean of n = 5 independent intestinal pools. Significant difference between cumulative gas production between MacroGard® and curdlan from 44–86 h [two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc (not shown)]. (B) pH of fermentation fluids after 168 h of in vitro fermentation (mean ± SD, n = 5). Significant differences between groups were assessed by Welch’s ANOVA followed by Games–Howell test. (C) Ammonia (NH3) accumulation in fermentation fluids after 168 h of in vitro fermentation (mean ± SD, n = 5). Significant differences between groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test. Groups with different letters are statistically different from one another.
Figure 3Differential SCFA profiles after in vitro fermentation of β-glucan. SCFA levels in the fermentation liquid following 168 h in vitro fermentation of PBS, glucose, MacroGard or curdlan. (A–E) Acetate, butyrate, propionate, and lactate, or total sum. Total SCFA levels were calculated by adding up all analysed SCFA levels including branched chain short-chain fatty acids. Bars indicate mean ± SD of n = 5 independent intestinal pools. Significant differences between groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (A, D, E) or by Welch’s ANOVA followed by the Games–Howell test (B, C). Groups with different letters are statistically different from one another. (D) The annotation “nd” indicates that lactate was not detected in these samples.
Figure 4SCFA reduced LPS-induced production of nitric oxide (NO) in head kidney leukocytes (HKL). Cells were stimulated with medium control (RPMI) or LPS (30 µg/ml) for 96 h in the presence or absence of the SCFAs, acetate, butyrate, or propionate or a mix in the relative proportion produced by in vitro fermenting MacroGard® (62.5%/10%/27.5%, acetate/butyrate/propionate). (A) NO production of LPS-stimulated HKL in the presence of acetate. (B) NO production of LPS-stimulated HKL in the presence of butyrate. (C) NO production of LPS-stimulated HKL in the presence of propionate. (A–C) Bars indicate mean ± SD of n = 3 independent experiments. (D) NO production of LPS-stimulated HKL in the presence of SCFA mix, indicating that the concentration is determined by the total amount of acetate, butyrate, and propionate (25 mM (15.625 mM acetate/2.5 mM butyrate/6.875 mM propionate). Bars indicate mean ± SD of n = 5 independent experiments. Note the difference in scale for the Y-axis in (D). Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between NO production induced in the presence (solid black bars) or absence of LPS (open white bars) assessed by the linear mixed model followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test.
Figure 5SCFA increased oxidative burst in head kidney leukocytes (HKL). Total production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) relative to unstimulated HKL (dotted line). Cells were exposed to different concentrations of SCFAs in the absence (medium control (RPMI), open bars) or presence (black bars) of zymosan (50 µg/ml). Immediately following exposure, ROS production was measured real-time over a period of 2 h. Bars indicate mean ± SD of n = 5 experiments performed independently. Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between ROS production induced in the presence (solid black bars) or absence of Zymosan (open white bars) assessed by the linear mixed model followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. Groups with different letters are statistically different from one another, within one treatment (acetate, butyrate, propionate or SCFA mix) where “a” indicates the lowest value.
Figure 6SCFAs reduce the expression of several cytokines ex vivo stimulated head kidney leukocytes. Gene expression after 3 (grey bars) and 6 (closed bars) h of stimulation with LPS (30 µg/ml), SCFA mix (2.5 mM), LPS, and SCFA mix or the three SCFAs at the concentration they were included in the mix; acetate 1.55 mM (AA), butyrate 0.25 mM (BA), and propionate 0.765 mM (PA), compared to unstimulated HKLs (dotted line). Bars indicate mean ± SD of n = 5 experiments performed independently. Significant differences between groups were assessed by the linear mixed model followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. Groups with different letters are statistically different from one another where “a” indicates the lowest value, groups indicated with asterisk (*) are significantly different from unstimulated HKLs.
Figure 7SCFAs regulate the expression of several gpr40L receptors ex vivo stimulated head kidney leukocytes. Gene expression after 3 (grey bars) and 6 (closed bars) h of stimulation with LPS (30 µg/ml), SCFA mix (2.5 mM), LPS, and SCFA mix or the three SCFAs at the concentration they were included in the mix; acetate 1.55 mM (AA), butyrate 0.25 mM (BA), and propionate 0.765 mM (PA), compared to unstimulated HKLs (dotted line). Bars indicate mean ± SD of n = 5 experiments performed independently. Significant differences between groups were assessed by the linear mixed model followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. Groups with different letters are statistically different from one another, where “a” indicates the lowest value; groups indicated with asterisk (*) are significantly different from unstimulated HKLs.
Figure 8Oral gavage with β-glucans alters cytokine and gpr40L gene expression in the posterior intestine of carp. Gene expression of selected cytokines (A), Type I IFN-related genes (B), and gpr40L genes (C) in the posterior intestine of carp treated with the β-glucan group compared to the control group (dotted line), as measured by RT-qPCR 7 days post-gavage. (A) Significantly lower expressions of cxca, il-1b, il-6a, and tnfαa2. A trend toward a lower expression of il-6b (p = 0.062) and tnfαb2 (p = 0.090) could be observed in the treated group. (B) Significantly lower expressions of tlr3.1 and mx3 (C) Significantly lower expressions of gpr40La-1.1 and gpr40Lc-1.1, but significantly higher expression of gpr40La-2. Bars indicate mean ± SD of n = 5 animals. Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference in expression between the group orally gavaged with PBS and the group orally gavaged with 1 mg MacroGard® as assessed by one-way ANOVA.