| Literature DB >> 35069413 |
Yu Zhang1, Yuqi Luo1, Xin Kong1, Tao Wan2, Yunling Long3,4, Jun Ma1.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the ability of a MRI-based radiomics-clinicopathological model to predict pituitary macroadenoma (PMA) recurrence within 5 years. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: deep learning; multilayer perceptron; pituitary macroadenoma; predictive model; recurrence
Year: 2022 PMID: 35069413 PMCID: PMC8767054 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.780628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1The process used for the analysis of radiomics. Radiomics features were extracted from the preoperative axial CE-T1WI images by 3D slicer. Dimension reductions were performed two times by ICC and LASSO. The MLP was used to build two predictive models. Model 1 included independent clinicopathological risk factors. Model 2 included the combination of radiomics features and independent risk factors.
Clinical characteristics of PMA subjects in the training and test sets.
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 45.59 (12.38) | 44.96 (11.63) | 45.39 (12.12) | 0.758 |
|
| 0.899 | |||
| Male | 57 (49.14) | 25 (48.08) | 82 (48.81) | |
| Female | 59 (50.86) | 27 (51.92) | 86 (51.19) | |
|
| 0.214 | |||
| Non-functioning | 71 (61.21) | 37 (71.15) | 108 (64.29) | |
| Functioning | 45 (38.79) | 15 (28.85) | 60 (35.71) | |
|
| 30.73 (20.42-41.04) | 31.82 (19.21-44.43) | 30.96 (25.81-36.93) | 0.284 |
|
| 0.584 | |||
| Without | 43 (37.07) | 17 (32.69) | 60 (35.71) | |
| With | 73 (62.93) | 35 (67.31) | 108 (64.29) | |
|
| 0.578 | |||
| No | 33 (28.45) | 17 (32.69) | 50 (29.76) | |
| Yes | 83 (71.55) | 35 (67.31) | 118 (70.24) | |
|
| 0.686 | |||
| Craniotomy | 29 (25.00) | 12 (23.08) | 41 (24.40) | |
| Trans-sphenoidal | 59 (50.86) | 30 (57.69) | 89 (52.98) | |
| Endoscopic | 28 (24.14) | 10 (19.23) | 38 (22.62) | |
|
| 0.906 | |||
| Immunonegative | 48 (41.38) | 25 (48.08) | 73 (43.45) | |
| GH-positive | 6 (5.17) | 1 (1.92) | 7 (4.17) | |
| PRL-positive | 5 (4.31) | 3 (5.77) | 8 (4.76) | |
| ACTH-positive | 11 (9.48) | 3 (5.77) | 14 (8.33) | |
| FSH-LH-positive | 22 (18.97) | 8 (15.38) | 30 (17.86) | |
| TSH-positive | 2 (1.72) | 1 (1.92) | 3 (1.79) | |
| Plurihormonal | 22 (18.97) | 11 (21.15) | 33 (19.64) |
ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; GH, growth hormone; IHC, immunohistochemistry; IQR, interquartile range; LH, luteinizing hormone; No, number; PRL, prolactin; SD, standard deviation; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone.
Two-sided independent sample t-test.
Mann—Whitney U-test.
Pearson's χ.
Fisher's precision probability test.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of clinical characteristics to identify risk factors in the recurrence of PMA in the training set.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.967 (0.937–0.997) | 0.034 | 0.963 (0.930–0.997) | 0.035 |
|
| ||||
| Male (ref.) | 1 | |||
| Female | 1.008 (0.484–2.100) | 0.982 | ||
|
| ||||
| Non-functioning (ref.) | 1 | |||
| Functioning | 1.196 (0.564–2.535) | 0.641 | ||
| Height, mm | 1.068 (1.018–1.120) | 0.007 | 1.045 (0.992–1.100) | 0.097 |
|
| ||||
| Without (ref.) | 1 | |||
| With | 2.963 (1.319–6.659) | 0.009 | 2.393 (1.011–5.667) | 0.047 |
|
| ||||
| No (ref.) | 1 | |||
| Yes | 3.359 (1.359–8.305) | 0.009 | 2.746 (0.994–7.585) | 0.051 |
|
| ||||
| Transcranial (ref.) | 1 | |||
| Trans-sphenoidal | 0.904 (0.371–2.202) | 0.824 | ||
| Endoscopic | 0.595 (0.206–1.722) | 0.338 | ||
|
| ||||
| Immunonegative (ref.) | 1 | |||
| Monohormonal | 0.821 (0.358–1.881) | 0.640 | ||
| Plurihormonal | 2.450 (0.865–6.939) | 0.092 | ||
CI, confidence interval; IHC, immunohistochemistry; OR, odds ratio.
p < 0.05.
Figure 2Violin plots showing the differences of 4 selected radiomics features, Shape_Sphericity (A), LOG_GLDM_LDHGLE (B), Wavelet_GLSZM_GLNU (C), and Wavelet_GLSZM_ZE (D) between groups of recurrence and non-recurrence in the training set by Mann—Whitney U-test. GLDM, gray-level dependence matrix; GLNU, gray-level non-uniformity; GLSZM, gray-level size zone matrix; LDHGLE, large dependence high-gray-level emphasis; LOG, laplacian of gaussian; ZE, zone entropy.
Figure 3The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for Models 1 and 2 in the training (A) and test sets (B), respectively. Model 1 included independent clinicopathological risk factors and Model 2 included both radiomics features and independent clinicopathological risk factors.
Predictive performance of Models 1 and 2 in the training and test set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | 0.749 (0.702–0.804) | 0.724 | 0.706 | 0.738 | 0.739 (0.665–0.818) | 0.692 | 0.652 | 0.724 |
| Model 2 | 0.800 (0.759–0.845) | 0.776 | 0.725 | 0.815 | 0.783 (0.718–0.860) | 0.808 | 0.826 | 0.793 |
Model 1 included independent clinicopathological markers and Model 2 included both radiomic features and clinicopathological markers.
AUC, area under the curve; ACC, accuracy; CI, confidence interval; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity.