| Literature DB >> 35069256 |
Tristan W Dorey1, Matthias Walter2,3, Andrei V Krassioukov2,4,5.
Abstract
Urodynamic studies (UDS) can provoke autonomic dysreflexia (AD) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) at and above the sixth thoracic spinal segment potentially leading to profound vagally mediated heart rate (HR) reductions. In this study, we test the hypothesis that intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections will improve HR and its variability (HRV) responses to UDS in individuals with cervical and thoracic SCI. A total of 19 participants with chronic SCI (5 women, mean age 42.5 ± 7.9 years) with confirmed neurogenic detrusor overactivity underwent UDS before (i.e., baseline) and 1 month after intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (200 U) injections (post-treatment). Continuous electrocardiography and blood pressure (BP) recordings were used to assess RR-interval, time, and frequency domain metrics of HRV (a surrogate marker of autonomic nervous system activity), and AD pre- and post-treatment. UDS pre-treatment resulted in increased RR-interval as well as time and frequency domain metrics of HRV. Vagally mediated increases in high-frequency (HF) power during UDS were larger in participants with cervical compared to upper thoracic SCI. Post-treatment, UDS had no effect on RR-interval and significantly reduced instances of bradycardia. Furthermore, intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections significantly reduced time domain metrics of HRV and HF power responses to UDS across all participants. Changes in HRV during UDS could be a potential indicator of improved autonomic cardiovascular function following interventions such as intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections.Entities:
Keywords: autonomic dysreflexia; cardiovascular control; heart rate variability; onabotulinumtoxinA; spinal cord injury; urodynamic studies
Year: 2021 PMID: 35069256 PMCID: PMC8769099 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.796277
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Trial flow diagram. AD, autonomic dysreflexia; ECG, electrocardiogram; SCI, spinal cord injury; UDS, urodynamic study.
Figure 2The effect of bladder filling during urodynamic studies on RR-interval and heart rate variability in individuals with cervical (n = 13) and upper thoracic (n = 6) spinal cord injury. (A) Representative RR-interval time series from participant 2 demonstrating prolongation of RR-interval with bladder filling and subsequent bradycardia during autonomic dysreflexia (AD) event. (B) Summary RR-interval data at rest and following bladder filling in the whole cohort (all) and in injury-level-dependent subgroups. (C) Representative RR-interval histogram at rest and during bladder filling. (D) and (E). Summary standard deviation of N-N intervals (SDNN; D) and root mean squared of successive differences (RMSSD; E) at rest and during bladder filling. (F-H) Representative nonlinear Poincaré plot analysis (F) and summary standard deviation 1 (SD1; G) and 2 (SD2; H) at rest and during bladder filling. (I-K) Representative power spectral density plots (I) and summary data for percentage low-frequency (LF; J) and high-frequency (HF; K) power. Exact values of p reported for each comparison via two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Holm–Sidak post hoc test.
Figure 3Effects of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment on heart rate variability responses during urodynamic studies in individuals with cervical and upper thoracic spinal cord injury. Pre−/post-onabotulinumtoxinA treatment comparison of the change in (A) ΔRR-interval, (B) summary standard deviation of RR-intervals (ΔSDNN), (C) root mean squared of successive differences (ΔRMSSD), (D) standard deviation 1 (ΔSD1), (E) standard deviation 2 (ΔSD2), (F) percent low-frequency (ΔLF) power, and (G) percent high-frequency (ΔHF) power responses to urodynamics UDS in the whole cohort and in injury-level-dependent subgroups. Exact values of p reported for each comparison via two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Holm–Sidak post hoc test.
Correlations between time and frequency domain responses to UDS and the change in SBP during UDS (ΔSBPUDS), AD (ΔSBPAD), and maximal SBP during AD.
| Category | ΔSBPUDS [mmHg] | ΔSBPAD [mmHg] | Maximum SBPAD [mmHg] |
|---|---|---|---|
| ΔRR-interval [s] | 0.421 (0.008) | 0.310 (0.05) | 0.265 (0.101) |
| ΔSDNN [ms] | 0.218 (0.187) | 0.331 (0.042) | 0.269 (0.101) |
| ΔRMSSD [ms] | 0.474 (0.002) | 0.369 (0.022) | 0.328 (0.044) |
| ΔSD1 [ms] | 0.471 (0.003) | 0.379 (0.018) | 0.332 (0.040) |
| ΔS2 [ms] | −0.005 (0.975) | 0.196 (0.237) | 0.145 (0.384) |
| ΔLF Power [%] | −0.036 (0.827) | −0.068 (0.681) | −0.053 (0.747) |
| ΔHF Power [%] | 0.489 (0.002) | 0.428 (0.007) | 0.468 (0.003) |
Results are presented as r (Pearson correlation) with p values in brackets. AD, autonomic dysreflexia; HF, high frequency; LF, low frequency; RMSSD, root mean squared of successive differences in RR-interval; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SDNN, SD of RR-intervals; UDS, urodynamic study.