| Literature DB >> 35069243 |
Mingming Deng1,2,3,4,5, Xiaoming Zhou6, Yanxia Li7, Yan Yin8, Chaonan Liang8, Qin Zhang8, Jingwen Lu8, Mengchan Wang8, Yu Wang8, Yue Sun8, Ruixia Li8, Liming Yan6, Qiuyue Wang8, Gang Hou1,2,3,4,5,9,10.
Abstract
Purpose: Skeletal muscle dysfunction is common in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and is associated with a poor prognosis. Abnormal muscle quantity of the lower limbs is a manifestation of skeletal muscle dysfunction in patients with COPD. Shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) is a novel and possible tool to evaluate qualitative muscle parameters. This study explores the feasibility of SWE to measure the stiffness of the rectus femoris and evaluates its value in predicting sarcopenia in patients with COPD.Entities:
Keywords: COPD; rectus femoris; sarcopenia; skeletal muscle dysfunction; ultrasonic elastography
Year: 2022 PMID: 35069243 PMCID: PMC8766419 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.783421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Measurements of rectus femoris stiffness using shear wave elastography. (A) The process of shear wave ultrasound elastography assessment; (B) Shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) images of the rectus femoris are displayed together with the grayscale ultrasound images. After placing a box (frame) over the rectus femoris, a colored image appears, revealing blue and red areas on an elastogram. Dark blue areas correspond to soft tissues, whereas red areas correspond to stiff tissues.
Basic characteristics of the study population.
| Characteristics | Healthy control ( | COPD ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 63.43 ± 7.81 | 64.02 ± 8.14 | 0.751 |
| Male/female, | 15/8 | 40/13 | 0.358 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.24 ± 3.07 | 25.07 ± 4.24 | 0.891 |
| FEV1, L | 3.05 ± 0.55 | 1.37 ± 0.68 | <0.001 |
| FEV1% predicted | 104.1 ± 10.43 | 50.88 ± 21.77 | <0.001 |
| FVC, L | 3.95 ± 0.55 | 2.52 ± 0.91 | <0.001 |
| FEV1/FVC | 78.91 ± 4.73 | 52.17 ± 11.07 | <0.001 |
| GOLD A/B/C/D, | 8/15/18/12 |
BMI, body mass index; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FEV1% pred, FEV percentage predicted; FVC, forced vital capacity; and GOLD, the global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease.
Reliability and repeatability results of the measurements performed by different observers.
| Parameter | Observer 1 | Observer 2 |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| ICC (95% CI) | 0.952 (0.863–0.983) | 0.985 (0.956–0.995) |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | |
|
| ||
| ICC (95% CI) | 0.984 (0.973–0.991) | |
| <0.001 | ||
Figure 2The difference in the mean elasticity indices of rectus femoris ultrasound elastography in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and healthy controls. (A) Representative SWE images of the rectus femoris and grayscale ultrasound images in healthy controls; (B) Representative SWE images of rectus femoris and grayscale ultrasound images in patients with COPD; (C) Difference in mean elasticity index (SWEmean) in patients with COPD and healthy controls; and (D) Difference in SWEmean in patients with global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) A and GOLD B and in patients with GOLD C and GOLD D. SWEmean: mean SWE elasticity index. *p<0.05; ***p<0.001.
Correlations among SWEmean, RFthick, RFcsa, and clinical features.
| Variable | SWE | Grayscale ultrasound | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWEmean, Kpa | RFthick, cm | RFcsa, cm2 | ||||
| Coefficient | Coefficient | Coefficient | ||||
|
| ||||||
| Age, years | −0.230 | 0.098 | −0.201 | 0.148 | −0.169 | 0.228 |
| Height, m | 0.174 | 0.214 | 0.344 |
| 0.281 |
|
| Weight, kg | 0.167 | 0.231 | 0.299 |
| 0.391 |
|
|
| ||||||
| FEV1, L | 0.397 |
| 0.370 |
| 0.287 |
|
| FEV1, %predicted | 0.317 |
| 0.242 | 0.081 | 0.192 | 0.169 |
| FVC, L | 0.266 | 0.054 | 0.266 | 0.071 | 0.329 |
|
| FVC, % predicted | 0.189 | 0.176 | 0.067 | 0.635 | 0.248 | 0.073 |
| FEV1/FVC, % | 0.397 |
| 0.401 |
| 0.253 |
|
|
| ||||||
| 5STS, s | −0.520 |
| −0.008 | 0.975 | −0.029 | 0.915 |
|
| ||||||
| 6MWD, m | 0.450 |
| 0.641 |
| 0.615 |
|
|
| ||||||
| BMI, kg/m2 | 0.130 | 0.355 | 0.165 | 0.237 | 0.311 | 0.023 |
| Body fat (%) | −0.038 | 0.787 | −0.099 | 0.481 | 0.057 | 0.682 |
| FFMI (kg/m2) | 0.354 | 0.034 | 0.072 | 0.675 | 0.195 | 0.256 |
|
| ||||||
| QMS (kg) | 0.533 |
| 0.398 |
| 0.311 |
|
|
| ||||||
| mMRC score | −0.301 |
| −0.346 |
| −0.325 |
|
| CAT scores | −0.362 |
| −0.388 |
| −0.151 |
|
FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FEV1% predicted, FEV percentage predicted; FVC, forced vital capacity; FVC% predicted, FVC percentage predicted; 5STS, five-repetition sit-to-stand test; 6MWD, 6-min walk distance; BMI, body mass index; FFMI, fat-free mass index; QMS, quadriceps muscle strength; mMRC, modified British medical research council; and CAT: COPD assessment test.
p < 0.05.
Figure 3The relationship between circulating biomarkers and the mean elasticity indices of rectus femoris ultrasound elastography in patients with COPD. (A) The relationship between SWEmean and serum GDF15 level; (B) The relationship between SWEmean and serum resistin level; and (C) The relationship between SWEmean and serum TNF-α level. SWEmean: mean SWE elasticity index.
Characteristics of the patients with/without sarcopenia.
| Variable | Without sarcopenia ( | With sarcopenia ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Age, years | 62 ± 7 | 67 ± 9 |
|
| Height, m | 1.66 ± 0.07 | 1.63 ± 0.08 | 0.317 |
| Weight, kg | 71.63 ± 11.92 | 64.28 ± 17.11 | 0.074 |
|
| |||
| FEV1, L | 1.57 ± 0.70 | 1.07 ± 0.55 |
|
| FEV1, %predicted | 55.52 ± 21.21 | 43.81 ± 21.16 |
|
| FVC, L | 2.74 ± 0.91 | 2.19 ± 0.81 |
|
| FVC, % predicted | 77.69 ± 20.63 | 69.93 ± 22.11 | 0.126 |
| FEV1/FVC, % | 55.34 ± 10.31 | 47.34 ± 10.65 |
|
|
| |||
| 5STS, s | 6.43 ± 1.24 | 10.37 ± 3.41 |
|
|
| |||
| 6MWD, m | 416 ± 74.75 | 318.2 ± 84.71 |
|
|
| |||
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.93 ± 3.77 | 23.72 ± 4.66 | 0.051 |
| Body fat (%) | 29.34 ± 5.54 | 30.18 ± 6.88 | 0.531 |
| FFMI (kg/m2) | 18.80 ± 2.01 | 15.79 ± 1.96 |
|
|
| |||
| QMS (kg) | 48.45 ± 9.65 | 38.64 ± 9.87 |
|
|
| |||
| mMRC score | 17.96 ± 5.96 | 20.76 ± 6.88 | 0.257 |
| CAT scores | 2.07 ± 1.07 | 2.05 ± 1.24 | 0.832 |
FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FEV1% predicted, FEV percentage predicted; FVC, forced vital capacity; FVC% predicted, FVC percentage predicted; 5STS, five-repetition sit-to-stand test; 6MWD, 6-min walk distance; BMI, body mass index; FFMI, fat-free mass index; QMS, quadriceps muscle strength; mMRC, modified British medical research council; and CAT, COPD assessment test.
p < 0.05.
Figure 4The predictive value of SWEmean. (A) The SWEmean were differed between patients with sarcopenia and patients without sarcopenia; (B-D) Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the mean elasticity indices of rectus femoris ultrasound elastography and thickness and cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris for predicting sarcopenia in patients with COPD. SWEmean: mean SWE elasticity index; RFthick: the thickness of rectus femoris; and RFcsa: the cross-sectional area of rectus femoris. ***p<0.001.