| Literature DB >> 35069175 |
Bin Wang1, Xiujie Sun2, Jiahan Wang1, Xiyuan Deng3, Yanan Lin4, Fanghao Liu1, Rui Dong5, Xu Lin1, Yanlin Bi1.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether progranulin (PGRN) levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were associated with postoperative delirium (POD) in geriatric patients undergoing knee replacement. Method: A total of 600 Han Chinese patients aged 65-90 years and who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty were included in the Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorder And Biomarker LifestylE (PNDABLE) study from June 2020 to November 2020. All participants were assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale on postoperative days 1-7 (or before discharge) by an anesthesiologist. CSF PGRN and CSF biomarkers of POD were measured by ELISA. We analyzed the risk and protective factors of POD using the multivariate logistic regression, and the associations between CSF PGRN and CSF biomarkers of POD using multiple linear regression. We also explored whether the influence of CSF PGRN on POD was mediated by POD core pathology in linear regression models.Entities:
Keywords: biomarkers; geriatric; neurodegeneration; postoperative delirium (POD); progranulin
Year: 2022 PMID: 35069175 PMCID: PMC8770335 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.772795
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
FIGURE 1The flow diagram showed the selection of eligible patients and the enrollment process.
FIGURE 2Distribution of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) progranulin (PGRN) and biomarker levels for participants with and without delirium during subsequent hospitalization.
Comparison of general condition and surgical condition, CSF biomarkers of unilateral total knee arthroplasty patients.
| Variable | POD( | NPOD( | P-values |
| Age (year), mean ± SD | 72.85 ± 6.29 | 71.00 ± 5.73 | 0.117 |
| Sex (female/male) | 22/31 | 20/33 | 0.421 |
| Body mass index (kg.m–2), mean ± SD | 24.8 ± 3.6 | 25.7 ± 3.4 | 0.187 |
| Education level (year), median and 25–75 percentile | 9(6–13.5) | 12(9–14) | 0.326 |
| ASA physical status (I/II) | 27/26 | 28/25 | 0.846 |
| APOE ε4 carriers (%), median and 25–75 percentile | 7(13) | 9(17) | 0.587 |
| Preoperative CSFAβ42 (100pgml–1), mean ± SD | 1.42 ± 0.43 | 3.01 ± 0.99 | <0.001 |
| Preoperative CSF Aβ40 (100pgml–1), mean ± SD | 62.98 ± 12.33 | 26.45 ± 9.24 | <0.001 |
| Preoperative CSF Aβ42/Aβ40, mean ± SD | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.13 ± 0.07 | <0.001 |
| Preoperative CSF T-tau (100pgml–1), mean ± SD | 3.14 ± 2.06 | 1.19 ± 0.55 | 0.003 |
| Preoperative CSF P-tau (pgml–1), mean ± SD | 130.47 ± 0.51 | 69.02 ± 29.01 | <0.001 |
| Preoperative CSF PGRN (100pgml–1), mean ± SD | 27.17 ± 8.73 | 30.49 ± 10.04 | <0.001 |
| Preoperative MMSE scores, median and 25–75 percentile | 28(26–29) | 28(27–29) | 0.330 |
| Duration of anesthesia (min), mean ± SD | 133.97 ± 26.5 | 141.25 ± 30.1 | 0.963 |
| Duration of surgery (min), mean ± SD | 125.72 ± 25.13 | 129.47 ± 26.32 | 0.455 |
| Intraoperative blood loss (ml), mean ± SD | 582.44 ± 148.65 | 603.91 ± 152.77 | 0.465 |
| Postoperative the highest MDAS (score), mean ± SD | 22.75 ± 5.02 | 5.62 ± 2.43 | <0.001 |
| Postoperative the highest VAS(score), median and 25–75 percentile, | 2(1–3) | 2(1–3) | 0.080 |
| TICS-m (score), mean ± SD | 36.2 ± 2.5 | 37.32 ± 3.5 | 0.079 |
| WHOQOL-BREF score | |||
| Physical domain(score), mean ± SD | 68.3 ± 3.1 | 69.6 ± 3.9 | 0.068 |
| Psychological domain (score), mean ± SD | 75.1 ± 2.5 | 75.8 ± 2.9 | 0.193 |
| Social relationships domain(score), mean ± SD | 67.5 ± 2.9 | 67.3 ± 2.8 | 0.789 |
| Environment domain (score), mean ± SD | 83.6 ± 2.9 | 82.9 ± 2.5 | 0.205 |
POD, postoperative delirium; MMSE, mini-mental state examination; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; MDAS, memorial delirium assessment scale; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale/Score; SD, standard deviation; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; Aβ
Logistic analysis for Risk factors of POD patients adjusted by age, sex, MMSE, educational level and APOE ε4.
| Unadjusted | Adjusted | |||
| odds ratio (95% CI) | P-value | odds ratio (95% CI) | P-value | |
| CSF PGRN (100pg • ml–1) | 0.896(0.854–0.940) | 0.001 | 0.073(0.646–0.832) | 0.001 |
| CSF Aβ40 (100pg • ml–1) | 1.385(1.173–1.636) | 0.001 | 1.781(1.161–2.731) | 0.003 |
| CSF Aβ42 (100pg • ml–1) | 0.090(0.038–0.212) | 0.001 | 0.082(0.033–0.203) | 0.001 |
| CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 | 0.000 (0.000–0.000) | 0.001 | 0.000 (0.000–0.000) | 0.001 |
| CSF T-tau (100pg • ml–1) | 3.438(1.915–6.170) | 0.001 | 4.337(2.266–8.303) | 0.001 |
| CSF P-tau (pg • ml–1) | 1.033(1.020–1.047) | 0.001 | 1.046(1.029–1.064) | 0.001 |
FIGURE 3Associations of CSF PGRN and biomarkers of POD. Scatter plots represent the associations of CSF PGRN with CSF biomarkers (Aβ42, Aβ40, Aβ42/Aβ40, T-tau, and P-tau) of POD. The normalized regression coefficients (r) and P-values computed by multiple linear regression after adjustment for age, sex, education, and APOE ε4 carrier status are shown.
FIGURE 4The ROC curve analysis of Aβ42, Aβ40, Aβ42/Aβ40, T-tau, P-tau, and PGRN showed that the concentrations of CSF PGRN had a high diagnostic value for POD.
FIGURE 5Mediation analyses with Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) as the cognitive outcome. In the PNDABLE (Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorder And Biomarker LifestylE study), the relationship between PGRN and MDAS was mediated by amyloid pathology indicated by (A) amyloid β 42 (Aβ42), (B) amyloid β 40 (Aβ40), (C) amyloid β 42/amyloid β 40 (Aβ42/Aβ40), (D) Total-tau (T-tau), and (E) phosphorylated total-tau (P-tau). IE, indirect effect.