| Literature DB >> 35069163 |
Eilidh MacNicol1, Paul Wright2, Eugene Kim1, Irene Brusini3,4, Oscar Esteban5,6, Camilla Simmons1, Federico E Turkheimer1, Diana Cash1.
Abstract
Age-specific resources in human MRI mitigate processing biases that arise from structural changes across the lifespan. There are fewer age-specific resources for preclinical imaging, and they only represent developmental periods rather than adulthood. Since rats recapitulate many facets of human aging, it was hypothesized that brain volume and each tissue's relative contribution to total brain volume would change with age in the adult rat. Data from a longitudinal study of rats at 3, 5, 11, and 17 months old were used to test this hypothesis. Tissue volume was estimated from high resolution structural images using a priori information from tissue probability maps. However, existing tissue probability maps generated inaccurate gray matter probabilities in subcortical structures, particularly the thalamus. To address this issue, gray matter, white matter, and CSF tissue probability maps were generated by combining anatomical and signal intensity information. The effects of age on volumetric estimations were then assessed with mixed-effects models. Results showed that herein estimation of gray matter volumes better matched histological evidence, as compared to existing resources. All tissue volumes increased with age, and the tissue proportions relative to total brain volume varied across adulthood. Consequently, a set of rat brain templates and tissue probability maps from across the adult lifespan is released to expand the preclinical MRI community's fundamental resources.Entities:
Keywords: Sprague-Dawley; VBM; aging; morphometry; preclinical imaging; template; tissue prior
Year: 2022 PMID: 35069163 PMCID: PMC8777032 DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2021.669049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neuroinform ISSN: 1662-5196 Impact factor: 4.081
Figure 1Resource generation workflow (clockwise from top left). An example RESILIENT template is shown (A), which was registered to the Waxholm space reference image to facilitate use of the associated resources. Regions in the Waxholm space atlas were designated as one of three tissue types, and the resulting label image (B) was used to generate probabilistic compartment images for each subject (C). The co-registered compartments were averaged across subjects to produce tissue probability maps (D). The voxel intensity in the probabilistic images represents the likelihood, from 0 (black) to 1 (white), of the presence of a given tissue.
Figure 2Comparison of thalamic gray matter (GM) estimates. (A–C) Qualitative histological estimation of thalamic GM. A section stained for myelin with Luxol Fast Blue (A) was transformed to gray-scale (B), and the mean () and standard deviation (SD) of pixel intensities were calculated within manually-delineated white matter (WM; purple) and ventricular (turquoise) regions of interest (ROI). The section was binarized (C) so that pixels which likely represent GM were valued 1 (white), while all others were valued 0 (black). The hand-delineated thalamus ROI (red overlay) is predominantly GM. (D) The RESILIENT TPM has higher prior probabilities of GM within the thalamic ROI (red overlay), derived from the SIGMA atlas, compared with existing resources. (E) GM estimates as a proportion of thalamic volume for each TPM set. The mean ± SD of estimates are shown for each set.
Figure 3Estimates of total intracranial (A), gray matter (B), white matter (C), and CSF (D) volumes across adulthood in the rat. (E) Relative proportion of tissue volumes with respect to total intracranial volume. The dashed lines represent individual trajectories, while the solid line and background fill connects the mixed-effects model estimated marginal means ± 95% confidence interval of the estimate. (F) Second level contrast plots indicating the size and direction of the difference between contrasts of consecutive sessions for each tissue type. The dots denote the estimate difference and the bars denote the 95% confidence interval of the estimate.
Consecutive comparison of the Estimated Marginal Means (EMMs) of the linear mixed-effects models.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| TIV | 5–3 | 152.77 | 4.11 | 197.95 | 0.0000 |
| 11–5 | 180.67 | 9.12 | 57.66 | 0.0000 | ||
| 17–11 | 91.99 | 9.42 | 68.16 | 0.0000 | ||
| Gray matter | 5–3 | 49.19 | 2.59 | 391.91 | 0.0000 | |
| 11–5 | 77.43 | 4.43 | 75.22 | 0.0000 | ||
| 17–11 | 24.52 | 4.82 | 103.13 | 0.0000 | ||
| White matter | 5–3 | 46.18 | 2.56 | 272.82 | 0.0000 | |
| 11–5 | 31.14 | 5.16 | 64.04 | 0.0000 | ||
| 17–11 | 33.14 | 5.42 | 79.88 | 0.0000 | ||
| CSF | 5–3 | 57.39 | 2.81 | 160.56 | 0.0000 | |
| 11–5 | 72.46 | 6.55 | 57.70 | 0.0000 | ||
| 17–11 | 34.78 | 6.72 | 65.24 | 0.0000 | ||
|
| GM | 5–3 | −1.44 | 0.24 | 435.74 | 0.0000 |
| 11–5 | −0.51 | 0.26 | 446.47 | 0.1274 | ||
| 17–11 | −0.30 | 0.29 | 444.52 | 0.6175 | ||
| WM | 5–3 | 0.36 | 0.24 | 435.74 | 0.3253 | |
| 11–5 | −0.50 | 0.26 | 446.48 | 0.1377 | ||
| 17–11 | 0.40 | 0.29 | 444.52 | 0.3827 | ||
| CSF | 5–3 | 1.07 | 0.24 | 435.74 | 0.0000 | |
| 11–5 | 1.01 | 0.26 | 446.48 | 0.0003 | ||
| 17–11 | −0.10 | 0.29 | 444.52 | 0.9712 |
The difference in mm.