Yuqing Wang1, Shangge Lv1, Xiaoqiang Liu2, Lei Yan1,3. 1. School of Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China. 2. Reproductive Medicine Center, Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong, China. 3. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Reproductive Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan Shandong, China.
Recent advances in sequencing technologies enabling more in-depth genomic and transcriptomic analyses have revealed that many long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are functionally associated with human diseases.[1,2] However, the expression levels of lncRNAs are low in abundance, which poses several challenges for their identification and analysis.[3,4]We read with great interest the article by Qi and colleagues.
The authors revealed for the first time the profile of differentially expressed lncRNAs involved in the responses of the single and chronic low-dose ionizing radiation (LDIR) through the integrated analysis of microarray data which is profound.The microarray data analysis strategy of this study should be carefully considered and further clarified. According to the authors’ description, they seem to use unadjusted P values and fold change of expression values when defining significantly differentially expressed lncRNAs. However, due to the characteristics of lncRNAs and high false positives caused by multiple comparisons, it seems that a specialized high-level microarray analysis method may be more suitable, especially when the number of detected lncRNAs is large. Only accurate screening of differential genes can ensure the reliability of pathway enrichment analysis results.A study comparing several data analysis schemes revealed that linear modeling with empirical Bayes moderation showed good control of the false discovery rate and reasonable sensitivity when defining significantly differentially expressed lncRNAs.
In our opinion, the authors might consider using linear models for microarray analysis (Limma), an R/Bioconductor software package that analyzes microarray data using linear models, to test the results.[7,8] Referring to Limma results, choosing appropriate expression fold changes and false discovery rate < .05 as the cutoff is a robust method to analyze the changes of gene expression.We agree on the importance of comprehensive identification of lncRNAs in single and chronic LDIR responses. More rigorous microarray analysis strategies will be required for insights into these complicated data sets.
Authors: Matthew E Ritchie; Belinda Phipson; Di Wu; Yifang Hu; Charity W Law; Wei Shi; Gordon K Smyth Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Thomas Derrien; Rory Johnson; Giovanni Bussotti; Andrea Tanzer; Sarah Djebali; Hagen Tilgner; Gregory Guernec; David Martin; Angelika Merkel; David G Knowles; Julien Lagarde; Lavanya Veeravalli; Xiaoan Ruan; Yijun Ruan; Timo Lassmann; Piero Carninci; James B Brown; Leonard Lipovich; Jose M Gonzalez; Mark Thomas; Carrie A Davis; Ramin Shiekhattar; Thomas R Gingeras; Tim J Hubbard; Cedric Notredame; Jennifer Harrow; Roderic Guigó Journal: Genome Res Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Seth Raithel; Loretta Johnson; Matthew Galliart; Sue Brown; Jennifer Shelton; Nicolae Herndon; Nora M Bello Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2016-02-27 Impact factor: 3.969