| Literature DB >> 35068950 |
Vivek Chauhan1, Vivek Dhiman1, Shamsher Singh Kanwar1.
Abstract
Around 200 different lipopeptides (LPs) have been identified to date, most of which are produced via Bacillus and Pseudomonas species. The clinical nature of the lipopeptide (LP) has led to a big surge in its research. They show antimicrobial and antitumor activities due to which mass-scale production and purification of LPs are beneficial. Response surface methodology (RSM) approach has emerged as an alternative in the field of computational biology for optimizing the reaction parameters using statistical models. In the present study, Pseudomonas sp. strain OXDC12 was used for production and partial purification of LPs using Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC). The main goal of the study was to increase the overall yield of LPs by optimizing the different variables in the fermentation broth. This was achieved using a combination of one factor at a time (OFAT) and response surface methodology (RSM) approaches. OFAT technique was used to optimize the necessary parameters and was followed by the creation of statistical models (RSM) to optimize the remaining variables. Maximum mycelial growth inhibition (%) against the fungus Mucor sp. was 61.3% for LP. Overall, the combination of both OFAT and RSM helped in increasing the LPs yield by 3 folds from 367mg/L to 1169mg/L.Entities:
Keywords: Fermentation; TLC; antifungal activity; optimization; purification; statistical evaluation
Year: 2021 PMID: 35068950 PMCID: PMC8733952 DOI: 10.3906/biy-2106-59
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Turk J Biol ISSN: 1300-0152
Plakett–Burman experimental design for evaluating the influence of various independent variables on LPs production via Pseudomonas sp. OXDC12.
| Run | Glucose extract (g/100mL) | Beef extract (g/100mL) | Production time (h) | pH (mM) | Temperature °C | Centrifugation rate (g) | Centrifugation time (min) | MnSO4 | Response(mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 24 | 7 | 40 | 20000 | 10 | 0.5 | 526 |
| 2 | 5 | 0.5 | 90 | 7 | 25 | 20000 | 20 | 5 | 324 |
| 3 | 5 | 5 | 90 | 6 | 25 | 9500 | 20 | 0.5 | 498 |
| 4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 24 | 7 | 25 | 20000 | 20 | 0.5 | 146 |
| 5 | 5 | 5 | 90 | 6 | 40 | 20000 | 20 | 0.5 | 625 |
| 6 | 5 | 5 | 24 | 6 | 25 | 20000 | 10 | 5 | 314 |
| 7 | 5 | 0.5 | 24 | 6 | 40 | 9500 | 20 | 5 | 289 |
| 8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 24 | 6 | 25 | 9500 | 10 | 0.5 | 138 |
| 9 | 0.5 | 5 | 90 | 7 | 25 | 9500 | 10 | 5 | 361 |
| 10 | 5 | 0.5 | 90 | 7 | 40 | 9500 | 10 | 0.5 | 462 |
| 11 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 90 | 6 | 40 | 20000 | 10 | 5 | 214 |
| 12 | 0.5 | 5 | 24 | 7 | 40 | 9500 | 20 | 5 | 281 |
Statistical analysis of RSM moldels.
| Sr. No | Test name | F- value | p-value | Predicted R² | Adjusted R² |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANOVA-PBD (for positive {5} variables) | 70.22 | <0.0001** | 0.9215* | 0.9692* | |
| ANOVA-PDB (for all {8}variables) | 54.40 | 0.0037** | 0.8838* | 0.9749* | |
| ANOVA-CCD | 15.48 | <0.0001** | 0.7064* | 0.8749* |
Central composite design (CCD) response for selected variables.
| Run | Beef extract (g/100mL) | Glucose extract (g/100mL) | Temperature (°C) | Production time (h) | Response (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.1 | 2.75 | 32.5 | 57 | 923 |
| 2 | 5 | 0.5 | 40 | 90 | 689 |
| 3 | 7.25 | 2.75 | 32.5 | 57 | 756 |
| 4 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 32.5 | 57 | 1168 |
| 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 24 | 412 |
| 6 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 32.5 | 8 | 256 |
| 7 | 5 | 0.5 | 40 | 24 | 522 |
| 8 | 5 | 5 | 40 | 90 | 766 |
| 9 | 0.5 | 5 | 40 | 24 | 389 |
| 10 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 25 | 24 | 345 |
| 11 | 2.75 | 7.25 | 32.5 | 57 | 689 |
| 12 | 0.5 | 5 | 40 | 90 | 672 |
| 13 | 0.5 | 5 | 25 | 90 | 482 |
| 14 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 17.5 | 57 | 98 |
| 15 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 40 | 24 | 355 |
| 16 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 32.5 | 57 | 980 |
| 17 | 0.5 | 5 | 25 | 24 | 367 |
| 18 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 32.5 | 57 | 1102 |
| 19 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 32.5 | 123 | 886 |
| 20 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 90 | 554 |
| 21 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 47.5 | 57 | 178 |
| 22 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 32.5 | 57 | 1145 |
| 23 | 5 | 5 | 40 | 24 | 456 |
| 24 | 2.75 | 0.1 | 32.5 | 57 | 926 |
| 25 | 5 | 0.5 | 25 | 90 | 498 |
| 26 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 32.5 | 57 | 1124 |
| 27 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 25 | 90 | 459 |
| 28 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 40 | 90 | 733 |
| 29 | 5 | 0.5 | 25 | 24 | 482 |
| 30 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 32.5 | 57 | 1167 |
Summary of different models used in the LPs production.
| Model Used | Factors optimized | LPs Production (mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| OFAT | Inoculation size | 112.33 ± 2.23 |
| Agitation rate | 145.33 ± 3.14 | |
| Carbon source (Glucose) | 142 ± 2.68 | |
| Nitrogen source (Beef extract) | 143 ± 3.22 | |
| Metal ion (Mn2+) | 98.66 ± 4.04 | |
| pH value (6 to 7) | 148.66 ± 1.86 | |
| Placket–Burman | beef extract, glucose, production time, pH value, centrifugation rate, centrifugation time, temperature, and MnSO4 | 625 |
| CCD | beef extract, glucose, production timetemperature | 1168 |