Literature DB >> 35068577

Effect of the inoculation strategies of selected Metschnikowia agaves and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the volatile profile of pineapple wine in mixed fermentation.

Xue Lin1,2, Yanyan Jia1, Kaiya Li1, Xiaoping Hu1,2, Congfa Li1,2, Sixin Liu3,2.   

Abstract

To investigate the effects of inoculation ratio, concentration, and sequence of selected Metschnikowia agaves P3-3 and commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae D254 on the volatiles of pineapple wine in mixed fermentation, the growth and fermentation ability of two yeast strains were monitored, and the physicochemical characteristics (including reducing sugar, total acidity, volatile acidity, and ethanol content) and volatile profile of pineapple wines produced by different inoculation strategies were analysed using chemical method and headspace-solid phase microextraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GCMS), respectively. Results indicate that although the proliferation of M. agaves P3-3 was repressed by S. cerevisiae D254, changes in inoculation methods influenced yeast-yeast interactions and modulated the physicochemical properties and volatile profile of pineapple wine. Inoculation sequence and concentration of two strains were more important to volatile profile of pineapple wine than inoculation ratio. Simultaneous inoculations with 1 × 107 CFU/mL M. agaves P3-3 and sequential inoculations increased the total acidity level, but their volatile acidity was lower than that with 5 × 106 CFU/mL M. agaves P3-3. Simultaneous inoculations with 5 × 106 CFU/mL M. agaves P3-3 retained more types of variety volatiles. However, the appropriate increase in the inoculation concentration of the cells and sequential inoculation increased the fermentative volatiles, especially ester levels. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13197-021-05019-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. © Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inoculation strategy; Metschnikowia agaves; Mixed fermentation; Pineapple wine

Year:  2021        PMID: 35068577      PMCID: PMC8758822          DOI: 10.1007/s13197-021-05019-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci Technol        ISSN: 0022-1155            Impact factor:   2.701


  19 in total

1.  Evaluation of aroma enhancement for "Ecolly" dry white wines by mixed inoculation of selected Rhodotorula mucilaginosa and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Xing-Chen Wang; Ai-Hua Li; Marta Dizy; Niamat Ullah; Wei-Xuan Sun; Yong-Sheng Tao
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 7.514

2.  Volatile profile of white wines fermented with sequential inoculation of Starmerella bacillaris and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Vasileios Englezos; Kalliopi Rantsiou; Francesco Cravero; Fabrizio Torchio; Matteo Pollon; Daniela Fracassetti; Anne Ortiz-Julien; Vincenzo Gerbi; Luca Rolle; Luca Cocolin
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 7.514

3.  Volatile flavour profile of reduced alcohol wines fermented with the non-conventional yeast species Metschnikowia pulcherrima and Saccharomyces uvarum.

Authors:  C Varela; F Sengler; M Solomon; C Curtin
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 7.514

4.  Selected non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts in controlled multistarter fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiae on alcoholic fermentation behaviour and wine aroma of cherry wines.

Authors:  Shu Yang Sun; Han Sheng Gong; Xiao Man Jiang; Yu Ping Zhao
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.516

5.  Influence of pre-fermentation cold maceration treatment on aroma compounds of Cabernet Sauvignon wines fermented in different industrial scale fermenters.

Authors:  Jian Cai; Bao-Qing Zhu; Yun-He Wang; Lin Lu; Yi-Bin Lan; Malcolm J Reeves; Chang-Qing Duan
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 7.514

6.  Evaluation of non-Saccharomyces yeasts for the reduction of alcohol content in wine.

Authors:  A Contreras; C Hidalgo; P A Henschke; P J Chambers; C Curtin; C Varela
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Evaluation of different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains on the profile of volatile compounds in pineapple wine.

Authors:  Xue Lin; Qingke Wang; Xiaoping Hu; Wuyang Wu; Yexin Zhang; Sixin Liu; Congfa Li
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.701

8.  The Oenological Potential of Hanseniaspora uvarum in Simultaneous and Sequential Co-fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Industrial Wine Production.

Authors:  Mariana Tristezza; Maria Tufariello; Vittorio Capozzi; Giuseppe Spano; Giovanni Mita; Francesco Grieco
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Different Non-Saccharomyces Yeast Species Stimulate Nutrient Consumption in S. cerevisiae Mixed Cultures.

Authors:  Jose A Curiel; Pilar Morales; Ramon Gonzalez; Jordi Tronchoni
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.