Adam Viera1,2, Collette D Sosnowy3, Jacob J van den Berg2,3,4,5,6, Nikita A Mehta1, E Jennifer Edelman1,2,7, Trace Kershaw1,2, Philip A Chan3,4,5. 1. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 2. Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 3. Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. 4. Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. 5. Providence/Boston Center for AIDS Research, Rhode Island, USA. 6. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 7. Yale School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stimulant use is increasing in the United States (U.S.), especially among men who have sex with men (MSM). Objectives: We sought to ascertain barriers and facilitators to substance use treatment utilization among MSM who use stimulants in the northeastern U.S. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with MSM who reported recent stimulant use. Interviews explored perceptions of and experiences with substance use treatment. We used thematic analysis to identify factors that facilitated or impeded substance use treatment engagement. Results: We interviewed 21 MSM in Providence, Rhode Island (n = 15) and New Haven, Connecticut (n = 6). Most participants identified as White (57.1%) and gay (52.4%). Over half (52.4%) screened positive for stimulant use disorder. We identified themes in how participants defined, entered, and engaged in substance use treatment. Participants described treatment to include a variety of modalities, including self-help and peer support groups; they defined treatment as an iterative process. Social networks played both a supportive and obstructive role in treatment entry depending on the relationships and approaches of network members. Meanwhile, social connection during treatment could be both therapeutic (reducing isolation) and counterproductive (precipitating cravings to use). Participants generally expressed a desire for harm reduction approaches to treatment over abstinence-only ones. Finally, participants did not find treatment responsive to their needs as MSM. Conclusion: This study highlights key barriers and facilitators to substance use treatment engagement and underscores the urgent need for culturally-responsive treatment programs that employ harm reduction approaches and are tailored to the unique circumstances of MSM who use stimulants. Supplemental data for this article is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2022.2026965.
BACKGROUND: Stimulant use is increasing in the United States (U.S.), especially among men who have sex with men (MSM). Objectives: We sought to ascertain barriers and facilitators to substance use treatment utilization among MSM who use stimulants in the northeastern U.S. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with MSM who reported recent stimulant use. Interviews explored perceptions of and experiences with substance use treatment. We used thematic analysis to identify factors that facilitated or impeded substance use treatment engagement. Results: We interviewed 21 MSM in Providence, Rhode Island (n = 15) and New Haven, Connecticut (n = 6). Most participants identified as White (57.1%) and gay (52.4%). Over half (52.4%) screened positive for stimulant use disorder. We identified themes in how participants defined, entered, and engaged in substance use treatment. Participants described treatment to include a variety of modalities, including self-help and peer support groups; they defined treatment as an iterative process. Social networks played both a supportive and obstructive role in treatment entry depending on the relationships and approaches of network members. Meanwhile, social connection during treatment could be both therapeutic (reducing isolation) and counterproductive (precipitating cravings to use). Participants generally expressed a desire for harm reduction approaches to treatment over abstinence-only ones. Finally, participants did not find treatment responsive to their needs as MSM. Conclusion: This study highlights key barriers and facilitators to substance use treatment engagement and underscores the urgent need for culturally-responsive treatment programs that employ harm reduction approaches and are tailored to the unique circumstances of MSM who use stimulants. Supplemental data for this article is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2022.2026965.
Entities:
Keywords:
men who have sex with men; qualitative; stimulants; substance use treatment