AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the greater trochanter's (GT) behaviour in simulated subtrochanteric osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurement of functional and anatomical femoral torsion, and position of the GT and lesser trochanter was performed using 3-dimensional (3D) surface models of 100 cadaveric femora. Femoral torsion between 2° and 22° was defined as normal, femora with <2° and >22° of femoral torsion were assigned to the low- and high-torsion group. Subtrochanteric osteotomy was simulated to normalise torsional deformities to 12°. RESULTS: With subtrochanteric osteotomy, functional torsion was simultaneously corrected while adjusting anatomical torsion (R2 = 0.866, p < 0.001). Compared to the normal-torsion group, an anteroposterior (AP) overcorrection of ±0.5 centimetres (range 0.02-1.1 cm) of the GT resulted in the high- and low-torsion group, respectively (p < 0.001): Mean AP GT distance to a standardised coronal plane was 2.1 ± 0.3 cm (range 12-30 cm) in the normal-torsion group compared to 1.61 ± 0.1 cm (range 1.4-1.71 cm) and 2.6 ± 0.6 cm (range 1.8-3.6 cm) for the corrected high and low-torsion groups, respectively. The extent of the GT shift in AP direction correlated strongly with the extent to which anatomical femoral torsion was corrected (R2 = 0.946; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Subtrochanteric osteotomy for femoral maltorsion reliably adjusts anatomical and functional torsion, but also results in a ±1 cm AP shift of the GT per 10° of torsional correction. However, this effect of the procedure is most likely not clinically relevant in relation to hip abductor performance.
AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the greater trochanter's (GT) behaviour in simulated subtrochanteric osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurement of functional and anatomical femoral torsion, and position of the GT and lesser trochanter was performed using 3-dimensional (3D) surface models of 100 cadaveric femora. Femoral torsion between 2° and 22° was defined as normal, femora with <2° and >22° of femoral torsion were assigned to the low- and high-torsion group. Subtrochanteric osteotomy was simulated to normalise torsional deformities to 12°. RESULTS: With subtrochanteric osteotomy, functional torsion was simultaneously corrected while adjusting anatomical torsion (R2 = 0.866, p < 0.001). Compared to the normal-torsion group, an anteroposterior (AP) overcorrection of ±0.5 centimetres (range 0.02-1.1 cm) of the GT resulted in the high- and low-torsion group, respectively (p < 0.001): Mean AP GT distance to a standardised coronal plane was 2.1 ± 0.3 cm (range 12-30 cm) in the normal-torsion group compared to 1.61 ± 0.1 cm (range 1.4-1.71 cm) and 2.6 ± 0.6 cm (range 1.8-3.6 cm) for the corrected high and low-torsion groups, respectively. The extent of the GT shift in AP direction correlated strongly with the extent to which anatomical femoral torsion was corrected (R2 = 0.946; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Subtrochanteric osteotomy for femoral maltorsion reliably adjusts anatomical and functional torsion, but also results in a ±1 cm AP shift of the GT per 10° of torsional correction. However, this effect of the procedure is most likely not clinically relevant in relation to hip abductor performance.