| Literature DB >> 35067070 |
Eijiro Onishi1, Satoshi Ota1, Satoshi Fujita1, Yoshihiro Tsukamoto1, Shinnosuke Yamashita1, Takumi Hashimura1, Kazuhiro Matsunaga1, Tadashi Yasuda1.
Abstract
AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate sagittal spinopelvic alignment (SSPA) in the early stage of rapidly destructive coxopathy (RDC) compared with hip osteoarthritis (HOA), and to identify risk factors of SSPA for destruction of the femoral head within 12 months after the disease onset.Entities:
Keywords: Lumbar lordosis; PI-LL; Sacral slope; alignment; femoral head collapse; femoral heads; hip joint; hip pain; joint space narrowing; osteoarthritis; pelvic tilt; pelvis; radiographs; rapidly destructive coxopathy; sagittal vertical axis; spine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35067070 PMCID: PMC9047078 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.31.BJO-2021-0175.R1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Jt Open ISSN: 2633-1462
Fig. 1Disease progression of rapidly destructive coxopathy (RDC) and hip osteoarthritis (HOA). Right hip joint with RDC demonstrating chondrolysis at two months, partial destruction of the femoral head at 5 months, and its massive destruction at ten months after the onset of hip pain. Sharp angle of the right hip was 42° at the onset of hip pain. Left hip joint with HOA showing slight joint space narrowing at two years, partial destruction of the femoral head with osteophyte formation in the acetabulum and femoral head at seven years, and exacerbating femoral head destruction at eight years after the onset of hip pain. Sharp angle of the left hip was 50° at the onset of hip pain.
Fig. 2Measurement of the femoral head collapse ratio. On the last anteroposterior radiograph taken within 12 months after the onset of hip pain, the vertical distance is measured between the two separate lines parallel to the radiological teardrop line drown through the most proximal and distal portions of the affected (A) and non-affected (B) femoral heads. The femoral head collapse ratio (%) is calculated with the equation as femoral head collapse ratio (%) = 100×(1 A/B).
Fig. 3Illustration of the radiological parameters of the sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis. PI, pelvic incidence; PT, pelvic tilt; SS, sacral slope; LL, lumbar lordosis angle; TK, thoracic kyphosis angle; SVA, sagittal vertical axis.
Comparison of radiological parameters and the SRS-Schwab classification modifiers between rapidly destructive coxopathy (RDC) and hip osteoarthritis (HOA).
| Variable | RDC (n = 34) | HOA (n = 25) | p-value | Cohen’s d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Sharp angle, ° | 40.4 (3.5; 39.2 to 41.6) | 48.8 (3.4; 47.6 to 50.1) | < 0.001 | 2.43 |
| PT, ° | 25.3 (15.2; 20.0 to 30.6) | 13.1 (8.7; 9.5 to 16.6) | < 0.001 | 0.96 |
| SS, ° | 24.3 (11.8; 20.2 to 28.4) | 32.7 (7.9; 29.5 to 36.0) | 0.003 | 0.82 |
| PI, ° | 49.6 (11.6; 45.6 to 53.6) | 45.8 (10.0; 41.6 to 49.9) | 0.189 | 0.35 |
| SVA, mm | 70.5 (50.4; 52.9 to 88.1) | 52.5 (46.7; 36.1 to 68.9) | 0.145 | 0.39 |
| TK, ° | 29.2 (13.3; 24.5 to 33.8) | 31.1 (10.1; 26.9 to 35.3) | 0.537 | 0.16 |
| LL, ° | 29.1 (18.6; 22.6 to 35.6) | 43.5 (12.0; 38.5 to 48.4) | 0.004 | 0.89 |
| PI-LL, ° | 20.5 (21.8; 12.9 to 28.1) | 2.3 (11.3; -2.3 to 7.0) | < 0.001 | 1.00 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| < 10° | 12 | 19 | 0.005 | |
| 10 to 20° | 9 | 4 | ||
| > 20° | 13 | 2 | ||
|
| ||||
| < 20° | 12 | 18 | 0.001 | |
| 20 to 30° | 9 | 7 | ||
| > 30° | 13 | 0 | ||
|
| ||||
| < 40 | 11 | 11 | 0.645 | |
| 40 to 95 | 14 | 9 | ||
| > 95 | 9 | 5 | ||
Mann-Whitney U test.
Student’s t-test.
Chi-squared test.
LL, lumbar lordosis angle; PI, pelvic incidence; PT, pelvic tilt; SD, standard deviation; SS, sacral slope; SVA, sagittal vertical axis; TK, thoracic kyphosis angle.
Fig. 4Scatter plots of correlation between the femoral head collapse ratio and radiological parameters in patients with rapidly destructive coxopathy. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) are shown with p-values. LL, lumbar lordosis angle; PI, pelvic incidence; PT, pelvic tilt; SS, sacral slope; SVA, sagittal vertical axis; TK, thoracic kyphosis angle.
Stepwise regression analysis with predictor variables of sagittal spinopelvic alignment.
| Model | Predictor | Partial regression coefficient (SE) | Standardized partial regression coefficient | t-ratio | p-value | 95% CI | Adjusted R2 | VIF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sacral slope | -1.026 (0.251) | -0.586 | -4.091 | < 0.001 | -1.537 to –0.515 | 0.323 | 1.000 |
| 2 | Sacral slope | -0.697 (0.262) | -0.398 | -2.659 | 0.012 | -1.231 to –0.162 | 0.429 | 1.294 |
| Sagittal vertical axis | 0.162 (0.061) | 0.395 | 2.639 | 0.013 | 0.037 to 0.287 | 1.294 |
Multiple regression analysis.
CI, confidence interval; R2, coefficient of determination; SE, standard error; VIF, variance inflation factor.