INTRODUCTION: Acute gastrointestinal obstruction due to colorectal cancer occurs in 7-30% of cases and is an abdominal emergency that requires urgent decompression. The safety and oncological effect of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) in these patients remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate its impact on these variables and compare it with that of emergency surgery (ES). METHODS: Descriptive, retrospective and single-centre study, performed between 2008 and 2015, with follow-up until 2017. One hundred eleven patients with diagnosis of left malignant colonic obstruction were included and divided according to the treatment received: stent as bridge to surgery (SBTS group: 39), palliative stent (PS group: 30) and emergency surgery with curative (ECS group: 34) or palliative intent (EPS group: 8). Treatment was decided by the attending surgeon in charge. RESULTS: Technical and clinical general success rates for colorectal SEMS were 95.7% and 91.3%, respectively, with an associated morbimortality of 23.2%, which was higher in the PS group (p = 0.002). The SBTS group presented a higher laparoscopic approach and primary anastomosis (p < 0.001), as well as a lower colostomy rate than the ECS group (12.8% vs. 40%; p = 0.023). Postoperative morbidity and mortality were significantly lower in the SBTS group compared to the ECS group (41% vs. 67.6%; p = 0.025). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were similar between the analysed groups. CONCLUSION: Colonic stent placement is a safe and effective therapeutic alternative to emergency surgery in the management of left-sided malignant colonic obstruction in both curative and palliative fields. It presents a lower postoperative morbimortality and a similar oncological prognosis.
INTRODUCTION: Acute gastrointestinal obstruction due to colorectal cancer occurs in 7-30% of cases and is an abdominal emergency that requires urgent decompression. The safety and oncological effect of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) in these patients remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate its impact on these variables and compare it with that of emergency surgery (ES). METHODS: Descriptive, retrospective and single-centre study, performed between 2008 and 2015, with follow-up until 2017. One hundred eleven patients with diagnosis of left malignant colonic obstruction were included and divided according to the treatment received: stent as bridge to surgery (SBTS group: 39), palliative stent (PS group: 30) and emergency surgery with curative (ECS group: 34) or palliative intent (EPS group: 8). Treatment was decided by the attending surgeon in charge. RESULTS: Technical and clinical general success rates for colorectal SEMS were 95.7% and 91.3%, respectively, with an associated morbimortality of 23.2%, which was higher in the PS group (p = 0.002). The SBTS group presented a higher laparoscopic approach and primary anastomosis (p < 0.001), as well as a lower colostomy rate than the ECS group (12.8% vs. 40%; p = 0.023). Postoperative morbidity and mortality were significantly lower in the SBTS group compared to the ECS group (41% vs. 67.6%; p = 0.025). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were similar between the analysed groups. CONCLUSION: Colonic stent placement is a safe and effective therapeutic alternative to emergency surgery in the management of left-sided malignant colonic obstruction in both curative and palliative fields. It presents a lower postoperative morbimortality and a similar oncological prognosis.
Authors: Su Jin Kim; Hyung Wook Kim; Su Bum Park; Dae Hwan Kang; Cheol Woong Choi; Byeong Jun Song; Joung Boom Hong; Dong Jun Kim; Byung Soo Park; Gyung Mo Son Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Gloria Fernández-Esparrach; J M Bordas; M D Giráldez; A Ginès; M Pellisé; O Sendino; G Martínez-Pallí; A Castells; J Llach Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Christine E Dauphine; Patrick Tan; Robert W Beart; Petar Vukasin; Hartley Cohen; Marvin L Corman Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Yoo Jin Lee; Jin Young Yoon; Jae Jun Park; Soo Jung Park; Jie-Hyun Kim; Young Hoon Youn; Tae Il Kim; Hyojin Park; Won Ho Kim; Jae Hee Cheon Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: K J Gorissen; J B Tuynman; E Fryer; L Wang; R Uberoi; O M Jones; C Cunningham; I Lindsey Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: T E Pavlidis; G Marakis; K Ballas; S Rafailidis; K Psarras; D Pissas; A K Sakantamis Journal: Acta Chir Belg Date: 2008 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.090