Literature DB >> 35066596

Bone Involvement in Patients with Spondyloarthropathies.

Willem Lems1, Corinne Miceli-Richard2,3, Judith Haschka4,5, Andrea Giusti6, Gitte Lund Chistensen7, Roland Kocijan8, Nicolas Rosine2,9, Niklas Rye Jørgensen7, Gerolamo Bianchi6, Christian Roux2.   

Abstract

Spondyloarthropathies (SpA) are common systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, in which, as in other rheumatic diseases, levels of markers of bone resorption are elevated, leading to bone loss and elevated risk of vertebral fractures. However, the diseases are also associated with new bone formation in the spine, the so-called syndesmophytes. We tried to unravel the pathogenesis of formation and growth of syndesmophytes and evaluated new diagnostic and treatment options. After a successful meeting of the Working Group on Rheumatic Diseases at the ECTS 2020, we (WL and CR) were excited about the quality of the speakers (CM, JH, AG, and GL) and their complimentary lectures. Given the relative lack of reviews on spondyloarthropathies and bone, we decided to work together on a comprehensive review that might be interesting for basic scientists and clinically relevant for clinicians. Radiographic progression in axSpA is linked to several risk factors, like male sex, smoking, HLA-B-27, increased levels of CRP, presence of syndesmophytes, and marked inflammation on MRI. The potential role of mechanical stress in the context of physically demanding jobs has been also suggested to promote structural damages. Different treatment options from NSAIDs to biologic agents like TNF inhibitors (TNFi) or IL-17inhibitors (IL-17i) result in a reduction of inflammation and symptoms. However, all these different treatment options failed to show clear and reproducible results on inhibition on syndesmophyte formation. The majority of data are available on TNFi, and some studies suggested an effect in subgroups of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Less information is available on NSAIDs and IL-17i. Since IL-17i have been introduced quite recently, more studies are expected. IL-17 inhibitors (Il-17i) potently reduce signs and symptoms, but serum level of IL-17 is not elevated, therefore, IL-17 probably has mainly a local effect. The failure of anti-IL-23 in axSpA suggests that IL-17A production could be independent from IL-23. It may be upregulated by TNFα, resulting in lower expression of DKK1 and RANKL and an increase in osteogenesis. In active AS markers of bone resorption are increased, while bone formation markers can be increased or decreased. Bone Turnover markers and additional markers related to Wnt such as DKK1, sclerostin, and RANKL are valuable for elucidating bone metabolism on a group level and they are not (yet) able to predict individual patient outcomes. The gold standard for detection of structural lesions in clinical practice is the use of conventional radiographics. However, the resolution is low compared to the change over time and the interval for detecting changes are 2 years or more. Modern techniques offer substantial advantages such as the early detection of bone marrow edema with MRI, the fivefold increased detection rate of new or growing syndesmophytes with low-dose CT, and the decrease in 18F-fluoride uptake during treatment with TNFα-inhibitors (TNFi) in a pilot study in 12 AS patients. Detection of bone involvement by new techniques, such as low-dose CT, MRI and 18-Fluoride PET-scans, and bone turnover markers, in combination with focusing on high-risk groups such as patients with early disease, elevated CRP, syndesmophytes at baseline, male patients and patients with HLA-B27 + are promising options for the near future. However, for optimal prevention of formation of syndesmophytes we need more detailed insight in the pathogenesis of bone formation in axSpA and probably more targeted therapies.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35066596     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-021-00933-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  171 in total

1.  Can we stop progression of ankylosing spondylitis?

Authors:  Georg Schett; Martin Rudwaleit
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.098

2.  MRI vertebral corner inflammation followed by fat deposition is the strongest contributor to the development of new bone at the same vertebral corner: a multilevel longitudinal analysis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Pedro M Machado; Xenofon Baraliakos; Désirée van der Heijde; Jürgen Braun; Robert Landewé
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Evolution of radiographic damage in ankylosing spondylitis: a 12 year prospective follow-up of the OASIS study.

Authors:  Sofia Ramiro; Carmen Stolwijk; Astrid van Tubergen; Désirée van der Heijde; Maxime Dougados; Filip van den Bosch; Robert Landewé
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Brief report: erosions and sclerosis on radiographs precede the subsequent development of syndesmophytes at the same site: a twelve-year prospective followup of patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Sofia Ramiro; Astrid van Tubergen; Désirée van der Heijde; Carmen Stolwijk; Gideon Bookelman; Maxime Dougados; Filip van den Bosch; Robert B M Landewé
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 10.995

5.  Which spinal lesions are associated with new bone formation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with anti-TNF agents? A long-term observational study using MRI and conventional radiography.

Authors:  X Baraliakos; F Heldmann; J Callhoff; J Listing; T Appelboom; J Brandt; F Van den Bosch; M Breban; Gr Burmester; M Dougados; P Emery; H Gaston; M Grunke; I E Van Der Horst-Bruinsma; R Landewé; M Leirisalo-Repo; J Sieper; K De Vlam; D Pappas; U Kiltz; D Van Der Heijde; J Braun
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Progression of radiographic damage in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: defining the central role of syndesmophytes.

Authors:  X Baraliakos; J Listing; M Rudwaleit; H Haibel; J Brandt; J Sieper; J Braun
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 7.  To move or not to move: the paradoxical effect of physical exercise in axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Fabio Massimo Perrotta; Rik Lories; Ennio Lubrano
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2021-02

8.  Association study of genes related to bone formation and resorption and the extent of radiographic change in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  A Cortes; W P Maksymowych; B P Wordsworth; R D Inman; P Danoy; P Rahman; M A Stone; M Corr; Lianne S Gensler; D Gladman; A Morgan; H Marzo-Ortega; M M Ward; T J Learch; J D Reveille; M A Brown; M H Weisman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Progress in spondylarthritis. Mechanisms of new bone formation in spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Rik J U Lories; Frank P Luyten; Kurt de Vlam
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Lifestyle factors may modify the effect of disease activity on radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Sofia Ramiro; Robert Landewé; Astrid van Tubergen; Annelies Boonen; Carmen Stolwijk; Maxime Dougados; Filip van den Bosch; Désirée van der Heijde
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2015-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.