Literature DB >> 35066565

"What's in a name?" Identification of newborn infants at birth using their given names.

Sonya Besagar1, Patrick Louie A Robles2, Chanel Rojas3, Jerard Z Kneifati-Hayek4, Paul Asadourian5, Wendy Tong5, Rashed Kosber5, Jo R Applebaum6, Craig Albanese6, Dena Goffman6,7, Jason S Adelman8,9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of pregnant women who selected names for their babies to be born and were willing to disclose them for use in hospital systems, thereby potentially reducing infant identification errors. STUDY
DESIGN: Survey of pregnant women admitted to postpartum or antepartum units at a large academic hospital. Descriptive analyses were conducted to determine the proportion who had chosen names prior to delivery. Chi-square tests and calculated odds ratios assessed the association with demographic and pregnancy factors.
RESULTS: Of postpartum participants, 79.0% had names for their newborns at birth. This proportion was significantly lower in self-identified non-Hispanic, white, and married women. Of antepartum participants, 65.7% had selected a name at the time of survey.
CONCLUSION: Most participants had names chosen for use at birth. This finding was consistent across demographic and pregnancy characteristics, supporting the feasibility of using given names for newborns in hospital systems at birth.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35066565     DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-01270-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   3.225


  1 in total

1.  "I meant that med for Baylee not Bailey!": a mixed method study to identify incidence and risk factors for CPOE patient misidentification.

Authors:  Hannah I Levin; James E Levin; Steven G Docimo
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.