Literature DB >> 35066211

Home-Based Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the United States.

Anthony D Sung1, Vinay K Giri2, Helen Tang3, Krista Rowe Nichols4, Meagan V Lew5, Lauren Bohannon5, Yi Ren5, Sin-Ho Jung6, Tara Dalton3, Amy Bush5, Jolien Van Opstal5, Alexandra Artica5, Julia Messina7, Rebecca Shelby8, Jennifer Frith5, Martha Lassiter9, Jill Burleson5, Kari Leonard5, Ashley S Potter5, Taewoong Choi5, Cristina J Gasparetto5, Mitchell E Horwitz5, Gwynn D Long5, Richard D Lopez5, Stefanie Sarantopoulos5, Nelson J Chao5.   

Abstract

Patients undergoing allogeneic (allo) and autologous (auto) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) require extensive hospitalizations or daily clinic visits for the duration of their transplantation. Home HCT, wherein patients live at home and providers make daily trips to the patient's residence to perform assessments and deliver any necessary interventions, may enhance patient quality of life and improve outcomes. We conducted the first study of home HCT in the United States to evaluate this model in the US healthcare setting and to determine the effect on clinical outcomes and quality of life. This case-control study evaluated patients who received home HCT at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, from November 2012 to March 2018. Each home HCT patient was matched with 2 controls from the same institution who had received standard treatment based on age, disease, and type of transplant for outcomes comparison. Clinical outcomes were abstracted from electronic health records, and quality of life was assessed via Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant. Clinical outcomes were compared with Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test (continuous variables) or chi-square test (categorical variables). Quality of life scores were compared using the Student t-test. All analyses used a significance threshold of 0.05. Twenty-five patients received home HCT, including 8 allos and 17 autos. Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the home HCT patients and their matched controls; home HCT patients had decreased incidence of relapse within 1 year of transplantation. Pre-HCT quality of life was well preserved for autologous home HCT patients. This Phase I study demonstrated that home HCT can be successfully implemented in the United States. There was no evidence that home HCT outcomes were inferior to standard-of-care treatment, and patients undergoing autologous home HCT were able to maintain their quality of life. A Phase II randomized trial of home versus standard HCT is currently underway to better compare outcomes and costs.
Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hematopoietic cell transplantation; Home-based; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35066211      PMCID: PMC8977260          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther        ISSN: 2666-6367


  36 in total

Review 1.  How we treat cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Michael Boeckh; Per Ljungman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Febrile Neutropenia.

Authors:  Krish Patel; Howard Jack West
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Cohort differences in the availability of informal caregivers: are the Boomers at risk?

Authors:  Lindsay H Ryan; Jacqui Smith; Toni C Antonucci; James S Jackson
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2012-01-31

4.  EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-BMT for the measurement of quality of life in bone marrow transplant recipients: a comparison.

Authors:  M Kopp; H Schweigkofler; B Holzner; D Nachbaur; D Niederwieser; W W Fleischhacker; G Kemmler; B Sperner-Unterweger
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation without protective isolation in adults with malignant disease.

Authors:  J A Russell; M C Poon; A R Jones; R C Woodman; B A Ruether
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Home care during the pancytopenic phase after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is advantageous compared with hospital care.

Authors:  Britt-Marie Svahn; Mats Remberger; Karl-Erik Myrbäck; Katarina Holmberg; Britta Eriksson; Patrik Hentschke; Johan Aschan; Lisbeth Barkholt; Olle Ringdén
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Quality of Life of Caregivers of Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Kareem Jamani; Lynn E Onstad; Merav Bar; Paul A Carpenter; Elizabeth F Krakow; Rachel B Salit; Mary E D Flowers; Stephanie J Lee
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Healthcare Burden, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Mucosal Barrier Injury Laboratory-Confirmed Bloodstream Infections after Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Christopher E Dandoy; David Haslam; Adam Lane; Sonata Jodele; Kathy Demmel; Javier El-Bietar; Laura Flesch; Kasiani C Myers; Abigail Pate; Seth Rotz; Paulina Daniels; Gregory Wallace; Adam Nelson; Heather Waters; Beverly Connelly; Stella M Davies
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Bacterial bloodstream infections in the allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant patient: new considerations for a persistent nemesis.

Authors:  C E Dandoy; M I Ardura; G A Papanicolaou; J J Auletta
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 5.174

10.  House calls for stem cell transplant patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Anthony D Sung; Krista R Nichols; Nelson J Chao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.