Literature DB >> 35065239

Conductivity augments ROS and RNS delivery and tumor toxicity of an argon plasma jet.

Lea Miebach1, Eric Freund1, Ramona Clemen2, Klaus-Dieter Weltmann2, Hans-Robert Metelmann3, Thomas von Woedtke4, Torsten Gerling2, Kristian Wende2, Sander Bekeschus5.   

Abstract

Gas plasma jet technology was recently identified as a potential adjuvant in the palliation of cancer patients. However, a practical point raised is if higher therapeutic efficacy is achieved with the gas plasma applied in direct contact to the tumor tissue (conducting) or during treatment with the remote cloud of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) being expelled. In a bedside-to-bench study, this clinical question was translated into studying these two distinct treatment modalities using a three-dimensional tumor cell-matrix-hydrogel assay with subsequent quantitative confocal imaging. Z-resolved fluorescence analysis of two cancer cell lines revealed greater toxicity of the conducting mode. This result was re-iterated in the growth analysis of vascularized tumor tissue cultured on chicken embryos' CAM using in ovo bioluminescence imaging. Furthermore, for conducting compared to free mode, optical emission spectroscopy revealed stronger RNS signal lines in the gas phase, while both ROS/RNS deposition in the liquid was drastically exacerbated in the conducting mode. Altogether, our results are vital in understanding the importance of standardized treatment distances on the therapeutic efficacy of gas plasma exposure in clinical oncology and will help to give critical implications for clinicians involved in plasma onco-therapy in the future.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Plasma medicine; Reactive nitrogen species; Reactive oxygen species; kINPen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35065239     DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med        ISSN: 0891-5849            Impact factor:   7.376


  9 in total

1.  Gas plasma-oxidized sodium chloride acts via hydrogen peroxide in a model of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Lea Miebach; Eric Freund; Ramona Clemen; Stephan Kersting; Lars-Ivo Partecke; Sander Bekeschus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Cold Atmospheric Plasma Does Not Affect Stellate Cells Phenotype in Pancreatic Cancer Tissue in Ovo.

Authors:  Angela Privat-Maldonado; Ruben Verloy; Edgar Cardenas Delahoz; Abraham Lin; Steve Vanlanduit; Evelien Smits; Annemie Bogaerts
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  The potential of gas plasma technology for targeting breast cancer.

Authors:  Sander Bekeschus; Fariba Saadati; Steffen Emmert
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2022-08

4.  Conductive Gas Plasma Treatment Augments Tumor Toxicity of Ringer's Lactate Solutions in a Model of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Lea Miebach; Eric Freund; Alessandra Lourenço Cecchini; Sander Bekeschus
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-25

5.  Biological Risk Assessment of Three Dental Composite Materials following Gas Plasma Exposure.

Authors:  Sander Bekeschus; Lea Miebach; Jonas Pommerening; Ramona Clemen; Katharina Witzke
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.927

6.  Toxicity and virucidal activity of a neon-driven micro plasma jet on eukaryotic cells and a coronavirus.

Authors:  Daniel M Mrochen; Lea Miebach; Henry Skowski; Robert Bansemer; Chiara A Drechsler; Ulfilas Hofmanna; Manuel Hein; Uwe Mamat; Torsten Gerling; Ulrich Schaible; Thomas von Woedtke; Sander Bekeschus
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 8.101

7.  d-Glucose Oxidation by Cold Atmospheric Plasma-Induced Reactive Species.

Authors:  Mohsen Ahmadi; Zahra Nasri; Thomas von Woedtke; Kristian Wende
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-08-26

Review 8.  Microwave Radiation and the Brain: Mechanisms, Current Status, and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Sohail Mumtaz; Juie Nahushkumar Rana; Eun Ha Choi; Ihn Han
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 9.  In ovo model in cancer research and tumor immunology.

Authors:  Lea Miebach; Julia Berner; Sander Bekeschus
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.786

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.