Literature DB >> 35064795

Automatic quantitative evaluation of normal pancreas based on deep learning in a Chinese adult population.

Jinxiu Cai1, Xiaochao Guo1, Ke Wang1, Yaofeng Zhang2, Dadou Zhang2, Xiaodong Zhang1, Xiaoying Wang3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a 3D U-Net-based model for the automatic segmentation of the pancreas using the diameters, volume, and density of normal pancreases among Chinese adults.
METHODS: A total of 2778 pancreas images (dataset 1) were retrospectively collected and randomly divided into training (n = 2252), validation (n = 245), and test (n = 281) datasets. The segmentation model for the pancreas was constructed through cascaded application of two 3D U-Net networks. The segmentation efficiency for the pancreas was evaluated by the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Another dataset of 3189 normal pancreas CT images (dataset 2) was obtained for external validation, including 1063 non-contrast images, 1063 arterial phase images, and 1063 portal venous phase images. The pancreas segmentation in dataset 2 was assessed objectively and manually revised by two radiologists. Then, the pancreatic volume, diameters, and average CT value for each phase of pancreas images in dataset 2 were calculated. The relationships between pancreas volume and age, sex, height, and weight were analyzed.
RESULTS: In dataset 1, a mean DSC of 0.94 for the test dataset was achieved. In dataset 2, the objective assessment yielded a 90% satisfaction rate for the automatic segmentation of the pancreas as external validation. The diameters of the pancreas were 43.71-44.28 mm, 67.40-68.15 mm, and 114.53-117.06 mm, respectively. The average pancreatic volume was 63,969.06-65,247.75 mm3, which was greatest at the age of 18-38 and then decreased to a minimum at the age of 69-85. The CT value of the pancreas also decreased with age, from a maximum value of 38.87 ± 9.70 HU to a minimum of 27.72 ± 10.85 HU.
CONCLUSION: The pancreas segmentation tool based on deep learning can segment the pancreas on CT images and measure its normal diameter, volume, and CT value accurately and effectively.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropometry; Computed tomography; Deep learning; Pancreas; Segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35064795     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03327-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  8 in total

1.  CT volumetry of normal pancreas: correlation with the pancreatic diameters measurable by the cross-sectional imaging, and relationship with the gender, age, and body constitution.

Authors:  A Djuric-Stefanovic; D Masulovic; J Kostic; K Randjic; D Saranovic
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Pancreatic volume and endocrine and exocrine functions in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Marie-France Philippe; Salim Benabadji; Laurence Barbot-Trystram; Dominique Vadrot; Christian Boitard; Etienne Larger
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.327

3.  Volume changes of the pancreatic head remnant after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Fee Klupp; Miriam Klauss; Nuh N Rahbari; Klaus Felix; Ulf Hinz; Ines Manglberger; Frank Bergmann; Matthias M Gaida; Thilo Hackert; Oliver Strobel; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Non-enhanced ultrasound is not a satisfactory modality for measuring necrotic ablated volume after radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules: a comparison with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Lin Yan; Yukun Luo; Jing Xiao; Lin Lin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Reduced pancreatic volume and beta-cell area in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Henning Schrader; Bjoern A Menge; Simone Schneider; Orlin Belyaev; Andrea Tannapfel; Waldemar Uhl; Wolfgang E Schmidt; Juris J Meier
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  The ageing pancreas: a systematic review of the evidence and analysis of the consequences.

Authors:  J-M Löhr; N Panic; M Vujasinovic; C S Verbeke
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Preoperative CT anthropometric measurements and pancreatic pathology increase risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yun Hwa Roh; Bo Kyeong Kang; Soon-Young Song; Chul-Min Lee; Yun Kyung Jung; Mimi Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Pancreas volumes in humans from birth to age one hundred taking into account sex, obesity, and presence of type-2 diabetes.

Authors:  Y Saisho; A E Butler; J J Meier; T Monchamp; M Allen-Auerbach; R A Rizza; P C Butler
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.414

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.