Literature DB >> 35064542

Clinical outcomes of geriatric patients with COVID-19: review of one-year data.

Gulru Ulugerger Avci1, Bahar Bektan Kanat2, Veysel Suzan2, Gunay Can3, Bora Korkmazer4, Ridvan Karaali5, Fehmi Tabak5, Sermin Borekci6, Gokhan Aygun7, Hakan Yavuzer2, Alper Doventas2.   

Abstract

AIMS: In this study, we aimed to reveal mortality rates and factors affecting survival in geriatric patients infected with COVID-19.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 873 geriatric patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized between March 11, 2020 and March 11, 2021. Demographic, clinical, laboratory data, and treatment options were obtained from electronic medical records. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the risk factors for in-hospital death.
RESULTS: During the specified period, 643 patients were discharged, and 230 patients died in the hospital. The mean age was 75.08 ± 7.39 years (mean ± SD) and 51.8% were males. We found that older age (≥ 85), polypharmacy, dyspnea, abnormal thorax computed tomography (CT), lower doses of anticoagulation, and high values of white blood cell, aspartate aminotransferase, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin were associated with a significant increase in mortality (P < 0.001 for all). Although all of these values were significant in multivariate logistic regression analysis, the most important ones were dyspnea (Odds ratio (OR) 57.916, 95% confidence interval (CI) 23.439-143.104, P < 0.001), polypharmacy (OR 6.782, 95% CI 3.082-14.927, P < 0.001), and thorax CT classification (typical; OR 9.633, 95% CI 2.511-37.122, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Older age, polypharmacy, dyspnea, and abnormal thorax CT were the most significant mortality criteria and in addition appropriate anticoagulant use was associated with reduced mortality. Identifying the risk factors to predict mortality in older adults with COVID-19 is important to treat future cases successfully.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Geriatrics; Hospitalized patients; Mortality; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35064542      PMCID: PMC8782714          DOI: 10.1007/s40520-021-02047-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   4.481


Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an acute infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, is a global epidemic [1]. COVID-19’s first case was detected in Turkey on March 11th, 2020. Six months after the first case, the total number of COVID-19 patients was reported to be 288.126, and the total number of deaths due to SARS-CoV-2 was 6951. On March 11th, 2021, 2.835.989 people have been diagnosed as COVID-19 positive, and 29.290 people have lost their lives. In Turkey, at the beginning of the pandemic, the government introduced several restrictions. First, schools and all public gathering places were closed, and a permanent lockdown for the elderly and with chronic illnesses was declared, followed by weekend curfews. The Ministry of Health gave an emergency use authorization for CoronaVac on Jan 13, 2021. An immediate vaccination program was started initially for healthcare workers and in the following months for the public, especially for older adults (aged ≥ 65 years). The disease presents a clinical picture ranging from asymptomatic to severe respiratory failure, sepsis, and death [2]. As it is known, patients over the age of 65 are very frail due to their accompanying diseases and physiological changes [3]. Studies have revealed that the elderly are in the risk group for the disease [4]. The course of the disease in the elderly may differ from the young. High fatality rates are observed in the elderly COVID-19 patients [5]. In this study, we aimed to reveal the factors affecting the mortality and survival of patients aged 65 and over who were hospitalized due to COVID-19 for 1 year in our hospital's inpatient services and intensive care units by comparing the first and the second 6 months.

Methods

Study population and design

Patients aged 65 and over who were discharged or died after being followed up in the COVID service and intensive care units of Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty Hospital between 11 March 2020 and 11 March 2021 with the diagnosis of COVID-19 were included in the study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty (35115–19.02.2021). An informed consent was obtained from all participants who were given assurances that their data would be treated confidentially. Demographic data, symptoms at presentation, altered states of consciousness, comorbidity, medication use, vital sign, results of blood tests were extracted from electronic medical records and retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Initial reference levels of hematocrit (Hct), neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocytes, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), urea, creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, fibrinogen, and d-dimer values; the highest values of CRP, fibrinogen, urea, creatinine, d-dimer, LDH, and ferritin during the course of hospitalization were obtained from the electronic information system. The number of days of hospitalization, initial oxygen needs during hospital admission, and the lowest oxygen saturation (SpO2) values were recorded in intensive care units and inpatient clinics. In addition, COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test results, chest CT manifestations and drug regimens used in the treatment of COVID-19 were accessed. Chest CT manifestations were staged by a radiologist in accordance with the reporting recommendations of the Society of Radiology North American Expert Consensus. The findings in the images were classified as typical, atypical, indeterminate, or negative [6]. The diagnosis of death due to COVID-19 disease was made with PCR positivity or the presence of thoracic CT findings. The use of five or more drugs on admission was considered polypharmacy [7, 8]. Patients were divided into two groups according to the hospitalization date due to 1st and 2nd 6 month periods. The length of hospital stay for the two periods were specified. The length of stay for the discharged and deceased patients during the 1st and 2nd 6 month period was analyzed. The mortality and discharge rates of the patients were examined by comparing the 1st and 2nd 6 months.

Statistical analysis

We expressed continuous variables as medians and interquartile ranges. Categorical variables were given as counts and percentages. A comparison of categorical variables between the discharged and deceased groups was performed using Pearson’s χ2 test with continuity correction or Fisher’s exact test, where appropriate. Student’s t test and The Mann–Whitney U test were used to compare differences in continuous variables between the two groups because they were all non-normally distributed. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to explore independent risk factors for death. Regression analysis was performed for parameters associated with mortality within their own groups (comorbidities, symptoms, etc.). Multivariate regression analysis was also performed for the parameters that were significant in these analyses. Continuous variables were treated as continuous measures in the model. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Differences were considered to be statistically significant when two-sided P values were less than 0.05.

Results

Eight hundred seventy-three patients, 452 males and 421 females, were included in the study. Mortality was 26.3% (n:230) among the geriatric COVID-19 patients. Although the mortality rate in man was 58.3% (n:134), it was 41.7% (n:96) in women. The mortality rate of men was higher than that of women (P: 0.022). The patients were divided into three age groups ranging from 65 to 74 (n: 466), 75–84 (n: 296), and 85 or more (n: 111) years. The mortality rate was found to be high in the 85 years and older group (OR 6.054, 95% CI 2.719–13.479, P: < 0.001). Whether the risk of death actually rose above 85 or any other age threshold was confirmed by Cubic spline regression and it was observed that there was an increase over the age of 85 (Fig. 1). When we re-analyze the age groups with 5-year intervals rather than 10 years, the mortality rate was 21% under the age of 70, 22% in the age group of 70–74, 31% in the age group of 75–79, 25% in the age group of 80–84, 37% in the age group of 85–89 and 50% in the 90 years and over group. In addition ROC analysis was performed and the maximum Youden Index (Sensitivity + specificity) value was reached at 84 (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

Cubic spline regression analysis of death and age

Fig. 2

Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of age and mortality. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for age 0.579, (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.535–0.623)

Cubic spline regression analysis of death and age Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of age and mortality. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for age 0.579, (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.535–0.623) As shown in Table 1, the most common comorbidities were hypertension (69.8%), type 2 diabetes mellitus (38.4%), coronary artery disease (CAD; 25.3%). Although we found no relationship in terms of comorbidities, some epidemiological studies have shown that hypertension was associated with increased mortality and morbidity in COVID-19 patients [9]. On the other hand, in our study malignancy, congestive heart failure, and chronic renal disease were found to be more common in patients who died (respectively, P: < 0.001, 0.001, 0.001). Polypharmacy was present in 71.8% of the patients and was significantly higher in the patients who died (OR 6.782, 95% CI 3.082–14.927, P: < 0.001). The mortality was found to be significantly higher in those who did not use ARB (P: 0.004). Common symptoms were fever (23.4%), cough (24.6%), and shortness of breath (45.9%) (Table 1). Mortality rates were higher in patients with dyspnea (OR 57.916, 95% CI 23.439–143.104, P: < 0.001). Mortality rates were found to be higher in those who did not have cough, who did not express headache or myalgia complaint (respectively, P: 0.001, 0,015, and 0.040). Mortality rates were also higher in patients with altered states of consciousness (P: < 0.001).
Table 1

Demographics and clinical presentation in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia

CharacteristicsAll patientsRecovery and dischargeDeathP value
n873643 (%73.7)230 (%26.3)
Age, mean ± SD75.08 (± 7.39)74.47 (± 7.03)76.77 (± 8.1) < 0.001
Age, groups, n (%)
 65–74466 (53.4%)366 (56.9%)100 (43.5%)
 75–84296 (33.9%)212 (33.0%)84 (36.5%) < 0.001
  ≥ 85111 (12.7%)65 (10.1%)46 (20.0%)
Sex
 Male (%)452 (51.8%)318 (49.5%)134 (58.3%)0.022
 Female (%)421 (48.2%)325 (50.5%)96 (41.7%)
Comorbidity n (%)
 Any781 (89.5%)565 (87.9%)216 (93.9%)0.01
 Hypertension609 (69.8%)451 (70.1%)158 (68.7%)0.682
 Diabetes335 (38.4%)235 (36.5%)100 (43.5%)0.064
 Malignancy121 (13.9%)67 (10.4%)54 (23.5%) < 0.001
 COPD186 (21.3%)138 (21.5%)48 (20.9%)0.851
 CHF96 (11.0%)57 (8.9%)39 (17.0%) < 0.001
 CAD221 (25.3%)162 (25.2%)59 (25.7%)0.891
 Chronic renal disease93 (10.7%)55 (8.6%)38 (16.5%) < 0.001
 Chronic liver disease4 (0.5%)4 (0.6%)0 (0%)0.578
 Cerebrovascular disease88 (10.1%)61 (9.5%)27 (11.7%)0.33
 Dementia81 (9.3%)54 (8.4%)27 (11.7%)0.134
Polypharmacy627 (71.8%)415 (64.5%)212 (92.2%) < 0.001
 Number of drugs used, mean ± SD6.97 (± 3.46)6.38 (± 3.3)8.6 (± 3.3) < 0.001
ACEI, n (%)180 (20.6%)138 (21.5%)42 (18.3%)0.303
ARB, n (%)238 (27.3%)192 (29.9%)46 (20.0%)0.004
Presence of symptoms, n (%)
 Fever204 (23.4%)150 (23.3%)54 (23.5%)0.963
 Cough215 (24.6%)177 (27.5%)38 (16.5%) < 0.001
 Fatigue182 (20.8%)143 (22.2%)39 (17.0%)0.091
 Myalgia55 (6.3%)47 (7.3%)8 (3.5%)0.04
 Dsypnea401 (45.9%)179 (27.8%)222 (96.5%) < 0.001
 Sputum22 (2.5%)17 (2.6%)5 (2.2%)0.696
 Headache15 (1.7%)15 (2.3%)0 (0%)0.015
 Loss of taste and smell11 (1.3%)9 (1.4%)2 (0.9%)0.737
 Diarrhea32 (3.7%)26 (4.0%)6 (2.6%)0.320
 Nausea/vomiting50 (5.7%)40 (6.2%)10 (4.3%)0.294
 Altered states of consciousness195 (22.3%)42 (6.5%)153 (66.5%) < 0.001

CAD coronary artery disease; CHF congestive heart failure; COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ACEI angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB angiotensin receptor blocker

Significant P values are in bold

Demographics and clinical presentation in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia CAD coronary artery disease; CHF congestive heart failure; COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ACEI angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB angiotensin receptor blocker Significant P values are in bold This study also investigated possible relationships between mortality and laboratory values. As shown Table 2, patients having lower lymphocyte, hematocrit levels and higher white blood cell count at the time of admission were found to have higher mortality rate (respectively, P: 0.031, 0.010 and < 0.001). AST and ALT values on admission were significantly higher (P < 0.001 for both of them). Urea and creatinine levels on admission and the highest creatinine values were higher in the patients who died (respectively, P: < 0.001, 0.001, < 0.001). CRP, ferritin, d-dimer and LDH on admission and their highest values were associated with mortality (P < 0.001 for all). Fibrinogen levels on admission and the highest values were higher in the patients who died (respectively, P: 0.005, < 0.001).
Table 2

Laboratory findings of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia

Laboratory results, mean ± SDAll patientsRecovery and dischargeDeathP value
Hemotocrit %34.3 (± 5.8)34.6 (± 5.6)33.4 (± 6.0)0.010
WBC, 10^3/μL6.4 (± 5.1)5.4 (± 3.7)9.0 (± 7.1) < 0.001
Lymphocyte, 10^3/μL1.35 (± 4.1)1.5 (± 4.7)0.8 (± 0.6)0.031
AST, IU/L54.9 (± 186.8)34.4 (± 31.3)112.4 (± 354.5) < 0.001
ALT, IU/L42.6 (± 157.1)26.0 (± 34.9)88.9 (± 296.1) < 0.001
Urea, mg/L58.3 (± 41.0)52.2 (± 34.6)75.2 (± 51.6) < 0.001
Highest Urea, mg/L212.9 (± 100.9)212.6 (± 93.7)213.8 (± 118.9)0.880
Creatinine, mg/L1.37 (± 1.26)1.28 (± 1.18)1.61 (± 1.44)0.001
Highest creatinine, mg/L1.89 (± 2.94)1.65 (± 3.23)2.54 (± 1.77) < 0.001
Ferritin, ng/mL553.0 (± 561.6)430.6 (± 463.0)895.2 (± 663.4) < 0.001
Highest ferritin, ng/mL851.6 (± 842.7)663.9 (± 584.2)1459.1 (± 1114.5) < 0.001
d-dimer, mg/L3.84 (± 9.82)2.17 (± 4.85)8.52 (± 16.51) < 0.001
Highest d-dimer, mg/L8.69 (± 15.24)5.63 (± 10.97)17.27 (± 21.16) < 0.001
LDH, IU/L371.6 (± 284.9)316.8 (± 161.1)524.6 (± 451.9) < 0.001
Highest LDH, IU/L584.6 (± 446.8)484.8 (± 247.2)863.3 (± 694.8) < 0.001
CRP, mg/L87.7 (± 76.5)70.4 (± 65.6)136.4 (± 83.7) < 0.001
Highest CRP, mg/L133.3 (± 105.8)99.1 (± 78.7)229.4 (± 113.0) < 0.001
Fibrinogen, mg/dL507.0 (± 216.3)494.7 (± 223.1)541.2 (± 192.4)0.005
Highest fibrinogen, mg/dL622.3 (± 176.5)599.5 (± 162.9)685.9 (± 196.9) < 0.001

WBC white blood cell; LDH lactate dehydrogenase; CRP C-reactive protein; INR international normalized ratio; AST aspartate aminotransferase; ALT alanine aminotransferase

Significant P values are in bold

Laboratory findings of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia WBC white blood cell; LDH lactate dehydrogenase; CRP C-reactive protein; INR international normalized ratio; AST aspartate aminotransferase; ALT alanine aminotransferase Significant P values are in bold Clinical findings and treatment modalities in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia are shown in Table 3. Two hundred ninety-six of the patients were hospitalized in the intensive care unit and five hundred seventy-seven in the inpatient clinics. Mortality rates were found to be high in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (P: < 0.001). Also, vital signs of patients, such as low saturation, high pulse, and low blood pressure were associated with death (P: < 0.001 for all). The COVID PCR tests were positive in 67.5% (n:589) of the patients and were positive in 74.8% (n:172) of those who died (P: 0.006). Typical COVID manifestations were positive in chest CTs in 57.0% of the patients and mortality was high (P < 0.001). In multivariate regression analysis, typical, atypical, and indeterminate covid manifestations in chest CT were the factors predicting mortality (respectively, P: < 0.001, 0.009, 0.017). Compared with those with negative chest CT manifestations, mortality was found to be 9.6 times higher in patients with typical chest CT manifestations, 7.9 times higher in atypical patients, and 6.6 times higher in patients with indeterminate chest CT manifestations. Mortality was found to be high in patients in need for oxygen therapy (P < 0.001). The most used drugs in medical treatment were 87.7% anticoagulants, 75.4% favipiravir, 40.3% corticosteroids. It was found that patients who used anticoagulants had lower mortality rate (P: < 0.001). According to the multivariate logistic regression results, anticoagulant therapy was associated with a lower risk of death (OR 0.336, 95% CI 0.132–0.855, P:0.022). In contrast, the use of corticosteroids was found to be higher in the patients who died (P: < 0.001). However, steroids were given especially to severe patients with cytokine storm.
Table 3

Clinical findings and treatment modalities of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia

Clinical findings and treatment modalitiesAll patientsRecovery and dischargeDeathP value
n873643 (%73.7)230 (%26.3)
Total hospitalized days numbers, mean ± SD10.5 (± 8.2)10.3 (± 8.1)11.2 (± 8.4)0.161
Hospitalized days numbers in intensive care unit, mean ± SD9.4 (± 8.9)10.2 (± 12.0)9.2 (± 7.8)0.431
Patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit296 (33.9%)72 (11.2%)224 (97.4%) < 0.001
SpO2% on admission, mean ± SD92.6 (± 4.6)93.6 (± 3.8)89.6 (± 5.4) < 0.001
The lowest SpO2%, mean ± SD87.3 (± 8.8)91.2 (± 4.5)76.3 (± 8.6) < 0.001
Blood pressure on admission, n (%)

  > 90/60

  ≤ 90/60

835 (95.6%)

38 (4.4%)

639 (99.4%)

4 (0.6%)

196 (85.2%)

34 (14.8%)

 < 0.001
Pulse rate on admission, mean ± SD86 (± 20)82 (± 17)97 (± 24) < 0.001
COVID PCR positive, n (%)589 (67.5%)417 (64.9%)172 (74.8%)0.006
Thorax CT Classification, n (%)

 0 (negative)

 1 (atypical)

 2 (indeterminate)

 3 (typical)

90 (10%)

139 (16%)

150 (17%)

494 (57%)

84 (13.1%)

106 (16.5%)

116 (18.0%)

337 (52.4%)

6 (2.6%)

33 (14.3%)

34 (14.8%)

157 (68.3%)

 < 0.001
Oxygen treatment, n (%)550 (63%)324 (50.4%)226 (98.3%) < 0.001
COVID treatment, n (%)

 Hydroxychloroquine

 Azithromycin

 Lopinavir/ritonavir

 Oseltamivir

 Tocilizumab

 Favipiravir

 Corticosteroids

 Anticoagulants

280 (32.1%)

194 (22.2%)

17 (1.9%)

163 (18.7%)

113 (12.9%)

658 (75.4%)

352 (40.3%)

766 (87.7%)

214 (33.3%)

154 (24.0%)

14 (2.2%)

123 (19.1%)

88 (13.7%)

483 (75.1%)

207 (32.2%)

582 (90.5%)

66 (28.7%)

40 (17.4%)

3 (1.3%)

40 (17.4%)

25 (10.9%)

175 (76.1%)

145 (63.0%)

184 (80.0%)

0.201

0.040

0.581

0.562

0.275

0.769

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

SpO2 oxygen saturation; COVID PCR Coronavirus disease polymerase chain reaction; CT computerized tomography

Significant P values are in bold

Clinical findings and treatment modalities of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia > 90/60 ≤ 90/60 835 (95.6%) 38 (4.4%) 639 (99.4%) 4 (0.6%) 196 (85.2%) 34 (14.8%) 0 (negative) 1 (atypical) 2 (indeterminate) 3 (typical) 90 (10%) 139 (16%) 150 (17%) 494 (57%) 84 (13.1%) 106 (16.5%) 116 (18.0%) 337 (52.4%) 6 (2.6%) 33 (14.3%) 34 (14.8%) 157 (68.3%) Hydroxychloroquine Azithromycin Lopinavir/ritonavir Oseltamivir Tocilizumab Favipiravir Corticosteroids Anticoagulants 280 (32.1%) 194 (22.2%) 17 (1.9%) 163 (18.7%) 113 (12.9%) 658 (75.4%) 352 (40.3%) 766 (87.7%) 214 (33.3%) 154 (24.0%) 14 (2.2%) 123 (19.1%) 88 (13.7%) 483 (75.1%) 207 (32.2%) 582 (90.5%) 66 (28.7%) 40 (17.4%) 3 (1.3%) 40 (17.4%) 25 (10.9%) 175 (76.1%) 145 (63.0%) 184 (80.0%) 0.201 0.040 0.581 0.562 0.275 0.769 < 0.001 < 0.001 SpO2 oxygen saturation; COVID PCR Coronavirus disease polymerase chain reaction; CT computerized tomography Significant P values are in bold Clinical findings, treatment methods, and presenting symptoms of the patients hospitalized in the first 6 months and the last 6 months are shown in Table 4. Among the symptoms, cough and diarrhea complaints were more common in the first 6 months (respectively, P: 0.030, 0.024); In the second 6 months altered states of consciousness, fatigue, dyspnea, and myalgia were more common (respectively, P: < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.028, 0.001). In the second 6 months, the blood pressure and saturation of the patients were lower. COVID PCR positivity and typical COVID manifestations in chest CT were significantly higher in the second 6 months (P: < 0.001). It was observed that the use of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, oseltamivir, lopinavir/ritonavir was higher in the first 6 months (P: < 0.001). In the second 6 months, the use of favipiravir, corticosteroids and anticoagulants was higher (P: < 0.001). The death rate and hospitalization of the intensive care unit patients were higher in the second 6 months (respectively, P: 0.005, 0.011). The mean hospital stay was 10.3 days in the first 6 months and 10.8 days in the following 6 months. In terms of the mean length of stay no significant difference was found between the discharged and deceased group. The mean length of hospital stay was found to be significantly higher in patients who died in the first 6 months (P: 0.015), no significant difference was found in the second period.
Table 4

Clinical findings, treatment methods and presentation symptoms of the patients hospitalized in the first and the second 6 months

Clinical findings, treatment methods and presentation symptomsFirst 6 monthsLast 6 monthsP value
n403 (46.2%)470 (53.8%)
Sex

 Male (%)

 Female (%)

206 (51.1%)

197 (48.9%)

246 (52.3%)

224 (47.4%)

0.718
Age, groups, n (%)

 65–74

 75–84

  ≥ 85

209 (51.9%)

142 (35.2%)

52 (12.9%)

257 (54.7%)

154 (32.8%)

59 (12.6%)

0.693
Presence of symptoms, n (%)

 Fever

 Cough

 Fatigue

 Dsypnea

 Sputum

 Headache

 Loss of taste and smell

 Myalgia

 Diarrhea

 Nausea/vomiting

 Altered states of consciousness

91 (22.6%)

113 (28%)

61 (15.1%)

169 (41.9%)

13 (3.2%)

5 (1.2%)

5 (1.2%)

14 (3.5%)

21 (5.2%)

25 (6.2%)

67 (16.6%)

113 (24.0%)

102 (21.7%)

121 (25.7%)

232 (49.4%)

9 (1.9%)

10 (2.1%)

6 (1.3%)

41 (8.7%)

11 (2.3%)

25 (5.3%)

128 (27.2%)

0.611

0.030

 < 0.001

0.028

0.218

0.315

0.962

0.001

0.024

0.575

 < 0.001

Blood pressure on admission, n (%)

  > 90/60

  ≤ 90/60

394 (97.8%)

9 (2.2%)

441 (93.8%)

29 (6.2%)

0.004
SpO2% on admission, mean ± SD92.7 (± 4.7)92.4 (± 4.5)0.328
The lowest SpO2%, mean ± SD88.1 (± 7.8)86.5 (± 9.5)0.008
COVID PCR positive, n (%)190 (47%)396 (84%) < 0.001
Thorax CT Classification, n (%)

 0 (negative)

 1 (atypical)

 2 (indeterminate)

 3 (typical)

52 (12.9%)

71 (17.6%)

88 (21.8%)

192 (47.6%)

38 (8.1%)

68 (14.5%)

62 (13.2%)

302 (64.3%)

 < 0.001
Oxygen treatment, n (%)261 (64.8%)289 (61.5%)0.318
COVID treatment, n (%)

 Tocilizumab

 Favipiravir

 Corticosteroids

 Anticoagulants

99 (51.03%)

253 (62.8%)

53 (13.2%)

325 (80.6%)

95 (48.9%)

405 (86.2%)

299 (63.6%)

441 (93.8%)

0.238

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit119 (29.5%)177 (37.7%)0.011
Death88 (21.8%)142 (30.2%) < 0.001

Significant P values are in bold

Clinical findings, treatment methods and presentation symptoms of the patients hospitalized in the first and the second 6 months Male (%) Female (%) 206 (51.1%) 197 (48.9%) 246 (52.3%) 224 (47.4%) 65–74 75–84 ≥ 85 209 (51.9%) 142 (35.2%) 52 (12.9%) 257 (54.7%) 154 (32.8%) 59 (12.6%) Fever Cough Fatigue Dsypnea Sputum Headache Loss of taste and smell Myalgia Diarrhea Nausea/vomiting Altered states of consciousness 91 (22.6%) 113 (28%) 61 (15.1%) 169 (41.9%) 13 (3.2%) 5 (1.2%) 5 (1.2%) 14 (3.5%) 21 (5.2%) 25 (6.2%) 67 (16.6%) 113 (24.0%) 102 (21.7%) 121 (25.7%) 232 (49.4%) 9 (1.9%) 10 (2.1%) 6 (1.3%) 41 (8.7%) 11 (2.3%) 25 (5.3%) 128 (27.2%) 0.611 0.030 < 0.001 0.028 0.218 0.315 0.962 0.001 0.024 0.575 < 0.001 > 90/60 ≤ 90/60 394 (97.8%) 9 (2.2%) 441 (93.8%) 29 (6.2%) 0 (negative) 1 (atypical) 2 (indeterminate) 3 (typical) 52 (12.9%) 71 (17.6%) 88 (21.8%) 192 (47.6%) 38 (8.1%) 68 (14.5%) 62 (13.2%) 302 (64.3%) Tocilizumab Favipiravir Corticosteroids Anticoagulants 99 (51.03%) 253 (62.8%) 53 (13.2%) 325 (80.6%) 95 (48.9%) 405 (86.2%) 299 (63.6%) 441 (93.8%) 0.238 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Significant P values are in bold In multivariate logistic regression analysis to detect the factors predicting mortality among older patients with COVID-19, age groups; chest CT classification; polypharmacy; dyspnea; lower doses of anticoagulation; AST; the highest values of CRP, LDH, and ferritin; the lowest values of lymphocyte and the highest values of white blood cell at the time of admission were independently associated with mortality (Table 5).
Table 5

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for mortality in COVID-19

VariableOdds ratio (95% CI)P value
Age, groups, n (%)

 65–74

 75–84

  ≥ 85

1

1.400 (0.763–2.570)

6.054 (2.719–13.479)

0.277

 < 0.001

Sex

 Female

 Male

1

0.832 (0.474–1.460)

0.522
Malignancy1.222 (0.579–2.582)0.599
CHF1.212 (0.542–2.712)0.640
Chronic renal disease0.956 (0.408–2.243)0.918
Polypharmacy6.782 (3.082–14.927) < 0.001
Dsypnea57.916 (23.439–143.104) < 0.001
WBC, 10^3/μL1.089 (1.035–1.145)0.001
Lymphocyte, 10^3/μL0.599 (0.390–0.920)0.019
AST, IU/L1.008 (1.000–1.015)0.043
ALT, IU/L1.001 (0.998–1.004)0.650
Highest CRP, mg/L1.007 (1.004–1.011) < 0.001
Highest LDH, IU/L1.001 (1.000–1.002)0.005
Highest creatinine, mg/L1.015 (0.932–1.104)0.737
Highest ferritin, ng/mL1.001 (1.001–1.001) < 0.001
Highest fibrinogen, mg/dL1.000 (0.998–1.002)0.787
Thorax CT classification

 0 (negative)

 1 (atypical)

 2 (indeterminate)

 3 (typical)

1

7.880 (1.711–34.502)

6.610 (1.425–29.995)

9.633 (2.511–37.122)

0.009

0.017

 < 0.001

Anticoagulation

 0: (no)

 1: (yes)

1

0.336 (0.132–0.855)

0.022

Significant P values are in bold

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for mortality in COVID-19 65–74 75–84 ≥ 85 1 1.400 (0.763–2.570) 6.054 (2.719–13.479) 0.277 < 0.001 Female Male 1 0.832 (0.474–1.460) 0 (negative) 1 (atypical) 2 (indeterminate) 3 (typical) 1 7.880 (1.711–34.502) 6.610 (1.425–29.995) 9.633 (2.511–37.122) 0.009 0.017 < 0.001 0: (no) 1: (yes) 1 0.336 (0.132–0.855) Significant P values are in bold

Discussion

This study showed that older age, polypharmacy, dyspnea, thorax CT classification, lower doses of anticoagulation, the laboratory parameters AST, CRP, LDH, ferritin, lymphocyte, and white blood cells were independent risk factors associated with a fatal outcome. These results have some similarities but also differences from the previous studies. In our study, mortality was 26.3% (n:230) among the geriatric COVID-19 patients. Furthermore in another retrospective study, 709 patients who were over 18 years old and received inpatient treatment for COVID-19 disease at our hospital between March 16, 2020 and June 18, 2020 was enrolled. Of the 709 patients treated for COVID-19, 75 (11%) died and 634 survived. The mortality risk increased 4.07-fold in patients aged between 55 and 64, 7.85-fold in patients aged 65 and 74, and 11.95-fold in patients aged 75 or older. The older age, specific comorbidities (cancer, heart failure, chronic renal failure), dyspnea, lower levels of oxygen saturation and hematocrit, higher levels of C-reactive protein, aspartate aminotransferase, and ferritin were independent risk factors for mortality. [10]. Since the beginning of the pandemic, older adults have been severely affected by the consequences of COVID-19. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), people over age 65 were responsible for 31% of COVID-19 infections, 45% of hospitalizations, and 80% of deaths caused by COVID-19 [11]. Many studies have shown that mortality increases with age [12-14]. In a study of 72,314 cases in China, the overall mortality rate was 2.3%; however, this rate was 8% in patients aged 70–79 years and 14.5% in ≥ 80 years. [15] Similarly in our study, mortality was higher in patients aged 85 years and older (41.4%). In a large-scale study involving 1663 patients, the mortality rate in men was higher than in women, similar to our study [16]. Malignancy is also an independent risk factor for mortality [17, 18]. This result may be due to the impaired immunity and inflammatory response in cancer patients. In our study, mortality was found to be higher in patients with malignancy. There is no research in the literature investigating the effect of polypharmacy on the prognosis of COVID-19. Polypharmacy was significantly higher in patients who died in our study. It was determined as one of the parameters predicting the mortality rate in multivariate regression analysis. Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a core receptor for viral entry of SARSCoV-2 [19, 20]. Therefore, at the beginning of the pandemic the use of ACEI and ARB was thought to have a role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 [21]. However, studies have shown that the use of ACEI and ARBs regulated RAAS homeostasis in severe COVID-19 [22]. Additionally, ARB has been shown to reduce lung fibrosis, hypertrophy, and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines; as well as improving heart function [23]. As for the effects of ARBs in COVID-19, it was shown to reduce coronavirus-associated long-term pulmonary dysfunction and overall end-organ damage [24, 25]. In our study, there was no relationship between ACEI usage and mortality; but the mortality rate for ARB users was lower. Although fever is the most common symptom in the general population (98.0%); In our study, the most common symptom was “dyspnea” (45.9%) [26, 27]. Fever response is usually reduced during infection due to decreased immune system response in the elderly. In our study, dyspnea was an important predictor of mortality. Therefore, we can easily say that the prognosis of patients with shortness of breath will be worse. Those with cough, myalgia, or headache symptoms had a lower mortality rate. It is known that cough reflex decreases with aging due to the gradual deterioration in motor functions. Older adults experience clouding of consciousness easily with infection. Therefore, they may not be able to describe the symptoms of headache and myalgia. In the literature, it has been found that some laboratory parameters such as CRP, ferritin, LDH, d-dimer, AST, ALT, which determine death, are higher in patients with a poor prognosis [28, 29]. Similar results were found in our study. High LDH may reflect the degree of pulmonary damage [30]. High d-dimer poses a risk in terms of arterial and venous thromboembolism [31]. In response, anticoagulants have been incorporated into COVID-19 treatment protocols; It is also seen in our study that anticoagulant usage significantly reduced mortality. Again, studies show that severe cases of COVID-19, similar to our research, tend to have higher neutrophil counts and lower lymphocyte counts. [32]. In our study, mortality was high in patients with low first-time saturation and the lowest SpO2 values. Again, the mortality rate was higher in patients who needed intensive care to follow up and whose vital signs were unstable. Like other studies, some patients with positive thorax CT findings presented with negative COVID PCR [33]. Some studies have already reported that the sensitivity of PCR is 71%, which is lower than that of thorax CT [34]. Therefore thorax CT is an essential tool for diagnosis and monitoring for COVID-19. [35] In our study, typical, atypical, and indeterminate chest CT manifestations were associated with death. Based on the data published so far, although there is no evidence to suggest that corticosteroid therapy reduces mortality in COVID-19; some clinical observational studies have shown some benefit in terms of improvements in clinical symptoms and oxygenation [36, 37]. Another study found that the use of dexamethasone in patients hospitalized with Covid-19 resulted in a lower 28-day mortality in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation or nasal oxygen, while no significant difference was found in those who did not receive respiratory support [38]. A meta-analysis of clinical trials in critically ill patients with COVID-19 found that systemic corticosteroids reduced 28-day all-cause mortality [39]. In our study, steroid treatment was started in patients with cytokine storm, prominent lung involvement, and desaturated patients 1 week after the diagnosis. It is observed that patients taking steroids die more and more steroids are given in the second 6 months. This result may be due to the fact that patients hospitalized in the second 6 months are more unstable and steroid treatment is used for critically ill patients. In the second 6 months of the pandemic, stable patients were treated at home and only critical patients were admitted to the hospital. This revealed some differences in mortality, clinical and laboratory findings between hospitalized patients in the first and second 6 months. As shown in Table 4, during the second six-month period, hospitalized patients had lower blood pressure, worse oxygen exchange, worse CT findings, and more need of intensive care. Therefore, in our study, the second 6-month period mortality was higher and clinical and laboratory findings were worse. In this study, the factors affecting mortality in elderly patients infected with COVID-19 were examined. This study had some limitations. First, since it was difficult to reach the patients' full medical history, data were based on the patients' self-reporting; thus, it may lead to recall bias. Second, the number of patients in the three age groups was different. The hospitalization day of the patients may have caused a difference in the results. In addition, unknown duration of the comorbidity was a possible confounding factor. Also viral load and cytokines were not assessed in our study. A screening test for frailty was not performed. We think that frailty assessment will be an essential parameter in geriatric patients in prospective studies. Although it is not clear yet when the COVID-19 pandemic will end, what is known is the fact that COVID-19 is more serious and deadly in the elderly. For this reason, it is important to clarify the causes of mortality. Elderly patients with COVID-19 should be monitored more closely, and more attention should be paid to factors affecting mortality. Polypharmacy is a geriatric syndrome that should be carefully evaluated. Anticoagulation plays a key role in the treatment of COVID-19. Although the efficacy of vaccines in older adults is not well known, a better preventation has not yet been found. The future of the elderly will be determined by the vaccination of the whole world as soon as possible.
  39 in total

Review 1.  Polypharmacy and Medication Management in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jennifer Kim; Abby Luck Parish
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.208

2.  Correcting the imbalanced protective RAS in COVID-19 with angiotensin AT2-receptor agonists.

Authors:  U Muscha Steckelings; Colin Sumners
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 6.124

3.  Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Srinivas Murthy; Janet V Diaz; Arthur S Slutsky; Jesús Villar; Derek C Angus; Djillali Annane; Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo; Otavio Berwanger; Alexandre B Cavalcanti; Pierre-Francois Dequin; Bin Du; Jonathan Emberson; David Fisher; Bruno Giraudeau; Anthony C Gordon; Anders Granholm; Cameron Green; Richard Haynes; Nicholas Heming; Julian P T Higgins; Peter Horby; Peter Jüni; Martin J Landray; Amelie Le Gouge; Marie Leclerc; Wei Shen Lim; Flávia R Machado; Colin McArthur; Ferhat Meziani; Morten Hylander Møller; Anders Perner; Marie Warrer Petersen; Jelena Savovic; Bruno Tomazini; Viviane C Veiga; Steve Webb; John C Marshall
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) Is a Key Modulator of the Renin Angiotensin System in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Chris Tikellis; M C Thomas
Journal:  Int J Pept       Date:  2012-03-20

5.  ADL-dependency, D-Dimers, LDH and absence of anticoagulation are independently associated with one-month mortality in older inpatients with Covid-19.

Authors:  Guilhem Bousquet; Géraldine Falgarone; David Deutsch; Sophie Derolez; Marilucy Lopez-Sublet; François-Xavier Goudot; Khadaoudj Amari; Yurdagul Uzunhan; Olivier Bouchaud; Frédéric Pamoukdjian
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.682

6.  Cancer history is an independent risk factor for mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Yifan Meng; Wanrong Lu; Ensong Guo; Jia Liu; Bin Yang; Ping Wu; Shitong Lin; Ting Peng; Yu Fu; Fuxia Li; Zizhuo Wang; Yuan Li; Rourou Xiao; Chen Liu; Yuhan Huang; Funian Lu; Xue Wu; Lixin You; Ding Ma; Chaoyang Sun; Peng Wu; Gang Chen
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 7.  COVID-19 and Older Adults: What We Know.

Authors:  Zainab Shahid; Ricci Kalayanamitra; Brendan McClafferty; Douglas Kepko; Devyani Ramgobin; Ravi Patel; Chander Shekher Aggarwal; Ramarao Vunnam; Nitasa Sahu; Dhirisha Bhatt; Kirk Jones; Reshma Golamari; Rohit Jain
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China.

Authors:  Wenhua Liang; Weijie Guan; Ruchong Chen; Wei Wang; Jianfu Li; Ke Xu; Caichen Li; Qing Ai; Weixiang Lu; Hengrui Liang; Shiyue Li; Jianxing He
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses.

Authors:  Michael Letko; Andrea Marzi; Vincent Munster
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 17.745

10.  Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19.

Authors:  Peter Horby; Wei Shen Lim; Jonathan R Emberson; Marion Mafham; Jennifer L Bell; Louise Linsell; Natalie Staplin; Christopher Brightling; Andrew Ustianowski; Einas Elmahi; Benjamin Prudon; Christopher Green; Timothy Felton; David Chadwick; Kanchan Rege; Christopher Fegan; Lucy C Chappell; Saul N Faust; Thomas Jaki; Katie Jeffery; Alan Montgomery; Kathryn Rowan; Edmund Juszczak; J Kenneth Baillie; Richard Haynes; Martin J Landray
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.