| Literature DB >> 35064475 |
Kiran Kumar Pvsn1, Sojit Tomo1, Purvi Purohit1, Shrimanjunath Sankanagoudar1, Jayakaran Charan2, Abhishek Purohit3, Vijaylakshami Nag4, Pradeep Bhatia5, Kuldeep Singh6, Naveen Dutt7, Mahendra Kumar Garg8, Praveen Sharma1, Sanjeev Misra9, Dharamveer Yadav10.
Abstract
The deficiencies of trace elements and infectious diseases often coexist and exhibit complex interactions. Several trace elements such as zinc (Zn), copper (Cu) and magnesium (Mg) have immunomodulatory functions and thus influence the susceptibility to the course and outcome of a variety of viral infections. So, this present study was aimed to study relations of trace metals in association with severity and mortality in SARS-CoV-2 patients. A total of 150 individuals infected with COVID-19 and 50 healthy individuals were recruited. Cases were divided based on severity (mild, moderate and severe) and outcome (discharged or deceased). Serum Zn, Mg and Cu levels were analysed by direct colourimetric method. Both serum Cu and Zn levels were significantly decreased in cases when compared to those in controls (p < 0.005 and p < 0.0001). Serum magnesium levels although not significant were found to be slightly decreased in controls. On comparing the trace elements between the deceased and discharged cases, a significant difference was found between serum copper and zinc levels, but for magnesium, both groups have similar levels. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve results indicate that a serum Cu/Zn ratio along with the age of patient provides some reliable information on COVID-19 course and survival odds by yielding an AUC of 95.1% with a sensitivity of 93.8% and specificity of 89.8%. Therefore, we would like to emphasize that measuring the serum copper and zinc along with their ratio can be used as routine investigations for COVID-19 patients in proper identification and management of severe cases in upcoming new waves of COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Copper; Magnesium; Trace metals; Zinc
Year: 2022 PMID: 35064475 PMCID: PMC8782674 DOI: 10.1007/s12011-022-03124-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Trace Elem Res ISSN: 0163-4984 Impact factor: 4.081
Demographic and biochemical parameters of the study population
| Variables | Mild | Moderate | Severe | Controls | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic Data | |||||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Age (In years) | 60.91 | 10.96 | 59.26 | 11.77 | 57.04 | 13.2 | 30.8 | 8.11 | |
| Outcome | Discharged | 42 | 34 | 26 | - | ||||
| Deceased | 8 | 16 | 24 | ||||||
| Gender | Males | 32 | 36 | 33 | 23 | ||||
| Females | 18 | 14 | 17 | 27 | |||||
| Biochemical Profile | |||||||||
| Urea | 56.4 | 29.67 | 75.43 | 41.48 | 74 | 31.11 | 21.80 | (6.12) | |
| Creatinine | 1.27 | 0.73 | 1.40 | 0.82 | 1.77 | 1.03 | 0.80 | 0.13 | |
| AST | 50.49 | 50.21 | 43.15 | 19.73 | 34.15 | 0.92 | 10.32 | 8.01 | |
| ALT | 65.61 | 59.45 | 61.07 | 43.60 | 45.6 | 6.79 | 24.89 | 12.36 | |
| T.Bil | 0.73 | 0.38 | 0.98 | 0.463 | 0.265 | 0.01 | 0.27 | 0.15 | |
| D.Bil | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.100 | 0.065 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 | |
| T.Protein | 6.37 | 0.67 | 5.83 | 0.598 | 5.85 | 1.22 | 7.61 | 0.54 | |
| Albumin | 3.21 | 0.48 | 2.75 | 0.351 | 2.94 | 0.55 | 4.34 | 0.38 | |
| ALP | 120.44 | 57.56 | 166.50 | 61.19 | 94 | 70.71 | 81.39 | 34.01 | |
| HsCRP | 118.10 | 62.69 | 107.16 | 71.62 | 75.7 | 1.41 | 2.29 | 3.00 | |
| Cholesterol | 133.3704 | 42.97 | 155.1 | 43.34 | 131.36 | 46.25 | 157.61 | 41.28 | |
| TG | 136 | 53.45 | 147.8 | 125.09 | 151.43 | 72.51 | 113.12 | 64.17 | |
| HDL | 34.7037 | 11.31 | 41.8 | 9.89 | 30.79 | 8.63 | 42.79 | 11.56 | |
| LDL | 93.11111 | 34.06 | 106.5 | 37.50 | 92.21 | 40.37 | 94.97 | 27.04 | |
| LDH | 524.35 | 25.45 | 385.4 | 42.94 | 558.86 | 297.53 | 114.59 | 28.55 | |
| Na | 132.47 | 5.03 | 137.2 | 5.357 | 124.4 | 0.71 | 142.94 | 4.62 | |
| K | 4.63 | 0.90 | 4.844 | 0.959 | 5.37 | 0.85 | 4.38 | 0.32 | |
| Cl | 97.34 | 5.33 | 102 | 6.964 | 95 | 2.83 | 108.08 | 3.59 | |
| Ferritin | 959.29 | 758.05 | 1611.05 | 846.91 | 721.00 | 546.82 | 116.78 | 53.3 | |
| PCT | 3.47 | 4.41 | 1.55 | 0.75 | 12.67 | 30.65 | 0.02 | 0.00 | |
| IL-6 | 78.13 | 95.71 | 82.53 | 40.81 | 238.52 | 995.54 | 0.51875 | 1.03 | |
Comparison of metals between COVID-19 cases and controls on baseline sample
| Magnesium | Copper | Zinc | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
| Median | 2.24 | 150.66 | 60.50 | |
| 25th percentile | 2.13 | 118.85 | 48.22 | |
| 75th percentile | 2.36 | 140.96 | 74.59 | |
| COVID-19 | 150 | 150 | 150 | |
| Median | 2.26 | 144.31 | 56.61 | |
| 25th percentile | 1.97 | 125.58 | 45.06 | |
| 75th percentile | 2.41 | 165.1 | 73.08 | |
| 0.7545 |
Statistical test: Mann–Whitney test
All bold values signifies p<0.05
Comparison of metals between different grades of COVID-19 cases and controls on the baseline sample
| Magnesium | Copper | Zinc | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
| Median | 2.24 | 150.66 | 60.50 | |
| 25th percentile | 2.13 | 118.85 | 48.22 | |
| 75th percentile | 2.36 | 140.96 | 74.59 | |
| Mild COVID-19 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
| Median | 2.26 | 145.41 | 56.705 | |
| 25th percentile | 1.93 | 133.1 | 48.84 | |
| 75th percentile | 2.39 | 164.41 | 72.95 | |
| Moderate COVID-19 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
| Median | 2.28 | 135.755 | 50.595 | |
| 25th percentile | 2.17 | 125.66 | 39.08 | |
| 75th percentile | 2.42 | 158.38 | 69.12 | |
| Severe COVID-19 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
| Median | 2.23 | 148.22 | 42.89 | |
| 25th percentile | 1.91 | 121.66 | 39.65 | |
| 75th percentile | 2.53 | 167.29 | 47.53 | |
| 0.3727 |
Statistical test: Kruskal–Wallis
All bold values signifies p<0.05
Comparison of metals in COVID-19 cases between baseline and follow-up sample of discharged patients
| Magnesium | Copper | Zinc | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 87 | 87 | 87 | |
| Median | 2.26 | 144.31 | 56.61 | |
| 25th percentile | 1.97 | 125.58 | 45.06 | |
| 75th percentile | 2.41 | 165.1 | 73.08 | |
| Follow-up | 150 | 150 | 150 | |
| Median | 2.26 | 148.28 | 61.33 | |
| 25th percentile | 1.97 | 124.61 | 48.21 | |
| 75th percentile | 2.47 | 165.70 | 74.42 | |
| 0.2211 | 0.4837 | 0.2566 |
Statistical test: Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Correlation analysis of baseline metals with inflammatory parameters in COVID-19 patients
| Magnesium | Copper | Zinc | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rho | Rho | Rho | ||||
| Ferritin | 0.5003 | − 0.1992 | 0.1175 | − 0.0422 | 0.7426 | |
| PCT | 0.2206 | 0.1895 | 0.0225 | 0.9847 | − 0.0786 | 0.6438 |
| IL6 | − 0.11 | 0.2556 | − 0.35 | 0.025 | − 0.2336 | |
| hsCRP | 0.0480 | 0.6569 | 0.0071 | 0.9478 | − 0.2042 | 0.0563 |
All bold values signifies p<0.05
Fig. 1a Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of copper, zinc, magnesium and Cu/Zn ratio in relation to survival in COVID-19 patients. b The multiple regression model based on Cu/Zn and the patient’s age outperformed any other combination of variables via stepwise AIC selection. The final model, based on these two parameters, yielded the highest AUC of 95.1%
Individual ROC and pairwise comparison of ROC curves
| Variable | AUC | SE | 95% CI | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zinc | 0.751 | 0.0364 | 0.681 to 0.813 | - |
| Magnesium | 0.515 | 0.0428 | 0.439 to 0.591 | - |
| Copper | 0.637 | 0.0462 | 0.561 to 0.707 | - |
| Cu/Zn ratio | 0.640 | 0.0427 | 0.565 to 0.710 | - |
| Pairwose Variable | Difference between areas | SE | 95% CI | |
| Zinc and Magnesium | 0.236 | 0.063 | 0.113 to 0.360 | 0.0002 |
| Zinc and Copper | 0.115 | 0.0567 | 0.00336 to 0.226 | 0.0435 |
| Zinc and Cu/Zn | 0.112 | 0.0309 | 0.0510 to 0.172 | 0.03 |
| Magnesium and Copper | 0.122 | 0.0667 | -0.00921 to 0.252 | 0.0685 |
| Magnesium and Cu/Zn | 0.125 | 0.0656 | -0.00408 to 0.253 | 0.0577 |
| Copper and Cu/Zn | 0.00301 | 0.0777 | -0.149 to 0.155 | 0.9692 |