Literature DB >> 35064356

Fracture resistance of root canal-treated molars restored with ceramic overlays with/without different resin composite base materials: an in vitro study.

Mohamed F Haridy1,2, Hend S Ahmed3, Mohamed M Kataia4, Shehabeldin M Saber4,5, Edgar Schafer6.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of different restorative protocols on fracture resistance of root canal-treated molars. 48 mandibular first molars were used and divided into six groups (n = 8); G1 (negative control): teeth kept intact. G2 (positive control): teeth had root canal treatment and standard MOD cavity preparations but kept unrestored. G3: prepared as G2 and directly restored with VitaEnamic ceramic overlays (CO). G4: as G3, but the pulp chamber was restored first with smart dental restorative (SureFil SDR flow = SDR) bulk-fill flowable composite base. G5: as G3, but the pulp chamber was restored first with SonicFill (SF) bulk-fill composite base. G6: as G3, but the pulp chamber was restored first with a fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) base. All samples were subjected to thermocycling between 5 °C and 55 °C in a water bath for a total of 2000 cycles with 10 s dwell time. Then specimens were individually mounted on a computer-controlled testing machine with a load cell of 5 kN, and the maximum load to produce fracture (N) was recorded. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (P = 0.05). There was a significant difference between the groups (P < 0.001). Teeth restored with FRC and ceramic overlays had the highest load-bearing capacity. Pulp chamber restoration with either FRC or SDR before ceramic overlay fabrication provided significantly better tooth reinforcement than ceramic overlay alone (P < 0.001). Fracture modes were analyzed to determine the type of fracture as repairable or catastrophic, where FRC + CO and SDR + CO groups had favorable fracture modes that were mostly repairable. When restoring root canal-treated molars with overlays, the pulp chamber should be sealed with either FRC or SDR to ensure the best possible fracture resistance. The clinical relevance of the study is that a new simple restorative protocol is presented to enhance the survival of root canal-treated molars using ceramic overlays.
© 2021. The Society of The Nippon Dental University.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bulk-fill composite; Ceramic overlay; Endocrowns; Fiber-reinforced composite; Fracture modes; Fracture resistance; Overlay; SonicFill

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35064356     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-021-00682-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.885


  34 in total

1.  The influence of elastic modulus of base material on the marginal adaptation of direct composite restoration.

Authors:  Oh-Hyun Kwon; Do-Hyun Kim; Sung-Ho Park
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.440

2.  Conservative restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolar teeth: a FEM study.

Authors:  Öznur Eraslan; Oğuz Eraslan; Gürcan Eskitaşcıoğlu; Sema Belli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Curing profile of bulk-fill resin-based composites.

Authors:  Xin Li; Pong Pongprueksa; Bart Van Meerbeek; Jan De Munck
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Effect of two different types of fibers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with composite resin.

Authors:  Sulthan Ibrahim Khan; Ramachandran Anupama; Mohanavelu Deepalakshmi; Kumarappan Senthil Kumar
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns.

Authors:  G R Biacchi; R T Basting
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.440

Review 6.  Endocrown restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  José Augusto Sedrez-Porto; Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da Rosa; Adriana Fernandes da Silva; Eliseu Aldrighi Münchow; Tatiana Pereira-Cenci
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  A new classification system for the restoration of root filled teeth.

Authors:  M Zarow; A Ramírez-Sebastià; G Paolone; J de Ribot Porta; J Mora; J Espona; F Durán-Sindreu; M Roig
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.264

8.  Effects of different cusp coverage restorations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.

Authors:  Tugba Serin Kalay; Tahsin Yildirim; Mustafa Ulker
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Influence of no-ferrule and no-post buildup design on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with resin nanoceramic CAD/CAM crowns.

Authors:  P Magne; A O Carvalho; G Bruzi; R E Anderson; H P Maia; M Giannini
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.440

10.  Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength.

Authors:  Anaïs Ramírez-Sebastià; Tissiana Bortolotto; Maria Cattani-Lorente; Lluis Giner; Miguel Roig; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.