| Literature DB >> 35064190 |
Alexei A Kamshilin1, Valery V Zaytsev2, Alexander V Lodygin3,4, Victor A Kashchenko3,4.
Abstract
Evaluation of tissue perfusion at various stages of surgery is of great importance for the implementation of the concept of safe surgery, including operations on the abdominal organs. Currently, there is no accurate and reliable intraoperative method for assessing tissue perfusion that could help surgeons determine the risks of ischemia and improve outcomes. We propose novel method of intraoperative assessment of tissue perfusion using video camera synchronized with the electrocardiogram. The technique is referred to as imaging photoplethysmography (iPPG). It can be used continuously for monitoring blood supply to organs e.g., before and after anastomosis. In our study, we followed 14 different surgical cases (four stomach and ten colorectal cancers) requiring reconstruction of various organs with anastomosis. With iPPG, intraoperative blood perfusion was successfully visualized and quantified in all 14 patients under study. As most indicative, here we describe in detail two clinical demonstrations during gastrectomy for gastric cancer and right-sided hemicolectomy for cancer of the ascending colon. Feasibility of the iPPG system to assess blood perfusion in organs before and after anastomosis during open surgery was demonstrated for the first time.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35064190 PMCID: PMC8782890 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05080-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Surgical cases monitored by the iPPG system.
| # | Surgery | Diagnosis | *Perfusion index (%) | Measurement distance (cm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panel B | Panel E | ||||
| Fig. | Total gastrectomy | Gastric cancer | 2.64 ± 1.09 | 1.89 ± 0.50 | 35 |
| Fig. | Laparoscopically assisted right-hemicolectomy | Ascending colon cancer | 1.17 ± 0.70 | 1.26 ± 0.64 | 25 |
| Fig. | Laparoscopic distal subtotal gastric resection | Gastric cancer | 1.42 ± 0.87 | 1.18 ± 0.52 | 40 |
| Fig. | Total gastrectomy | Gastric cancer | 1.16 ± 1.22 | 2.06 ± 1.34 | 25 |
| Fig. | Laparoscopically assisted right-hemicolectomy | Ascending colon cancer | 0.88 ± 0.36 | 1.53 ± 0.87 | 30 |
| Fig. | Laparoscopically assisted sigmoid colon resection | Sigmoid colon cancer | 0.44 ± 0.37 | 0.53 ± 0.49 | 35 |
| Fig. | Right hemicolectomy | Ascending colon cancer | 1.27 ± 0.64 | 1.80 ± 1.17 | 25 |
| Fig. | Laparoscopically assisted left-hemicolectomy | Descending colon cancer | 1.03 ± 0.51 | 0.61 ± 0.27 | 25 |
| Fig. | Total gastrectomy | Gastric cancer | 1.09 ± 0.60 | 1.39 ± 0.60 | 35 |
| Fig. | Laparoscopically assisted right-hemicolectomy | Cancer of ascending colon | 1.07 ± 0.62 | 0.89 ± 0.67 | 30 |
| Fig. | Laparoscopically assisted left colon resection | Sigmoid colon cancer | 0.64 ± 0.40 | 0.62 ± 0.35 | 35 |
| Fig. | Laparoscopically assisted sigmoid colon resection | Sigmoid colon cancer | 0.43 ± 0.19 | 0.45 ± 0.20 | 25 |
| Fig. | Laparoscopically assisted anterior rectal resection | Upper rectal cancer | 0.43 ± 0.30 | 0.31 ± 0.20 | 40 |
| Fig. | Descendorectostomy with ileostomy and hepatic resection | Rectosigmoid cancer | 1.27 ± 1.77 | 1.55 ± 2.58 | 35 |
*Perfusion index is expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 1Intestinal blood perfusion in the case of T-shaped anastomosis. Panels (A,F) are photographs of the patient’s bowels before and after jejunojejunostomy, respectively. Yellow dashed lines in these panels mark the areas within which mapping of the perfusion was assessed. Spatial distributions of the amplitude of the pulsatile component (APC) before and after anastomosis are shown in Panels (B,E), respectively. APC maps are overlaid on the respective intestine images. The boundaries of zones with different levels of perfusion according to the surgeon's assessment are designated as M1–M3. The red dashed line in panel (B) indicates the final dissection line. The color bars in the bottom of Panels (B,E) show the APC as a percentage: more reddish, more perfusion. Panels (C,D) and (G,H) demonstrate PPG pulses in selected Region-Of-Interest (ROI sizing 2 × 2 pixels or 0.04 × 0.04 mm2) before and after anastomosis, respectively. Each ROI in which we show the PPG waveforms is centered on either yellow or cyan circle marked on APC maps. There are four graphs in each panel designated as X1, X2, X3, and X4 (X = A, C, G, or H). Graph X1 shows PPG waveform calculated in the selected ROI without image stabilization. X2 is the ratio of alternating and slow varying components of the PPG waveform in the same ROI after image stabilization, law-pass filtering, and signal inversion. X3 is ECG signal synchronously recorded with video frames. Graph X4 shows one-cardiac-cycle pulse wave (thick green line) obtained after averaging of particular pulse waves (thin gray lines) over 12 cardiac cycles.
Figure 2Intestinal blood perfusion in the case of side-to-side anastomosis. Panels (A,F) are color photographs of patient’s intestines before and after anastomosis, respectively. Spatial distributions of the APC before and after anastomosis overlaid on the respective intestine images are shown in Panels (B,E), respectively. Points M1 and M2 mark the boundaries of visible vascularization and mesenteric attachment, respectively. The color bars in the bottom of Panels (B,E) show APC percentagewise. Panels (C,D) and (G,H) demonstrate PPG pulses in selected ROIs before and after anastomosis, respectively. The meaning of the graphs in these panels is the same as in Fig. 1.
Figure 3Custom-made iPPG system used in the experimental study.