Literature DB >> 35063281

Randomized phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel vs. cediranib-olaparib (continuous or intermittent schedule) in platinum-resistant high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer.

Nicoletta Colombo1, Federica Tomao2, Pierluigi Benedetti Panici3, Maria Ornella Nicoletto4, Germana Tognon5, Alessandra Bologna6, Andrea Alberto Lissoni7, Andrea DeCensi8, Mariateresa Lapresa2, Rosanna Mancari9, Innocenza Palaia3, Giulia Tasca4, Francesca Tettamanzi10, Maria Francesca Alvisi10, Eliana Rulli10, Davide Poli10, Luciano Carlucci10, Valter Torri10, Roldano Fossati10, Elena Biagioli11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous findings showed that cediranib-olaparib increased PFS in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer compared to olaparib alone.
METHODS: BAROCCO trial randomized 123 patients: 80mg/m2 paclitaxel weekly up to 24 weeks (control), olaparib 300mg tablets twice daily together with 20mg cediranib daily (continuous schedule) or with 20mg cediranib 5 days/week (intermittent schedule) until progression. The primary objective was the PFS comparison between each experimental arm and the control (alpha one-sided 5%; power 80%; HR 0.5).
RESULTS: The median platinum-free interval was 1.9 months, 60% of patients had been pretreated with 3 or more chemotherapy lines. Median PFS for paclitaxel, the continuous, and the intermittent schedules were 3.1, 5.6, and 3.8 months. The HR for PFS in the continuous arm vs control was 0.76 (90% CI: 0.50-1.14, p = 0.265). The HR for PFS in the intermittent arm vs control was 1.03 (90% CI: 0.68-1.55, p = 0.904). Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 15%, 20%, and 5% of patients in the control, continuous and intermittent arms. Grade ≥ 3 anemia and diarrhea and hypertension of any grade occurred only in the experimental arms, and peripheral neuropathies and alopecia only in the control arm. Five serious adverse drug reactions occurred and two were fatal: one in the control and one in the continuous arm.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cediranib-olaparib was not superior to chemotherapy in terms of PFS in heavily pretreated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients. However, this oral doublet, is active and may offer a non-chemotherapy option in this difficult to treat population. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFICATION: IRFMN-OVA-7289, EudraCT: 2016-003964-38, NCT03314740.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cediranib; Olaparib; Ovarian cancer; Phase II; Randomized

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35063281     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  4 in total

Review 1.  Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Abigail Tattersall; Neil Ryan; Alison J Wiggans; Ewelina Rogozińska; Jo Morrison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-16

2.  MiR-320b and miR-320d as Biomarkers to Predict and Participate in the Formation of Platinum Resistance in Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Liu; Ren-Feng Zhao; Chao Liu; Jie Zhou; Liu Yang; Li Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 3.  Antiangiogenic Strategies in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Mechanism, Resistance, and Combination Therapy.

Authors:  Chengwen Jin; Mingyuan Yuan; Hualei Bu; Chengjuan Jin
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.501

Review 4.  PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: overcoming resistance with combination strategies.

Authors:  Rowan E Miller; Karim H El-Shakankery; Jung-Yun Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.756

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.