| Literature DB >> 35062941 |
Vanessa Gut1, Julia Schmid2, Lars Imbach1, Achim Conzelmann1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study firstly aimed to identify context patterns in sport and exercise among adolescents at lower and upper secondary education. The organisational, social and competitive contexts of leisure-time sport and exercise were included as pattern indicators. The second aim was to examine the stability of these patterns across educational transition. The last aim was to investigate whether a subjective evaluation of the transition influences whether people stay in the same pattern across time.Entities:
Keywords: Life event; Person-oriented approach; Physical activity; Social-ecological framework; Youth
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35062941 PMCID: PMC8783455 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12471-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Context patterns before educational transition (t1): latent profile analysis models for 3- to 5-latent-pattern solutions (class-invariant, diagonal Σ)
| Latent-pattern solution | Club-organised | Non-club organised | Self-organised | Alone | With people you do not know | With family and/or partner | With friends | Competition participation | Sport and exercise volume | Sex | BIC | Sample-adjusted BIC | Entropy | VLMR | BLRTa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 429.19 | 321.305 | .98 | -397.954 | |||||||||||||
| 1. Self-organised individualists | 164 (41.84%) | 3.90% (1.41) | 2.00% (1.05) | 45.20% (3.10) | 22.00% (2.86) | 5.80% (2.36) | 6.40% (1.64) | 27.00% (3.62) | 7.70% (1.01) | 152.00 min/week (21.08) [2, 3] | 67.50% [2, 3] | |||||
| 2. Non-club-organised sportspersons | 50 (12.76%) | 4.10% (1.41) | 84.70% (1.05) | 8.60% (3.10) | 26.50% (2.86) | 12.00% (2.36) | 7.70% (1.64) | 40.90% (3.62) | 12.50% (1.01) | 250.33 min/week (30.08) [1, 3] | 82.00% [1, 3] | |||||
| 3. Traditional competitive club athletes with friends | 178 (45.41%) | 87.90% (1.41) | 3.10% (1.05) | 7.10% (3.10) | 7.10% (2.86) | 9.30% (2.36) | 3.50% (1.64) | 76.90% (3.62) | 68.00% (1.01) | 319.67 min/week (17.00) [1, 2] | 51.70% [1, 2] | |||||
| Wald-Chi-Square-Test | χ2 = 37.56, | χ2 = 22.30, | ||||||||||||||
| -52.02 | -188.457 | .98 | -113.081 | |||||||||||||
| 1. Traditional competitive club athletes with friends | 179 (45.66%) | 87.70% (1.38) | 3.20% (1.05) | 7.30% (1.34) | 7.20% (1.34) | 9.60% (25.69) | 3.70% (23.66) | 76.40% (35.78) | 67.40% (32.09) | 318.98 min/week (16.86) [2, 3,] | 51.90% [2, 3] | |||||
| 2. Mostly inactives | 81 (20.66%) | 1.30% (1.38) | 1.30% (1.05) | 2.50% (1.34) | 2.80% (1.34) | 5.40% (25.69) | 3.50% (23.66) | 17.20% (35.78) | 7.50% (32.09) | 56.51 min/week (15.74) [1, 3, 4] | 70.70% [1] | |||||
| 3. Non-club-organised sportspersons | 51 (13.01%) | 4.40% (1.38) | 84.20% (1.05) | 8.80% (1.34) | 26.50% (1.34) | 12.80% (25.69) | 7.80% (23.66) | 41.00% (35.78) | 12.70% (32.09) | 247.01 min/week (29.76) [1, 2] | 82.20% [1, 4] | |||||
| 4. Self-organised individualists | 81 (20.66%) | 5.50% (1.38) | 2.30% (1.05) | 89.40% (1.34) | 41.80% (1.34) | 5.10% (25.69) | 9.10% (23.66) | 36.90% (35.78) | 7.60% (32.09) | 247.90 min/week (36.63) [2] | 63.80% [3] | |||||
| Wald-Chi-Square-Test | χ 2 = 135.21, | χ 2 = 23.204, | ||||||||||||||
| -388.152 | -553.146 | .99 | 154.392 | |||||||||||||
| 1. Mostly inactives | 79 (20.15%) | 0.70% (1.41) | 0.30% (0.55) | 2.10% (1.34) | 2.50% (2.57) | 3.60% (2.35) | 3.10% (1.64) | 16.80% (3.56) | 6.00% (3.19) | 46.64 min/week (13.96) [2, 3, 4, 5] | 71.00% [3] | |||||
| 2. Non-club-organised sportspersons | 35 (8.93%) | 0.00% (1.41) | 96.00% (0.55) | 2.50% (1.34) | 22.90% (2.57) | 14.00% (2.35) | 10.10% (1.64) | 38.90% (3.56) | 10.90% (3.19) | 235.94 min/week (38.03) [1, 3, 4, 5] | 86.30% [3, 4, 5] | |||||
| 3. Traditional competitive club athletes with friends | 167 (42.60%) | 89.80% (1.41) | 0.90% (0.55) | 7.50% (1.34) | 6.40% (2.57) | 9.30% (2.35) | 3.8% (1.64) | 77.20% (3.56) | 69.10% (3.19) | 306.04 min/week (16.86) [1, 2, 5] | 53.30% [1, 2] | |||||
| 4. Self-organised individualists | 78 (19.90%) | 6.00% (1.41) | 0.70% (0.55) | 90.50% (1.34) | 42.00% (2.57) | 5.30% (2.35) | 9.50% (1.64) | 35.70% (3.56) | 8.10% (3.19) | 252.70 min/week (37.93) [1, 2] | 62.60% [2] | |||||
| 5. Flexible sportspersons | 33 (8.42%) | 28.50% (1.41) | 47.60% (0.55) | 19.10% (1.34) | 27.20% (2.57) | 14.40% (2.35) | 2.90% (1.64) | 53.80% (3.56) | 27.30% (3.19) | 348.43 min/week (40.78) [1, 2, 3] | 59.80% [2] | |||||
| Wald-Chi-Square-Test | χ2 = 168.74, | χ2 = 21.298, |
Note. BIC = Bayesian information criterion; sample-adjusted BIC = sample-adjusted Bayesian information criterion; VLMR = Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test; BLRT = bootstrapped likelihood-ratio test. Numbers in brackets indicate that patterns differ significantly at p < .05. aThe BLRT could only be performed without correction for nesting.
Behavioural context patterns after the educational transition (t2): latent profile analysis models for 3-to 5-latent-pattern solutions (class-invariant, diagonal Σ)
| Latent-pattern solution | Club-organised | Non-club organised | Self-organised | Alone | With people you do not know | With family and/or partner | With friends | Competition participation | Sport and exercise volume | Sex | BIC | Sample-adjusted BIC | Entropy | VLMR | BLRTa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -145.069 | -252.950 | .99 | -220.888 | |||||||||||||
| 1. Mostly inactives | 189 (48.32%) | 1.40% (1.22) | 0.90% (0.89) | 33.10% (3.27) | 20.90% (3.11) | 1.60% (1.73) | 3.40% (1.70) | 14.20% (3.13) | 2.70% (2.68) | 92.71 min/week (12.73) [2, 3] | 64.00% female | |||||
| 2. Traditional competitive club athletes with friends | 152 (38.78%) | 86.50% (1.22) | 3.10% (0.89) | 8.80% (3.27) | 0.90% (3.11) | 8.60% (1.73) | 1.90% (1.70) | 79.70% (3.13) | 66.00% (2.68) | 354.36 min/week (22.04) [1, 3] | 57.70% female | |||||
| 3. Non-club-organised sportspersons | 51 (13.01%) | 0.30% (1.22) | 89.90% (0.89) | 6.40% (3.27) | 28.00% (3.11) | 11.00% (1.73) | 18.10% (1.70) | 41.90% (3.13) | 8.70% (2.68) | 278.88 min/week (27.86) [1, 2] | 69.40% female | |||||
| Wald-Chi-Square-Test | χ2 = 121.62, | χ2 = 2.72, | ||||||||||||||
| -868.684 | -1005.122 | 1.00 | 174.046 | |||||||||||||
| 1. Non-club-organised sports persons | 51 (13.01%) | 3.00% (1.23) | 90.40% (0.89) | 5.90% (1.18) | 27.40% (2.49) | 11.10% (1.73) | 18.30% (1.70) | 42.20% (3.00) | 8.70% (2.68) | 278.73 min/week (27.91) [2, 3] | 69.20% female | |||||
| 2. Mostly inactives | 121 (30.87%) | 0.00% (1.23) | 0.00% (0.89) | 0.01% (1.18) | 0.01% (2.49) | 0.00% (1.73) | 0.01% (1.70) | 4.70% (3.00) | 0.10% (2.68) | 23.33 min/week (10.99) [1, 3, 4] | 66.20% female | |||||
| 3. Traditional competitive club athletes with friends | 152 (38.78%) | 86.50% (1.23) | 3.10% (0.89) | 8.70% (1.18) | 8.90% (2.49) | 8.60% (1.73) | 1.90% (1.70) | 79.80% (3.00) | 66.10% (2.68) | 354.39 min/week (22.08) [1, 3, 4] | 57.60% female | |||||
| 4. Self-organised individualists | 68 (17.35%) | 4.10% (1.23) | 2.80% (0.89) | 91.50% (1.18) | 56.80% (2.49) | 3.70% (1.73) | 7.90% (1.70) | 31.50% (3.00) | 6.40% (2.68) | 218.00 min/week (22.44) [2, 3] | 60.30% female | |||||
| Wald-Chi-Square-Test | χ 2 = 241.75, | χ2 = 3.40, | ||||||||||||||
| -1285.32 | -1450.309 | 1.00 | 562.724 | |||||||||||||
| 1. Mostly inactives | 121 (30.87%) | 0.00% (1.05) | 0.00% (0.89) | 0.40% (0.71) | 0.90% (2.49) | 0.40% (1.73) | 0.80% (1.70) | 4.50% (3.00) | 0.80% (2.61) | 23.33 min/week (10.99) [2, 3, 4, 5] | 66.10% female | |||||
| 2. Non-club-organised sportspersons | 30 (7.65%) | 42.70% (1.05) | 7.80% (0.89) | 46.70% (0.71) | 28.40% (2.49) | 7.10% (1.73) | 2.90% (1.70) | 61.40% (3.00) | 35.10% (2.61) | 324.25 min/week (48.88) [1, 5] | 50.20% female | |||||
| 3. Self-organised individualists | 51 (13.01%) | 3.20% (1.05) | 90.30% (0.89) | 5.80% (0.71) | 27.30% (2.49) | 11.10% (1.73) | 18.20% (1.70) | 42.50% (3.00) | 8.90% (2.61) | 279.04 min/week (27.80) [1, 4] | 68.80% female | |||||
| 4. Traditional competitive club athletes with friends | 133 (33.93%) | 90.90% (1.05) | 3.10% (0.89) | 4.30% (0.71) | 7.50% (2.49) | 9.10% (1.73) | 1.80% (1.70) | 80.90% (3.00) | 69.50% (2.61) | 353.39 min/week (23.20) [1, 3, 5] | 60.00% female | |||||
| 5. Flexible sportspersons | 57 (14.54%) | 0.50% (1.05) | 0.30% (0.89) | 98.40% (0.71) | 59.50% (2.49) | 2.70% (1.73) | 8.90% (1.70) | 28.90% (3.00) | 2.50% (2.61) | 207.68 min/week (24.21) [1, 4] | 59.60% female | |||||
| Wald-Chi-Square-Test | χ2 = 242.18, | χ2 = 3.87, |
Note. BIC = Bayesian information criterion; sample-adjusted BIC = sample-adjusted Bayesian information criterion; VLMR = Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test; BLRT = bootstrapped likelihood-ratio test. Numbers in brackets indicate that patterns differ significantly at p < .05.
Fig. 1Z-standardised behavioural context patterns (t1 and t2) their transitional probabilites (arrows). Only transition probabilities ≥ 20% are reported
The moderating effects of a subjective evaluation of the educational transition on the associations of context patterns
| Upper secondary education ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional competitive club athletes with friends | Non-club-organised sportspersons | Self-organised individualists | Mostly inactives | |||||
| Lower secondary education ( | ||||||||
| Traditional competitive club athletes with friends x subjective evaluation | -0.781 [-1.317, -0.246] | .004* | -0.402 [-1.052, 0.248] | .225 | -0.50 [-1.187, 0.184] | .152 | − | − |
| Non-club-organised sportspersons x subjective evaluation | 0.243 [-0.280, 1.165] | .614 | -0.453 [-0.325, 1.397] | .239 | 0.056 [-0.563, 0.841] | .886 | − | − |
| Self-organised individualists x subjective evaluation | 0.443 [-0.280, 1.165] | .230 | 0.536 [-0.325, 1.397] | .222 | 0.139 [-0.563, 0.841] | .698 | − | − |
| Mostly inactives x subjective evaluation | -0.149 [-0.855, 0.556] | .678 | -0.062 [-0.772, 0.648] | .864 | 0.304 [-0.486, 1.094] | .451 | − | − |
Note. For the analyses of the main effects of the psychosocial profiles, one-sided significance tests were applied. B = unstandardised B-regression coefficient; * p < .05. CI = confidence interval for unstandardised B-regression coefficient. Reference groups: Mostly inactives. For the moderation analysis, two-sided significance tests were applied.