| Literature DB >> 35062892 |
Lu-Yi Ying1,2, Wen-Ya Qiu1,2, Bing-Hong Wang1,2, Ping Zhou1,2, Bei Zhang1,2, Yu-Feng Yao3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To report on corneal endothelial regeneration, graft clarity, and vision recovery when using endothelium-free grafts.Entities:
Keywords: Corneal endothelial regeneration; Corneal graft; Cryopreserved cornea; Penetrating keratoplasty
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35062892 PMCID: PMC8783470 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02260-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Characteristics of corneal endothelial regeneration on donor grafts after therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty
| Patient | Gender/Age | Primary Disease | Reason requires T-PKP | Graft Characteristics | Changes of Graft after Surgery | Additional Ops | BCVA | Follow-up | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centricity | Size | Earliest detectable ECs | Shift to complete clear | Final | Pre-op | Last | ||||||
| M/47 | FK | Perforation & severe intraocular inflammation | centric | 7.75 | 2.5 | 10 | 814 | Phaco+IOL implant | LP | 1.0 | 207 | |
| Laser posterior capsulectomy | ||||||||||||
| M/35 | Thermal Burn | Corneal perforation | Centric | 7.75 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1148 | CLAU | HM | 0.2 | 36 | |
| M/55 | FK | Corneal perforation | Centric | 8.0 | 3 | 5 | 875 | none | FC | 0.5 | 16 | |
| M/27 | HSK | Corneal perforation | Eccentric | 8.25 | 1 | 2 | 1531 | none | HM | 0.8 | 19 | |
| M/28 | FK | Corneal perforation & severe intraocular inflammation | Centric | 8.0 | 3 | 11 | 1340 | none | HM | 0.8 | 19 | |
| F/61 | HSK | Large tear of DM, scheduled DALK shifted to temporary PK using cryopreserved tissue | Centric | 7.75 | 4 | 7.5 | 819 | none | FC | 0.3 | 26 | |
| M /21 | Keratoconus, Acute corneal hydrops | Large tear of DM, scheduled DALK shifted to temporary PK using cryopreserved tissue | Centric | 8.0 | 1 | 6.5 | 1030 | none | FC | 0.9 | 37 | |
| F/22 | Phlyctenular keratoconjunctivitis | Corneal perforation | Eccentric | 7.5 | 3 | 6 | 848 | none | 0.4 | 0.7 | 20 | |
| M/65 | HSK | Corneal perforation | Centric | 8.0 | 1.5 | 10 | 853 | ECCE+IOL | FC | 0.2 | 12.5 | |
| M/22 | Keratoconus | Large tear of DM, scheduled DALK shifted to temporary PK using cryopreserved tissue | Centric | 7.75 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 782 | none | 0.1 | 0.6 | 38 | |
| M/48 | Thermal Burn | Corneal perforation | Centric | 8.0 | 3 | 7 | 1126 | AMT + CLAU | HM | 0.3 | 36 | |
| M/47 | Thermal Burn | Corneal melting, perforation, prolapse of intraocular contents | Eccentric involving partial limbal area | 7.0 | 2 | 6.5 | 939 | AMT + CLAU | LP | 0.2 | 24 | |
| M/48 | HSK | Corneal perforation | Eccentric | 7.5 | 3 | 8 | 1208 | non | LP | 0.5 | 168 | |
| M/16 | Phlyctenular keratoconjunctivitis | Large tear of DM, scheduled DALK shifted to temporary PK using cryopreserved tissue | Centric | 8.0 | 1 | 3 | 873 | none | 0.3 | 0.7 | 36 | |
| M/25 | Keratoconus, Acute corneal hydrops | Large tear of DM, scheduled DALK shifted to temporary PK using cryopreserved tissue | Centric | 7.5 | 3 | 5 | 882 | none | FC | 0.8 | 30 | |
| F/18 | Trauma, Corneal laceration, Large tissue defect | Corneal perforation & laceration | Eccentric involving partial limbal area | 9.5 | 1.5 | 5 | 859 | CLAU | FC | 0.2 | 72 | |
| F/15 | Keratoconus, Acute corneal hydrops | Large tear of DM, scheduled DALK shifted to temporary PK using cryopreserved tissue | Centric | 8.25 | 2 | 3.5 | 900 | none | 0.05 | 1 | 50.5 | |
| F/22 | HSK | Large tear of DM, scheduled DALK shifted to temporary PK using cryopreserved tissue | Centric | 8.0 | 3 | 5.5 | 1002 | none | FC | 0.1 | 20 | |
T-PKP therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty, Ops operations, EC endothelial cell, FK fungal keratitis, HSK herpes simplex keratitis, BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, CLAU conjunctiva limbal autograft, HM hand motion, LP light perception, AMT amniotic membrane transplantation, ALT Allogeneic limbal transplantation. The size of the graft was 0.5 mm larger than the size of host trephination
Fig. 1A: Representative case #1. Two months after the therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty using cryopreserved tissue, slit-lamp microscopy revealed significant edema and cloudiness in the corneal graft with mild conjunctival hyperemia. B: Representative case #1. Seven months after the therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty using cryopreserved tissue, slit-lamp microscopy showed that the graft had become comparatively clear but still retained a certain degree of edema, making the corneal graft obviously thicker than normal. C: Representative case #1. Ten months after the therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty using cryopreserved tissue, slit-lamp microscopy showed that the graft had become completely clear with normal corneal thickness
Fig. 2A: Representative case #5. One month after the therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty using cryopreserved tissue, slit-lamp microscopy revealed marked stromal edema and epithelial bullae coupled with corneal cloudiness of the graft and significant conjunctival hyperemia. B: Representative case #5. Three months after the therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty using cryopreserved tissue, the corneal graft had become almost clear with only mild edema in the stroma. Linear pigmented keratic precipitates on the posterior surface of the cornea can be clearly identified. The conjunctival hyperemia had also nearly resolved. C: Representative case #5. Eleven months after the therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty using cryopreserved tissue, the corneal graft became completely clear with no signs of inflammation, except for localized regional scarring around the graft-host junction
Fig. 3A: In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal graft for representative case #1 at 2 months after therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. Only a uniformly gray light reflection was observed, and no cells were detected on the posterior surface of the graft. B: In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal graft for representative case #1 at 7 months after therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. In vivo confocal microscopy revealed a formed endothelium with multiple nuclei in a single cell (triangle) and cell division morphology (arrow). The cell size and morphology varied markedly. C: In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal graft for representative case #1 at 10 months after therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. In vivo confocal microscopy revealed hexagonal and polygonal-shaped endothelial cells on the corneal graft, with a cell density of 1023 cells/mm2. The endothelial cells became relatively consistent in morphology and size
Fig. 4A: In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal graft for representative case #5 at 1 month after the therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. No corneal endothelial cells were detected on the posterior surface of the graft. B: In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal graft for representative case #5 at 3 months after the therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. A newly reconstructed corneal endothelium on the donor graft is observed, with markedly varied cell size and morphology, extraordinarily large cells containing multiple nuclei (triangle) and cell division (arrow). The cell density of the regenerated endothelium was 1186 cells/mm2 at this time. C: In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal graft for representative case #5 at 11 months after the therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. Corneal endothelial cell density of the endothelium on the graft became comparatively consistent in cell morphology and size. The cell density of the regenerated endothelium reached 1686 cells/mm2 at this time
Characteristics of the Eyes with Regaining Transparent Grafts and with Persistent Cloudy Grafts
| Groups | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grafts with Recovered Clear Cornea | Grafts with Persistent Cloudiness and Edema | ||||
| Graft Number | Graft Number | ||||
| 18 | 177 | ||||
| Gender | Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| 13 | 5 | 113 | 64 | ||
| Age (Average, Range) | 37 ± 15 (16 ~ 65) | 28 ± 19 (15 ~ 61) | 38 ± 19 (20 ~ 66) | 41 ± 11 (35 ~ 51) | |
| Primary Disease | 3 | 0 | 68 | 39 | |
| 0 | 0 | 23 | 14 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | ||
| 3 | 2 | 9 | 5 | ||
| 3 | 0 | 6 | 2 | ||
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Size of Corneal Perforation (mm) | 12 | 5 | 11 | 5 | |
| 1 | 0 | 81 | 36 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 | ||
| Severity of Ocular Inflammation & intraocular fibrous membrane | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | 2 | 19 | 5 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 94 | 59 | ||
Size of graft (mm) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 16 | 3 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 76 | 51 | ||
| 0 | 1 | 21 | 10 | ||