| Literature DB >> 35062635 |
Francesco Rundo1, Ilaria Anfuso1, Maria Grazia Amore1, Alessandro Ortis2, Angelo Messina1,3, Sabrina Conoci1,4, Sebastiano Battiato2.
Abstract
From a biological point of view, alcohol human attentional impairment occurs before reaching a Blood Alcohol Content (BAC index) of 0.08% (0.05% under the Italian legislation), thus generating a significant impact on driving safety if the drinker subject is driving a car. Car drivers must keep a safe driving dynamic, having an unaltered physiological status while processing the surrounding information coming from the driving scenario (e.g., traffic signs, other vehicles and pedestrians). Specifically, the identification and tracking of pedestrians in the driving scene is a widely investigated problem in the scientific community. The authors propose a full, deep pipeline for the identification, monitoring and tracking of the salient pedestrians, combined with an intelligent electronic alcohol sensing system to properly assess the physiological status of the driver. More in detail, the authors propose an intelligent sensing system that makes a common air quality sensor selective to alcohol. A downstream Deep 1D Temporal Residual Convolutional Neural Network architecture will be able to learn specific embedded alcohol-dynamic features in the collected sensing data coming from the GHT25S air-quality sensor of STMicroelectronics. A parallel deep attention-augmented architecture identifies and tracks the salient pedestrians in the driving scenario. A risk assessment system evaluates the sobriety of the driver in case of the presence of salient pedestrians in the driving scene. The collected preliminary results confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed approach.Entities:
Keywords: alcohol detection; artificial neural networks; driver safety
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35062635 PMCID: PMC8780914 DOI: 10.3390/s22020674
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1The proposed intelligent car driver assisting pipeline.
Figure 2Schematic overview of the proposed GHT25S-based sensing system.
Figure 3Schematic internal overview of the GHT25S sensing device.
Figure 4An overview of the GHT25S sensor: (a) frontal view; (b) side view.
Figure 5GHT25S car driver breath sampling data diagram: (a) sober driver; (b) driver who drank alcohol.
Figure 6Some instances of the driving scene frames overlaid with segmented salient pedestrians in different configurations (on foot, by bicycle, etc.). In red are the predicted bounding-boxes and related relevant/not relevant pedestrian assessment.
Figure 7The testing setup of the proposed sensing system.
Car driver alcohol detection by soft-sensing system: experimental results.
| Model | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1D-CNN |
|
|
|
| FCN | 0.9775 | 0.9802 | 0.9755 |
| SVM | 0.9500 | 0.9800 | 0.9700 |
| LSTM | 0.8952 | 0.8905 | 0.9001 |
Intelligent pedestrian tracking system: experimental results (CamVid dataset).
| Method | Intelligent Pedestrian Tracking System mIoU |
|---|---|
| Proposed |
|
| Faster-R-CNN | 53.95% |
| Mask-R-CNN with ResNet-101 backbone w/o Criss-Cross RCCA | 63.96% |