| Literature DB >> 35062614 |
Xiaohan Liu1, Chenglin Wen2, Xiaohui Sun1.
Abstract
In this paper, a novel design idea of high-order Kalman filter based on Kronecker product transform is proposed for a class of strong nonlinear stochastic dynamic systems. Firstly, those augmenting systems are modeled with help of the Kronecker product without system noise. Secondly, the augmented system errors are illustratively charactered by Gaussian white noise. Thirdly, at the expanded space a creative high-order Kalman filter is delicately designed, which consists of high-order Taylor expansion, introducing magical intermediate variables, representing linear systems converted from strongly nonlinear systems, designing Kalman filter, etc. The performance of the proposed filter will be much better than one of EKF, because it uses more information than EKF. Finally, its promise is verified through commonly used digital simulation examples.Entities:
Keywords: Kalman filter; Kronecker product; high-order Taylor expansion; nonlinear system
Year: 2022 PMID: 35062614 PMCID: PMC8780940 DOI: 10.3390/s22020653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1The actual state and its estimate.
Figure 2The actual state and its estimate.
Figure 3Estimated error for state .
Figure 4Estimated error for state .
Error comparison between Proposed Filter and EKF in case 1.
| EKF | Proposed Filter (r = 2) | Proposed Filter (r = 3) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSE of
|
|
|
| |
| MSE of
|
|
|
| |
| MSE of
|
|
|
| |
| Improved (%) |
| × | 14.34% | 52.93% |
|
| × | 39.06% | −18.02% | |
| Improved of
| × | 21.50% | 34.15% | |
| Improved relative to EKF (%) |
| × | 14.34% | 59.68% |
|
| × | 39.06% | 24.54% | |
| Improved of
| × | 21.50% | 48.31% | |
Figure 5The actual state and its estimate.
Figure 6The actual state and its estimate.
Figure 7Estimated error for state .
Figure 8Estimated error for state .
Error comparison between Proposed Filter and EKF in case 2.
| EKF | Proposed Filter (r = 2) | Proposed Filter (r = 3) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSE of
|
|
|
| |
| MSE of
|
|
|
| |
| MSE of
|
|
|
| |
| Improved (%) |
| × | 45.30% | 20.31% |
|
| × | 83.76% | 0% | |
| Improved of | × | 74.85% | 10.24% | |
| Improved relative to EKF (%) |
| × | 45.30% | 59.41% |
|
| × | 83.76% | 83.76% | |
| Improved of | × | 74.85% | 77.43% | |