| Literature DB >> 35062591 |
Josip Lorincz1, Ivana Ramljak2, Dinko Begušić1.
Abstract
Due to the capability of the effective usage of the radio frequency spectrum, a concept known as cognitive radio has undergone a broad exploitation in real implementations. Spectrum sensing as a core function of the cognitive radio enables secondary users to monitor the frequency band of primary users and its exploitation in periods of availability. In this work, the efficiency of spectrum sensing performed with the energy detection method realized through the square-law combining of the received signals at secondary users has been analyzed. Performance evaluation of the energy detection method was done for the wireless system in which signal transmission is based on Multiple-Input Multiple-Output-Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing. Although such transmission brings different advantages to wireless communication systems, the impact of noise variations known as noise uncertainty and the inability of selecting an optimal signal level threshold for deciding upon the presence of the primary user signal can compromise the sensing precision of the energy detection method. Since the energy detection may be enhanced by dynamic detection threshold adjustments, this manuscript analyses the influence of detection threshold adjustments and noise uncertainty on the performance of the energy detection spectrum sensing method in single-cell cognitive radio systems. For the evaluation of an energy detection method based on the square-law combining technique, the mathematical expressions of the main performance parameters used for the assessment of spectrum sensing efficiency have been derived. The developed expressions were further assessed by executing the algorithm that enabled the simulation of the energy detection method based on the square-law combining technique in Multiple-Input Multiple-Output-Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing cognitive radio systems. The obtained simulation results provide insights into how different levels of detection threshold adjustments and noise uncertainty affect the probability of detection of primary user signals. It is shown that higher signal-to-noise-ratios, the transmitting powers of primary user, the number of primary user transmitting and the secondary user receiving antennas, the number of sampling points and the false alarm probabilities improve detection probability. The presented analyses establish the basis for understanding the energy detection operation through the possibility of exploiting the different combinations of operating parameters which can contribute to the improvement of spectrum sensing efficiency of the energy detection method.Entities:
Keywords: MIMO; OFDM; SISO; SLC; SNR; cognitive networks; dynamic threshold; energy detection; false alarm; noise uncertainty; power; probability; receive; spectrum sensing; transmit; wireless
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35062591 PMCID: PMC8780854 DOI: 10.3390/s22020631
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Literature survey of related work.
| Reference | Major Contribution |
|---|---|
| [ | Improved SS at the SU side in a realistic environment by employing SLC and square-law selection |
| [ | Software radio implementation of MIMO-OFDM. |
| [ | A comprehensive survey of OFDM transmission for wireless communications. |
| [ | A detailed survey on the performance requirements of 5G wireless cellular communication systems in terms of capacity, data rate, spectral efficiency, latency, energy efficiency, and quality of service. |
| [ | In comparison with single antenna CRs systems, significant improvement is observed in PU detection probability when ED based on the SLC technique is performed in MIMO CRs systems. |
| [ | Multiple antenna techniques and cyclostationary feature detection-based systems are proposed for ED. |
| [ | Analysis of cooperative spectrum sensing with ED over various fading channels using the SLC diversity scheme. |
| [ | Analyses of the problem of ED of an unknown signal over a multipath channel by employing SLC and SLS techniques. |
| [ | The tutorial presents a comprehensive overview of the ED-based SS and provides tools necessary for performing analyses of several SS algorithms. |
| [ | A survey of the NU impact on ED in communication systems with different OFDM system designs has been presented. |
| [ | A review of ED performance exploiting dynamic DT adaptations in the SISO-OFDM systems. |
| [ | Presentation of a novel approach based on subchannel and transmission power allocation that adaptively assigns the radio resources considering the interference caused to the PUs in multi-cell wireless networks. |
| [ | Analyses of the new communication approach based on the licensed shared access (LSA) spectrum sharing framework with in-band full-duplex multi-cell multi-user MIMO communication network as the licensee, which operates in the service region of a multi-user MIMO incumbent network. |
| [ | Presentation of the simulation algorithm that enables the performance analysis of the ED method employing the SLC technique in MIMO-OFDM CR systems and analyses of simulation results. |
| [ | Analyses of efficiency of ED SS - based on SLC technique in MIMO-OFDM Cognitive Radio Networks without the impact of NU and dynamic DT adjustments. |
| [ | Presentation of novel transmission solution based on adaptive beamforming with the coding scheme based on STBCs in IEEE 802.11 n WLAN systems. |
| [ | Presentation of the current state-of-the-art related to the research on SS by using ED with an extensive overview of basic theories in recent research, architectures for performing ED SS, the possible applications of ED and performance measurements of ED. |
| [ | The analysis of optimal DT selection for SS in a CRN using the ED approach is performed for fixed detection and false alarm probabilities. |
| [ | A survey of the fundamental concepts of CRN characteristics, functions, network architecture and applications is presented. |
| [ | The introduction of the ED SS which reduces the SNR-wall problem caused by the NU effects through the cooperation of multiple receivers for adapting the DT at each sensing point to the noise power present at the moment of SS. |
| [ | A new ED algorithm based on dynamic DT selection is presented and the relationship of detection sensitivity and ED performance with the impact of fluctuation of average noise power is investigated. |
| [ | Analyses of the influence of DDT and NU factor in the case of ED SSs on the detection and false alarm probability with the significance of their ratio on the sensing technique is analyzed and the expression of the empirical relationship between the sampling number and SNR is also proposed. |
| [ | Development of the analytical model for estimation of the statistical performance of the ED which can be used for setting the appropriate DT such that more spectrum sharing can be exploited, especially when combined with cooperative SS. |
Figure 1Main blocks of the MIMO-OFDM wireless communication system for SS based on ED employing SLC technique.
Parameters used in the simulation analysis.
| Index | Description |
|---|---|
|
| The hypothesis which defines the existence of the PU signal |
|
| The hypothesis which defines the non-existence of the PU signal |
|
| The number of Tx chains on the PU side |
|
| The number of Rx chains on the SU side |
|
| The total number of PU Tx chains |
|
| The total number of SU Rx chains |
|
| The overall number of sampling points utilized for ED without DT adjustment and influence of NU |
|
| The overall number of sampling points utilized for ED with DT adjustment |
|
| The overall number of sampling points utilized for ED influenced by NU |
|
| The overall number of sampling points utilized for ED with DT adjustment and influence of NU |
|
| The complex signal carried via the |
|
| The complex signal of the PU transmitted over the |
|
| The total via |
|
| Instantaneous Tx power transmitted on the PU |
|
| Vector of the signal detected at |
|
| Vector of the signal received by all |
|
| Vector of channel gain among the |
|
| Vector of the signal detected within the |
|
| Vector of the noise impacting ED during the |
|
| The variance of noise for the signal detected in |
|
| The variance of the received signal in the |
|
| AWGN variance used in the ED impacted with NU |
|
| AWGN variance used in the ED impacted with NU and DT adjustments |
|
| Test statistics for signals detected at the |
|
| The overall test statistics of all signals detected via the |
|
| Signal-to-noise ratio at the |
|
| The total signal-to-noise ratio associated with the |
|
| The mean signal-to-noise ratio detected by the SU during the |
|
| False alarm probability for ED performed without DT adjustments and impact of NU |
|
| Detection probability for ED performed without DT adjustments and impact of NU |
|
| False alarm probability for ED impacted with NU |
|
| Detection probability for ED impacted with NU |
|
| False alarm probability for ED performed with DT adjustments |
|
| Detection probability for performed with DT adjustments |
|
| False alarm probability for ED performed with DT adjustments and impact of NU |
|
| Detection probability for ED performed with DT adjustments and impact of NU |
|
| Standard Gaussian Q function |
| λ | DT for ED performed without DT adjustments and impact of NU |
|
| False alarm threshold in the case of ED performed based on CFAR principles |
|
| DT level for ED performed based on CDR principles |
|
| DT for SLC ED performed with DT adjustments |
|
| False alarm threshold for ED performed with DT adjustments |
|
| DT for ED impacted with NU |
|
| False alarm threshold for ED impacted with NU |
|
| DT for SLC ED performed with DT adjustments and impacted with NU |
|
| False alarm threshold for ED performed with DT adjustments and impacted with NU |
|
| DT for ED performed without NU |
|
| DT for ED performed with DT adjustments and NU |
|
| NU factor |
|
| DDT factor |
Parameters used in the process of simulation.
| Parameters | Type/Quantity |
|---|---|
| PU signal modulation scheme | OFDM |
| Number of Tx chains (antennas) of the PU | 1–4 |
| Number of Rx chains (antennas) of the SU | 1–6 |
| OFDM modulation schemes | 64 QAM, 16 QAM, QPSK |
| Model of the noise [ | AWGN |
| 1.00 | |
| 1.01 | |
| Number of sampling points for ED (FFT size) [ | 128, 512, 1024 |
| SNRs range at SU position (dB) [ | −25–25 |
| 1.00, 1.03, 1.05 | |
| 1.00, 1.03, 1.05 | |
| Target false alarm probability [ | 0.01, 0.2 |
| Overall number of Monte Carlo simulations | 10,000 |
Figure 2The dependency of detection probability on SNR for ED performed with different combinations of DDT and NU factors in (a) SISO, (b) symmetric 2 × 2 MIMO and (c) symmetric 4 × 4 MIMO communication systems.
Figure 3The dependency of detection probability on SNR for ED performed with different combinations of DDT and NU factors in asymmetric 2 × 3 MIMO communication system.
Figure 4The dependency of detection probability on SNR of ED performed with different combinations of DDT and NU factors in communication: (a) SISO systems with 100 mW PU Tx power, (b) SISO systems with 10 W PU Tx power, (c) 2 × 2 MIMO systems with PU Tx power, (d) 2 × 2 MIMO systems with 10 W PU Tx power, (e) 4 × 4 MIMO systems with 100 mW PU Tx power and (f) 4 × 4 MIMO systems with 10 W PU Tx power.
Figure 5The dependency of detection probability on SNR for ED performed with versatile combinations of DDT and NU factors in SISO and asymmetric communication MIMO 2 × 6 and 6 × 2 systems.
Figure 6The dependency of detection probability on SNR for ED performed with different combinations of DDT and NU factors in asymmetric communication MIMO 4 × 6 and 6 × 4 systems.
Figure 7The dependency of the probability of detection on SNR for ED performed with the versatile number of sampling points and combinations of DDT and NU factors in (a) SISO, (b) 2 × 2 symmetric MIMO and (c) 4 × 4 symmetric MIMO communication systems.
Figure 8The dependency of detection probability on SNR for ED performed with different false alarm probabilities and combinations of DDT and NU factors in (a) SISO, (b) 2 × 2 symmetric MIMO and (c) 4 × 4 symmetric MIMO communication systems.