| Literature DB >> 35062530 |
Aitizaz Ali1, Mohammed Amin Almaiah2, Fahima Hajjej3, Muhammad Fermi Pasha1, Ong Huey Fang1, Rahim Khan4, Jason Teo4, Muhammad Zakarya5.
Abstract
The IoT refers to the interconnection of things to the physical network that is embedded with software, sensors, and other devices to exchange information from one device to the other. The interconnection of devices means there is the possibility of challenges such as security, trustworthiness, reliability, confidentiality, and so on. To address these issues, we have proposed a novel group theory (GT)-based binary spring search (BSS) algorithm which consists of a hybrid deep neural network approach. The proposed approach effectively detects the intrusion within the IoT network. Initially, the privacy-preserving technology was implemented using a blockchain-based methodology. Security of patient health records (PHR) is the most critical aspect of cryptography over the Internet due to its value and importance, preferably in the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT). Search keywords access mechanism is one of the typical approaches used to access PHR from a database, but it is susceptible to various security vulnerabilities. Although blockchain-enabled healthcare systems provide security, it may lead to some loopholes in the existing state of the art. In literature, blockchain-enabled frameworks have been presented to resolve those issues. However, these methods have primarily focused on data storage and blockchain is used as a database. In this paper, blockchain as a distributed database is proposed with a homomorphic encryption technique to ensure a secure search and keywords-based access to the database. Additionally, the proposed approach provides a secure key revocation mechanism and updates various policies accordingly. As a result, a secure patient healthcare data access scheme is devised, which integrates blockchain and trust chain to fulfill the efficiency and security issues in the current schemes for sharing both types of digital healthcare data. Hence, our proposed approach provides more security, efficiency, and transparency with cost-effectiveness. We performed our simulations based on the blockchain-based tool Hyperledger Fabric and OrigionLab for analysis and evaluation. We compared our proposed results with the benchmark models, respectively. Our comparative analysis justifies that our proposed framework provides better security and searchable mechanism for the healthcare system.Entities:
Keywords: blockchain; healthcare system; homomorphic encryption; performance; privacy; security; smart contracts
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35062530 PMCID: PMC8779424 DOI: 10.3390/s22020572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Applications of blockchain technology.
List of parameters for our proposed algorithms.
| S. No | Parameters | Details |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Blockchain network |
| 2 |
| Clinician ID |
| 3 |
| Lab ID |
| 4 |
| Patient health record |
| 5 |
| Ring signature |
| 6 |
| Username |
| 7 |
| Private key |
| 8 |
| Integer |
| 9 |
| Number of nodes |
| 10 |
| Bilinear order group |
| 11 |
| Generator of additive group 1 |
| 12 |
| Generator of additive group 2 |
| 13 |
| Bilinear identifier |
| 14 |
| Homomorphic encryption |
| 15 |
| Degree of signature |
Figure 2Performance comparison of the proposed framework and Medrec.
Figure 3Proposed data-sharing scheme.
Figure 4Comparative analysis of different blockchain-based domains.
Figure 5Performance comparison of the proposed framework and Medrec.
Simulation setup, configurations, and specifications.
| Parameters | Details |
|---|---|
| Dataset size | 100 number of blocks + PHR |
| Hardware | GPU-enabled system |
| Software | Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric |
| Parameters | Block height, number of blocks, no. transac, no. PHR, delay, signature creation |
| Performance metric | Efficiency (average percentage of gas, no. packets, no. dead nodes, no. alive nodes), |
| security (execution time of policies) and cost (execution time of blocks) | |
| Number of simulations | Number of test performed on single dataset |
| Number of rounds or transactions | 5000 |
Performance analysis based on number of patients.
| Number of People | FPR | FNR | FDR | ACC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 200 | 0 | 0.022 | 0.025 | 0.96 |
| 300 | 0.002 | 0.029 | 0.035 | 0.87 |
Figure 6Comparative analysis of different domains based on homomorphic encryption and secure searchable.
Figure 7Comparative analysis of concurrent requests for the proposed policies.
Figure 8Performance comparison of the proposed framework and Medrec.
Figure 9Performance comparison of the proposed framework and Medrec.