Literature DB >> 35062367

Real-Life Impact of Drug Toxicity on Dolutegravir Tolerability: Clinical Practice Data from a Multicenter Italian Cohort.

Arturo Ciccullo1, Gianmaria Baldin2,3, Vanni Borghi4, Filippo Lagi5, Alessandra Latini6, Gabriella d'Ettorre7, Letizia Oreni8, Paolo Fusco9, Amedeo Capetti10, Massimiliano Fabbiani11, Andrea Giacomelli8, Alessandro Grimaldi1, Giordano Madeddu12, Gaetana Sterrantino5, Cristina Mussini4, Simona Di Giambenedetto3,13.   

Abstract

Dolutegravir (DTG) is currently one of the most used Integrase inhibitors (INI) in antiretroviral therapies (ARV) in both naïve and experienced people living with HIV (PLWHIV). We analyzed a multicenter cohort of PLWHIV, both naïve and experienced, starting an ARV including DTG. We enrolled 3775 PLWHIV: 2763 (73.2%) were males, with a median age of 50 years. During 9890.7 PYFU, we observed 930 discontinuations (9.4 per 100 PYFU). Estimated probabilities of maintaining DTG at three and five years were 75.1% and 67.2%, respectively. Treatment-naïve pts showed a lower probability of maintaining DTG at three and five years compared to treatment-experienced PLWHIV (log-rank p < 0.001). At a multivariate analysis, a longer time of virological suppression (aHR 0.994, p < 0.001) and having experienced a previous virological failure (aHR 0.788, p = 0.016) resulted protective against DTG discontinuation. Most discontinuations (84.0%) happened within the first 12 months of DTG initiation, in particular, 92.2% of discontinuations due to neuropsychiatric toxicity were observed in the first year. Our data confirm the overall good tolerability of DTG in clinical practice, with a low rate of discontinuations. CNS toxicity resulted the main reason for DTG discontinuation, with most related interruptions happening in the first year from DTG introduction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HAART; HIV; dolutegravir; toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35062367      PMCID: PMC8778073          DOI: 10.3390/v14010163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Viruses        ISSN: 1999-4915            Impact factor:   5.048


1. Introduction

Dolutegravir (DTG), a second-generation integrase inhibitor (INI), has shown high efficacy and safety in both naïve and treatment-experienced (TE) people living with HIV (PLWHIV) [1,2], in both three-drug regimens, as well as in two-drug regimens with either lamivudine or rilpivirine [3,4]. Clinical practice studies have shown the optimal tolerability profile of DTG-based strategies [5,6]. Nevertheless, reports from clinical practice about the high rate of neuropsychiatric events in patients treated with DTG leading to treatment discontinuation (TD) [7] have raised questions on the tolerability of DTG-based regimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the overall tolerability of DTG-based regimens in an Italian multicenter cohort of PLWHIV.

2. Materials and Methods

We analyzed data from a multicenter cohort [8] of adult (age ≥ 18 years) PLWHIV starting for the first time any DTG-containing regimen. We evaluated both time to virological failure (VF, defined as failure to achieve HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL for naïve PLWHIV or experienced PLWHIV on a failing regimen after 24 weeks from treatment initiation and defined by a single HIV-1 RNA ≥ 1000 copies/mL or by two consecutive HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL in virologically suppressed PLWHIV) and time to TD (defined as the discontinuation of DTG regardless of whether the remaining antiretroviral drugs used in the combination had been changed or not) for any cause, using Kaplan–Meyer survival analysis. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of TD. We collected age, sex, risk factors for HIV infection, ARV history, peak HIV-1 RNA, CD4+ cells count nadir and viro-immunological parameters at baseline.

3. Results

We enrolled 3775 PLWHIV: 2763 (73.2%) were males, with a median age of 50 years (IQR 42–56). Naïve PLWHIV were 702 (18.6%), of whom 128 (18.2%) were AIDS-presenters. As to experienced PLWHIV, median time from HIV diagnosis was 17.0 years (9.0–24.8) while median time on ARV was 13.4 years (6.7–19.9); 393 (12.8%) had an HIV-RNA > 50 cp/mL at baseline. Full population characteristics are available in Table 1.
Table 1

Characteristics of the study population.

VariablesOverall n = 3775
Males, n (%)2763 (73.2)
Age, Years, Median (IQR)50.4 (41.6–56.1)
HIV Risk factors, n (%)
  Heterosexual1447 (38.3)
  MSM1377 (36.5)
  IDU592 (15.7)
  Others/Unknown359 (9.5)
HCV Ab positive, n (%)456 (12.1)
HBsAg positive, n (%)97 (2.6)
CDC stage C, n (%)932 (24.7)
Years from HIV diagnosis (for TE), Median (IQR)17.0 (9.0–24.8)
Zenith HIV-RNA, log10 cp/mL, Median (IQR)5.07 (4.53–5.53)
Nadir CD4+, cells/mmc, Median (IQR)200 (65–332)
Reasons for starting study drug, n (%)
  Naive702 (18.6)
  Treatment failure318 (8.4)
  Simplification1722 (45.6)
  GI/hepatic toxicity148 (3.9)
  Dyslipidemia214 (5.7)
  Renal toxicity87 (2.3)
  CNS toxicity29 (0.8)
  Rash/hypersensitivity17 (0.5)
  Osteoporosis47 (1.2)
  Other toxicities39 (1.0)
Drug–drug interactions161 (4.3)
Restart after interruption28 (0.7)
Cardiovascular disease17 (0.5)
Other/Unknown246 (6.5)
Years on ARV (for TE), Median (IQR)13.4 (6.7–19.9)
Months of virological suppression (for TE), Median (IQR)23.5 (5.7–96.8)
Previous virological failure (for TE), n (%)1482 (48.2)
Virological suppressed at baseline (for TE), n (%)2680 (87.2)
Therapies before switch (for TE), n (%)
  2NRTI + PI915 (29.8)
  2NRTI + NNRTI763 (24.8)
  2NRTI + INI407 (13.3)
  Mono/Dual609 (19.8)
  Others379 (12.3)
Previous INI exposure (for TE), n (%)860 (28.0)
Reasons for discontinuation, n (% of total discontinuation)
  Intensification158 (17.0)
  Simplification166 (17.8)
  GI/hepatic toxicity58 (6.2)
  Dyslipidemia4 (0.4)
  Renal toxicity19 (2.1)
  CNS toxicity129 (13.9)
  Rash/hypersensitivity26 (2.8)
  Osteoporosis4 (0.4)
  Other toxicities82 (8.8)
  Drug–drug interactions18 (1.9)
  Pregnancy10 (1.1)
  Cardiovascular disease10 (1.1)
  Death34 (3.7)
  Other/Unknown212 (22.8)
During 9890.7 PYFU, we observed 930 discontinuations, a rate of 9.4 per 100 PYFU. The reasons for DTG discontinuation were: toxicity (34.6% of total discontinuations), simplification to a Single Tablet Regimen (STR, 17.8%), treatment intensification (17.0%), death due to non-HIV-related issues (3.7%), drug–drug interaction (1.9%), pregnancy (1.1%), concern of cardiovascular toxicity (1.1%), other/unknown (22.8%). Regarding discontinuations due to toxicity, the most frequently reported causes were: Central Nervous System (CNS) toxicity (129 PLWHIV, 3.4% of total population), gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (58, 1.5%), hypersensitivity (26, 0.7%), and renal toxicity (19, 0.5%). We further investigated neuropsychiatric events leading to TD. In detail, there were cases of: insomnia (34, 0.9%), headache (31, 0.8%), depression (26, 0.7%), anxiety (26, 0.7%), nightmares/hallucinations (6, 0.2%) and vertigo (6, 0.2%). PLWHIV experiencing TD due to neuropsychiatric events were predominantly males (95, 73.6%), with a median age of 49 years (IQR 40–55). No significant differences were observed in terms of baseline characteristics between PLWHIV who experienced CNS toxicity and those who did not. Estimated probabilities of maintaining DTG at 144 and 240 weeks were 75.1% (SD ± 0.8%) and 67.2% (SD ± 0.9%), respectively. Treatment-naïve PLWHIV showed a lower probability of maintaining DTG at 144 and 240 weeks (64.6% and 57.8%, respectively) compared to treatment-experienced PLWHIV (77.4% and 69.2%, log-rank p < 0.001). In particular, we observed that both virologically suppressed experienced PLWHIV (aHR 0.58, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.50–0.68, p < 0.001) and experienced PLWHIV with a detectable HIV-RNA at baseline (aHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60–0.95, p = 0.016) had a lower risk of discontinuing DTG compared to naïve PLWHIV. At a multivariate analysis, a longer time of virological suppression (per 10 months more, B -0.06, aHR 0.994, 95% CI 0.992–0.996, p < 0.001) and having experienced a previous virological failure (B-0.238, aHR 0.788, 95% CI 0.650–0.956, p = 0.016) resulted protective against DTG discontinuation, after adjusting for CDC stage, peak HIV-RNA and nadir CD4+ cell count. The vast majority of discontinuations (781/930, 84.0%) happened within the first 12 months of DTG initiation. In our cohort, we observed 318 VF over 9499.8 PYFU, a rate of 3.3 VF per 100 PYFU. Estimated probability of not experiencing VF was 96.1% (SD ± 0.3%) at 48 weeks, 90.1% (SD ± 0.6%) at 144 weeks and 87.0% (SD ± 0.8%) at 240 weeks. In our regression analysis, we found that a peak HIV-RNA over 500,000 copies/mL (vs. lower than 500,000 copies/mL, aHR 1.86, 95% CI 1.32–2.61, p < 0.001) and a previous episode of VF (aHR 1.51, 95% CI 1.10–2.08, p = 0.012) were associated with a higher risk of failing DTG while months of virological suppression at baseline (per 10 months more B-0.15, aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98–0.99, p < 0.001) resulted protective against VF. In a specific survival analysis, the probability of not discontinuing DTG due to neuropsychiatric toxicity was 88.5% at one year, 77.7% at three years, and 75.4% at five years of follow-up. No differences in this regard were observed between naïve or experienced pts. In our regression analysis, concomitant abacavir use was not a predictor of discontinuations due to CNS toxicity (p = 0.335). Discontinuations due to CNS toxicity showed an overall rate of 1.3 per 100 PYFU and they were observed almost entirely in the first year since DTG initiation (119/229, 92.2%).

4. Discussion

Our data confirm the good tolerability profile of DTG in a large multicenter cohort of 3775 PLWHIV. Indeed, confirming previous findings [9], in our work, we reported less than 10 TD per 100 PYFU, with over 80% of TD observed in the first year. Only a portion of TDs were due to adverse events: We reported an incidence rate of discontinuations due to all toxicities of 3.2 per 100 PYFU and, in particular, a rate of discontinuations due to neuropsychiatric events incidence rate of 1.30 per 100 PYFU. In our cohort, experienced PLWHIV presented a lower risk of discontinuing DTG compared to treatment-naive ones. This is highlighted both from the significant difference in terms of DTG discontinuation observed between naïve and treatment-experienced PLWHIV and from the fact that, in our regression analysis, a previous virological failure and a longer time of virological suppression (both found in heavily-experienced individuals) resulted protective against TD. These findings are similar to those observed by Penafiel et al. [10] and suggest that DTG is considered by clinicians a fundamental drug in salvage regimens. Data from our cohort show a lower rate of neuropsychiatric events leading to TD compared to other studies [11,12,13]. In this particular instance, our analyses failed to observe any predictor of TD due to CNS toxicity, although in other studies from our cohort [14], HCV-serostatus appeared to be associated with this event. In particular, we did not observe a significant association between co-administration of abacavir and CNS toxicity, a finding reported in previous studies [13]. Regarding TD due to pregnancy, new data from the Tsepamo study re-evaluate the potential effects of DTG on neural tube development and may change clinicians’ perspective on DTG use in young women [15]. Even if our study was not specifically designed to investigate efficacy, we observed a very low rate of VF, in line with what we expected from the results of previous studies [16]. As previously observed, PLWHIV with a higher peak HIV-RNA at time of diagnosis, had a higher risk of incurring in VF [14]. Our study’s main limitations are its retrospective design and the fact that low-grade toxicity not requiring treatment interruption was not registered in the cohort’s database. Instead, the long follow-up time and the large sample size represent the main strengths of our work. In conclusion, our work confirms the high tolerability of DTG in a clinical-practice setting, both in naive and TE PLWHIV. There has been significant controversy regarding the potential role of DTG in inducing neuropsychiatric toxicity and, with our study, we tried to evaluate the “real-life” impact of DTG-based strategies on neuropsychiatric toxicity events.
  15 in total

Review 1.  Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events with Dolutegravir and Other Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors

Authors:  Christian Hoffmann; Josep M Llibre
Journal:  AIDS Rev       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Tolerability of integrase inhibitors in a real-life setting.

Authors:  Judit Peñafiel; Elisa de Lazzari; Mireia Padilla; Jhon Rojas; Ana Gonzalez-Cordon; Jose L Blanco; Jordi Blanch; Maria A Marcos; Montserrat Lonca; Maria Martinez-Rebollar; Montserrat Laguno; Amparo Tricas; Ana Rodriguez; Josep Mallolas; Jose M Gatell; Esteban Martinez
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Dolutegravir versus raltegravir in antiretroviral-experienced, integrase-inhibitor-naive adults with HIV: week 48 results from the randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority SAILING study.

Authors:  Pedro Cahn; Anton L Pozniak; Horacio Mingrone; Andrey Shuldyakov; Carlos Brites; Jaime F Andrade-Villanueva; Gary Richmond; Carlos Beltran Buendia; Jan Fourie; Moti Ramgopal; Debbie Hagins; Franco Felizarta; Jose Madruga; Tania Reuter; Tamara Newman; Catherine B Small; John Lombaard; Beatriz Grinsztejn; David Dorey; Mark Underwood; Sandy Griffith; Sherene Min
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Five Years With Dolutegravir Plus Lamivudine as a Switch Strategy: Much More Than a Positive Finding.

Authors:  Arturo Ciccullo; Vanni Borghi; Andrea Giacomelli; Maria Vittoria Cossu; Gaetana Sterrantino; Alessandra Latini; Andrea Giacometti; Andrea De Vito; William Gennari; Giordano Madeddu; Amedeo Capetti; Gabriella d'Ettorre; Cristina Mussini; Stefano Rusconi; Simona Di Giambenedetto; Gianmaria Baldin
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.731

5.  Discontinuation due to neuropsychiatric adverse events with efavirenz- and dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy: a comparative real-life study.

Authors:  Noelia Fernández-Bargiela; Sandra Rotea-Salvo; Luis Margusino-Framiñán; Vanesa Balboa-Barreiro; Isabel Martín-Herranz; Ángeles Castro-Iglesias; Álvaro Mena-De-Cea; Soledad López-Calvo; Pilar Vázquez-Rodríguez; Enrique Míguez-Rey; Purificación Cid-Silva
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020-10-13

Review 6.  Dolutegravir plus lamivudine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection.

Authors:  Arturo Ciccullo; Gianmaria Baldin; Alberto Borghetti; Simona Di Giambenedetto
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Long-term data on the efficacy and tolerability of lamivudine plus dolutegravir as a switch strategy in a multi-centre cohort of HIV-1-infected, virologically suppressed patients.

Authors:  Gianmaria Baldin; Arturo Ciccullo; Stefano Rusconi; Amedeo Capetti; Gaetana Sterrantino; Manuela Colafigli; Gabriella d'Ettorre; Andrea Giacometti; Maria Vittoria Cossu; Alberto Borghetti; William Gennari; Cristina Mussini; Vanni Borghi; Simona Di Giambenedetto
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 5.283

8.  Effectiveness of dolutegravir-based regimens as either first-line or switch antiretroviral therapy: data from the Icona cohort.

Authors:  Annalisa Mondi; Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri; Alessandro Tavelli; Stefano Rusconi; Francesca Vichi; Francesca Ceccherini-Silberstein; Andrea Calcagno; Andrea De Luca; Franco Maggiolo; Giulia Marchetti; Andrea Antinori; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.396

9.  Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Fixed-Dose 2-Drug Regimen vs Continuing a Tenofovir Alafenamide-Based 3- or 4-Drug Regimen for Maintenance of Virologic Suppression in Adults Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1: Phase 3, Randomized, Noninferiority TANGO Study.

Authors:  Jean van Wyk; Faïza Ajana; Fiona Bisshop; Stéphane De Wit; Olayemi Osiyemi; Joaquín Portilla Sogorb; Jean-Pierre Routy; Christoph Wyen; Mounir Ait-Khaled; Maria Claudia Nascimento; Keith A Pappa; Ruolan Wang; Jonathan Wright; Allan R Tenorio; Brian Wynne; Michael Aboud; Martin J Gartland; Kimberly Y Smith
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Shall We Dance? Extending TANGO's Results to Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Alberto Borghetti; Arturo Ciccullo; Gianmaria Baldin; Stefano Rusconi; Amedeo Capetti; Gaetana Sterrantino; William Gennari; Cristina Mussini; Vanni Borghi; Simona Di Giambenedetto
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.