| Literature DB >> 35062259 |
Gi Uk Jeong1, Gun Young Yoon1, Hyun Woo Moon1, Wooseong Lee1, Insu Hwang1, Haesoo Kim1, Kyun-Do Kim1, Chonsaeng Kim1, Dae-Gyun Ahn1, Bum-Tae Kim1, Seong-Jun Kim1, Young-Chan Kwon1.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2, like other RNA viruses, has a propensity for genetic evolution owing to the low fidelity of its viral polymerase. Several recent reports have described a series of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants. Some of these have been identified as variants of concern (VOCs), including alpha (B.1.1.7, Clade GRY), beta (B.1.351, Clade GH), gamma (P.1, Clade GR), and delta (B.1.617.2, Clade G). VOCs are likely to have some effect on transmissibility, antibody evasion, and changes in therapeutic or vaccine effectiveness. However, the physiological and virological understanding of these variants remains poor. We demonstrated that these four VOCs exhibited differences in plaque size, thermal stability at physiological temperature, and replication rates. The mean plaque size of beta was the largest, followed by those of gamma, delta, and alpha. Thermal stability, evaluated by measuring infectivity and half-life after prolonged incubation at physiological temperature, was correlated with plaque size in all variants except alpha. However, despite its relatively high thermal stability, alpha's small plaque size resulted in lower replication rates and fewer progeny viruses. Our findings may inform further virological studies of SARS-CoV-2 variant characteristics, VOCs, and variants of interest. These studies are important for the effective management of the COVID-19 pandemic.Entities:
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; replication rate; thermal stability; variants of concern
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35062259 PMCID: PMC8781966 DOI: 10.3390/v14010055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Comparison of the plaque size of four SARS-CoV-2 variants. (A) Representative images of the plaque forming assay for each variant of concern in Vero E6 cells. (B) The mean plaque size (1 × 10−3 mm2) of each variant. (C) The images of the plaque forming assay for each variant of concern in Vero E6-TMPRSS2 cells. (D) The mean plaque size of each variant. All error bars indicate the standard errors of the mean. Mean values for the plaque size were compared using one-way ANOVA in GraphPad Prism 8.0 software. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. (****, p < 0.0001).
Figure 2Different thermal stability of four SARS-CoV-2 variants. (A) The relative infectivity of each variant after incubation at 4, 24, or 37 °C for 8 h as evaluated via the focus-forming assay. (B) Nonlinear regression of the relative infectivity of each variant following prolonged incubation (2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h) at physiological temperatures (37 °C). (C) Average half-life values for each variant at 37 °C. All error bars indicate the standard errors of the mean. Mean values for the half-life were compared using one-way ANOVA in GraphPad Prism 8.0 software. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (****, p < 0.0001).
Figure 3Viral replication rate of four SARS-CoV-2 variants. (A) The infectivity of the progeny viruses was evaluated via plaque forming assay completed at 12, 24, and 48 h post infection. (B) Extracellular and (C) intracellular viral RNA were assessed by qRT-PCR with SARS-CoV-2 NP probes. All error bars indicate the standard errors of the mean.