Literature DB >> 35062000

Aspiration-assisted freeform bioprinting of mesenchymal stem cell spheroids within alginate microgels.

Myoung Hwan Kim1,2, Dishary Banerjee2,3, Nazmiye Celik2,3, Ibrahim T Ozbolat1,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Aspiration-assisted freeform bioprinting (AAfB) has emerged as a promising technique for precise placement of tissue spheroids in three-dimensional (3D) space enabling tissue fabrication. To achieve success in embedded bioprinting using AAfB, an ideal support bath should possess shear-thinning behavior and yield-stress to facilitate tight fusion and assembly of bioprinted spheroids forming tissues. Several studies have demonstrated support baths for embedded bioprinting in the past few years, yet a majority of these materials poses challenges due to their low biocompatibility, opaqueness, complex and prolonged preparation procedures, and limited spheroid fusion efficacy. In this study, to circumvent the aforementioned limitations, we present the feasibility of AAfB of human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) spheroids in alginate microgels as a support bath. Alginate microgels were first prepared with different particle sizes modulated by blending time and concentration, followed by determination of the optimal bioprinting conditions by the assessment of rheological properties, bioprintability, and spheroid fusion efficiency. The bioprinted and consequently self-assembled tissue structures made of hMSC spheroids were osteogenically induced for bone tissue formation. Alongside, we investigated the effects of peripheral blood monocyte-derived osteoclast incorporation into the hMSC spheroids in heterotypic bone tissue formation. We demonstrated that alginate microgels enabled unprecedented positional accuracy (∼5%), transparency for visualization, and improved fusion efficiency (∼97%) of bioprinted hMSC spheroids for bone fabrication. This study demonstrates the potential of using alginate microgels as a support bath for many different applications including but not limited to freeform bioprinting of spheroids, cell-laden hydrogels, and fugitive inks to form viable tissue constructs.
© 2022 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alginate microgels; aspiration-assisted freeform bioprinting; mesenchymal stem cell-derived osteoblasts; peripheral blood monocyte derived-osteoclasts; spheroid fusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35062000      PMCID: PMC8855887          DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac4dd8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  26 in total

Review 1.  The bioink: A comprehensive review on bioprintable materials.

Authors:  Monika Hospodiuk; Madhuri Dey; Donna Sosnoski; Ibrahim T Ozbolat
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 14.227

2.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs.

Authors:  Sean V Murphy; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Quantitative characterization of mineralized silk film remodeling during long-term osteoblast-osteoclast co-culture.

Authors:  Rebecca S Hayden; Kyle P Quinn; Carlo A Alonzo; Irene Georgakoudi; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  RANK ligand signaling modulates the matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene expression during osteoclast differentiation.

Authors:  Kumaran Sundaram; Riko Nishimura; Joseph Senn; Rimon F Youssef; Steven D London; Sakamuri V Reddy
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 5.  Organ printing: tissue spheroids as building blocks.

Authors:  Vladimir Mironov; Richard P Visconti; Vladimir Kasyanov; Gabor Forgacs; Christopher J Drake; Roger R Markwald
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  A cell-autonomous requirement for neutral sphingomyelinase 2 in bone mineralization.

Authors:  Zohreh Khavandgar; Christophe Poirier; Christopher J Clarke; Jingjing Li; Nicholas Wang; Marc D McKee; Yusuf A Hannun; Monzur Murshed
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Cell spheroid fusion: beyond liquid drops model.

Authors:  Nastasia V Kosheleva; Yuri M Efremov; Boris S Shavkuta; Irina M Zurina; Deying Zhang; Yuanyuan Zhang; Nikita V Minaev; Anastasiya A Gorkun; Shicheng Wei; Anastasia I Shpichka; Irina N Saburina; Peter S Timashev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Current Status of Bioinks for Micro-Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Amit Panwar; Lay Poh Tan
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Aspiration-assisted bioprinting for precise positioning of biologics.

Authors:  Bugra Ayan; Dong Nyoung Heo; Zhifeng Zhang; Madhuri Dey; Adomas Povilianskas; Corina Drapaca; Ibrahim T Ozbolat
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  1 in total

1.  miRNA induced 3D bioprinted-heterotypic osteochondral interface.

Authors:  Nazmiye Celik; Myoung Hwan Kim; Miji Yeo; Fadia Kamal; Daniel J Hayes; Ibrahim T Ozbolat
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 11.061

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.