Literature DB >> 35061402

Overcoming Nanoscale Inhomogeneities in Thin-Film Perovskites via Exceptional Post-annealing Grain Growth for Enhanced Photodetection.

Tian Du1,2, Filipe Richheimer3, Kyle Frohna4, Nicola Gasparini5, Lokeshwari Mohan1,2, Ganghong Min5, Weidong Xu5, Thomas J Macdonald1,5, Haozhen Yuan1, Sinclair R Ratnasingham1,2, Saif Haque5, Fernando A Castro3, James R Durrant5,6, Samuel D Stranks4,7, Sebastian Wood3, Martyn A McLachlan2, Joe Briscoe1.   

Abstract

Antisolvent-assisted spin coating has been widely used for fabricating metal halide perovskite films with smooth and compact morphology. However, localized nanoscale inhomogeneities exist in these films owing to rapid crystallization, undermining their overall optoelectronic performance. Here, we show that by relaxing the requirement for film smoothness, outstanding film quality can be obtained simply through a post-annealing grain growth process without passivation agents. The morphological changes, driven by a vaporized methylammonium chloride (MACl)-dimethylformamide (DMF) solution, lead to comprehensive defect elimination. Our nanoscale characterization visualizes the local defective clusters in the as-deposited film and their elimination following treatment, which couples with the observation of emissive grain boundaries and excellent inter- and intragrain optoelectronic uniformity in the polycrystalline film. Overcoming these performance-limiting inhomogeneities results in the enhancement of the photoresponse to low-light (<0.1 mW cm-2) illumination by up to 40-fold, yielding high-performance photodiodes with superior low-light detection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Thin-film perovskites; grain growth; nanoscale inhomogeneities; photodetection; photoresponse

Year:  2022        PMID: 35061402      PMCID: PMC9007526          DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   11.189


Solution-processed metal halide perovskites (MHPs) are inherently polycrystalline, consisting of crystallographic[1] and electronic defects.[2] Although high-performance solar cells can be achieved from these solution-processed films,[3] as the trap states in MHPs are reported to be less detrimental under solar irradiance,[4] the impact of trap-mediated recombination is non-negligible at low carrier densities.[5,6] Under weak illumination, for example, trap-mediated recombination may completely switch off charge transfer to contact layers.[4,7] Hence, the control of crystallographic defects and thus electronic trap states in thin-film MHPs is of great importance to devices working in the dark or under low-light conditions, such as transistors,[8] photodetectors,[9] or indoor solar cells.[10] Since first being introduced,[11] the “antisolvent washing” for spin coating of perovskite films has become the dominant technique used for high-performing devices. The overriding factor driving the uptake of this method is the need for smooth, compact, and planar perovskite films for subsequent deposition of charge transport layers by solution-processed routes. However, the rapid perovskite crystallization induced by antisolvent washing and subsequent thermal annealing gives rise to relatively small grains (∼150–200 nm in diameter). These small grains typically demonstrate a strongly heterogeneous shape owing to limited space for postcrystallization growth. As such, local inhomogeneity exists in these films in terms of material composition,[12] crystallographic defects,[13] trap density,[14] and lattice strains[15] with the local inhomogeneity being observed not only intergrain[16,17] but also intragrain.[18,19] In addition, the prevalent grain boundaries (GBs) in polycrystalline films are heterogeneous to the grain interior in nature,[20,21] and they typically host a variety of crystallographic defects.[22] Therefore, overcoming the local inhomogeneities, particularly at the GBs, is a critical route toward improvement of the overall quality of polycrystalline films. Post-deposition crystal growth is widely used to improve the grain sizes of thin-film polycrystalline semiconductors above the film thickness.[23] For MHP films, this has been realized through elevated temperature,[24] high-energy laser pulses,[25] or solution-assisted Ostwald ripening.[26,27] However, the poor stability of perovskites[22] poses a fundamental limit to the time and temperature windows for post-deposition treatments. Herein, we report a solid-state secondary grain growth method enabling a nearly 10-fold increase of lateral grain size at a typical thermal annealing temperature for MAPbI3 perovskites (100 °C) within a short period of time (5 min). The treatment drives a comprehensive morphological transition toward minimization of surface energy, enabling not only the novel photophysical observation of emissive GBs but also exceptional nanoscale photoconductive uniformity and superior low-light photoresponse, leading to high-performance photodiodes.

Results and Discussion

The perovskite (MAPbI3) films are deposited through an established “antisolvent washing” method followed by thermal annealing.[28] Post-deposition treatment of the MAPbI3 films was carried out in an aerosol-assisted chemical vapor deposition setup[29] by passing through aerosolized dimethylformamide (DMF) containing methylammonium chloride (MACl; 0.1 mol L–1) carried by continuous nitrogen flow over the film heated at 100 °C. The laminar flow of aerosol vaporizes near the film surface, and the vapor ingresses into the film. Figure a–c shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the MAPbI3 films before and after the treatment. The as-deposited MAPbI3 film comprises small grains (Figure a), while after 5 min of treatment, closely packed, monolithic grains are formed (Figure b). Overtreatment for 10 min results in the grains dewetting from the substrates, which leaves voids in the film (Figure c), strongly indicating the grain growth is driven by the minimization of surface energy.
Figure 1

Grain growth of MAPbI3 films induced by treatment with DMF–MACl aerosol. (a–c) Tilt-angle cross-section SEM images of untreated MAPbI3 film after antisolvent-assisted spin coating (a), treated MAPbI3 film for 5 min, (b) and overtreated MAPbI3 film for 10 min (c). Scale bars in all images are 500 nm. (d) Impact of MACl concentration in DMF on the statistical data of lateral grain size. (e) Impact of different halide compound additives in DMF (all with concentrations of 0.1 M) on the statistical data of lateral grain size. (f) Schematic drawing of MAPbI3 film morphological transition during MACl treatment and the process of aerosol ingression to the MAPbI3 films; growth of larger MAPbI3 grains at the expense of surrounding smaller grains.

Grain growth of MAPbI3 films induced by treatment with DMF–MACl aerosol. (a–c) Tilt-angle cross-section SEM images of untreated MAPbI3 film after antisolvent-assisted spin coating (a), treated MAPbI3 film for 5 min, (b) and overtreated MAPbI3 film for 10 min (c). Scale bars in all images are 500 nm. (d) Impact of MACl concentration in DMF on the statistical data of lateral grain size. (e) Impact of different halide compound additives in DMF (all with concentrations of 0.1 M) on the statistical data of lateral grain size. (f) Schematic drawing of MAPbI3 film morphological transition during MACl treatment and the process of aerosol ingression to the MAPbI3 films; growth of larger MAPbI3 grains at the expense of surrounding smaller grains. In Figure d, we demonstrate the critical role of MACl as an additive in driving exceptional grain growth. An increase in the concentration of MACl in the DMF aerosol consistently increases the average lateral grain size of the MAPbI3 films (Figure S1) within the fixed time of 5 min. An analogous effect can be seen by incorporating similar AX compounds, where A = MA, formamidine (FA), or Cs and X = I or Br, Figures e and S2. Clearly, it is the A cation, instead of the halide, that drives exceptional grain growth, as potassium iodide (KI) shows no such effect since it cannot form a stable 3D ABX3 (here B = Pb) perovskite. MACl is employed in this study as we observed that its lower mass assists the formation of a consistent laminar aerosol flow, and it remains most stable in the DMF against continuous aerosolization. The morphological change of MAPbI3 films and mechanism of grain growth are schematically illustrated in Figure f. The ingression of the DMF–MACl vapor is insufficient to fully dissolve the MAPbI3 films but enables the selective consumption of the smaller grains, allowing mass transfer of material from the smaller grains to the larger ones and eventually leading to an increase of overall grain size as time elapses, a process described by Ostwald ripening theory.[23] Contrary to large perovskite grains grown from solution,[13,26,30] the films remain in the solid state throughout our treatment (Figure S3). The absence of a liquid phase prevents additional perovskite nucleation on the surface; thus, the overriding process is the growth of the existing grains, leading to minimization of both surface energy and surface crystallographic defects. While DMF vapor is known to break apart perovskite crystals,[29] the role of MACl, as well as other AX (A = Cs, FA, MA, X = Br, I) additives, is to increase the solvating power of DMF, thereby driving continuous dissolution of the smaller grains among the existing perovskite grains. We think this is because the ingression of MA+, Cs+, or FA+ can distort the [PbI6]4– octahedra in the MAPbI3 lattice and therefore facilitates the collapse of the 3D perovskite structures, analogous to the dissolution of MAPbI3 films by MA gas.[31] It is worth noting that the additives are mostly expelled from the film when larger MAPbI3 grains are formed, as we observed a negligible band gap change that would be expected from incorporation of FA, Cs, Br, or Cl. (Figure S4). The above results show that, by controlling the additives in the aerosol and the time of aerosol ingression, a remarkable grain size increase can be achieved while the film compactness is maintained. Hereon, we focus on the films before (denoted as “untreated”) and after 5 min of treatment with 0.1 M MACl in DMF (denoted as “MACl treated”). The surface and cross-sectional SEM images in Figure a–d further highlight the morphological difference. The large number of crystallographic terraces observed on the grains of the untreated film (Figure a), giving a “wrinkled” appearance, indicate the heterogeneous nature of the grain morphology due to rapid crystallization, as such a variety of crystallographic facets are exposed on the surface.[32] The cross-sectional image further elucidates the heterogeneous morphology of the grains (Figure b). In contrast, the terraces are completely removed from the surface of the MACl treated film (Figure c). The cross-sectional image demonstrates the morphology of the monolithic grains that all have flattened side facets and smooth convex surfaces (Figure d), indicating comprehensive recrystallization at the surfaces and the grain boundaries.
Figure 2

Characterization of MAPbI3 films. (a–d) Surface and cross-sectional SEM images of untreated MAPbI3 film (a, b) and MACl treated MAPbI3 film (c, d). Scale bars are 500 nm on all images. (e) X-ray diffraction patterns of untreated and MACl treated MAPbI3 films. (f) Zoom-in of the (110) diffraction peak. (g, h) Time-resolved PL spectra of untreated MAPbI3 (g) and MACl treated MAPbI3 (h) films, measured with a 435 nm pulsed laser under varied excitation density. (i) Steady-state PL spectra of MAPbI3 films measured with a 635 nm continuous-wavelength laser with an excitation density of 1.5 mW cm–2. The inset figure shows the spectra with normalized PL intensity, and the arrow indicates peak broadening of the MACl treated film.

Characterization of MAPbI3 films. (a–d) Surface and cross-sectional SEM images of untreated MAPbI3 film (a, b) and MACl treated MAPbI3 film (c, d). Scale bars are 500 nm on all images. (e) X-ray diffraction patterns of untreated and MACl treated MAPbI3 films. (f) Zoom-in of the (110) diffraction peak. (g, h) Time-resolved PL spectra of untreated MAPbI3 (g) and MACl treated MAPbI3 (h) films, measured with a 435 nm pulsed laser under varied excitation density. (i) Steady-state PL spectra of MAPbI3 films measured with a 635 nm continuous-wavelength laser with an excitation density of 1.5 mW cm–2. The inset figure shows the spectra with normalized PL intensity, and the arrow indicates peak broadening of the MACl treated film. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns, Figure e, show that the MACl treated film has a large increase of diffraction intensity, indicating improved crystallinity, and an approximate 4-fold increase of the relative intensity between the (110) and (310) peak, suggesting a strong preferential (110) crystallographic orientation. Closer inspection of the (110) XRD peak, Figure f, highlights a peak shift to lower 2θ angles after MACl treatment, indicating increased lattice spacing in the out-of-plane directions. This is typically ascribed to relaxation of the residual tensile strains in the in-plane direction,[33] which is achieved through grain growth and morphological transition toward minimized surface energy. To elucidate the change of charge recombination mechanisms, time-resolved photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy was measured under varied excitation densities, Figure g–h. The PL decay dynamics of the untreated MAPbI3 film (Figure g) show typical biexponential behavior comprising a fast decay in the first few nanoseconds and a slow decay in tens of nanoseconds.[4] Under the lowest excitation density, 0.028 μJ cm–2, the fast decay quenches over 99.5% of the initial PL, whereas increasing the excitation density consistently reduces the fast-decay component. Such excitation-dependent behavior is assigned to the filling of trap states by photogenerated carriers, and thus, the fast-decay component is ascribed to charge trapping.[34,35] In contrast, the fast-decay quenches only around 80% of the initial PL in the MACl treated film under 0.028 μJ cm–2 (Figure h). As excitation density increases, the fast-decay magnitude shows much less change while the lifetime of slow decay becomes shorter, ascribed to the acceleration of band-to-band recombination as the density of photogenerated charge carriers increases. These results show the dominance of trap-assisted recombination in the untreated MAPbI3 film and that the density of trap states is substantially reduced by the MACl treatment. Consistent with time-resolved PL data, the steady-state PL spectra show an approximate 12-fold increase of PL intensity by MACl treatment, Figure i. At the same time, the enhancement of PL emission is accompanied by a change of spectral shape, in that the peak becomes asymmetric and exhibits a “shoulder” on the low-energy side, shown in the inset figure. This indicates that the emissive film exhibits additional radiative recombination pathways with slightly reduced transition energy. We note that we observe a similar increase of grain size and spectral broadening of PL in a Cs0.1FA0.9Pb(I0.95Br0.05)3 film after MACl treatment (Figure S5), indicating MA is not a critical component for this effect to occur. To understand the spatial origin of enhanced PL and the spectral “shoulder”, we turn to hyperspectral PL maps to probe local spectra. Figure shows broadband emission maps and wavelength-specific emission maps at 775 and 800 nm from the untreated (a–c) and MACl treated films (d–f). The untreated film exhibits local variations of emission intensity in the broadband map (Figure a), but no clear trend in their spatial distribution is observed in wavelength-specific maps (Figure b,c), typical for perovskite films prepared with antisolvent washing.[36] In the MACl treated film, we are readily able to resolve individual grains, as there is notably intensified PL along the GBs (Figure d). When one looks at the wavelength-specific maps, the brightening of the GB is less prominent in the 775 nm map (Figure e) but is the dominant origin of emission in the 800 nm map (Figure f), which coincides with the low-energy “shoulder” in the PL peak. We note that no such GB brightening is exhibited in films treated with DMF-only vapors (Figure S6), indicating the critical role that MACl plays in facilitating this behavior.
Figure 3

Photoluminescence mapping of MAPbI3 films. (a–f) Hyperspectral PL maps on an untreated MAPbI3 film (a–c) and a MACl treated MAPbI3 film (d–f) probed with broadband detector (a, d) and wavelength-selective detector at 775 nm (b, e) and at 800 nm (c, f). Maps were taken with 405 nm laser excitation with an intensity of 240 mW cm–2 in an ambient atmosphere. (g) Localized PL spectra from three different grains labeled “I”, “II”, and “III” in (d). On all images, a.u. refers to arbitrary units.

Photoluminescence mapping of MAPbI3 films. (a–f) Hyperspectral PL maps on an untreated MAPbI3 film (a–c) and a MACl treated MAPbI3 film (d–f) probed with broadband detector (a, d) and wavelength-selective detector at 775 nm (b, e) and at 800 nm (c, f). Maps were taken with 405 nm laser excitation with an intensity of 240 mW cm–2 in an ambient atmosphere. (g) Localized PL spectra from three different grains labeled “I”, “II”, and “III” in (d). On all images, a.u. refers to arbitrary units. To gain further spectral insight, we plot in Figure g the local spectra at both the GB and grain interior from three representative grains (labeled “I” to “III” in Figure d), where the spectral difference between the GB and grain interior can immediately be seen. All these spectra show a redshift of peak position at the GB regions with the peak area comparable or even greater than the grain interiors, highlighting the emissive nature of GBs in MACl treated films. Therefore, we can conclude that the overall spectral asymmetry observed in Figure i associated with the emergence a low-energy subpeak stems directly from local brightening at the GBs in the MACl treated MAPbI3 film. The observation of the red-shifted PL emission in the perovskite films has been ascribed to compression of the perovskite lattice and is usually accompanied by increased charge carrier lifetime,[33,37,38] hereby signaling an improvement of film quality. The emergence of GB emission herein indicates a substantial defect elimination in these regions, while the redshift is likely correlated to a relaxation of tensile strains[39] on the side facets of the monolithic grain. The latter is supported by the XRD data where relaxation of in-plane tensile strain leads to increased out-of-plane lattice spacing (Figure f). The grain edges show the largest improvement in optoelectronic properties as the GBs have maximum exposure to the DMF–MACl aerosol during the post-treatment. Hence, a complete recrystallization preferentially occurs at the edges of the existing grains, thereby eliminating the conventionally defective regions. We note that Cl passivation[40] is not likely to play an overriding role in the formation of emissive GBs, as Cl-doping of MAPbI3 leads to an increase of the band gap whereas we observe a redshift. We also exclude the contribution of PL scattering at the grain edges to the spectral redshift/broadening by measuring probe-angle-dependent PL spectra, Figure S7, in which the change in spectral shape by varying the probing angle is negligible compared to the change induced by MACl treatment. To further examine how the improved quality in the GB regions affects the local optoelectronic properties, we turn to photoconductive atomic force microscopy (pc-AFM) measurements. Figure a–h shows the maps for the untreated film (a–d) and the MACl treated film (e–h), including height (a, e), dark current (Idark) (b, f), photocurrent (Iph) (c, g), and photoresponse (d, h). Here, the photoresponse [nA cm2 mW–1] is defined as[41]and is used as an assay of photodetecting properties under certain incident light intensity (Pin). We note that the direct estimation of the responsivity [A W–1] remains challenging due to the difficulty in determining the effective tip–sample emission area and thus the current density.[42]Iph and photoresponse are mapped under varied Pin values between 0.03 and 160 mW cm–2 (Figures S8 and S9). Representative line-scan data taken from an untreated film (line “I”) and MACl treated film (lines “II”, “III”, and “IV”) are plotted in Figure i,j, respectively. Different grains along the line scans are indicated to highlight the intra- and intergrain variation of these quantities.
Figure 4

pc-AFM measurement of perovskite films. (a–h) pc-AFM maps of untreated MAPbI3 film (a–d) and MACl treated MAPbI3 film (e–h): surface height (a, e), dark current Idark (b, f), and the photocurrent Iph (c, g) and photoresponse (d, h) under 0.03 mW cm–2. Both films are deposited on ITO substrate. All Idark and Iph data are measured with an applied bias of −1.5 V on ITO. Illumination is provided by a 633 nm laser. (i, j) Line-scan data of height, Idark, Iph, and photoresponse taken from untreated film (marked “I”) and from three different positions in MACl treated film (marked “II”, “III”, and “IV”, respectively) under varied light intensities from 0.03 to 160 mW cm–2. (k) Schematic drawing of the energy diagram of the ITO/perovskite/Au heterojunction under bias. (l) Area averaged photoresponse as a function of light intensity. The error bars indicate spatial variation of the photoresponse within the measured area.

pc-AFM measurement of perovskite films. (a–h) pc-AFM maps of untreated MAPbI3 film (a–d) and MACl treated MAPbI3 film (e–h): surface height (a, e), dark current Idark (b, f), and the photocurrent Iph (c, g) and photoresponse (d, h) under 0.03 mW cm–2. Both films are deposited on ITO substrate. All Idark and Iph data are measured with an applied bias of −1.5 V on ITO. Illumination is provided by a 633 nm laser. (i, j) Line-scan data of height, Idark, Iph, and photoresponse taken from untreated film (marked “I”) and from three different positions in MACl treated film (marked “II”, “III”, and “IV”, respectively) under varied light intensities from 0.03 to 160 mW cm–2. (k) Schematic drawing of the energy diagram of the ITO/perovskite/Au heterojunction under bias. (l) Area averaged photoresponse as a function of light intensity. The error bars indicate spatial variation of the photoresponse within the measured area. The map of Idark highlights a substantial spatial inhomogeneity in untreated MAPbI3 (Figure b). The line-scan data (Figure i) further elucidate that the variation of Idark is both intragrain and intergrain, but in general, Idark tends to be greater near the GBs. When an illumination of 0.03 mW cm–2 is turned on, Iph remains spatially inhomogeneous and does not fully track the distribution of Idark (Figure c,i). We thus highlight a set of regions in Figure b–d that exhibit exceptionally high Idark but do not show the proportionality of Iph and thereby have a negligible photoresponse. Importantly, these regions showing a negligible photoresponse under these low-light levels serve as performance-limiting clusters in the untreated MAPbI3 in terms of photodetection. It can also be observed that these clusters tend to overlap certain crystallographic facets that are particularly defective. Note that these clusters all have a stronger photoresponse when the light intensity is increased, suggesting that the performance-limiting factor is trap-mediated charge recombination that prevails under weak illumination levels. This in itself is noteworthy, as it allows us to directly visualize trap-rich, performance-limiting regions of the perovskite films. In contrast, the MACl treated film exhibits remarkably improved spatial homogeneity of both Idark and Iph, particularly under weak illumination levels as shown by the maps (Figure f,g) and line-scan data (Figure j). Importantly, the spatial variations of Idark and Iph are minimized both intergrain and intragrain in spite of the surface height change being greater than in the untreated film (Figure j). Therefore, the GBs in the MACl treated film become “invisible” in the electrical measurement under dark or weak illumination. The line-scan data also indicate that Iph is much higher than Idark as the illumination is applied, yielding stronger photoresponse in the MACl treated film. We then turn to a quantitative analysis of the photoresponse of what is essentially an ITO/perovskite/Au photoconductor under bias, as indicated in Figure k. As Figure l shows, the photoresponse of both films decreases as light intensity increases, but the MACl treated films exhibit a substantially enhanced photoresponse; such an enhancement is much greater under lower light intensities, showing an increase by a factor of 20–40 in the range of 0.03–3.2 mW cm–2. We can also observe a much greater variation of both Iph and photoresponse in the untreated film under lower light intensities, which tracks their large spatial inhomogeneity, indicating that the low Iph and poor photoresponse are correlated to the large local variations of these quantities. These results highlight an exceptional improvement in low-light detecting capability using MACl treated films. Finally, to investigate how overcoming local inhomogeneities in MAPbI3 films translates to the performance of full optoelectronic devices, we fabricated and tested perovskite photodiodes (PPDs) with the architecture shown in Figure a. Figure b plots the current density–voltage (J–V) curves in the dark and under illumination (100 mW cm–2). As a key parameter governing the sensitivity of a photodiode, the dark current (Jd) reported for PPDs varies in a wide range depending largely on the engineering of the contact layers and/or defects in the perovskite layer.[43] We herein employ relative thick contact layers that are reported to suppress leakage current and thus reduce Jd (see Table S1 and Figure S10).[44] Even for the PPD with an otherwise optimized layer thickness, MACl treatment brings about a remarkable reduction of Jd. At −2 V, for example, Jd is 2.2 × 10–8 A cm–2 for the MACl treated PPD, about two orders lower than the Jd of 3.5 × 10–6 A cm–2 for the reference PPD. This is among the lowest Jd value reported for a PPD at this bias.[45]
Figure 5

Characterization of the perovskite photodiodes (PPDs). (a) Schematic drawing of the architecture of the PPDs where poly[bis(4-phenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)amine (PTAA) is used as the electron blocking layer, [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) is used as the hole blocking layer, poly(9,9-bis(3′-(N,N-dimethyl)-N-ethylammoinium-propyl-2,7-fluorene)-alt-2,7-(9,9-dioctylfluorene))dibromide (PFN-Br) is used as the surface modifier of PTAA to reduce its hydrophobicity, and bathocuproine (BCP) is used as the interfacial dipole layer for the cathode. (b) Current density–voltage (J–V) scans of the PPDs under the dark and illumination of 100 mW cm–2 provided by an AM1.5G solar simulator. Scan rate is 25 mV s–1 in the forward direction from −2 to 1.5 V. (c) Responsivity spectra of the PPDs measured under an applied bias of −0.5 V. (d) Specific detectivity (D*) of the PPDs measured at −0.5 V, calculated from the responsivity and noise spectra. (e) Photocurrent measured at −0.5 V bias under varied light intensities provided by an AM1.5G solar simulator with neutral density filters. The solid line is a linear guideline, and the dashed lines indicate the Jdark of the respective PPDs.

Characterization of the perovskite photodiodes (PPDs). (a) Schematic drawing of the architecture of the PPDs where poly[bis(4-phenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)amine (PTAA) is used as the electron blocking layer, [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) is used as the hole blocking layer, poly(9,9-bis(3′-(N,N-dimethyl)-N-ethylammoinium-propyl-2,7-fluorene)-alt-2,7-(9,9-dioctylfluorene))dibromide (PFN-Br) is used as the surface modifier of PTAA to reduce its hydrophobicity, and bathocuproine (BCP) is used as the interfacial dipole layer for the cathode. (b) Current density–voltage (J–V) scans of the PPDs under the dark and illumination of 100 mW cm–2 provided by an AM1.5G solar simulator. Scan rate is 25 mV s–1 in the forward direction from −2 to 1.5 V. (c) Responsivity spectra of the PPDs measured under an applied bias of −0.5 V. (d) Specific detectivity (D*) of the PPDs measured at −0.5 V, calculated from the responsivity and noise spectra. (e) Photocurrent measured at −0.5 V bias under varied light intensities provided by an AM1.5G solar simulator with neutral density filters. The solid line is a linear guideline, and the dashed lines indicate the Jdark of the respective PPDs. Figure c plots the responsivity (R) of the PPDs calculated from the external quantum efficiency (EQE) as an assay of photon-to-electron conversionwhere λ is the wavelength of incident light, q is the elementary charge, h is Planck’s constant, and c is the speed of light. We can observe a moderate increase of R in the MACl treated PPD, but the difference is less significant than that of Jd. To properly calculate the specific detectivity (D*), we measured the noise power spectra for both PPDs, Figure S11. The noise floor is reached near 0.3 Hz, and the noise current (in) at −0.5 V is approximately 1 order of magnitude lower in the MACl treated PPD, tracking the change of Jd. Here, in comprises not only the shot noise from Jd but also the thermal noise from carrier agitation, but it is clear that the reduction of in can be attributed mostly to the reduction of Jd. Using R and in, we can determine D*, Figure d, which describes the sensitivity of PPD,where A is the pixel area and Δf is electrical bandwidth. The MACl treated PPD shows higher D* over the whole spectrum with a peak value of 1.24 × 1013 Jones, while the peak value of D* for the reference device is 7.6 × 1012 Jones. To highlight the improvement of low-light detection, J–V scans are performed under varied light intensities with Jph at −0.5 V plotted in Figure e. The MACl treated PPD shows linearity between Jph and light intensity down to approximately 2 × 10–8 W cm–2: 2 orders of magnitude lower than the value of 10–6 W cm–2 for the reference PPD. The improvement of low-light detection can be further confirmed by repeated Jph measurements with increasing and decreasing light intensities (Figure S12). From these data we can calculate the linear dynamic range (LDR),where Jmax (Jmin) is the maximum (minimum) value of the measured current. The LDR is 93 dB for the reference PPD and 126 dB for the MACl treated PPD. We can therefore conclude that the impact of our morphological modification on PPD is manifested by a remarkable reduction of Jd and thus in, which enables a greater D* and extended LDR toward lower light levels. These improvements are consistent with the exceptional enhancement of the low-light photoresponse observed in the pc-AFM measurements on the bare perovskite films.

Conclusions

In summary, we have demonstrated the inherent nanoscale inhomogeneity in antisolvent-assisted spin-coated perovskite films in which local defective clusters are significant and undermine the overall film quality. These performance-limiting clusters can be effectively eliminated using a vapor-mediated, post-annealing grain growth without the need of passivation agents. The facile treatment leads to remarkable photoluminescence observed at the grain boundaries, while the grain boundaries are almost invisible in the local photoconduction measurements, features which are atypical to polycrystalline thin films. The removal of local defective clusters is found to most significantly benefit the low-light photoresponse of perovskite films and perovskite photodiodes, enhancing their low-light detecting capabilities. In a broader context, our findings highlight an issue that rapid crystallization of the perovskite film may have simultaneously created new challenges surrounding material uniformity and optoelectronic quality. The challenges not only undermine the low-light performance of these perovskites but also may limit their performance potential in photovoltaics (PV) or light-emitting diode (LED) devices. To this end, post-annealing grain growth can be an effective process to resolve this issue toward outstanding material quality and uniformity.
  22 in total

1.  Resolving Weak Light of Sub-picowatt per Square Centimeter by Hybrid Perovskite Photodetectors Enabled by Noise Reduction.

Authors:  Yanjun Fang; Jinsong Huang
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 30.849

2.  High-Temperature-Short-Time Annealing Process for High-Performance Large-Area Perovskite Solar Cells.

Authors:  Minjin Kim; Gi-Hwan Kim; Kyoung Suk Oh; Yimhyun Jo; Hyun Yoon; Ka-Hyun Kim; Heon Lee; Jin Young Kim; Dong Suk Kim
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  Simultaneous band-gap narrowing and carrier-lifetime prolongation of organic-inorganic trihalide perovskites.

Authors:  Lingping Kong; Gang Liu; Jue Gong; Qingyang Hu; Richard D Schaller; Przemyslaw Dera; Dongzhou Zhang; Zhenxian Liu; Wenge Yang; Kai Zhu; Yuzhao Tang; Chuanyi Wang; Su-Huai Wei; Tao Xu; Ho-Kwang Mao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Strain engineering and epitaxial stabilization of halide perovskites.

Authors:  Yimu Chen; Yusheng Lei; Yuheng Li; Yugang Yu; Jinze Cai; Ming-Hui Chiu; Rahul Rao; Yue Gu; Chunfeng Wang; Woojin Choi; Hongjie Hu; Chonghe Wang; Yang Li; Jiawei Song; Jingxin Zhang; Baiyan Qi; Muyang Lin; Zhuorui Zhang; Ahmad E Islam; Benji Maruyama; Shadi Dayeh; Lain-Jong Li; Kesong Yang; Yu-Hwa Lo; Sheng Xu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Low noise, IR-blind organohalide perovskite photodiodes for visible light detection and imaging.

Authors:  Qianqian Lin; Ardalan Armin; Dani M Lyons; Paul L Burn; Paul Meredith
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 30.849

6.  Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic-organic hybrid perovskite solar cells.

Authors:  Nam Joong Jeon; Jun Hong Noh; Young Chan Kim; Woon Seok Yang; Seungchan Ryu; Sang Il Seok
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 43.841

7.  Microscopic Investigation of Grain Boundaries in Organolead Halide Perovskite Solar Cells.

Authors:  Jiang-Jun Li; Jing-Yuan Ma; Qian-Qing Ge; Jin-Song Hu; Dong Wang; Li-Jun Wan
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 9.229

8.  Mapping the Photoresponse of CH3NH3PbI3 Hybrid Perovskite Thin Films at the Nanoscale.

Authors:  Yasemin Kutes; Yuanyuan Zhou; James L Bosse; James Steffes; Nitin P Padture; Bryan D Huey
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 11.189

9.  Performance-limiting nanoscale trap clusters at grain junctions in halide perovskites.

Authors:  Tiarnan A S Doherty; Andrew J Winchester; Stuart Macpherson; Duncan N Johnstone; Vivek Pareek; Elizabeth M Tennyson; Sofiia Kosar; Felix U Kosasih; Miguel Anaya; Mojtaba Abdi-Jalebi; Zahra Andaji-Garmaroudi; E Laine Wong; Julien Madéo; Yu-Hsien Chiang; Ji-Sang Park; Young-Kwang Jung; Christopher E Petoukhoff; Giorgio Divitini; Michael K L Man; Caterina Ducati; Aron Walsh; Paul A Midgley; Keshav M Dani; Samuel D Stranks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Strained hybrid perovskite thin films and their impact on the intrinsic stability of perovskite solar cells.

Authors:  Jingjing Zhao; Yehao Deng; Haotong Wei; Xiaopeng Zheng; Zhenhua Yu; Yuchuan Shao; Jeffrey E Shield; Jinsong Huang
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.