Tian Du1,2, Filipe Richheimer3, Kyle Frohna4, Nicola Gasparini5, Lokeshwari Mohan1,2, Ganghong Min5, Weidong Xu5, Thomas J Macdonald1,5, Haozhen Yuan1, Sinclair R Ratnasingham1,2, Saif Haque5, Fernando A Castro3, James R Durrant5,6, Samuel D Stranks4,7, Sebastian Wood3, Martyn A McLachlan2, Joe Briscoe1. 1. School of Engineering and Materials Science and Materials Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Materials and Centre for Processable Electronics, Imperial College, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom. 3. National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, United Kingdom. 4. Cavendish Laboratory, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom. 5. Department of Chemistry and Centre for Processable Electronics, Imperial College, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom. 6. SPECIFIC IKC, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 7AX, United Kingdom. 7. Department of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge CB3 0AS, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Antisolvent-assisted spin coating has been widely used for fabricating metal halide perovskite films with smooth and compact morphology. However, localized nanoscale inhomogeneities exist in these films owing to rapid crystallization, undermining their overall optoelectronic performance. Here, we show that by relaxing the requirement for film smoothness, outstanding film quality can be obtained simply through a post-annealing grain growth process without passivation agents. The morphological changes, driven by a vaporized methylammonium chloride (MACl)-dimethylformamide (DMF) solution, lead to comprehensive defect elimination. Our nanoscale characterization visualizes the local defective clusters in the as-deposited film and their elimination following treatment, which couples with the observation of emissive grain boundaries and excellent inter- and intragrain optoelectronic uniformity in the polycrystalline film. Overcoming these performance-limiting inhomogeneities results in the enhancement of the photoresponse to low-light (<0.1 mW cm-2) illumination by up to 40-fold, yielding high-performance photodiodes with superior low-light detection.
Antisolvent-assisted spin coating has been widely used for fabricating metal halide perovskite films with smooth and compact morphology. However, localized nanoscale inhomogeneities exist in these films owing to rapid crystallization, undermining their overall optoelectronic performance. Here, we show that by relaxing the requirement for film smoothness, outstanding film quality can be obtained simply through a post-annealing grain growth process without passivation agents. The morphological changes, driven by a vaporized methylammonium chloride (MACl)-dimethylformamide (DMF) solution, lead to comprehensive defect elimination. Our nanoscale characterization visualizes the local defective clusters in the as-deposited film and their elimination following treatment, which couples with the observation of emissive grain boundaries and excellent inter- and intragrain optoelectronic uniformity in the polycrystalline film. Overcoming these performance-limiting inhomogeneities results in the enhancement of the photoresponse to low-light (<0.1 mW cm-2) illumination by up to 40-fold, yielding high-performance photodiodes with superior low-light detection.
Solution-processed
metal halide
perovskites (MHPs) are inherently polycrystalline, consisting of crystallographic[1] and electronic defects.[2] Although high-performance solar cells can be achieved from these
solution-processed films,[3] as the trap
states in MHPs are reported to be less detrimental under solar irradiance,[4] the impact of trap-mediated recombination is
non-negligible at low carrier densities.[5,6] Under weak
illumination, for example, trap-mediated recombination may completely
switch off charge transfer to contact layers.[4,7] Hence,
the control of crystallographic defects and thus electronic trap states
in thin-film MHPs is of great importance to devices working in the
dark or under low-light conditions, such as transistors,[8] photodetectors,[9] or
indoor solar cells.[10]Since first
being introduced,[11] the
“antisolvent washing” for spin coating of perovskite
films has become the dominant technique used for high-performing devices.
The overriding factor driving the uptake of this method is the need
for smooth, compact, and planar perovskite films for subsequent deposition
of charge transport layers by solution-processed routes. However,
the rapid perovskite crystallization induced by antisolvent washing
and subsequent thermal annealing gives rise to relatively small grains
(∼150–200 nm in diameter). These small grains typically
demonstrate a strongly heterogeneous shape owing to limited space
for postcrystallization growth. As such, local inhomogeneity exists
in these films in terms of material composition,[12] crystallographic defects,[13] trap
density,[14] and lattice strains[15] with the local inhomogeneity being observed
not only intergrain[16,17] but also intragrain.[18,19] In addition, the prevalent grain boundaries (GBs) in polycrystalline
films are heterogeneous to the grain interior in nature,[20,21] and they typically host a variety of crystallographic defects.[22] Therefore, overcoming the local inhomogeneities,
particularly at the GBs, is a critical route toward improvement of
the overall quality of polycrystalline films.Post-deposition
crystal growth is widely used to improve the grain
sizes of thin-film polycrystalline semiconductors above the film thickness.[23] For MHP films, this has been realized through
elevated temperature,[24] high-energy laser
pulses,[25] or solution-assisted Ostwald
ripening.[26,27] However, the poor stability of perovskites[22] poses a fundamental limit to the time and temperature
windows for post-deposition treatments. Herein, we report a solid-state
secondary grain growth method enabling a nearly 10-fold increase of
lateral grain size at a typical thermal annealing temperature for
MAPbI3 perovskites (100 °C) within a short period
of time (5 min). The treatment drives a comprehensive morphological
transition toward minimization of surface energy, enabling not only
the novel photophysical observation of emissive GBs but also exceptional
nanoscale photoconductive uniformity and superior low-light photoresponse,
leading to high-performance photodiodes.
Results and Discussion
The perovskite (MAPbI3) films are deposited through
an established “antisolvent washing” method followed
by thermal annealing.[28] Post-deposition
treatment of the MAPbI3 films was carried out in an aerosol-assisted
chemical vapor deposition setup[29] by passing
through aerosolized dimethylformamide (DMF) containing methylammonium
chloride (MACl; 0.1 mol L–1) carried by continuous
nitrogen flow over the film heated at 100 °C. The laminar flow
of aerosol vaporizes near the film surface, and the vapor ingresses
into the film. Figure a–c shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of
the MAPbI3 films before and after the treatment. The as-deposited
MAPbI3 film comprises small grains (Figure a), while after 5 min of treatment, closely
packed, monolithic grains are formed (Figure b). Overtreatment for 10 min results in the
grains dewetting from the substrates, which leaves voids in the film
(Figure c), strongly
indicating the grain growth is driven by the minimization of surface
energy.
Figure 1
Grain growth of MAPbI3 films induced by treatment with
DMF–MACl aerosol. (a–c) Tilt-angle cross-section SEM
images of untreated MAPbI3 film after antisolvent-assisted
spin coating (a), treated MAPbI3 film for 5 min, (b) and
overtreated MAPbI3 film for 10 min (c). Scale bars in all
images are 500 nm. (d) Impact of MACl concentration in DMF on the
statistical data of lateral grain size. (e) Impact of different halide
compound additives in DMF (all with concentrations of 0.1 M) on the
statistical data of lateral grain size. (f) Schematic drawing of MAPbI3 film morphological transition during MACl treatment and the
process of aerosol ingression to the MAPbI3 films; growth
of larger MAPbI3 grains at the expense of surrounding smaller
grains.
Grain growth of MAPbI3 films induced by treatment with
DMF–MACl aerosol. (a–c) Tilt-angle cross-section SEM
images of untreated MAPbI3 film after antisolvent-assisted
spin coating (a), treated MAPbI3 film for 5 min, (b) and
overtreated MAPbI3 film for 10 min (c). Scale bars in all
images are 500 nm. (d) Impact of MACl concentration in DMF on the
statistical data of lateral grain size. (e) Impact of different halide
compound additives in DMF (all with concentrations of 0.1 M) on the
statistical data of lateral grain size. (f) Schematic drawing of MAPbI3 film morphological transition during MACl treatment and the
process of aerosol ingression to the MAPbI3 films; growth
of larger MAPbI3 grains at the expense of surrounding smaller
grains.In Figure d, we
demonstrate the critical role of MACl as an additive in driving exceptional
grain growth. An increase in the concentration of MACl in the DMF
aerosol consistently increases the average lateral grain size of the
MAPbI3 films (Figure S1) within
the fixed time of 5 min. An analogous effect can be seen by incorporating
similar AX compounds, where A = MA, formamidine (FA), or Cs and X
= I or Br, Figures e and S2. Clearly, it is the A cation,
instead of the halide, that drives exceptional grain growth, as potassium
iodide (KI) shows no such effect since it cannot form a stable 3D
ABX3 (here B = Pb) perovskite. MACl is employed in this
study as we observed that its lower mass assists the formation of
a consistent laminar aerosol flow, and it remains most stable in the
DMF against continuous aerosolization.The morphological change
of MAPbI3 films and mechanism
of grain growth are schematically illustrated in Figure f. The ingression of the DMF–MACl
vapor is insufficient to fully dissolve the MAPbI3 films
but enables the selective consumption of the smaller grains, allowing
mass transfer of material from the smaller grains to the larger ones
and eventually leading to an increase of overall grain size as time
elapses, a process described by Ostwald ripening theory.[23] Contrary to large perovskite grains grown from
solution,[13,26,30] the films
remain in the solid state throughout our treatment (Figure S3). The absence of a liquid phase prevents additional
perovskite nucleation on the surface; thus, the overriding process
is the growth of the existing grains, leading to minimization of both
surface energy and surface crystallographic defects.While DMF
vapor is known to break apart perovskite crystals,[29] the role of MACl, as well as other AX (A = Cs,
FA, MA, X = Br, I) additives, is to increase the solvating power of
DMF, thereby driving continuous dissolution of the smaller grains
among the existing perovskite grains. We think this is because the
ingression of MA+, Cs+, or FA+ can
distort the [PbI6]4– octahedra in the
MAPbI3 lattice and therefore facilitates the collapse of
the 3D perovskite structures, analogous to the dissolution of MAPbI3 films by MA gas.[31] It is worth
noting that the additives are mostly expelled from the film when larger
MAPbI3 grains are formed, as we observed a negligible band
gap change that would be expected from incorporation of FA, Cs, Br,
or Cl. (Figure S4).The above results
show that, by controlling the additives in the
aerosol and the time of aerosol ingression, a remarkable grain size
increase can be achieved while the film compactness is maintained.
Hereon, we focus on the films before (denoted as “untreated”)
and after 5 min of treatment with 0.1 M MACl in DMF (denoted as “MACl
treated”). The surface and cross-sectional SEM images in Figure a–d further
highlight the morphological difference. The large number of crystallographic
terraces observed on the grains of the untreated film (Figure a), giving a “wrinkled”
appearance, indicate the heterogeneous nature of the grain morphology
due to rapid crystallization, as such a variety of crystallographic
facets are exposed on the surface.[32] The
cross-sectional image further elucidates the heterogeneous morphology
of the grains (Figure b). In contrast, the terraces are completely removed from the surface
of the MACl treated film (Figure c). The cross-sectional image demonstrates the morphology
of the monolithic grains that all have flattened side facets and smooth
convex surfaces (Figure d), indicating comprehensive recrystallization at the surfaces and
the grain boundaries.
Figure 2
Characterization of MAPbI3 films. (a–d)
Surface
and cross-sectional SEM images of untreated MAPbI3 film
(a, b) and MACl treated MAPbI3 film (c, d). Scale bars
are 500 nm on all images. (e) X-ray diffraction patterns of untreated
and MACl treated MAPbI3 films. (f) Zoom-in of the (110)
diffraction peak. (g, h) Time-resolved PL spectra of untreated MAPbI3 (g) and MACl treated MAPbI3 (h) films, measured
with a 435 nm pulsed laser under varied excitation density. (i) Steady-state
PL spectra of MAPbI3 films measured with a 635 nm continuous-wavelength
laser with an excitation density of 1.5 mW cm–2.
The inset figure shows the spectra with normalized PL intensity, and
the arrow indicates peak broadening of the MACl treated film.
Characterization of MAPbI3 films. (a–d)
Surface
and cross-sectional SEM images of untreated MAPbI3 film
(a, b) and MACl treated MAPbI3 film (c, d). Scale bars
are 500 nm on all images. (e) X-ray diffraction patterns of untreated
and MACl treated MAPbI3 films. (f) Zoom-in of the (110)
diffraction peak. (g, h) Time-resolved PL spectra of untreated MAPbI3 (g) and MACl treated MAPbI3 (h) films, measured
with a 435 nm pulsed laser under varied excitation density. (i) Steady-state
PL spectra of MAPbI3 films measured with a 635 nm continuous-wavelength
laser with an excitation density of 1.5 mW cm–2.
The inset figure shows the spectra with normalized PL intensity, and
the arrow indicates peak broadening of the MACl treated film.X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns, Figure e, show that the MACl treated
film has a
large increase of diffraction intensity, indicating improved crystallinity,
and an approximate 4-fold increase of the relative intensity between
the (110) and (310) peak, suggesting a strong preferential (110) crystallographic
orientation. Closer inspection of the (110) XRD peak, Figure f, highlights a peak shift
to lower 2θ angles after MACl treatment, indicating increased
lattice spacing in the out-of-plane directions. This is typically
ascribed to relaxation of the residual tensile strains in the in-plane
direction,[33] which is achieved through
grain growth and morphological transition toward minimized surface
energy.To elucidate the change of charge recombination mechanisms,
time-resolved
photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy was measured under varied excitation
densities, Figure g–h. The PL decay dynamics of the untreated MAPbI3 film (Figure g)
show typical biexponential behavior comprising a fast decay in the
first few nanoseconds and a slow decay in tens of nanoseconds.[4] Under the lowest excitation density, 0.028 μJ
cm–2, the fast decay quenches over 99.5% of the
initial PL, whereas increasing the excitation density consistently
reduces the fast-decay component. Such excitation-dependent behavior
is assigned to the filling of trap states by photogenerated carriers,
and thus, the fast-decay component is ascribed to charge trapping.[34,35] In contrast, the fast-decay quenches only around 80% of the initial
PL in the MACl treated film under 0.028 μJ cm–2 (Figure h). As excitation
density increases, the fast-decay magnitude shows much less change
while the lifetime of slow decay becomes shorter, ascribed to the
acceleration of band-to-band recombination as the density of photogenerated
charge carriers increases. These results show the dominance of trap-assisted
recombination in the untreated MAPbI3 film and that the
density of trap states is substantially reduced by the MACl treatment.Consistent with time-resolved PL data, the steady-state PL spectra
show an approximate 12-fold increase of PL intensity by MACl treatment, Figure i. At the same time,
the enhancement of PL emission is accompanied by a change of spectral
shape, in that the peak becomes asymmetric and exhibits a “shoulder”
on the low-energy side, shown in the inset figure. This indicates
that the emissive film exhibits additional radiative recombination
pathways with slightly reduced transition energy. We note that we
observe a similar increase of grain size and spectral broadening of
PL in a Cs0.1FA0.9Pb(I0.95Br0.05)3 film after MACl treatment (Figure S5), indicating MA is not a critical component for
this effect to occur.To understand the spatial origin of enhanced
PL and the spectral
“shoulder”, we turn to hyperspectral PL maps to probe
local spectra. Figure shows broadband emission maps and wavelength-specific emission maps
at 775 and 800 nm from the untreated (a–c) and MACl treated
films (d–f). The untreated film exhibits local variations of
emission intensity in the broadband map (Figure a), but no clear trend in their spatial distribution
is observed in wavelength-specific maps (Figure b,c), typical for perovskite films prepared
with antisolvent washing.[36] In the MACl
treated film, we are readily able to resolve individual grains, as
there is notably intensified PL along the GBs (Figure d). When one looks at the wavelength-specific
maps, the brightening of the GB is less prominent in the 775 nm map
(Figure e) but is
the dominant origin of emission in the 800 nm map (Figure f), which coincides with the
low-energy “shoulder” in the PL peak. We note that no
such GB brightening is exhibited in films treated with DMF-only vapors
(Figure S6), indicating the critical role
that MACl plays in facilitating this behavior.
Figure 3
Photoluminescence mapping
of MAPbI3 films. (a–f)
Hyperspectral PL maps on an untreated MAPbI3 film (a–c)
and a MACl treated MAPbI3 film (d–f) probed with
broadband detector (a, d) and wavelength-selective detector at 775
nm (b, e) and at 800 nm (c, f). Maps were taken with 405 nm laser
excitation with an intensity of 240 mW cm–2 in an
ambient atmosphere. (g) Localized PL spectra from three different
grains labeled “I”, “II”, and “III”
in (d). On all images, a.u. refers to arbitrary units.
Photoluminescence mapping
of MAPbI3 films. (a–f)
Hyperspectral PL maps on an untreated MAPbI3 film (a–c)
and a MACl treated MAPbI3 film (d–f) probed with
broadband detector (a, d) and wavelength-selective detector at 775
nm (b, e) and at 800 nm (c, f). Maps were taken with 405 nm laser
excitation with an intensity of 240 mW cm–2 in an
ambient atmosphere. (g) Localized PL spectra from three different
grains labeled “I”, “II”, and “III”
in (d). On all images, a.u. refers to arbitrary units.To gain further spectral insight, we plot in Figure g the local spectra at both
the GB and grain
interior from three representative grains (labeled “I”
to “III” in Figure d), where the spectral difference between the GB and
grain interior can immediately be seen. All these spectra show a redshift
of peak position at the GB regions with the peak area comparable or
even greater than the grain interiors, highlighting the emissive nature
of GBs in MACl treated films. Therefore, we can conclude that the
overall spectral asymmetry observed in Figure i associated with the emergence a low-energy
subpeak stems directly from local brightening at the GBs in the MACl
treated MAPbI3 film.The observation of the red-shifted
PL emission in the perovskite
films has been ascribed to compression of the perovskite lattice and
is usually accompanied by increased charge carrier lifetime,[33,37,38] hereby signaling an improvement
of film quality. The emergence of GB emission herein indicates a substantial
defect elimination in these regions, while the redshift is likely
correlated to a relaxation of tensile strains[39] on the side facets of the monolithic grain. The latter is supported
by the XRD data where relaxation of in-plane tensile strain leads
to increased out-of-plane lattice spacing (Figure f). The grain edges show the largest improvement
in optoelectronic properties as the GBs have maximum exposure to the
DMF–MACl aerosol during the post-treatment. Hence, a complete
recrystallization preferentially occurs at the edges of the existing
grains, thereby eliminating the conventionally defective regions.
We note that Cl passivation[40] is not likely
to play an overriding role in the formation of emissive GBs, as Cl-doping
of MAPbI3 leads to an increase of the band gap whereas
we observe a redshift. We also exclude the contribution of PL scattering
at the grain edges to the spectral redshift/broadening by measuring
probe-angle-dependent PL spectra, Figure S7, in which the change in spectral shape by varying the probing angle
is negligible compared to the change induced by MACl treatment.To further examine how the improved quality in the GB regions affects
the local optoelectronic properties, we turn to photoconductive atomic
force microscopy (pc-AFM) measurements. Figure a–h shows the maps for the untreated
film (a–d) and the MACl treated film (e–h), including
height (a, e), dark current (Idark) (b,
f), photocurrent (Iph) (c, g), and photoresponse
(d, h). Here, the photoresponse [nA cm2 mW–1] is defined as[41]and is used as an assay of
photodetecting properties under certain incident light intensity (Pin). We note that the direct estimation of the
responsivity [A W–1] remains challenging due to
the difficulty in determining the effective tip–sample emission
area and thus the current density.[42]Iph and photoresponse are mapped under varied Pin values between 0.03 and 160 mW cm–2 (Figures S8 and S9). Representative line-scan
data taken from an untreated film (line “I”) and MACl
treated film (lines “II”, “III”, and “IV”)
are plotted in Figure i,j, respectively. Different grains along the line scans are indicated
to highlight the intra- and intergrain variation of these quantities.
Figure 4
pc-AFM
measurement of perovskite films. (a–h) pc-AFM maps
of untreated MAPbI3 film (a–d) and MACl treated
MAPbI3 film (e–h): surface height (a, e), dark current Idark (b, f), and the photocurrent Iph (c, g) and photoresponse (d, h) under 0.03 mW cm–2. Both films are deposited on ITO substrate. All Idark and Iph data
are measured with an applied bias of −1.5 V on ITO. Illumination
is provided by a 633 nm laser. (i, j) Line-scan data of height, Idark, Iph, and photoresponse
taken from untreated film (marked “I”) and from three
different positions in MACl treated film (marked “II”,
“III”, and “IV”, respectively) under varied
light intensities from 0.03 to 160 mW cm–2. (k)
Schematic drawing of the energy diagram of the ITO/perovskite/Au heterojunction
under bias. (l) Area averaged photoresponse as a function of light
intensity. The error bars indicate spatial variation of the photoresponse
within the measured area.
pc-AFM
measurement of perovskite films. (a–h) pc-AFM maps
of untreated MAPbI3 film (a–d) and MACl treated
MAPbI3 film (e–h): surface height (a, e), dark current Idark (b, f), and the photocurrent Iph (c, g) and photoresponse (d, h) under 0.03 mW cm–2. Both films are deposited on ITO substrate. All Idark and Iph data
are measured with an applied bias of −1.5 V on ITO. Illumination
is provided by a 633 nm laser. (i, j) Line-scan data of height, Idark, Iph, and photoresponse
taken from untreated film (marked “I”) and from three
different positions in MACl treated film (marked “II”,
“III”, and “IV”, respectively) under varied
light intensities from 0.03 to 160 mW cm–2. (k)
Schematic drawing of the energy diagram of the ITO/perovskite/Au heterojunction
under bias. (l) Area averaged photoresponse as a function of light
intensity. The error bars indicate spatial variation of the photoresponse
within the measured area.The map of Idark highlights a substantial
spatial inhomogeneity in untreated MAPbI3 (Figure b). The line-scan data (Figure i) further elucidate
that the variation of Idark is both intragrain
and intergrain, but in general, Idark tends
to be greater near the GBs. When an illumination of 0.03 mW cm–2 is turned on, Iph remains
spatially inhomogeneous and does not fully track the distribution
of Idark (Figure c,i). We thus highlight a set of regions
in Figure b–d
that exhibit exceptionally high Idark but
do not show the proportionality of Iph and thereby have a negligible photoresponse. Importantly, these
regions showing a negligible photoresponse under these low-light levels
serve as performance-limiting clusters in the untreated MAPbI3 in terms of photodetection. It can also be observed that
these clusters tend to overlap certain crystallographic facets that
are particularly defective. Note that these clusters all have a stronger
photoresponse when the light intensity is increased, suggesting that
the performance-limiting factor is trap-mediated charge recombination
that prevails under weak illumination levels. This in itself is noteworthy,
as it allows us to directly visualize trap-rich, performance-limiting
regions of the perovskite films. In contrast, the MACl treated film
exhibits remarkably improved spatial homogeneity of both Idark and Iph, particularly
under weak illumination levels as shown by the maps (Figure f,g) and line-scan data (Figure j). Importantly,
the spatial variations of Idark and Iph are minimized both intergrain and intragrain
in spite of the surface height change being greater than in the untreated
film (Figure j). Therefore,
the GBs in the MACl treated film become “invisible”
in the electrical measurement under dark or weak illumination. The
line-scan data also indicate that Iph is
much higher than Idark as the illumination
is applied, yielding stronger photoresponse in the MACl treated film.We then turn to a quantitative analysis of the photoresponse of
what is essentially an ITO/perovskite/Au photoconductor under bias,
as indicated in Figure k. As Figure l shows,
the photoresponse of both films decreases as light intensity increases,
but the MACl treated films exhibit a substantially enhanced photoresponse;
such an enhancement is much greater under lower light intensities,
showing an increase by a factor of 20–40 in the range of 0.03–3.2
mW cm–2. We can also observe a much greater variation
of both Iph and photoresponse in the untreated
film under lower light intensities, which tracks their large spatial
inhomogeneity, indicating that the low Iph and poor photoresponse are correlated to the large local variations
of these quantities. These results highlight an exceptional improvement
in low-light detecting capability using MACl treated films.Finally, to investigate how overcoming local inhomogeneities in
MAPbI3 films translates to the performance of full optoelectronic
devices, we fabricated and tested perovskite photodiodes (PPDs) with
the architecture shown in Figure a. Figure b plots the current density–voltage (J–V) curves in the dark and under illumination
(100 mW cm–2). As a key parameter governing the
sensitivity of a photodiode, the dark current (Jd) reported for PPDs varies in a wide range depending largely
on the engineering of the contact layers and/or defects in the perovskite
layer.[43] We herein employ relative thick
contact layers that are reported to suppress leakage current and thus
reduce Jd (see Table S1 and Figure S10).[44] Even for the
PPD with an otherwise optimized layer thickness, MACl treatment brings
about a remarkable reduction of Jd. At
−2 V, for example, Jd is 2.2 ×
10–8 A cm–2 for the MACl treated
PPD, about two orders lower than the Jd of 3.5 × 10–6 A cm–2 for
the reference PPD. This is among the lowest Jd value reported for a PPD at this bias.[45]
Figure 5
Characterization of the perovskite photodiodes (PPDs). (a) Schematic
drawing of the architecture of the PPDs where poly[bis(4-phenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)amine
(PTAA) is used as the electron blocking layer, [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric
acid methyl ester (PCBM) is used as the hole blocking layer, poly(9,9-bis(3′-(N,N-dimethyl)-N-ethylammoinium-propyl-2,7-fluorene)-alt-2,7-(9,9-dioctylfluorene))dibromide (PFN-Br) is used
as the surface modifier of PTAA to reduce its hydrophobicity, and
bathocuproine (BCP) is used as the interfacial dipole layer for the
cathode. (b) Current density–voltage (J–V) scans of the PPDs under the dark and illumination of
100 mW cm–2 provided by an AM1.5G solar simulator.
Scan rate is 25 mV s–1 in the forward direction
from −2 to 1.5 V. (c) Responsivity spectra of the PPDs measured
under an applied bias of −0.5 V. (d) Specific detectivity (D*) of the PPDs measured at −0.5 V, calculated from
the responsivity and noise spectra. (e) Photocurrent measured at −0.5
V bias under varied light intensities provided by an AM1.5G solar
simulator with neutral density filters. The solid line is a linear
guideline, and the dashed lines indicate the Jdark of the respective PPDs.
Characterization of the perovskite photodiodes (PPDs). (a) Schematic
drawing of the architecture of the PPDs where poly[bis(4-phenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)amine
(PTAA) is used as the electron blocking layer, [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric
acid methyl ester (PCBM) is used as the hole blocking layer, poly(9,9-bis(3′-(N,N-dimethyl)-N-ethylammoinium-propyl-2,7-fluorene)-alt-2,7-(9,9-dioctylfluorene))dibromide (PFN-Br) is used
as the surface modifier of PTAA to reduce its hydrophobicity, and
bathocuproine (BCP) is used as the interfacial dipole layer for the
cathode. (b) Current density–voltage (J–V) scans of the PPDs under the dark and illumination of
100 mW cm–2 provided by an AM1.5G solar simulator.
Scan rate is 25 mV s–1 in the forward direction
from −2 to 1.5 V. (c) Responsivity spectra of the PPDs measured
under an applied bias of −0.5 V. (d) Specific detectivity (D*) of the PPDs measured at −0.5 V, calculated from
the responsivity and noise spectra. (e) Photocurrent measured at −0.5
V bias under varied light intensities provided by an AM1.5G solar
simulator with neutral density filters. The solid line is a linear
guideline, and the dashed lines indicate the Jdark of the respective PPDs.Figure c plots
the responsivity (R) of the PPDs calculated from
the external quantum efficiency (EQE) as an assay of photon-to-electron
conversionwhere λ is the wavelength
of incident light, q is the elementary charge, h is Planck’s constant, and c is
the speed of light. We can observe a moderate increase of R in the MACl treated PPD, but the difference is less significant
than that of Jd. To properly calculate
the specific detectivity (D*), we measured the noise
power spectra for both PPDs, Figure S11. The noise floor is reached near 0.3 Hz, and the noise current (in) at −0.5 V is approximately 1 order
of magnitude lower in the MACl treated PPD, tracking the change of Jd. Here, in comprises
not only the shot noise from Jd but also
the thermal noise from carrier agitation, but it is clear that the
reduction of in can be attributed mostly
to the reduction of Jd. Using R and in, we can determine D*, Figure d, which describes the sensitivity of PPD,where A is
the pixel area and Δf is electrical bandwidth.
The MACl treated PPD shows higher D* over the whole
spectrum with a peak value of 1.24 × 1013 Jones, while
the peak value of D* for the reference device is
7.6 × 1012 Jones.To highlight the improvement
of low-light detection, J–V scans are performed under varied light
intensities with Jph at −0.5 V
plotted in Figure e. The MACl treated PPD shows linearity between Jph and light intensity down to approximately 2 ×
10–8 W cm–2: 2 orders of magnitude
lower than the value of 10–6 W cm–2 for the reference PPD. The improvement of low-light detection can
be further confirmed by repeated Jph measurements
with increasing and decreasing light intensities (Figure S12). From these data we can calculate the linear dynamic
range (LDR),where Jmax (Jmin) is the maximum (minimum)
value of the measured current. The LDR is 93 dB for the reference
PPD and 126 dB for the MACl treated PPD. We can therefore conclude
that the impact of our morphological modification on PPD is manifested
by a remarkable reduction of Jd and thus in, which enables a greater D* and extended LDR toward lower light levels. These improvements
are consistent with the exceptional enhancement of the low-light photoresponse
observed in the pc-AFM measurements on the bare perovskite films.
Conclusions
In summary, we have demonstrated the inherent nanoscale inhomogeneity
in antisolvent-assisted spin-coated perovskite films in which local
defective clusters are significant and undermine the overall film
quality. These performance-limiting clusters can be effectively eliminated
using a vapor-mediated, post-annealing grain growth without the need
of passivation agents. The facile treatment leads to remarkable photoluminescence
observed at the grain boundaries, while the grain boundaries are almost
invisible in the local photoconduction measurements, features which
are atypical to polycrystalline thin films. The removal of local defective
clusters is found to most significantly benefit the low-light photoresponse
of perovskite films and perovskite photodiodes, enhancing their low-light
detecting capabilities.In a broader context, our findings highlight
an issue that rapid
crystallization of the perovskite film may have simultaneously created
new challenges surrounding material uniformity and optoelectronic
quality. The challenges not only undermine the low-light performance
of these perovskites but also may limit their performance potential
in photovoltaics (PV) or light-emitting diode (LED) devices. To this
end, post-annealing grain growth can be an effective process to resolve
this issue toward outstanding material quality and uniformity.
Authors: Lingping Kong; Gang Liu; Jue Gong; Qingyang Hu; Richard D Schaller; Przemyslaw Dera; Dongzhou Zhang; Zhenxian Liu; Wenge Yang; Kai Zhu; Yuzhao Tang; Chuanyi Wang; Su-Huai Wei; Tao Xu; Ho-Kwang Mao Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nam Joong Jeon; Jun Hong Noh; Young Chan Kim; Woon Seok Yang; Seungchan Ryu; Sang Il Seok Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2014-07-06 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Yasemin Kutes; Yuanyuan Zhou; James L Bosse; James Steffes; Nitin P Padture; Bryan D Huey Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Tiarnan A S Doherty; Andrew J Winchester; Stuart Macpherson; Duncan N Johnstone; Vivek Pareek; Elizabeth M Tennyson; Sofiia Kosar; Felix U Kosasih; Miguel Anaya; Mojtaba Abdi-Jalebi; Zahra Andaji-Garmaroudi; E Laine Wong; Julien Madéo; Yu-Hsien Chiang; Ji-Sang Park; Young-Kwang Jung; Christopher E Petoukhoff; Giorgio Divitini; Michael K L Man; Caterina Ducati; Aron Walsh; Paul A Midgley; Keshav M Dani; Samuel D Stranks Journal: Nature Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 49.962